|
I mean stealing the cookies of other people is serious crime.
Stealing money, ok.
Murder, ok.
But stealing cookies ??? MEAN !
I think cookie-thieves deserve the death-penalty !
|
| |
| |
I heard a rumor that on 24 Oct 2004 02:55:44 -0700,
netspider4@lycos.com (Karl-Hugo Weesberg) wrote:
I mean stealing the cookies of other people is serious crime.
Nah. It's barely 5th degree theft here.
Stealing money, ok.
It seems to work for the majority of televangelists :)
Murder, ok.
But stealing cookies ??? MEAN !
I think cookie-thieves deserve the death-penalty !
What about Fig Newton's? They aren't really cookies, you know.
:)
Kent
--
Q: What do you call the sweat that's produced when two rednecks are
having sex?
A: Relative Humidity.
|
| |
| |
Kent Wills wrote:
Karl-Hugo Weesberg wrote:
Stealing money, ok.
It seems to work for the majority of televangelists :)
You need to get your heart right with the Lord.
--
Theodore A. Kaldis
kaldis@worldnet.att.net
|
| |
| |
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
Kent Wills wrote:
Stealing money, ok.
You need to get your heart right with the Lord.
Et tu, Brute?
|
| |
| |
Ken Smith wrote:
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
Et tu, Brute?
So Ken, have you received Jesus Christ as your Lord and Saviour since we last
communicated? If not, first, you need to. And second, where then do you
have any room to lecture me?
--
Theodore A. Kaldis
kaldis@worldnet.att.net
|
| |
| |
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
Ken Smith wrote:
So Ken, have you received Jesus Christ as your Lord and Saviour since we last
communicated?
Of course not. He's nowhere *to* be found. Never shows up when you
call him....
If not, first, you need to.
Tell you what. If and when he enters my office and visits me, face
to face, I'll consider that proof of his existence; until then, money
talks and bull#@($ walks.
And second, where then do you have any room to lecture me?
You're the one lecturing Kent -- it's between you two, but it is
clear that you don't have standing to lecture anyone about veracity,
"Electric TeddiBeer."
|
| |
| |
I have it on good authority that on Sun, 24 Oct 2004 06:38:06 -0700,
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
Kent Wills wrote:
Stealing money, ok.
You need to get your heart right with the Lord.
It is.
Let's see... Bob Lar$on, Peter Poffet (might be spelled wrong),
Robert Tilton, Benny Hinn, W.V. Grant, and so on.
For every Billy Gram, there are countless wolves in sheep's
clothing.
Kent
--
A mouse trap, placed on top of your alarm clock, will prevent you
from rolling over and going back to sleep when you hit the snooze
button.
|
| |
| |
Kent Wills wrote:
I have it on good authority that on Sun, 24 Oct 2004 06:38:06 -0700,
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
At least this one isn't a lie.
Kent Wills wrote:
Karl-Hugo Weesberg wrote:
Stealing money, ok.
It seems to work for the majority of televangelists :)
You need to get your heart right with the Lord.
It is.
I'm not so sure.
Let's see ... Bob Lar$on, Peter Poffet (might be spelled wrong),
"Popoff".
Robert Tilton, Benny Hinn, W.V. Grant, and so on.
You shouldn't be critical of purported men of the cloth before the world.
For every Billy Gram,
"Graham".
there are countless wolves in sheep's clothing.
Don't you have discernment? I can spot these fakes without having to be
told. Why can't you?
--
Theodore A. Kaldis
kaldis@worldnet.att.net
|
| |
| |
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
Kent Wills wrote:
At least this one isn't a lie.
Kent Wills wrote:
Karl-Hugo Weesberg wrote:
Stealing money, ok.
It seems to work for the majority of televangelists :)
You need to get your heart right with the Lord.
I'm not so sure.
Another double-entry from Ted Kaldis' Thoroughly-Fucked Dictionary:
"'get your heart right with the Lord' = agree with Ted, no matter how
absurd his views might be."
Let's see ... Bob Lar$on, Peter Poffet (might be spelled wrong),
"Popoff".
You shouldn't be critical of purported men of the cloth before the world.
Why not, Ted? Where does it say in the Bible that you are supposed
to cover for wolves like that ravening at the door? Ezek. 33:1-6 says
just the opposite.
"Graham".
Great. Spelling flames.
Don't you have discernment? I can spot these fakes without having to be
told. Why can't you?
Tell us which ones are the fakes, and which are real. (I have ways
of finding out. :) )
|
| |
| |
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:<417C60D8.E4B67EAE@worldnet.att.net>...
Ken Smith wrote:
So Ken, have you received Jesus Christ as your Lord and Saviour since we last
communicated? If not, first, you need to. And second, where then do you
have any room to lecture me?
You own posts condemn you, Kaldis. You have a history of misogyny,
racial hatred and overall boorishnes and crudity that should shame
your alleged savior, Jesus. You can put on your "righteous halo" but
if sins were farts, you would be emitting toxic gas in mass
quantities. Remember when you posted pretending to be an Aussie until
some pointed out you haven't been to Australia in decades?
You're a phony, Callous, and an embarassment to any actual follower
of Jesus. How many racist statements have you posted and how many
crude sexual references have you snickered at online in your posts?
How many times have you bragged you are a babe magnet when you are in
fact a fat, ugly man? How many times have you considered women either
"skags or whores"?
It doesn'ttake much to criticize you, Callous. All one has to do is
read some of your posts.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
|
| |
| |
Moe wrote:
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
You own posts condemn you, Kaldis. You have a history of misogyny, racial
hatred and overall boorishnes and crudity that should shame your alleged
savior, Jesus.
Perhaps. But I hve never claimed to be an exemplar.
Moreover, the sinfulness of another will not help your case when you stand
before God at the Final Judgement. And what do you propose to say to Him on
that day?
You can put on your "righteous halo" but if sins were farts, you would be
emitting toxic gas in mass quantities.
As would we all: man is by nature a sinner.
Remember when you posted pretending to be an Aussie until some pointed out
you haven't been to Australia in decades?
Wrong on both counts. Someone once asked me a question about Australia, and
I informed him that I was only a tourist to Australia. And I have been to
Australia numerous times in the past decade, the last time in 2003.
You're a phony,
On what basis do you say this? You have none.
Callous,
The name is "Kaldis".
and an embarassment to any actual follower of Jesus.
Let the followers of Jesus decide that for themselves -- and if they should
decide to speak up, I would advise them to do so prayerfully.
How many racist statements have you posted
None.
and how many crude sexual references have you snickered at online in your
posts?
Nobody's perfect.
How many times have you bragged you are a babe magnet
"Were". Many years ago. And that has been pointed out to you more than
once. Why do you continue to lie?
when you are in fact a fat, ugly man?
Tastes vary, you know, honeypie. But I can assure you for a fact that your
opinion is NOT universal.
How many times have you considered women either "skags or whores"?
I dunno. But the question still remains: are you a skank?
It doesn't take much to criticize you, Callous.
Perhaps not. But that's a knife that cuts both ways.
All one has to do is read some of your posts.
As Ken said, et tu, Brute?
--
Theodore A. Kaldis
kaldis@worldnet.att.net
|
| |
| |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------020201000307070409040600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Moe wrote:
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:<417C60D8.E4B67EAE@worldnet.att.net>...
You own posts condemn you, Kaldis. You have a history of misogyny,
racial hatred and overall boorishnes and crudity that should shame
your alleged savior, Jesus. You can put on your "righteous halo" but
if sins were farts, you would be emitting toxic gas in mass
quantities. Remember when you posted pretending to be an Aussie until
some pointed out you haven't been to Australia in decades?
It's not that he hadn't been there in decades. The incident which is
most indicative of Ted's apparent stalking behavior happened in Melbourne.
You're a phony, Callous, and an embarassment to any actual follower
of Jesus. How many racist statements have you posted and how many
crude sexual references have you snickered at online in your posts?
How many times have you bragged you are a babe magnet when you are in
fact a fat, ugly man? How many times have you considered women either
"skags or whores"?
It doesn't take much to criticize you, Callous. All one has to do is
read some of your posts.
Kent's psychologist wife Lindsay has diagnosed Ted as suffering from
obsessive-compulsive disorder, also displaying staking characteristics.
Google reveals that he has posted almost 200 messages this month, and
roughly three-quarters of them mention yours truly. Add those about his
brother-in-law Cam Brown (who has been lawfully indicted for the alleged
murder of his illegitimate four-year-old daughter by apparently throwing
her off a 40-meter-high cliff), and you're left with a half-dozen brief
posts.
I'm convinced that he's mentally unstable, and am starting to suspect
that he is potentially dangerous.
--------------020201000307070409040600
Content-Type: message/rfc822;
name="tedstalker.eml"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename="tedstalker.eml"
From - Thu Oct 28 16:28:10 2004
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Path: newsspool2.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!ba2a9a51!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <4180DCAD.7050003@it.com>
From: Ken Smith <forget@it.com>
Reply-To: Ranger57@concentric.net
Organization: ?????
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: misc.legal,alt.true-crime,ca.general,co.politics
Subject: Re: Ken Smith Before The Colorado Bar Examiners
References: <qi50o0d4e7uussh06m60p1g2ici1urdqeo@4ax.com> <20041027190203.17534.00001878@mb-m20.wmconnect.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:50:43 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.227.169.21
X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net
X-Trace: newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net 1098964243 4.227.169.21 (Thu, 28 Oct 2004 04:50:43 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 04:50:43 PDT
Xref: news.earthlink.net misc.legal:462333 alt.true-crime:956377 ca.general:107006 co.politics:115354
X-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 04:50:33 PDT (newsspool2.news.pas.earthlink.net)
Lindsay wrote:
From: Kent Wills compuelf@gmail.com
Ken Smith wrote:
Ted's conspiracy theories -- especially, the one about the hit man -- are
so bizarre as to identify him as a crank, but I'd imagine that we've
gotten there already. :)
So tell us again, why is it that you're not a lawyer in Colorado?
Obsess much?
Ted has displayed, and is displaying, traits consistent with obsessive
compulsive disorder. His life revolves around Ken and Ken's dealings with the
Colorado Bar. How long has it been since Ken first tried to gain admittance
with the Colorado Bar? People not directly involved in the case would have let
go the matter and continued on with their lives. Ted's posts indicate an
inability to do so.
His tendency towards stalking is also evident in his driving clear across
Melbourne, Australia, to take a picture of an advisory's primary residence and
place it on a web site. This fits into the intimidation aspect of the
stalker's mind set perfectly. Had Ted been able to stay longer, he may well
have found many more opportunities to just "happen to be in the neighborhood."
Yes, Ted does want, or at least did want, people to think he's Australian. He
once boasted about how natives thought he was native. No native is going to
confuse an Australian accent with an American one. Indeed, no tourist is going
to confuse the two either. He had to impersonate a native accent to pull off
this ruse. The fact that natives were fooled indicates the degree to which Ted
studied the accent. The sole reason to do this would be to make one's self seem
native.
Ted most certainly has issues that he would do well to have address with the
aid of a competent mental health professional.
Ted, if you'd like, I could look up some psychologists in your area that could
help you discover and deal with the underlying cause of your problems.
The E-mail address I'm posting with is temporary. If you wish for me to assist
you, you will need to ask for it here. Kent will let me know if you accept my
offer.
Lin
Kent and Lindsay, I do appreciate the input, coming as it does from a
practicing professional. Ted's persistence in this matter goes WAAAAAAY
beyond what is normal, and his tendency toward stalking suggests that he
might pose a threat. His brother-in-law's incarceration for the alleged
murder of his illegitimate four-year-old daughter appears on its face to
have put Ted under considerable stress, which could make him dangerous.
--------------020201000307070409040600--
|
| |
| |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------020804070901060505090603
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
Moe wrote:
On what basis do you say this? You have none.
Apart from your posting history?
The name is "Kaldis".
The description is apt.
and an embarassment to any actual follower of Jesus.
Let the followers of Jesus decide that for themselves -- and if they should
decide to speak up, I would advise them to do so prayerfully.
And they have.
None.
Nobody's perfect.
--------------020804070901060505090603
Content-Type: text/plain;
name="tedracistnew.txt"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename="tedracistnew.txt"
Subject: Re: It Really IS About Ken Smith ...
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 07:44:03 -0500
From: John Hattan <john@thecodezone.com>
Organization: The Code Zone
Newsgroups: misc.legal,alt.fan.bob-larson
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
I have never expressed malice, online or otherwise.
I have the necessary qualifications to speak on behalf of Jesus.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
What "cute" hindu chick? Sorry, but I think the swarthy dot-heads are
dogs. I wouldn't even f*** her with your d***.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
Hey, they let ragheads and towelheads and slapheads and camel jockeys
in. Why shouldn't they let me in? At least I'm not from a completely
alien culture.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
Darling, you're just wound a little too tight. And I know exactly
what'll loosen you up.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
But no towel-heads, no slap-heads, no rag-heads, no camel jockeys, and
no bloody swarthy wogs!
--Theodore A. Kaldis
What other words are there? "Gook". "Slope". "Slant-eye". The list
continues further downhill from here.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
BTW, you're not ugly, or a fat chick, now are you?
--Theodore A. Kaldis
I do not use the word "nigger", nor do I use the word "coon"
--Theodore A. Kaldis
At that rate, assuming there are somewhere between 25 to 50 million
blacks in the U.S. (and I don't know what the exact figure is, but I
would surmise that it falls somewhere within that range), they each get
between US$140 to $280. Chump change. With that they would only be
"nigger rich".
--Theodore A. Kaldis
I've already been assaulted a couple of times, but both times by Guido's
rather than by coons.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
Raghead women are too ugly to become flight attendants.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
That's easy. This is yet another example of feminine ``logic'' (truly
an oxymoron if ever there was one).
--Theodore A. Kaldis
Ragheads, towel heads, camel jockeys, and other swarthy types not
allowed.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
The Dick-suckin' Chicks are toast.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
I have the Holy Spirit to lead me into all the truth and righteousness.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
---
John Hattan Grand High UberPope - First Church of Shatnerology
john@thecodezone.com http://www.shatnerology.com
--------------020804070901060505090603--
|
| |
| |
I have it on good authority that on Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:44:05 GMT, Ken
Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
Moe wrote:
It's not that he hadn't been there in decades. The incident which is
most indicative of Ted's apparent stalking behavior happened in Melbourne.
Kent's psychologist wife Lindsay has diagnosed Ted as suffering from
obsessive-compulsive disorder, also displaying staking characteristics.
I wouldn't say she *diagnosed* him. She pointed out his posts
and actions are consistent with OCD and that he definitely has
tendencies towards stalking.
She most definitely feels and believes with all her being that
Ted has serious issues that he needs to address.
Google reveals that he has posted almost 200 messages this month, and
roughly three-quarters of them mention yours truly. Add those about his
brother-in-law Cam Brown (who has been lawfully indicted for the alleged
murder of his illegitimate four-year-old daughter by apparently throwing
her off a 40-meter-high cliff), and you're left with a half-dozen brief
posts.
I became convinced when he and I were discussing Cam's case and
Ted *had* to bring your name/case into it.
I'm convinced that he's mentally unstable, and am starting to suspect
that he is potentially dangerous.
I concur with the mentally unstable bit 100%. I don't know how
truly dangerous he might be. Yes, the potential is there, but I don't
know how dangerous he really is.
Kent
--
Be really good to your family and friends. You never know
when you are going to need them to empty your bedpan.
|
| |
| |
Kent Wills wrote:
I have it on good authority that on Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:44:05 GMT, Ken
Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
I wouldn't say she *diagnosed* him. She pointed out his posts
and actions are consistent with OCD and that he definitely has
tendencies towards stalking.
Fair enough; I stand corrected. Would "preliminary evaluation" be
closer to the mark.
She most definitely feels and believes with all her being that
Ted has serious issues that he needs to address.
On that, we can all agree.
Google reveals that he has posted almost 200 messages this month, and
roughly three-quarters of them mention yours truly. Add those about his
brother-in-law Cam Brown (who has been lawfully indicted for the alleged
murder of his illegitimate four-year-old daughter by apparently throwing
her off a 40-meter-high cliff), and you're left with a half-dozen brief
posts.
I became convinced when he and I were discussing Cam's case and
Ted *had* to bring your name/case into it.
I concur with the mentally unstable bit 100%. I don't know how
truly dangerous he might be. Yes, the potential is there, but I don't
know how dangerous he really is.
And frankly, I don't want to find out.
|
| |
| |
I have it on good authority that on Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:09:20 GMT, Ken
Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
[...]
Kent's psychologist wife Lindsay has diagnosed Ted as suffering from
obsessive-compulsive disorder, also displaying staking characteristics.
I wouldn't say she *diagnosed* him. She pointed out his posts
and actions are consistent with OCD and that he definitely has
tendencies towards stalking.
Fair enough; I stand corrected. Would "preliminary evaluation" be
closer to the mark.
Yes. MUCH closer.
[...]
I'm convinced that he's mentally unstable, and am starting to suspect
that he is potentially dangerous.
I concur with the mentally unstable bit 100%. I don't know how
truly dangerous he might be. Yes, the potential is there, but I don't
know how dangerous he really is.
And frankly, I don't want to find out.
Certainly understandable.
Kent
--
Nie'se schlect sim'wa
|
| |
| |
Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:<4182484B.D531D3DA@worldnet.att.net>...
Moe wrote:
Perhaps. But I hve never claimed to be an exemplar.
No but you often use your religion to hide behind while you
self-righetously deride Ken and others such as me. Remember thetime
you wenton your "biblical sabbatical" and posted a message saying if
anyone talked bad about you, your god will beat us up? Your profession
of being a Christian and your obsessive posts attacking Ken Smith and
your racial, gender and religious bigotry have not persuaded ANYONE to
convert to your religion. You can CLAIM that your online manner is not
the real you, but how you appear to others, online or not shows what
you ARE. Your own Bible says " by their FRUITS you shall know them".
Basically that means that how a supposed believer in Jesus ACTS, what
the non-christian SEES, shows what the alleged follower of Jesus is in
fact following Jesus or being a modern self-righteous Pharisee. IMO
you are the later, And your web site where there is a baby givingthe
finger shows how much you honor your savior, doesn't it?
http://www.mywebpages.comcast/kaldis
Moreover, the sinfulness of another will not help your case when you stand
before God at the Final Judgement. And what do you propose to say to Him on
that day?
As would we all: man is by nature a sinner.
Not all people beleive in sin. By your own claim your relative Cameron
Brown, as a sinner, DID indeed throw four-year-old Lauren Key off the
cliff to her death. And as a sinner yourself, your have OCD about Ken
Smith. No, Callous, youa re just an asshole, one thatin his obsession
could kill Ken SMith and rationalize it as "doing god's work". :-(
Wrong on both counts. Someone once asked me a question about Australia, and
I informed him that I was only a tourist to Australia. And I have been to
Australia numerous times in the past decade, the last time in 2003.
Bullcrap. You have mande many posts using Aussie slang INFFERRINGthat
youa re currently in Australia. YOU STOPPED That crap when I and some
others found out you have been in the USA for years. I never claimed
you never were in Australia, just that your posed yourself as being
there currently. You were exposed as a poser.
On what basis do you say this? You have none.
Actually many basies. Your previous posts over the years, your hiding
behind your religion to self-righteously judge people, your crude and
sexist comments to my posts, some of which Kent has posted in another
thread, and the claims about yourself over the years you posted online
that turn out to be crapola and lies.
The name is "Kaldis".
Yes i know your real name but to ME you ARE "Callous" Your
hate-filled posts and your views on gays ane women are despicable for
someone who claims to follow the Prince of Peace. You can claim all
you want that what you do online is just an act but, according to your
own religion, Jesus is not fooled. AFAIK Jesus taught AGAINST many of
the hate-filled stuff you posted over the years.
Here's something you may think about. What if Jesus cam to you as a
black man or a "rag-head" or a "poofer" and you derided Him? Ya think
that inf ailing His test of showing love and comassion that your soul
would be "saved"? Naw he would reject you and say He never knew you.
Let the followers of Jesus decide that for themselves -- and if they should
decide to speak up, I would advise them to do so prayerfully.
Dude, I have met good and bad people who are followers of Jesus. IMO
the good people who follow Jesus show the FRUITS of the Spirit.
Remember what those are? WHat was it you said to ME in past posts
that were demeaning? WHen have you EVER shown actual "fruits" online.
Is your web site what real Christians would approve of, with the baby
waving the "@$#* you" finger?
If you are what a Christian is, I am glad that I am no Christian. Was
Cam Brown a Christian like you when he killed his "illegitimate"
daugher?
You're a hypocrite. Callous.
How many racist statements have you posted
None.
Many. Now you are lying, bearing FALSE WITNESS about yourself. Kent
posted some of the racist statements you have made. I dont have timeto
post URLS for some of the more grevious ones, but you know damn well
you are lying about this, SHame on you. SHeesh anyone can Google your
frigging name and read some of them, dumbass.
Nobody's perfect.
It shows your character. Is that your' Walk with Jesus" when you
consider wowmen only for screwing? Was that JEsus speakingthrough you
when you derided me ins ome posts?
"Were". Many years ago. And that has been pointed out to you more than
once. Why do you continue to lie?
I am not lying, but you are. You made that claim that you were a
"babe magnet" You even still claimed a few years ago that some bar
broads still were hot for you. Judging from the photo of you online I
seriously doubt that you have been laid by anyone other than a
prostitute for years. Lose some tonnage and get away from the alcohol
and you may be as happily married as Ken Smith seems to be. As for
me, every time I see your photo I am tempted to upchuck my dinner.
Tastes vary, you know, honeypie. But I can assure you for a fact that your
opinion is NOT universal.
IOW you are inferring that some females LIKE you now? LOL!! I know
there are people who have a paraphilia about fat people. COnsidering
how obsessive you are about Ken Smith, I doubt you have a female
lusting after you for at least five years. Only the whores you pay
will pretend to love you.
I dunno. But the question still remains: are you a skank?
Neither. Sexually wise I am not interested in you, so don't bother
dreaming about doing me. I am not sexually loose nor indiscriminate.
In fact if you knew me you would think I had the morals of an actual
follower of Jesus, except that I think gays as people not awful
deviants.
|
| |
| |
I mistyped Kaldis's url. Here is the corrected one....
http://www.mywebpages.comcast.net/kaldis
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
|
| |
| |
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:<4182484B.D531D3DA@worldnet.att.net>...
Moe wrote:
.
None.
One more apology. I though Kent posted some of his remarks, but it
was John Hattan. Below is the copy of what Hattan posted plus my
notations when it was referring to me.
Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
I have the necessary qualifications to speak on behalf of Jesus.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
What "cute" hindu chick? Sorry, but I think the swarthy dot-heads are
dogs. I wouldn't even f*** her with your d***.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
Hey, they let ragheads and towelheads and slapheads and camel jockeys
in. Why shouldn't they let me in? At least I'm not from a completely
alien culture.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
Darling, you're just wound a little too tight. And I know exactly
what'll loosen you up.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
This is in response to me.
But no towel-heads, no slap-heads, no rag-heads, no camel jockeys, and
no bloody swarthy wogs!
--Theodore A. Kaldis
What other words are there? "Gook". "Slope". "Slant-eye". The list
continues further downhill from here.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
BTW, you're not ugly, or a fat chick, now are you?
--Theodore A. Kaldis
This is in response to me.
I do not use the word "nigger", nor do I use the word "coon"
--Theodore A. Kaldis
At that rate, assuming there are somewhere between 25 to 50 million
blacks in the U.S. (and I don't know what the exact figure is, but I
would surmise that it falls somewhere within that range), they each get
between US$140 to $280. Chump change. With that they would only be
"nigger rich".
--Theodore A. Kaldis
I've already been assaulted a couple of times, but both times by Guido's
rather than by coons.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
Raghead women are too ugly to become flight attendants.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
That's easy. This is yet another example of feminine ``logic'' (truly
an oxymoron if ever there was one).
--Theodore A. Kaldis
This is in response to me.
Ragheads, towel heads, camel jockeys, and other swarthy types not
allowed.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
The Dick-suckin' Chicks are toast.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
I have the Holy Spirit to lead me into all the truth and righteousness.
--Theodore A. Kaldis
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
|
| |
| |
I have it on good authority that on 1 Nov 2004 22:47:24 -0800,
fvrnite@yahoo.com (Moe) wrote:
One more apology. I though Kent posted some of his remarks, but it
was John Hattan. Below is the copy of what Hattan posted plus my
notations when it was referring to me.
Correct. I've just posted what John found.
Kent
--
Be really good to your family and friends. You never know
when you are going to need them to empty your bedpan.
|
| |
| |
I have it on good authority that on 1 Nov 2004 22:35:10 -0800,
fvrnite@yahoo.com (Moe) wrote:
Here's something you may think about. What if Jesus cam to you as a
black man or a "rag-head" or a "poofer" and you derided Him?
Jesus was not causation, as many paintings depict. He would have
had the same skin tone and features as others in the area. He had
darker skin. Jesus would look much more like the middle easterners
Ted hates than anything else.
Kent
--
When cryptography is outlawed,
bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
|
| |
| |
Kent Wills wrote:
I have it on good authority that on 1 Nov 2004 22:35:10 -0800,
fvrnite@yahoo.com (Moe) wrote:
Jesus was not causation, as many paintings depict. He would have
had the same skin tone and features as others in the area. He had
darker skin. Jesus would look much more like the middle easterners
Ted hates than anything else.
Everybody knows that Jesus had blond hair and blue eyes, because the
Jews we know often have blond hair and/or blue eyes. And we all know
that Windsor, Ontario, Canada isn't south of Detroit.... ;)
As Bill Maher said to Curt Schilling: "Hey! Jesus is the guy playing
centerfield...." :)
|
| |
| |
Kent Wills wrote:
I have it on good authority that on 1 Nov 2004 22:35:10 -0800,
fvrnite@yahoo.com (Moe) wrote:
Jesus was not causation, as many paintings depict. He would have
had the same skin tone and features as others in the area. He had
darker skin. Jesus would look much more like the middle easterners
Ted hates than anything else.
Don't you think that Ted really hates the Jesus of the Bible, and
made up his own personal Jesus from his Aryan Nations' view of the world
(the "true" Greeks don't look like Cat Stevens but rather, had blond
hair and blue eyes)?
After all, it's clear from Ted's dissertations on the Bible that even
I know him and his teachings better than he does....
|
| |
| |
I have it on good authority that on Tue, 02 Nov 2004 14:01:41 GMT, Ken
Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
Don't you think that Ted really hates the Jesus of the Bible, and
made up his own personal Jesus from his Aryan Nations' view of the world
(the "true" Greeks don't look like Cat Stevens but rather, had blond
hair and blue eyes)?
It's entirely possible, and, given his posting history, very
probable.
After all, it's clear from Ted's dissertations on the Bible that even
I know him and his teachings better than he does....
That's not really saying all that much though, is it :)
Kent
--
Nie'se schlect sim'wa
|
| |
| |
Kent Wills wrote:
I have it on good authority that on Tue, 02 Nov 2004 14:01:41 GMT, Ken
Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
It's entirely possible, and, given his posting history, very
probable.
That's not really saying all that much though, is it :)
No, it is not. Remember, his mentor was Doug Gilliland....
|
| |
| |
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:41897356.3090706@it.com...
Kent Wills wrote:
No, it is not. Remember, his mentor was Doug Gilliland....
Who?
|
| |
| |
I have it on good authority that on Thu, 04 Nov 2004 00:11:00 GMT, Ken
Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
After all, it's clear from Ted's dissertations on the Bible that even
I know him and his teachings better than he does....
That's not really saying all that much though, is it :)
No, it is not. Remember, his mentor was Doug Gilliland....
True. And it speaks VOLUMES. Unfortunately for Ted, it's all
negative.
Kent
--
Be really good to your family and friends. You never know
when you are going to need them to empty your bedpan.
|
| |
| |
"Bootstrap Bill" <wrcousert@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<hNkid.462041$mD.365632@attbi_s02>...
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:41897356.3090706@it.com...
Who?
Doug Gilliand was a reg on the BL NG some years back who claimed he
was studying for the seminary and clained to be a Christian. One of
his more memorable crappy statements was that if a husband forced
himself on his wife it was not rape, IOW a husband cannot rape his
wife. He was a bigoted as Teddie but not as blatantly as Teddie.
Another thing was he claimed Disney World attracted gays yet Doug had
a year long pass to Disneyworld. One of his many faults was that his
daily posts were exessive, obviously because his wife was working and
he was not.
'Course doug would change his screenname more than a pesterng user on
Yahoo chat rooms. I haven't seen a post of his for years s maybe his
wife kicked his butt out or osmething.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
|
| |
| |
|
