|
Here are the details of the situation: I am assuming I scratched a car parked on the curb with my push lawnmower. I left a note saying "I may have scratched your car. Please contact me." Driver (not the owner) of the vehicle says she hadn't noticed the scratch before. I offered to try to buff it out for her the following day but she mentions she has to head back to Fresno (300 miles away) the next morning where she is attending school. I ask her to get me some estimates on getting it buffed out or send me the bill if it's under $100. A month later, she faxes 3 estimates ranging from $1200 - $1800. Her father (the owner) now calls to see what I want to do. I offer him $250 to cover the expense of having an auto detailer buff it out for him and explain that $1200 worth of damage from a push mower seems quite exorbitant and the details of the estimates indicates work resembling that of an auto collision rather than a guy pushing a lawnmower. He decides to go through his insurance company rather than settle. Farmers Insurance is now contacting me to pay the $1200. I dispute the amount of damage I may have caused. *Anything* could have happend to the vehicle from the time she left for Fresno till the time she got the estimates. I have a digital picture of the scratch. How should I respond to their insurance company if 1)There's no proof I even caused this scratch, 2)I feel the costs and type of repair are unreasonable, and 4)I'm wondering now if some other damage may have occured between the time of the incident and the time of repair. NOTE: We rent and have no property insurance to cover such things. Also, I don't mind going to small claims court to fight this, however, is that how insurance companies operate - through small claims? How far will they go in a situation like this? Any help/advice would be appreciated. TIA, Whiff
|
| |
| |
Whiffleboy wrote:
Here are the details of the situation: I am assuming I scratched a car parked on the curb with my push lawnmower. I left a note saying "I may have scratched your car. Please contact me." Driver (not the owner) of the vehicle says she hadn't noticed the scratch before. I offered to try to buff it out for her the following day but she mentions she has to head back to Fresno (300 miles away) the next morning where she is attending school. I ask her to get me some estimates on getting it buffed out or send me the bill if it's under $100. A month later, she faxes 3 estimates ranging from $1200 - $1800. Her father (the owner) now calls to see what I want to do. I offer him $250 to cover the expense of having an auto detailer buff it out for him and explain that $1200 worth of damage from a push mower seems quite exorbitant and the details of the estimates indicates work resembling that of an auto collision rather than a guy pushing a lawnmower. He decides to go through his insurance company rather than settle. Farmers Insurance is now contacting me to pay the $1200. I dispute the amount of damage I may have caused. *Anything* could have happend to the vehicle from the time she left for Fresno till the time she got the estimates. I have a digital picture of the scratch. How should I respond to their insurance company if 1)There's no proof I even caused this scratch, 2)I feel the costs and type of repair are unreasonable, and 4)I'm wondering now if some other damage may have occured between the time of the incident and the time of repair. NOTE: We rent and have no property insurance to cover such things. Also, I don't mind going to small claims court to fight this, however, is that how insurance companies operate - through small claims? How far will they go in a situation like this? Any help/advice would be appreciated. TIA, Whiff
I am not a lawyer. I do not even see email sent to this address, due to past DOS attacks. If you wish to respond, do so through this newsgroup.
|
| |
| |
Whiff, You seem to admit causing the damage. You've been provided with 3 estimates to repair the damage. You seem to believe that the damage could be buffed out. There's little question that you will have to pay to get the damage fixed. Call the body shops that provided the estimates and ask what they think of you "buffing" as a repair and how much they would charge for this. Don't be surprised if they reject buffing as a solution. Confirm with the body shops that the estimate is to fix only the scratched paint. Good luck, Dave M.
|
| |
| |
whiffleboy@gmail.com (Whiffleboy) wrote in message news:<9fa4b26c.0410211002.5ee81b05@posting.google.com>...
Here are the details of the situation: I am assuming I scratched a car parked on the curb with my push lawnmower. I left a note saying "I may have scratched your car. Please contact me." Driver (not the owner) of the vehicle says she hadn't noticed the scratch before. I offered to try to buff it out for her the following day but she mentions she has to head back to Fresno (300 miles away) the next morning where she is attending school. I ask her to get me some estimates on getting it buffed out or send me the bill if it's under $100. A month later, she faxes 3 estimates ranging from $1200 - $1800.
....
I dispute the amount of damage I may have caused. *Anything* could have happend to the vehicle from the time she left for Fresno till the time she got the estimates. I have a digital picture of the scratch.
Contact the insurance company, and tell them you want to see photos of the damage. You're entitled to that, they have to prove their damages - if they can't produce them, or if their photos are different than what you have, offer to provide YOUR photos to refute their claim. You can also take the photos you have to a collision repair shop and ask them how much it would cost to repair a scratch like that - they should be able to ballpark you, and depending on where the scratch is and how many panels it affected, $1200 isn't really shocking.
How should I respond to their insurance company if 1)There's no proof I even caused this scratch, 2)I feel the costs and type of repair are unreasonable, and 4)I'm wondering now if some other damage may have occured between the time of the incident and the time of repair. NOTE: We rent and have no property insurance to cover such things. Also, I don't mind going to small claims court to fight this, however, is that how insurance companies operate - through small claims? How far will they go in a situation like this?
The carrier will go as far as it takes to get paid, as long as the cost to pursue doesn't exceed the recovery. They may write it off and sell the debt to a collection agency, and they're tenacious and will tack fees on. So after you negotiate - advise the rep you don't KNOW if you did the damage in question, go in with an alternate repair cost from a certified, licensed repair shop, etc. and then offer what you feel is reasonable. This may not satisfy them, but it may (especially if they have no photos, or their photos show damage that yours doesn't). Then go get insurance. Even though you rent, you can get renters insurance that will cover you for liability claims such as this, and it will also cover your personal property against damage.
|
| |
| |
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 23:50:47 GMT, "David Martel" <marte005@earthlink.net>
Whiff, You seem to admit causing the damage. You've been provided with 3 estimates to repair the damage.
No, he admits that he might have scratched the car.
You seem to believe that the damage could be buffed out. There's little question that you will have to pay to get the damage fixed. Call the body shops that provided the estimates and ask what they think of you "buffing" as a repair and how much they would charge for this. Don't be surprised if they reject buffing as a solution.
And don't be surprised if the estimates are bogus.
Confirm with the body shops that the estimate is to fix only the scratched paint. Good luck, Dave M.
-- There's no way to delay that trouble comin' everyday
|
| |
| |
<thisisme@cotse.net> wrote in message news:<dGhpc2lzbWU=.e8beec4570f7ddcc894a56963ed91656@1098391423.nulluser.com>...
I am not a lawyer. I do not even see email sent to this address, due to past DOS attacks. If you wish to respond, do so through this newsgroup.
I'd love to respond. Do you have any advice or an opinion to offer? Whiff
|
| |
| |
Thanks everyone for your responses. From a couple of phone calls I've received, it's sounds as if they're already pawned it off to collections. Whiff jobeth66@gmail.com (jobeth66) wrote in message news:<2a1e036d.0410211618.2af83f77@posting.google.com>...
whiffleboy@gmail.com (Whiffleboy) wrote in message news:<9fa4b26c.0410211002.5ee81b05@posting.google.com>... ... Contact the insurance company, and tell them you want to see photos of the damage. You're entitled to that, they have to prove their damages - if they can't produce them, or if their photos are different than what you have, offer to provide YOUR photos to refute their claim. You can also take the photos you have to a collision repair shop and ask them how much it would cost to repair a scratch like that - they should be able to ballpark you, and depending on where the scratch is and how many panels it affected, $1200 isn't really shocking. The carrier will go as far as it takes to get paid, as long as the cost to pursue doesn't exceed the recovery. They may write it off and sell the debt to a collection agency, and they're tenacious and will tack fees on. So after you negotiate - advise the rep you don't KNOW if you did the damage in question, go in with an alternate repair cost from a certified, licensed repair shop, etc. and then offer what you feel is reasonable. This may not satisfy them, but it may (especially if they have no photos, or their photos show damage that yours doesn't). Then go get insurance. Even though you rent, you can get renters insurance that will cover you for liability claims such as this, and it will also cover your personal property against damage.
|
| |
| |
whiffleboy@gmail.com (Whiffleboy) wrote in message news:<9fa4b26c.0410211002.5ee81b05@posting.google.com>...
Here are the details of the situation: I am assuming I scratched a car parked on the curb with my push lawnmower. I left a note saying "I may have scratched your car. Please contact me." Driver (not the owner) of the vehicle says she hadn't noticed the scratch before. I offered to try to buff it out for her the following day but she mentions she has to head back to Fresno (300 miles away) the next morning where she is attending school. I ask her to get me some estimates on getting it buffed out or send me the bill if it's under $100. A month later, she faxes 3 estimates ranging from $1200 - $1800. Her father (the owner) now calls to see what I want to do. I offer him $250 to cover the expense of having an auto detailer buff it out for him and explain that $1200 worth of damage from a push mower seems quite exorbitant and the details of the estimates indicates work resembling that of an auto collision rather than a guy pushing a lawnmower. He decides to go through his insurance company rather than settle. Farmers Insurance is now contacting me to pay the $1200. I dispute the amount of damage I may have caused. *Anything* could have happend to the vehicle from the time she left for Fresno till the time she got the estimates. I have a digital picture of the scratch. How should I respond to their insurance company if 1)There's no proof I even caused this scratch, 2)I feel the costs and type of repair are unreasonable, and 4)I'm wondering now if some other damage may have occured between the time of the incident and the time of repair. NOTE: We rent and have no property insurance to cover such things. Also, I don't mind going to small claims court to fight this, however, is that how insurance companies operate - through small claims? How far will they go in a situation like this? Any help/advice would be appreciated. TIA, Whiff
This appears to be California (unless, say, you're in Reno). In California, the deck is stacked in favor of the insurance company that paid out on damages suffered by their insured (as well as the insured and the body shop that did the work). There is no requirement to get multiple estimates and go with the lowest estimate. The insured can get the damage fixed at any shop he or she wants to, in whatever manner is not totally unreasonable, so your claim that it could have been fixed with a $250 detail job is a non-starter even if it is true. Once the insurer has paid for repairs, the insurer has the right to subrogate against anybody who caused the damage. The insurer will have detailed justification, prepared by adjusters and repairmen who do this for a living, as to just why it cost what it did. Your assertion that it could have been done for less puts you in the position of an unarmed man facing a tag team of gladiators. If you want to get out of this for less than the insurance company is dunning you for, you will need to negotiate from a position of strength. The best way to place yourself in such a position is to hire a lawyer. Note, however, that the cost of doing so may exceed the cost of settling. Your call. -- Not a lawyer, Chris Green
|
| |
| |
This appears to be California (unless, say, you're in Reno). In California, the deck is stacked in favor of the insurance company that paid out on damages suffered by their insured (as well as the insured and the body shop that did the work). There is no requirement to get multiple estimates and go with the lowest estimate. The insured can get the damage fixed at any shop he or she wants to, in whatever manner is not totally unreasonable, so your claim that it could have been fixed with a $250 detail job is a non-starter even if it is true. Once the insurer has paid for repairs, the insurer has the right to subrogate against anybody who caused the damage. The insurer will have detailed justification, prepared by adjusters and repairmen who do this for a living, as to just why it cost what it did. Your assertion that it could have been done for less puts you in the position of an unarmed man facing a tag team of gladiators. If you want to get out of this for less than the insurance company is dunning you for, you will need to negotiate from a position of strength. The best way to place yourself in such a position is to hire a lawyer. Note, however, that the cost of doing so may exceed the cost of settling. Your call.
That's all fine and I understand. The key point here is that I only *assume* that I caused the scratch on their car. Being neighborly, I was willing to remedy the situation myself or settle with the person (in this case, her dad) so that there was no bad blood. We were new to the neighborhood and I didn't want to cause any waves. There is no admittance of guilt and I will not pay unless a court orders me to pay. My main concern is, if they have passed it on to a collection agency, does a collection agency have the right to track me down, find my SS# and ruin my credit for a repair bill caused from an incident where there is only an assumption of my liability. Would they not have to prove I caused the damage before I am obligated to pay? Whiff
|
| |
| |
Whiffleboy wrote:
<thisisme@cotse.net> wrote in message
news:<dGhpc2lzbWU=.e8beec4570f7ddcc894a56963ed91656@1098391423.nulluser.com> .... I am not a lawyer. I do not even see email sent to this address, due to past DOS attacks. If you wish to respond, do so through this newsgroup.
I'd love to respond. Do you have any advice or an opinion to offer?
Sorry about that. I pressed the wrong button and accidentally sent out an empty post. I am not a lawyer. I do not even see email sent to this address, due to past DOS attacks. If you wish to respond, do so through this newsgroup.
|
| |
| |
|