|
|
| |
| |
No, you ignorant nincompoop... He didn't miss the point.
You did.
Nobody out here is worried in the least about being "defamed"
except by you, perhaps. The rest of us out here don't give a
rat's rosy red rear about what people say about us, because
we don't go around provoking everyone. You do.
You totally ignored the statement he made that demanded
accountability for your own words.
Just like you did here:
]Gordon Roy Parker wrote:
]>
]> Actually, I came across Grace v. Ebay when I was seeking
]> counsel for my case against Google. The attorney I spoke
]> with had been involved in some copyright stuff involving
]> pictures on a search engine and got me up to speed on
]> recent developments.
]] If this is true, you won't have any trouble identifying
] this "attorney" you spoke with, will you?
]] If you don't identify this "attorney" then it means there
] isn't one.
So what is it, litigation boy?
Who is this "attorney"? If that "attorney" really exists,
you won't have any trouble naming that person, will you?
And what are you doing, being a "Civil Rights Activist"
obtaining services by patronizing what you call someone
who hires women for secretarial jobs by the way they look?
Isn't that hypocritical in the extreme?
Nevermind. You don't have the BALLS to respond to us.
And we know it.
Idiot.
--
The Editorial Staff
-----
A quote from Gordon Roy Parker, AKA "Ray Gordon":
"(For a dissenting opinion on my character, please visit
the following website: http://members.tripod.com/~rayfaq.html)*
This site contains many lies about me, but as a defender of
free speech I fully support its right to exist."
-Message-ID: <6ertau$76b$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
*The original RayFAQ was removed from the internet as a
result of dozens of complaints from Gordon Roy Parker.
Freedom of Speech is WORTHLESS without Social Responsibility.
-=-
This message was posted via two or more anonymous remailing services.
|
| |
| |
|
