misc.legal

> Phil, > > I may be mistaken --- I have not read all of the posts about the legal > proceedings --- but it seems to me that you are seriously misreading > the import of the freeze. My impression is that the main issue is > whether the sale of the bu

There is a 'rumor' that Sam doesn't wear any. :) Tom Klem "Leopold" <chessguy@qwest.net> wrote in message news:g8bsd.48$R86.34470@news.uswest.net... > > "Matt Nemmers" <qcchess@mcnospamhsi.com> wrote in message > news:N68sd.506051$D%.21418@at

"S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> writes: >Stephen M. Adams wrote: >> "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> writes: >> > > I was NOT giving legal advice. None. >> > >> > Good thing then, since your advice was utterly >> > bogus, both legally and logicall

"S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> writes: >Stephen M. Adams wrote: >> It's going to be WISCONSIN that determines if he answered >> truthfully or not. I hope he doesn't follow your very BAD >> advice. > >Wrong again you blithering idiot. The Full Fa

In article <RRFOKPQL38324.6051273148@anonymous.poster> assnonymous <Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote: > >On 2 Dec 2004, faxhor@hotmail.com wrote: > ><snip> If any there were any proof of your dualistic theory. >"By eliminating certai

Phil, My dear friend. I was shocked at the sheer number of 501(c)3 organizations in the US promoting chess. As I see it, there should be one coherent plan of action regarding these organizations. I do not know if that is currently the case. Does the

That's how they lead you around by the nose, Sam. They let you think you know 'something', and you do their bidding. -- Tom Klem And, the third rail of USCF politics is Bill Goichberg. Say something bad about him ... off to the gulag (TDCC, Et

"Matt Nemmers" <qcchess@mcnospamhsi.com> wrote in message news:N68sd.506051$D%.21418@attbi_s51... > "Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message > news:41b1099e.14879000@ca.news.verio.net... > > Word or rumor is flying around that Beatriz Mari

"Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message news:41af0b4a.10237453@ca.news.verio.net... > At 01:33 AM 12/2/2004 EST, Chesspride@aol.com wrote: > >In a message dated 12/1/04 10:32:41 AM Eastern Standard Time, > >samsloan@samsloan.com writes:

On 2 Dec 2004 19:05:10 -0800, Barbara Schwarz wrote: > I wish I would understand what you guys are posting about. But > Hipcrime and Dipslime sounds really bad, really really bad. It sounds > maximum security prison bad. It sounds so bad that Homeland

Also i think you can sometimes get a record expunged!

Dont know if this would have effect but write on your check: PAID IN FULL FOR BILL WITH INVOICE NUMBER Y. If they dont want to accept the payment with the payment as designated, then they can return your uncashed check!

>> Well, Penn's response to the motion was all of ten words: "There he goes >> again. Parker's 60(b) motion should be denied." >> >> There was also a footnote explaining where the quote came from. > > Concise. Simple. Direct. Humorous. Accurate. C

"S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> writes: >Stephen M. Adams wrote: >> >> It appears you are talking about a state job in WI, so you >> need to know what the Wisconsin rules are. > >Wrong again dipstick. His record and crime weren't in WI, >they were

"S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> writes: >> > Why do you insist on spewing completely bogus legal >> > "advice" ? >> >> I was NOT giving legal advice. None. > >Good thing then, since your advice was utterly >bogus, both legally and logically.

On 2 Dec 2004, faxhor@hotmail.com wrote: <snip> "By eliminating certain fears by hypnosis, curing my rheumatism and laying off hormones, I hope to restore my former libido. I must! By hypnosis I must be convinced as follows: You like to have y

"Cleopatra" <Cleo@linkedto.cypherprivacy.com> wrote in message news:4d16fd73.0412021812.d546dca@posting.google.com... > Crowfoot <suzych@swcp.com> wrote in message > news:<comepj$mfr$6@iruka.swcp.com>... >> In article <ip0tq0hpcu4f02eja8r261br9b17

In article <1102102785.cMpBSWnkXVgzVgjTdK3h0Q@teranews> "Pastor Frank" <PF@christfirst.com> writes: > "Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message > news:co2vhl$1bq$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu... > > In article <4ko9q0dfaj7s7k2r2btqch0uiau

<christian@velocitus.net> wrote in message news:l4u1r05vddmanh2guqvaunehccau53cgmr@4ax.com... > Hello "Bob" <BOB@BOB.BOB>, > you posted in alt.religion.christianity : > > > ><christian@velocitus.net> wrote in message > >news:20c1r0hjhtf9hr51fhpu3t

> > > >In article <cnvkp0phth6990mgo200lm5sjh3n9kvpri@4ax.com>, me@privacy.net says... > > > >>After I recovered from the shock of having just been in an accident > >>caused on purpose by some psychopath who has a thing about people > >>driving behi

> Translation: Ray moves for yet another court loss. Well, Penn's response to the motion was all of ten words: "There he goes again. Parker's 60(b) motion should be denied." There was also a footnote explaining where the quote came from.

In n3Xrd.6345$_C2.915@trndny01, Ray Gordon <ray@cybersheet.com> shared the these words: <snip> Translation: Ray moves for yet another court loss. -- Rusty The preceding message reflects my beliefs and opinions. Veracity of statements is left to

I agree. Except to say he'll most certainly want to speak with a lawyer. > Thom, > > I don't think that you'll convince anyone of the illegality of their > actions, this sounds like a civil matter. You may wish to speak with a > lawyer. Bri

Stephen M. Adams wrote: > "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> writes: > > > Stephen M. Adams wrote: > > > "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > "Stephen M. Adams" wrote: > > > > > > > > > Give me a break. If the state of

In article <jj9sd.325$C76.2714@news.uswest.net>, S. O. Damocles <so@damocl.es> wrote: > > Who cares what they ask, or how they ask it dip#@($. > The fact is he is AUTHORIZED by LAW to DENY > it. > > > > > > You are banking on WI ignoring a f

In article <CC8sd.314$C76.2627@news.uswest.net>, S. O. Damocles <so@damocl.es> wrote: > > Once again dip#@($, he is AUTHORIZED by LAW to DENY it! > What part don't you comprehend? > Interviewer: We asked you last week if you'd ever been arre

S. O. Damocles wrote: [...] The LAW specifically AUTHORIZES him to > DENY the event, no matter how the questions is phrased. [...] The incident took place in the state of NY five years ago. the records were expunged, image deleted. I want to apply i

Melissa wrote: > boogieman <dan040@sympatico.ca> wrote : > > > I would say most of us are hunters and have had been > > confronted by tresspassers before but none of us have > > ever felt this could happen to them. > > > > I'll be pointing my gun

James H. Hood wrote: > S. O. Damocles <so@damocl.es> wrote in message > news:W2Qod.15$8o5.21662@news.uswest.net... > > boogieman wrote: > > > I would say most of us are hunters and have had been > > > confronted by tresspassers before but none of us

On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 07:21:37 -0800, "David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote: >http://money.cnn.com/2004/12/03/news/economy/jobless_november/index.htm? >cnn=yes > >NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Job growth slowed significantly in November, >according to a g

sloan@ishipress.com (Sam Sloan) wrote in message news:<41b01503.10260625@ca.news.verio.net>... > On 2 Dec 2004 20:44:38 -0800, robmtchl@bellsouth.net (Rob Mitchell) > wrote: > > >Grant, > >I looked up the organizations information. It is a 501(c) 3.

avik Kang wrote: > "Dcjtee" <dcjtee@aol.com> wrote in message > news:20041202105953.06685.00000715@mb-m24.aol.com... > > > The article is nothing more than propaganda and > > > rhetoric staraight out of al jazeera and you are > > > nothing more than

Thats real nice. Its great how Pakistan, who the US needs in their war on terror, can continue to have a dictatorship. Please, Mr. Bush, spread some more freaking freedom in the world. "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> wrote in message news:aV2s

Stephen M. Adams wrote: > "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> writes: > > > "Stephen M. Adams" wrote: > > > > > Give me a break. If the state of Wisconsin, Department > > > of Corrections is *authorized* by WI to ask about > > > expunged

Agrypa Wielki <agrypa1@_poczta.onet.pl> writes: >S. O. Damocles wrote: >[...] The LAW specifically AUTHORIZES him to >> DENY the event, no matter how the questions is phrased. >[...] >The incident took place in the state of NY five years ago. the r

Colin Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 20:43:43 GMT, > 7h3_n3ck_r0m4nc3r@salmahayeksknockers.edu wrote: > > > > > Course we also know they, along with Syria, have been > > > fighting the US in Iraq. > > > > How do you know that? > > I don't

"S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> writes: <SOD's blather which ignores the point deleted.> >>If the question is NOT illegal, and you don't answer truthfully ("even >>expunged") then you have filed a false application. > >Wrong again #@($head. The

You may NOT use the Service as follows: (d) to bombard individuals or newsgroups with uninvited communications, data or information, or other similar activities, including but not limited to "spamming", "flaming" or denial or distributed denial of s

Stephen M. Adams wrote: > "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> writes: > > Stephen M. Adams wrote: > > > "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> writes: > > > > > > I was NOT giving legal advice. None. > > > > > > > > Good thing then, since your advice was utt

<christian@velocitus.net> wrote in message news:20c1r0hjhtf9hr51fhpu3tqh2qg5vmkec4@4ax.com... > Hello "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster>, > you posted in alt.religion.christianity : > >In our last episode <llcuq091b45p36jja5jfvoov0hptqvva9c

'Confirmation' for my hypothesis from this august organ http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1365181,00.html Friday December 3, 2004 The Guardian <...> "In a number of well-publicised recent criminal cases, experts have been challenged on the

"1MAN4ALL" <forahmad@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ba13f877.0412030934.56775813@posting.google.com.. Bull#@($. Even if they did, the dogs would appreciate Bar-B-Q instead of simply "Iraqi Chunks & Bits"!

Arthur L. Rubin wrote: > "Stephen M. Adams" wrote: > > > Give me a break. If the state of Wisconsin, Department > > of Corrections is *authorized* by WI to ask about > > expunged conviction, then it does not matter one fig what > > NY says. Do you

Stephen M. Adams wrote: > "S. O. Damocles" <so@damocl.es> writes: > > Stephen M. Adams wrote: > > > > It's going to be WISCONSIN that determines if he > > > answered truthfully or not. I hope he doesn't follow > > > your very BAD > > > advice. >

forahmad@hotmail.com (1MAN4ALL) wrote in message news:<ba13f877.0412030934.56775813@posting.google.com>... > nabbas69@softhome.net (gutrench) wrote in message news:<589d9550.0412030220.6ce0bc4d@posting.google.com>... > > > When the U Shit of A was usi

On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 16:42:58 GMT, nospam@isp.com wrote: >On 01 Dec 2004, Lisa <nobody@home.com> in apparent law-pertinent part >said/asked in substance: > >> [ Soon after my recently deceased mother gave my alcoholic >> brother a general POA a f

>> Alternatively, I have moved the Court to supplement the record on >> appeal with the new evidence, and the related pleadings which are >> pending. >> > > I could make all kinds of valid responses to your posted text. Instead > I'll > just ask w