misc.legal

Followups set. On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 23:28:20 GMT in talk.rape Offshore Eddie <eddie@nospam.com> wrote in message <oCXdd.3702$KJ6.183@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>... > > http://www.dailytrojan.com/news/2004/10/04/Opinions/In.Cases.Of.Sexual.Ass

Whiff, You seem to admit causing the damage. You've been provided with 3 estimates to repair the damage. You seem to believe that the damage could be buffed out. There's little question that you will have to pay to get the damage fixed. Call

Scott en Aztlán wrote:. > They do the same thing in Niles, IL - only there they at least tell > you when they're coming so you can tidy up a bit. ;) Another reason I live in Arkansas. No building code. Nobody will ever inspect anything uless yu rent

"Bob" <BOB@BOB.BOB> wrote: > It is freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. Congress is to >make no laws with respect to religion. Any laws they have done so with are >Unconstitutional prima facie, e.g. the laws allowing Indians to eat peyote

>Kent Wills wrote >>Ken Smith wrote: >>> SolarChase wrote: >>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote >>>>> And we've hired a top-notch attorney." >>> Yes, you have. He's exactly the type that wont bend over and take it when the state is driving all over

>Kent Wills wrote ">I'm just trying to get Ted to commit to one view or another." Join the club ;-) "He seems to jump around a lot." Indeed. Remember, he hasnt told us ANYTHING about this case... LOL ------ have a GREAT day !!!! Sola

>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote ">But if one knew the facts, one would not have to think." And someone who supposedly knew the facts didnt think this would ever get to indictment, now did they ? Craig Hum has quite a few facts, dont he ? ">Which is

"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cl6uc8$nks@dispatch.concentric.net... > http://www.dailytrojan.com/news/2004/10/04/Opinions/In.Cases.Of.Sexual.Assau > lt.Language.Matters-740223.shtml > > One in four college women w

>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote ">Sorry, but we know MUCH MORE about Cameron than we knew before." Regrettably, so do we. If you would have kept your mouth shut in the first place, no one would ever have connected Cam with you. ">The police have turne

Followups set to the only two groups which are at all interested. On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:41:21 -0700 in talk.rape Tim May <timcmay@removethis.got.net> wrote in message <211020040941214477%timcmay@removethis.got.net>... > Then the psychobabblers pi

The clay pipe underneath my house's front yard (the drive way, i.e. between the front door and the sidewalk) is partially blocked. It's effecting the plumbing of the house right now. Since it is not inside or underneath of the house, can I seek any

Followups set. On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:26:12 GMT in talk.rape Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote in message <UiSdd.339$_3.6259@typhoon.sonic.net>... > "s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:cl6uc8$nks@dispatch.co

>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote ">If you knew everything that I know, you would be ABSOLUTELY APPALLED at the conduct of the authorities." So, what DO you know ? You say on the one hand that you have deep intimate knowledge of the case and on the other

>Kent Wills wrote >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote >>As, for example, the requests of the Colorado Bar Examiners? > Obsess much? Whats that make, Ted's 515th reference to the Colorado Bar now ? ----- have a GREAT day !!!! Solar

<thisisme@cotse.net> wrote in message news:<dGhpc2lzbWU=.e8beec4570f7ddcc894a56963ed91656@1098391423.nulluser.com>... > I am not a lawyer. I do not even see email sent to this address, due to > past DOS attacks. If you wish to respond, do so through th

If someone gets a restraining order taken out on you, how do you find out that this has happened? Is someone required to send you a certified letter informing you, etc.? I am referring to laws in Connecticut.

"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message news:d0fb0cae46111ec98334e1ce6fc937fa@dizum.com... > <http://www.wumarkus.com/forums/dtv/files/Snow-v-DTV.pdf> > > Essentially, DTV is being sued for DMCA violations. In essence, the > plaintiff

I heard a rumor that on 21 Oct 2004 22:32:41 GMT, solarchase@aol.com (SolarChase) wrote: >>Kent Wills wrote > >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote > >>>As, for example, the requests of the Colorado Bar Examiners? > >> Obsess much? > >Whats that make,

I heard a rumor that on 21 Oct 2004 23:20:20 GMT, solarchase@aol.com (SolarChase) wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote > >">Sorry, but we know MUCH MORE about Cameron than we knew before." > >Regrettably, so do we. If you would have kept your mouth s

I heard a rumor that on 21 Oct 2004 22:56:39 GMT, solarchase@aol.com (SolarChase) wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote > >">If you knew everything that I know, you would be ABSOLUTELY APPALLED at the >conduct of the authorities." > >So, what DO you

I heard a rumor that on Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:38:00 -0400, " jls" <jls1016@bellsouth.net> wrote: [...] > >I'm getting a kick out of reading all these exchanges -- in this misc.legal >newsgroup otherwise contaminated by chess nuts, kooks, and sci

Kent Wills wrote: > My motivation is mostly an opportunity to yet again expose Ted for the liar > and hypocrite he is. You've yet to do that even once, little man. But that's exactly what you've shown yourself to be. -- Theodore A. Kaldis k

Kent Wills wrote: > The real question is: Was Ted lying when [blah, blah, blah ...] Ted's not lying. Unlike you. Because Ted's not a liar. Unlike you. It's no wonder that you get along so well with Ken Smith. Birds of a feather flock togethe

SolarChase wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote >> If you knew everything that I know, you would be ABSOLUTELY APPALLED at >> the conduct of the authorities. > So, what DO you know? You say on the one hand that you have deep intimate > knowledge

On 21 Oct 2004 19:32:14 -0700, excathedra@eboxmail.net (ex_cathedra) wrote: >Check out the photo of the smiling nutface "news" personalities on the >top of the page of the link. > LOL > I don't think I could smile while dolling out incrimental >to

Ken Smith wrote: > You don't seem to be doing too good at "talking sense," Teddi, as it > appears that absolutely NO ONE is buying the bull#@($ you're selling -- What, "jls"? I wear his contempt as a feather in my cap. > whether it is about the

jls wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Ken Smith wrote: >>>> SolarChase wrote: >>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>>> And we've hired a top-notch attorney." >>>>> Yes, you have. He's exactly the type that wont bend o

Check out the photo of the smiling nutface "news" personalities on the top of the page of the link. LOL I don't think I could smile while dolling out incrimental totalitarianism. But they don't seem to have a problem with it. A good reason to k

jtnospam@yahoo.com (jitney) wrote in message news:<b8002be7.0410130652.665bf63@posting.google.com>... > The FDA has just approved the use of an implantable computer chip in > humans, from the AP wire: > http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/tech/20

Hi there y'all ! I got some good adivse last time I posted to these forums,so I'm back for more ! (Though the misc.legal xpost is new) I am having some doubt about placing an ad in the paper to sell a car and wish to avoid solicitation from Autotr

I think they are a good franchise in regards to marketing for BRAND AWARENESS But if you are set up with an LLC and a Line of Credit, you can better spend you monthly marketing budget and save yourself the franchise fee. I don't think there is much be

"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:5ibgn09h9rlf6u10agvuegrfdrckdqijuv@4ax.com... > I heard a rumor that on Thu, 21 Oct 2004 06:40:42 -0700, "Theodore A. > Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > > >Ken Smith wrote: > > > >

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 23:50:47 GMT, "David Martel" <marte005@earthlink.net> >Whiff, > > You seem to admit causing the damage. You've been provided with 3 >estimates to repair the damage. No, he admits that he might have scratched the car.

"Jen" <legalqs@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:81dda1f2.0410211125.287c955@posting.google.com... > I was involved in a 4 car collision. The police came and filled out a > report. This was around August 7, 2004. > > Just briefly, > > <-[car1] <-

whiffleboy@gmail.com (Whiffleboy) wrote in message news:<9fa4b26c.0410211002.5ee81b05@posting.google.com>... > Here are the details of the situation: > > I am assuming I scratched a car parked on the curb with my push > lawnmower. I left a note sayi

I heard a rumor that on Thu, 21 Oct 2004 06:40:42 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> SolarChase wrote: >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote > >>>> And we've hired a top-notch attorney." > >>> Yes, you ha

heard a rumor that on Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:42:04 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>> Then he is, at best, criminally negligent. > >>> That's not what he's charged w

Whiffleboy wrote: > Here are the details of the situation: > > I am assuming I scratched a car parked on the curb with my push > lawnmower. I left a note saying "I may have scratched your car. > Please contact me." Driver (not the owner) of the v

"Alex" <avdeelen.REMOFE@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message news:41777b6e$0$62050$ee9da40f@news.wanadoo.nl... > "greg brown" <noway@way.com> schreef in bericht > news:2cCdd.2581$KJ6.2013@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net... >> >> "Michael Snyder" <msnyder

"Sports Fan" <sports@fan.home> wrote in message news:dhudn0prtmmft9vcnssetqiuq7rahbpaer@4ax.com... > On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:18:02 GMT, "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> > wrote: > >>Get fair, feminists. > > You're asking them to do something

"PeterL" <peterl@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:2toa4jF225muaU1@uni-berlin.de... > > "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote in message > news:_cwdd.155$_3.1598@typhoon.sonic.net... >> >> >> > SUSAN ESTRICH, USC LAW PROFESSOR, FOX NEWS P

"greg brown" <noway@way.com> wrote in message news:2cCdd.2581$KJ6.2013@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote in message > news:_cwdd.155$_3.1598@typhoon.sonic.net... >> >> >>> SUSAN ESTRICH, USC LAW

I heard a rumor that on Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:19:39 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Ken Smith wrote: > >>>> Bottom line, I don't have an abundance of faith in the sys

On 20 Oct 2004, "Don Zimmerman" <doreen194@adelphia.net> wrote: > *** [P]eople in their wills often appoint spouses > or close relatives as executors, because they trust > them. These inexperienced relatives do not know > much about the probate pro

Thomas Anantharaman wrote: > jitney wrote: > >> If I went to the local cemetary and started digging up graves and >> taking away the contents, I would be arrested and prosecuted for grave >> robbery, which is the way it should be. If I get on the Di

ArGee45@hotmail.com (Ben) wrote in message news:<581ee38e.0410060245.7393b68e@posting.google.com>... > mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<mair_fheal-059EFA.16191405102004@corp.supernews.co

"Alex" <avdeelen.REMOFE@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message news:41777dcf$0$62029$ee9da40f@news.wanadoo.nl... > > "s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht > news:cl6uc8$nks@dispatch.concentric.net... >> http://www.dailytrojan.com/news

In article <41780037.1AAF@assist.org>, Larry Coon <lcnospam@assist.org> wrote: >Michael Snyder wrote: > >> So, who's gonna draw up the *accused* shield legislation? > >James Madison? Given that Madison is dead, someone's gonna have to get off the

ontinuing to illustrate that and why the lawyer he and his friend who consider themselves "partners" in the ownership of a damaged car whose dealer/seller has declined their warranty claims has declined to represent them was behaving practically and se