|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Kent Wills wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>> Would that be a bizarre manifestation of his mental patholog
>>>> There is NO "pathology" here.
>>> Stalkers invariably deny it when confronted. Again, your obsessive
>> I go
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> I have it on good authority that on Sun, 24 Oct 2004 14:43:50 GMT, Ken
> Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
>>[adding aus.politics to this thread fbo Kym Horsell]
>
> [...]
>
>>>> Would that be a bizarre manifestation of his men
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Kent Wills wrote:
>>I have it on good authority that on Sun, 24 Oct 2004 06:38:06 -0700,
>>"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> At least this one isn't a lie.
>>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>Karl-Hugo Weesberg
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> I have it on good authority that on Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:24:39 GMT, Ken
> Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
[snip]
>>>>>>Would that be a bizarre manifestation of his mental pathology?
>>>>>
>>>There is NO "pathology" here.
>>
|
|
|
AH# 49 writes: <GRONK@BCComics.net> wrote in message news:<417D1F2B.19D0CD57@BCComics.net>...
>
> School officials are the ones that put the value on it.
> While I haven't seen it, or know what size it is, perhaps the
> artwork painted on it is what
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>There is NO such "perfect" day. This was an open area with no cover, and
>>>a number of potential witnesses around. To suggest that ANYONE would plan
>>>a crime of this
|
|
|
Has anyone waded through the amended complaint to see what changed?
--
Rusty
The preceding message reflects my beliefs and opinions. Veracity of
statements is left to the common sense of the reader.
|
|
|
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:06:49 -0400 in talk.rape tinydancer
<tinydancer@nowhere.com> wrote in message
<__cfd.106655$yp.13747@bignews1.bellsouth.net>...
> "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote in message
> news:9Mbfd.901$_3.17873@typhoon.sonic.n
|
|
|
NGs left intact this time, since this is subthread is a multi-way
conversation with at least one person from each group.
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:45:16 -0600 in talk.rape Chas
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message
<lb6dndm32MB67uDcRVn-1Q@co
|
|
|
OL. Please provide adequate proof for you kooky claim.
I determine what, where, when and how I want to write. If I
am off, please send me a reference so I can study it if I
choose to.
<snip> Thats enough Ambassador Yak, keep me out of your
stereo
|
|
|
You already already received advice from a lawyer. Have your lawyer write a
letter to the store.
>I was on a business trip with my lawyer today and I told him the story.
> He told me that since they found it and had it in their possession an
> impli
|
|
|
Ray Gordon wrote:
>>>Grace actually "won" its argument against Section 230 immunity for
>>>distributor liability.
>>
>>No they did not. Unless an appeals court ruled that part of the argument
>>wrong and ordered it reversed, it becomes irrelevan
|
|
|
tilllovingMarty@myway.com (Barbara Schwarz) wrote in message news:<bf456302.0410251333.7716d23b@posting.google.com>...
> trollwatch@nym.hush.com (Dicktop_Stud's fan) wrote in message news:<423b4ea3.0410250203.759f0178@posting.google.com>...
> > I tried
|
|
|
Scientology is not the issue in dealing with CMU.
The issue is President Bush's appointment of Carnegie Mellon
President Jared Cohon to the 16-member Homeland Security
Advisory Council in December 2003, CMU'S $35.5 million grant
from the U.S. Federa
|
|
|
"Doc Tavish" <Doc_Tavish@Tavish-Central01.net> wrote in message
news:7p7rn0hd6tp98q962buqq6dad87pbg3bcb@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:05:51 -0400,
> <B_5fd.4519$Qs6.414520@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan"
> <test@dev.null>
> wrote:
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In article <2tr9psF22t005U1@uni-berlin.de>,
Ben Jimmie <bgjimmie@ncv.ca.bc> wrote:
>Can anyone post any proof about the ancient masonic history ?
No, since (except for math) nothing posted can be proof.
>How many old churches or historic building
|
|
|
eith ( who aparently was Vicky once ) wrote:
> If you have ENTREPRENEURIAL BENT OF MIND, then SKY IS THE LIMIT, you
> can SELL this FBI agents' NOC LIST and MAKE MILLIONS of dollars like
> Tom Cruise (Ethan) did in the movie MISSION IMPOSSIBLE.
>
|
|
|
Connect the dots or 911 will recur.
When are we going to learn to connect the dots?
http://www.geocities.com/billyspencer2000/dot.htm
|
|
|
Xeton2001IsAMoron.20.dwpj65@spamgourmet.com (David W. Poole, Jr.) wrote
in news:6b6b154c.0410251124.3f9e9e6e@posting.google.com:
> xeton2001@yahoo.com (Laura Bush murdered her boy friend) wrote in
> message news:<780ea958.0410231900.3c35c27e@posting
|
|
|
On 25 Oct 2004 09:27:14 -0500, <szkekjm98l9.fsf@fnord.io.com> Patrick Lee
Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote:
>Steve_Talbot@yahoo.com (Steve Talbot) writes:
>
>>On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 03:47:56 -0500, <7t9pn01erpi0vqcnr8u9g6bs3qfhr8appv@4ax.com>
>>Doc Tav
|
|
|
n Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:05:51 -0400,
<B_5fd.4519$Qs6.414520@news20.bellglobal.com> "Patrick Keenan" <test@dev.null>
wrote:
>"Doc Tavish" <Doc_Tavish@Tavish-Central01.net> wrote in message
>news:7t9pn01erpi0vqcnr8u9g6bs3qfhr8appv@4ax.com...
>> From:
|
|
|
Keith wrote:
> If you have ENTREPRENEURIAL BENT OF MIND, then SKY IS THE LIMIT, you
> can SELL this FBI agents' NOC LIST and MAKE MILLIONS of dollars like
> Tom Cruise (Ethan) did in the movie MISSION IMPOSSIBLE.
>
get a life please , your brain
|
|
|
You will not get a fair deal from the Republicans....they ought to
redistribute the money back from rich pill, oil, tax fleecing companies
like Halliburton, pharmaceutical companies and all the rest...
~
What you should get is a fair deal from the
|
|
|
"Michael Snyder" (msnyder@redhat.com) writes:
> "Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:upednekWKqk8quDcRVn-rw@comcast.com...
>> "tinydancer" <tinydancer@nowhere.com> wrote
>>> Thank you Chas, for expressing the thought so we
|
|
|
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message news:<Qrbfd.3080$t23.2147@trndny03>...
> >> Grace actually "won" its argument against Section 230 immunity for
> >> distributor liability.
> >
> > No they did not. Unless an appeals court ruled that
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:upednekWKqk8quDcRVn-rw@comcast.com...
> "tinydancer" <tinydancer@nowhere.com> wrote
>> Thank you Chas, for expressing the thought so well. I wanted to say
>> exactly
>> the same thing
|
|
|
So a click through disclaimer is all that is needed to cure your lawsuit?
Hmmm Can we name it after you?
LOL
BM
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:Qrbfd.3080$t23.2147@trndny03...
>>> Grace actually "won" its argument agai
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:jfidnWwGWOkauuDcRVn-1Q@comcast.com...
> "Michael Snyder" <msnyder@redhat.com> wrote
>> No -- they use it to magnify the severity of rape, get increased sympathy
>> for the victims, make v
|
|
|
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:02:41 GMT, Steve_Talbot@yahoo.com (Steve
Talbot) wrote:
[cut]
>
>My humble opinion is that those narrow minded souls who oppose you will never
>get the point. They choose to keep dishonesty as their vanguard. Rather than
>ad
|
|
|
>> On August 18, 2004 I filed the complaint. On October 8, 2004, Google
>> moved
>> to dismiss the complaint pursuant to federal rule 12(b)(6). Today, I
>> filed
>> an Amended Complaint and responded to the motion to dismiss.
>>
>
> You can't f
|
|
|
>> Grace actually "won" its argument against Section 230 immunity for
>> distributor liability.
>
> No they did not. Unless an appeals court ruled that part of the argument
> wrong and ordered it reversed, it becomes irrelevant because the party
|
|
|
MrPepper,
I don't receive the Wall Street Journal but I'll presume that this is a
real article. I'm struck by the first anecdote where a woman is successfully
sued for $9500 in Arizona small claims court. A quick check suggests that
Arizona ca
|
|
|
xeton2001@yahoo.com (Laura Bush murdered her boy friend) wrote in message news:<780ea958.0410242036.4488d809@posting.google.com>...
> AH# 49 writes: <GRONK@BCComics.net> wrote in message news:<417BFE77.A0836E9E@BCComics.net>...
> >
> > "Limbaugh" is a
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>> If this case was such a turkey, and he'd have his hat handed to him if he
>>> tried it,
>> As he will, either by the judge at an evidentiary hearing, or else when it
>> gets
|
|
|
have it on good authority that on Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:24:05 -0700,
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>>> Not quite. Truth is, I'd just as soon leave all
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
[snip]
> Yes, well, you see, that's the problem with many psychologically unbalanced
> individuals. They suffer delusions.
When you talk to God, it's called prayer; when God talks back, it is
|
|
|
his is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------080004020807080200040505
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
|
|
|
heodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
[in re Cam Brown murder trial]
>>>Not quite. Truth is, I'd just as soon leave all you slugs in the dark.
>>>If you knew what was really going on in
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------070502000300060809000007
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:24:39 GMT, Ken
Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>>>[adding aus.politics to this thread fbo Kym Horsell]
>>
>> What for? You count that tosser a
|
|
|
Hello Everyone,
Thanks in advanced for your suggestions. This is in
Pennsylvania. On Sunday my girlfriend and I were at a large department
store shopping and I lent her my cell phone so that she could call
another store to see if they wer
|
|
|
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:12:39 -0700, Robert Morien
<PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote:
>That sure added something to this discussion. At least we know you don't
>go to a barber very often.
>
Ho-ho ...... actually a good retort!
Joel
>
|
|
|
have it on good authority that on Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:10:10 -0700,
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> [adding aus.politics to this thread fbo Kym Horsell]
>
>What for? You count that tosser as one of your
|
|
|
<snip>
> Now, if the courts want to create a world where someone can defame you
> from 10,000 miles away on an obscure newsgroup or website, and have the
> defamation turn up the next day five minutes after you have a job
> interview, I'm sure pe
|
|
|
Ray Gordon wrote:
>>>Actually, I came across Grace v. Ebay when I was seeking counsel for my
>>>case against Google. The attorney I spoke with had been involved in some
>>>copyright stuff involving pictures on a search engine and got me up to
>>
|
|
|
MrPepper11@go.com (MrPepper11) wrote in message news:<57cfd534.0410250752.1c01d0fa@posting.google.com>...
> "Asset's hard-hitting strategy of going after consumers in
> small-claims courts has affected tens of thousands of people around
> the country..
|
|
|
I have it on good authority that on Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:20:53 -0700,
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>
>>> Of course, Ted could be putting on an act. He may have, for what ever
>>> r
|
|
