If Pilate Had Dispensed Solomonic Justice...
2 November 2004
{HRI 20041102}
If Pilate would have had the wisdom of King Solomon
when facing the Criminal Mind and High Priest Caiaphas,

If Pilate Had Dispensed Solomonic Justice...
2 November 2004
{HRI 20041102}
If Pilate would have had the wisdom of King Solomon

If Pilate Had Dispensed Solomonic Justice...
2 November 2004
{HRI 20041102}
If Pilate would have had the wisdom of King Solomon
when facing the Criminal Mind and High Priest Caiaphas,
then Pilate would of course have arrested this High Priest, Caiaphas,
on the grounds of
accomplished incitement to Criminal acts and public
Injustice, *(1)
on the grounds of
proven and mortally false accusations against Jesus *(2)

on the grounds of
proven public incitement *(3) to executing not only an
innocent but also extremely valuable, contributive person.
And then, Pilate would of course have had the High Priest Caiaphas,
after arresting him,
publicly whipped in front of the very crowd
from which the High Priest Caiaphas was hiding
that not Jesus but that he, Caiaphas himself was the
Criminal Mind destroying their lives. *(4)
And then, by way of fulfilling the demand of Caiaphas that
"the people want to see someone put to death," *(5)
Pilate would of course have had the High Priest Caiaphas crucified.
Let this be a lesson - mutatis mutandis* - to entirely Lawless
law students and lawyers, and
to equally Lawless public prosecutors and judges, and
to equally Lawless diplomats and journalists and politicians
and civil servants
to the utter amazement and dismay of the alert public
and to the detriment of the concerned public,
- if we study only a little bit of history at all,
or if we read some 'Legal Expertise' in any field -
when the not at all imaginary case applies,
that such 'servants of the public' either are too cowardly
to exert the viewpoint, or
that they DO NOT EVEN WANT to have a viewpoint
on what actually is Lawless and what is Lawful. *(6)
And when they DO have a viewpoint on what IS Lawless and what IS
Law[ful]
- as most people do have very well a viewpoint on that,
after all it is native to the normal, non-Criminal mind
to have a conscience -
then why do they not want to exert that viewpoint that they do
have?
Solely and only because they are afraid to get hit by
Criminal Minds,
because Criminal Minds USE RULES AND LAWS AND
REGULATIONS AND PROTOCOLS
IN REVERSE.
Criminal Minds USE laws and regulations and rules
in order to ENFORCE THEIR DESTRUCTIVE IMPULSES ON
PEOPLE, on you and me, on everyone. *(7)
You can observe them trying to make rules (and
even laws) to that effect,
if you look at all around you or at the
news.
That is the easiest thing to observe in the society,
because 'applying rules or laws destructively' is already
done to children, at school, even at home, and so on and
on.
It is time that you start to face Criminal Minds - they make up
only one percent of the population, and
they are the ones that you pay every year trillions of
dollars in defense and anti-terror measures, as well as
your monthly medical insurance for, *(9)
for your intensely insane *(10) and utter laziness in NOT
detecting them and NOT understanding them. *(11)(12)
So, do now for yourself, and for your children, and also for me,
what I would suggest to the sane and caring minds amongst you.
As always, I inform you in accordance with
'The Trinity of Science.'
Koos Nolst Trenite "Cause Trinity"
human rights philosopher and poet
'Men of all nations came
to listen to Solomon's wisdom,
sent by all the kings of the world,
who had heard of his wisdom.'
1 Kings 4:34
_________
Footnotes:
(1) 'Detecting Criminal Minds By Their Intentional Omission Of Truth'
(19 August 2002 - Version 1.2)

(2) '"What Do You Think Of Jesus Christ?"' (28 April 2004)

(3) 'Criminal Minds Know Themselves Very Well They Are Lying'
{HRI 20040520-V1.3} (20 May 2004) (Version 1.3 at 21 May 2004)

(4) 'Only 'Zero Tolerance For Criminal Minds' Can Tolerate Them'
{HRI 20040205-V3.0-beta-1-p2}
(Preview 1 of Version 3.0 part two, on 30 Oct 2004)

(5) 'Standard Responses Of Criminal Minds' (9 May 2003)

(6) 'Tolerance Defined In Holland (The Netherlands)' (25 Dec 2002)

(7) 'Only 'Zero Tolerance For Criminal Minds' Can Tolerate Them'
{HRI 20040205-V3.0-beta-1-p1}
(Preview 1 of Version 3.0 part one, on 26 Oct 2004)

(8) 'Learning And Reading - Leonardo Da Vinci and Galileo Galilei had
an excellent command of reading and writing' {HRI 20040811}
(11 August 2004)

If Pilate Had Dispensed Solomonic Justice...

On 1 Nov 2004 11:44:36 -0800, AmbassadorForMankind@hotmail.com (Koos
Nolst Trenite) wrote:
he would never have been prefect of Judea. The Roman occupiers wanted
order, not justice. Pilate gave them what they paid him for, until
even the Romans were so appalled at his viciousness that they gave him
the sack.

If Pilate Had Dispensed Solomonic Justice...
2 November 2004
{HRI 20041102}
If Pilate would have had the wisdom of King Solomon
when facing the Criminal Mind and High Priest Caiaphas,

If you read John Chapter 10, you will find that the so called Jews, are
going to stone Jesus.

So, instead of a cross in churches, you'd have a pile of rocks.

Admiral Crunch wrote:
Or Christians wearing little electric chairs around their necks.

robert j. kolker wrote:
Whoops. I should have written, Christians wearing little pebbles on
chains around their necks. Instead of making the sign of the cross, the
would do the motion of a right handed overhand throw.

"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:bA8jd.372436$D%.213118@attbi_s51...

Or just imagine if it had been say the Turks, so they wear a little
impailing stake, ouch.
But I though a large part of the problem was under Roman law local courts
couldn't impose a death sentince, so they had to come up with something the
Romans would off him for, solving their problem and forfilling prophacy in
one neat move, opps.

"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:bA8jd.372436$D%.213118@attbi_s51...

Nicholas Smid wrote:
...
So reconcile that Roman policy with the story of the woman taken in
adultery, who was about to be stoned to death. Did local customs,
even involving killing, apply in some cases but not others? Say, in
matters of moral but not criminal offenses?
Anyway, if he had been stoned, there would be learned discussions
about how his telling Peter that he was the rock on which the church
would be built was foreshadowing of his own death and linked in
indescribable (but nevertheless described at great length) ways with
life, death and Earth (and thence Heaven and Hell). Altars even more
massively rock-like than some are anyway. No cross but maybe a
big picture of Jesus holding the first rock, which he miraculously
caught and then made the subject of a brief sermon before the crowd
got their bearings back and started stoning in earnest. Bloodstained
(?) stones of dubious provenance in elaborate containers in churches.
Dome Of The Rock (oops, wrong religion). Mount Ararat, Mount
Sinai, Mount of Olives, Temple Mount ... rocks, rocks, rocks ...