On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, krp wrote:
I really think it had to do with the Bush Administration's
"Politics of Fear."
Of course you and Carol would. That'e because your politics have taken
you both into the vaccum of space.
I have seen evidence of the politics of fear.
What politics of fear, you might ask.
Some might ask. Some might even deny it when the evidence is presented to
them.
The Bush politics of fear included, but was not limited to:
fear of gays, fear of terrorism, fear of Kerry taking away their
Bibles.
You are TOTALLY fukking clueless aren't ya? You have NO idea why almost
60 MILLION American REJECT your BULLSHIT do you?
What bull#@($ was that?
I kid you not!! In ARK and W.VA the republican party distributed
literature stating that Kerry was going to take everyone's Bibles
away, proving how low they were willing to go to invoke fear. On the
front of one such envelope was a picture of a Bible with the word
"BANNED" slapped across it. In addition, it said: "This will be
Arkansas...if you don't vote."
... SO you are botching
botching? botching?
because some WIERD
WEIRD or WIRED?
preacher in incest ridden Arkansas passed out some leaflets,
are you reading impaired. I thought he said "republican party
distributed literature."
how does that compare to Dan Rather TOTALLY manufacturing a story
to GET BUSH?
He was certainly taken in, but Rather did not TOTALLY manufacture it.
You justy
justy?
do NOT understand why a GROWING number of your fellow
Americans think you people need to be sent to rubber rooms.
What is that supposed to mean?
Lest you suggest that I am imagining this was done by the
Republicans, the tactic was defended by Christine Iverson, a
spokeswoman for the Republican National Committee who said it was in
response to activist judges who want to recognize same-sex marriage
and remove the 'under God' from the Pledge.
Do you NOT understand the problem with UN-ELECTED activist Judges
writing the laws?
Many concepts which come out of the court become the rule of law.
Just who are these activist justices? Scalia? Rehnquist? O'Connor?
Thomas? Ginsberg? Who?
I want you to yank your head out of the place you have been hiding
it and to THINK. I know you haven't done that in years.
How do you "know" that?
TRY to think of Bush appointing thousands of RIGHT
WING activist judges who want to make LAWS their way!
That is not to difficult to imagine, especially with the announcement of
Ashcroft leaving the adminstration.
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
Naw you don't have the IQ to consider the dismal failure of
your illogical arguments.
I haven't seen you show that his arguments were illogical. I have seen,
however, you distort what he has said. He said republican literature
from the republican party. You translate that to "'wierd' preacher in
incest ridden Arkansas." How logical is that? Not very. Just desperate.
You just don't THINK! You've been pre-programmed
and you just replay the bull#@($ endlessly.
You have proven nothing to be bull#@($.
Nothing.
" ... the real difference between liberals and conservatives in this
country is that conservatives think sex is very, very important and
liberals think sex is essentially trivial. ... " --Jane Haddam
http://www.janehaddam.com/chd/sex.html
