|
Schwarz Law, the definition
-----------------------------------------------
I noticed in several newsgroups that when certain posters are
uneducated about certain subjects and feel that they lose an argument,
they claim that the other poster is mentally ill to discredit him or
her.
That is of course not just unfair posting, but also libel per se.
You can look it up in any law book or go to any legal website and you
will find that legal experts all agree that it is libel per se to
claim that somebody else suffers from an illness, e.g. mental illness,
without having the expert proof of it.
In court, you, the libel-originator, the defendant, has to prove that
the person is mentally ill, and you have to pay the "experts", the
court costs, the attorneys and damages to the plaintiff.
Ask attorneys, a libel pro se case may cost you dearly, even your life
savings.
However, for those who become the victims of Internet bullies and
people who libel others as being mentally ill, can immediately invoke
the "Schwarz Law". They are entitled to tell the libeling person that
they lose, in the newsgroups and in courts of laws.
Barbara Schwarz
|
| |
| |
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
Schwarz Law, the definition
-----------------------------------------------
I noticed in several newsgroups that when certain posters are
uneducated about certain subjects and feel that they lose an argument,
they claim that the other poster is mentally ill to discredit him or
her.
That is of course not just unfair posting, but also libel per se.
You're crazy if you think that....
Primarily because stating the poster is crazy doesn't identify
a real person -- only "the person using that ID".
|
| |
| |
You are completely insane.
As usual.
Schwarz Law, the definition
-----------------------------------------------
I noticed in several newsgroups that when certain posters are
uneducated about certain subjects and feel that they lose an argument,
they claim that the other poster is mentally ill to discredit him or
her.
That is of course not just unfair posting, but also libel per se.
You can look it up in any law book or go to any legal website and you
will find that legal experts all agree that it is libel per se to
claim that somebody else suffers from an illness, e.g. mental illness,
without having the expert proof of it.
In court, you, the libel-originator, the defendant, has to prove that
the person is mentally ill, and you have to pay the "experts", the
court costs, the attorneys and damages to the plaintiff.
Ask attorneys, a libel pro se case may cost you dearly, even your life
savings.
However, for those who become the victims of Internet bullies and
people who libel others as being mentally ill, can immediately invoke
the "Schwarz Law". They are entitled to tell the libeling person that
they lose, in the newsgroups and in courts of laws.
Barbara Schwarz
|
| |
| |
StilllovingMarty@myway.com (Barbara Schwarz) wrote in message news:<bf456302.0410270923.50d8fc21@posting.google.com>...
Schwarz Law, the definition
More clueless spew from a delusional psychopath.
|
| |
| |
"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message news:<41800228.74CB817B@sprintmail.com>...
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
You're crazy if you think that....
Primarily because stating the poster is crazy doesn't identify
a real person -- only "the person using that ID".
Huh? You missed the entire point. If I would be you I would read the
posting before I heckle into it.
Who posted anything about the identification of people? If you are
afraid to be caught, you should be, as there are ways to trace any
person on computers.
Barbara Schwarz
|
| |
| |
Schwarz Law, the definition
-----------------------------------------------
I noticed in several newsgroups that when certain posters are
uneducated about certain subjects and feel that they lose an argument,
they claim that the other poster is mentally ill to discredit him or
her.
That is of course not just unfair posting, but also libel per se.
You can look it up in any law book or go to any legal website and you
will find that legal experts all agree that it is libel per se to
claim that somebody else suffers from an illness, e.g. mental illness,
without having the expert proof of it.
In court, you, the libel-originator, the defendant, has to prove that
the person is mentally ill, and you have to pay the "experts", the
court costs, the attorneys and damages to the plaintiff.
Ask attorneys, a libel pro se case may cost you dearly, even your life
savings.
However, for those who become the victims of Internet bullies and
people who libel others as being mentally ill, can immediately invoke
the "Schwarz Law". They are entitled to tell the libeling person that
they lose, in the newsgroups and in courts of laws.
Barbara Schwarz
|
| |
| |
Hello "Barbara Schwarz". Your many posts over the past
few years are absolute proof that you are completely insane.
You are a certified Grade-A netkook.
You are crazy.
You are a drooling fsck-tard and an ass.
Have a nice day!
"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
news:<41800228.74CB817B@sprintmail.com>...
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
Schwarz Law, the definition
-----------------------------------------------
I noticed in several newsgroups that when certain posters are
uneducated about certain subjects and feel that they lose an argument,
they claim that the other poster is mentally ill to discredit him or
her.
That is of course not just unfair posting, but also libel per se.
You're crazy if you think that....
Primarily because stating the poster is crazy doesn't identify
a real person -- only "the person using that ID".
Huh? You missed the entire point. If I would be you I would read the
posting before I heckle into it.
Who posted anything about the identification of people? If you are
afraid to be caught, you should be, as there are ways to trace any
person on computers.
Barbara Schwarz
|
| |
| |
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message news:<41800228.74CB817B@sprintmail.com>...
Huh? You missed the entire point.
YOU missed the entire point. If "Barbara Schwarz" could be
identified as a real person, then you might be correct about
the statement that "Barbara Schwarz is crazy" is actionable.
However, the statement that "the poster is crazy" cannot be
actionable, because the poster cannot be identified, unless
the post is digitally signed. The person posting would have
to identify herself publicly in order for the statement to be
actionable -- so she has defamed herself.
|
| |
| |
StilllovingMarty@myway.com (Barbara Schwarz) wrote in message news:<bf456302.0410280902.6e43d79f@posting.google.com>...
Schwarz Law, the definition
-----------------------------------------------
I noticed in several newsgroups that when certain posters are
uneducated about certain subjects and feel that they lose an argument,
they claim that the other poster is mentally ill to discredit him or
her.
That is of course not just unfair posting, but also libel per se.
You can look it up in any law book or go to any legal website and you
will find that legal experts all agree that it is libel per se to
claim that somebody else suffers from an illness, e.g. mental illness,
without having the expert proof of it.
In court, you, the libel-originator, the defendant, has to prove that
the person is mentally ill, and you have to pay the "experts", the
court costs, the attorneys and damages to the plaintiff.
Ask attorneys, a libel pro se case may cost you dearly, even your life
savings.
However, for those who become the victims of Internet bullies and
people who libel others as being mentally ill, can immediately invoke
the "Schwarz Law". They are entitled to tell the libeling person that
they lose, in the newsgroups and in courts of laws.
Barbara Schwarz is a clinically diagnosed schizophrenic. Her
consistent erratic & hostile behavior is typical for those affected
with this mental disorder:
Schizophrenia is a mental disorder that affects one in every one
hundred people worldwide. It is defined as a psychotic disorder
usually characterized by withdrawal from reality, illogical patterns
of thinking, delusions, and hallucinations, and accompanied by various
degrees of emotional, behavioral, and intellectual disturbances.
Over the years, as families try to cope with the reality of having a
loved one suffer from schizophrenia, they have come up with various
early warning signs that correspond with the illness. These signs
include unexpected hostility, depression, as well as bizarre behavior,
noticeable social withdrawal, and drug and alcohol abuse. Additional
warning signs include the inability to express joy, or cry, as well as
several others.
Compare these behaviors to the hundreds of inflammatory posts made by
Barbara Schwarz in the last year and decide for yourself.
Barbara Schwarz
|
| |
| |
"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message news:<41817194.381DBFD4@sprintmail.com>...
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
YOU missed the entire point. If "Barbara Schwarz" could be
identified as a real person, then you might be correct about
the statement that "Barbara Schwarz is crazy" is actionable.
YOU missed the entire point, Arthur, as I, Barbara Schwarz, are a real
person and the defamatory malicious libel is actionable.
Barbara Schwarz
|
| |
| |
"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message news:<41817194.381DBFD4@sprintmail.com>...
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
YOU missed the entire point. If "Barbara Schwarz" could be
identified as a real person, then you might be correct about
the statement that "Barbara Schwarz is crazy" is actionable.
You should also keep in mind that there were postings from that poster
before who were the total actionable libel.
Barbara Schwarz
|
| |
| |
YOU missed the entire point, Arthur, as I, Barbara Schwarz, are a real
person and the defamatory malicious libel is actionable.
Then @$#*ing sue him already or shut the @$#* up.
Barbara Schwarz
|
| |
| |
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message news:<41817194.381DBFD4@sprintmail.com>...
YOU missed the entire point, Arthur, as I, Barbara Schwarz, are a real
person and the defamatory malicious libel is actionable.
If I assert that the poster is crazy, and you assert that you
are the poster, you are libeling yourself. _I'm_ not legally
liable.
|
| |
| |
"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message news:<41828C2D.C9281787@sprintmail.com>...
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
If I assert that the poster is crazy, and you assert that you
are the poster, you are libeling yourself. _I'm_ not legally
liable.
I don't assert that the poster is crazy, I think the posters are
criminal. I don't libel myself. Garry Scarff, the cyber criminal stole
my name and also posts with it. If he libels me with my name, I don't
libel myself.
Don't split hairs. As you very well know the ARS gang libels and
defame me, an existing person.
Lecture those guys, not me.
www.MegaLaw.com
Barbara Schwarz
|
| |
| |
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
I don't assert that the poster is crazy,
No -- I asserted that whoever posted the article at the top
of this thread was crazy. YOU are asserting that you are that
person, hence you are libeling yourself.
....
Don't split hairs. As you very well know the ARS gang libels and
defame me, an existing person.
They defamed me (or, to be precise, my handle) also. So what?
|
| |
| |
|
