|
Can somebody send me a copy of the judgment in this case; I have a
copy of the order but want the full judgment, also any "accurate"
information about the good doctor's antecedents.
Thanks
|
| |
| |
In message <10503184.0410300519.66937858@posting.google.com>, Alexander
Baron <A_Baron@ABaron.Demon.Co.UK> writes
Can somebody send me a copy of the judgment in this case; I have a
copy of the order but want the full judgment, also any "accurate"
information about the good doctor's antecedents.
Thanks
I have a 26 page article 03/01/04
UK. HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYER
was
OBOTE`s "MURDER SQUAD LEADER
I note in it Marshall Rice refers to a Tread of 15 articles on uk.legal
Date:2002-02-13 02:41:01 PST
=============
New readers Dr ADOKO is a black lawyer from Uganda where he claims he
was the President of the Uganda Law Society and also Chairman of the
Uganda professional association. He now in his seventies apparently.
And has got into deep deep trouble by exposing uncontrolled wickedness
within the British set up.
Knowing as I do know first hand of the "UNCONTROLLED" corruption within
the British Judiciary I can well believe this.
--
Roger J. P. Jones
|
| |
| |
Can somebody send me a copy of the judgment in this case; I have a
copy of the order but want the full judgment, also any "accurate"
information about the good doctor's antecedents.
Thanks
Do you have an email address that actually works?
By the way, the vexatious litigant site at
http://www.geocities.com/vexatious_litigant/ seems to be down when I try to
access it. Is that a temporary problem or is it to be moved elsewhere? It
was a very useful site.
|
| |
| |
Do you have an email address that actually works?
By the way, the vexatious litigant site at
http://www.geocities.com/vexatious_litigant/ seems to be down when I try
to
access it. Is that a temporary problem or is it to be moved elsewhere? It
was a very useful site.
Still available on
http://web.archive.org/web/20041031030908/http://www.geocities.com/vexatious
_litigant/vex_litigant_index.html
from
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.geocities.com/vexatious_litigant/
What they aren't telling you about DNA profiles
and what Special Branch don't want you to know.
http://www.nutteing2.freeservers.com/dnapr.htm
or nutteingd in a search engine
Valid email nutteing@fastmail.....fm (remove 4 of the 5 dots)
Ignore any other apparent em address used to post this message -
it is defunct due to spam.
|
| |
| |
Do you have an email address that actually works?
By the way, the vexatious litigant site at
http://www.geocities.com/vexatious_litigant/ seems to be down when I try to
access it. Is that a temporary problem or is it to be moved elsewhere? It
was a very useful site.
I think Ewing has taken it down, I'll have a word with him and if he
is still of that mind I'll set it up at another url; he's a bit of a
strange bloke, check out his antipetersainsbury site for the reason.
|
| |
| |
Do you have an email address that actually works?
By the way, the vexatious litigant site at
http://www.geocities.com/vexatious_litigant/ seems to be down when I try
to
access it. Is that a temporary problem or is it to be moved elsewhere? It
was a very useful site.
I think Ewing has taken it down, I'll have a word with him and if he
is still of that mind I'll set it up at another url; he's a bit of a
strange bloke, check out his antipetersainsbury site for the reason.
Okay. Hope the site can be re-established somewhere. Meanwhile, if you do
want a copy of the Adoko judgment I can email it to you, if you tell me
which address to use.
|
| |
| |
"The Todal" <deadmailbox@beeb.net> wrote in message news:<2uivijF2bhhr0U1@uni-berlin.de>...
Do you have an email address that actually works?
By the way, the vexatious litigant site at
http://www.geocities.com/vexatious_litigant/ seems to be down when I try to
access it. Is that a temporary problem or is it to be moved elsewhere? It
was a very useful site.
Sorry, I can now be found at
a_baron[AT]ntlworld.com
I use the old Demon address purely as an anti-spam measure.
I've spoken to Ewing, he says he will be putting up the Vexatious
Litigant site again shortly. Check out his antipetersainsbury site,
it's a right laugh.
|
| |
| |
O/6396/2003
Neutral Citation Number: [2004] EWHC 1409 (Admin)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
DIVISIONAL COURT
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London WC2
Thursday, 20th May 2004
B E F O R E:
MR JUSTICE COLLINS
MR JUSTICE PITCHERS
- - - - - - -
HER MAJESTY'S ATTORNEY GENERAL
(CLAIMANT)
-v-
AKENA ADOKO
(DEFENDANT)
- - - - - - -
Computer-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of
Smith Bernal Wordwave Limited
190 Fleet Street London EC4A 2AG
Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838
(Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
- - - - - - -
MR S KOVATS (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) appeared on behalf
of the CLAIMANT
The DEFENDANT did not attend and was not represented
- - - - - - -
J U D G M E N T
(As Approved by the Court)
- - - - - - -
Crown copyright
1.MR JUSTICE COLLINS: There is before the court an application by
Her Majesty's Attorney General for a Civil Proceedings Order, pursuant
to section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981, against Akena Adoko.
That order is requested on the basis that Mr Adoko is a vexatious
litigant, having habitually and persistently, and without any
reasonable ground, instituted vexatious civil proceedings and made
vexatious applications in civil proceedings.
2.Mr Adoko has not attended before us. We have made enquiries of the
List Office and are entirely satisfied that a notice was sent on 7th
April of this year to his address; that is to say, 10 Sloane House,
Roland Way, London SW17 2JF. Further, we are told by Mr Kovats that
on 11th May there was also sent to that address a copy of his skeleton
argument which itself contained the date of this hearing. Further,
the respondent himself has made an application in these proceedings,
that being that he should be permitted to enter into a consent order,
which he is prepared to do; the order being in the same terms as a
Civil Proceedings Order would itself be in.
3.Mr Adoko has submitted a bundle of documents, including that
application. Filed within that and received by the court on 6th April
2004, is a notice given to him by the court of the date upon which
that application would be heard, and that is today's date. The reason
why that application is noted as being received on 6th April, whereas
the listing letter in the main proceedings is dated 7th April is as
follows. He would have been given an immediate date for the hearing
of his application when he tendered his documents on 6th April. The
court, having given that date, would of course marry it up with the
date of the hearing of the application by the Attorney General. That
is to say, this application. Accordingly, there is no surprise at all
that the formal letter notifying him of the date of these proceedings
should have been sent on 7th April, the day after he received
notification of the date of the hearing of his application.
4.In all those circumstances, in my view, it is apparent that he was
aware of the hearing which was due to take place today and in those
circumstances we are quite satisfied that it is proper for us to have
continued to consider and decide upon the application made by the
Attorney General.
5.Mr Adoko is now 73 years old. He is Ugandan by nationality. He
was, in Uganda, president, or the equivalent of president, of the Law
Society there, and was also holding some important position in the
government. In any event, in 1986 he came to this country and by
October 1989, having become settled in this country, he began
practising law here, initially as a barrister and then working for
solicitors. He had, in fact, been called to the bar and was a member
of the Middle Temple.
6.In January of 1991, he decided that he wished to be admitted as a
solicitor and he made an application to the Law Society to that end.
He was required to sit an examination in professional conduct and
accounts. This he did in 1992, but he did not pass those exams and so
the Law Society decided not to admit him as a solicitor. He took
proceedings in an industrial tribunal against the Law Society,
asserting that the practice of exempting barristers who had practised
for at least eight years in England or Wales from the relevant exams
was to discriminate against such as himself, and that it amounted to
indirect racial discrimination.
7.The Law Society, in those circumstances, decided in December 1995
that it would exempt Mr Adoko from having to sit those exams.
However, that did not produce the result that he desired, because on
17th May 1995 the Law Society made a formal complaint to the
Professional Conduct Committee of the Bar which arose out of Mr
Adoko's publication of information which he had obtained on discovery
in his litigation against the Law Society. It was, or should have
been, apparent to any practising member of the Bar, and indeed to any
solicitor, that to misuse information obtained on discovery in the way
that Mr Adoko did -- which was by publishing names and details of
English barristers who had been exempted from the aforementioned
examinations -- was a clear breach of the requirement of professional
conduct on both sides of the profession.
8.Following that, the Law Society wrote to Mr Adoko saying that it
was deferring the decision whether to admit him as solicitor. On 14th
February 2000 it decided not to admit him, relying on the fact that he
had been found guilty in June 1997, by a disciplinary tribunal of the
Inns of Court, of two charges of professional misconduct, that his
appeal had been dismissed, and indeed he had applied to be voluntarily
disbarred and had so been. Further, in June 1999 he had been made
bankrupt on his own petition and further, he had used information
obtained while working for a firm of solicitors to publish a libellous
attack on an employee of a body that one of his clients had sued. As
a result, he was eventually made subject to an order from the
Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal that no solicitor was to employ or to
remunerate him.
9.However, he has in more recent years been apparently providing
legal services, pursuing what he has described as a "hobby", and has
instituted numerous actions against former clients and opponents.
There are a total of some 27 actions that have been taken by him over
a period of about 10 years since 1993. Ten have been against the Law
Society -- three of which were against the Office of the Supervision
of Solicitors -- and two have been taken against the Solicitors
Disciplinary Tribunal. He has also issued libel proceedings against
counsel and solicitors who acted for the Law Society, and a further
action against an internet service provider because, following
notification that the contents were libellous, it withdrew an attack
which Mr Adoko had placed on the internet against the solicitor who
had acted for the Law Society in the course of his litigation.
10.Further, he has brought claims against the Lord Chancellor's
Department, alleging judicial corruption. Essentially he has asserted
that the decisions made against him were only made because the judges
who decided against him were corrupt. Perhaps the flavour of the type
of litigation, and the allegations that he has seen fit to make, can
be gleaned from a statement of claim which he served in his action
against the Lord Chancellor. I quote from that statement of claim
which i
|
| |
| |
In message <10503184.0410310324.63623e0c@posting.google.com>, Alexander
Baron <A_Baron@ABaron.Demon.Co.UK> writes
Do you have an email address that actually works?
By the way, the vexatious litigant site at
http://www.geocities.com/vexatious_litigant/ seems to be down when I try to
access it. Is that a temporary problem or is it to be moved elsewhere? It
was a very useful site.
I think Ewing has taken it down, I'll have a word with him and if he
is still of that mind I'll set it up at another url; he's a bit of a
strange bloke, check out his antipetersainsbury site for the reason.
As regards Dr ADOKO. He is a lawyer readers and is an Ugandan gentleman,
now in his seventies who wrote a book after coming to England and
discovering the CORRUPTION HE CAME ACROSS and exposing it.
Marshall Rice knows him well readers because of two cases
= Adoko v Marshall Rice!!!
I do believe Rice should watch out for him still. As the tide wave will
soon arrive regarding this fast receding status of MP`s and Lawyers
and towards exposing British corruption.
Adoko is I understand is still about!!!.
You don't? He tells his story here every week! I'll not copy it, but
one telling of it is here - "My Case Background":
http://tinyurl.com/4gxsl
Read it, and you'll probably agree with Dave's analysis.
It's a very worrying account, isn't it? If you dig a little deeper,
though, as a few of us did some years ago, it soon becomes apparent that
(1) it's no more than another piece of News of the World style
journalism by the late Simon Regan, who was to accuracy and impartiality
what Alaric the Goth was to diplomacy, and bears little relation to the
truth; (2) Roger's not only misunderstood the law, but ignored every
explanation of it that's been offered; (3) he's actually been dealt with
quite fairly by the courts.
If any uk.legal reader should wish to have a copy of my most hard
hitting Booklet do let me know. I also have some of the late Simon
Ragan`s ones (in association with SCANDALS IN JUSTICE).
CLASSIC
MISCARRIAGES
OF
JUSTICE
The Pig Farmers Nightmare
The continuing nightmare ordeal of
Roger Jones and his fight to expose
corruption in the judiciary
Taken from Scallywag Magazine
Issue 36 September 1998
--
Roger J. P. Jones
--
Roger J. P. Jones
|
| |
| |
|
