|
|
>"Stephen M. Adams" wrote:
>> Give me a break. If the state of Wisconsin, Department of Corrections
>> is *authorized* by WI to ask about expunged conviction, then it does
>> not matter one fig what NY says. Do you really want to assert that NY
>>
|
|
|
On 2 Dec 2004 13:43:39 -0800, faxhor@hotmail.com (Faxhor) wrote:
more junk, fixed by inserting some content into the thread
Using the swaztika is absolutely acceptable in describing
scientology
They covertly use it themselves on their
|
|
|
In article <HFtsd.31$mQ6.17324@news.uswest.net>, _News Server_
<news@usenet.org> wrote:
> truckinsp wrote:
> >> "Stephen M. Adams" wrote:
> >
> >>> Give me a break. If the state of Wisconsin, Department of
> >>> Corrections is *authorized* by WI
|
|
|
mstrhypno@earthlink.net (Lee Darrow) wrote in
news:815b360f.0412040018.40ae882a@posting.google.com:
> "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message
> news:<Qy4sd.427$IB6.219@trndny06>...
>> >> Well, Penn's response to the motion was all of te
|
|
|
Chess One wrote:
> > Phil, Have your ever served as a delegate to the USCF? WOuld you be
> > inclined to participate in such ?
>
> Dear Rob,
>
> No I have not served, and I may have some conflicts of interest since
I also
> work directly, and in
|
|
|
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in
news:Wfdsd.298$gF5.198@trndny01:
> Here's what Agnar's post SNIPPED (the part about the court telling
> Penn to file a "substantive response" rather than the 10 words it
> filed).
Amazing! ray gordon c
|
|
|
NadCixelsyd wrote:
> Based on a movie I just watched.
> What's the difference between Bond and Bail? I sometimes hear "$1000
> bail, or $3000 bond".
> OK, suppose I put up $1000 bail and then flee. Two years later, I'm
> captured. Do I g
|
|
|
truckinsp wrote:
[...]
> Why are you trying so hard to "rationalize" this?
My original question pertains to job applications [...]
thanks
Agrypa
|
|
|
"Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message
news:41b11533.17844156@ca.news.verio.net...
> On Sat, 04 Dec 2004 01:09:01 GMT, "Matt Nemmers"
> <qcchess@mcnospamhsi.com> wrote:
>
>>"Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message
>>news:41b10
|
|
|
|
|
|
>My original question pertains to job applications [...]
>thanks
>Agrypa
Really????? hmmmmm......I doubt that it it pertains to job applications, I
think it pertains to you specifically trying to get a job as a
CO......somehow, I don't think a law
|
|
|
On 2 Dec 2004 13:26:21 -0800, faxhor@hotmail.com (Faxhor)
>DISCRIMINATION AGAINST AFRICAN AMERICANS:
>Part I
>David Touretzky: "There should be a video game where you can beat
>Rodney King."
>
Hey, if there's a market for it, there would be one
|
|
|
On 04 Dec 2004 23:04:09 GMT, jdrew63929@aol.com (Jan) wrote:
>Lawyers for the plaintiffs argue that Rosenthal is liable because
>posting the comments makes her a "developer" of the information in
>question, and she therefore becomes the legal equival
|
|
|
>Hi,
>Let me cite what they actually ask for:
>On the Application supplement for a correction officer it reads:
>++++++++++++++
....
>2) Have you been convicted or fined for any offense including traffic
>but not parking or speeding? (Include offens
|
|
|
truckinsp wrote:
>> "Stephen M. Adams" wrote:
>
>>> Give me a break. If the state of Wisconsin, Department of
>>> Corrections is *authorized* by WI to ask about expunged conviction,
>>> then it does not matter one fig what NY says. Do you really wan
|
|
|
"OrionCA" <OrionCA@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:7f92r01odi4vrcqtn3f4icoon3vjc7ubp0@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 07:21:37 -0800, "David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> >http://money.cnn.com/2004/12/03/news/economy/jobless_november
|
|
|
"Ilena Rose" <ilena@san.rr.com> wrote in message
news:tln4r01lvqcu9mostssp6ah1gepsfeljg3@4ax.com...
> On 04 Dec 2004 23:04:09 GMT, jdrew63929@aol.com (Jan) wrote:
>
>>Lawyers for the plaintiffs argue that Rosenthal is liable because
>>posting the
|
|
|
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote in message news:<Qy4sd.427$IB6.219@trndny06>...
> >> Well, Penn's response to the motion was all of ten words: "There he goes
> >> again. Parker's 60(b) motion should be denied."
> >>
> >> There was also a fo
|
|
|
> I've read that there's at least one state (Florida) that has
> something resembling a "wealth" or "net worth" tax.I've also
> read that there's at least one state that has an "inhertitence"
> tax (not to be confused with an "estate" tax).
> Can an
|
|
|
In alt.politics.usa.republican Eyeball Kid <jfm6949@nospam.ispwest.com> wrote:
: In article <41b1b019.57497703@ca.news.verio.net>, Sam Sloan
: <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote:
: > Kenneth Starr says he shouldn't have been involved in Lewinsky case
: >
|
|
|
ote: German newsgroups trimmed (de.soc.*)
================================================================
"...I can have the very same bomb-making info on MY web site..."
- CMU UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR David Touretzky
===================================
|
|
|
ew York Times
December 5, 2004
Rulings in Texas Capital Cases Try Supreme Court's Patience
By ADAM LIPTAK and RALPH BLUMENTHAL
In the past year, the Supreme Court has heard three appeals from
inmates on death row in Texas, and in each case the pr
|
|
|
Faxhor@hotmail.com: Tilman's posting is not totally honest,
it contains lies. Such as his statement
about human rights. You can read about
Tilman:
http://www.relig
|
|
|
LMAO!!! So true, though.
sloan@ishipress.com (Sam Sloan) wrote in message news:<41b1b92c.59820812@ca.news.verio.net>...
> Eventually, just about everybody figured out that Ken Starr was gay,
> which explained why he was so obsessed with the subject
|
|
|
In our last episode <t5n3r0tuo4jnblmnmkjigqmhhfqnmv1b9s@4ax.com>,
christian lept out of the bushes shouting:
> You are welcome to your opinion. Of course that is all it is. . .opinion.
I see. This from the guy who prefaced his opinion with "as an
|
|
|
On 1 Dec 2004 12:07:06 -0800, faxhor@hotmail.com (Faxhor)
>Barbara Schwarz (StilllovingMarty@myway.com) wrote:
>>>>>> If you want to read some racial remarks, read what
>>>>>> Dave Touretzky wrote about blacks and others.
>
>Like this one:
>
>==
|
|
|
Tony Cottell developed the Roach Motel System of USCF Finances. Any
money that came in did not go out.
He was a CPA who was twice elected treasurer. It was during the terms
of Tony Cottell as USCF Treasurer that the USCF built up a reserve of
two mi
|
|
|
In article <41b1b019.57497703@ca.news.verio.net>, Sam Sloan
<sloan@ishipress.com> wrote:
> Kenneth Starr says he shouldn't have been involved in Lewinsky case
>
> The Associated Press
>
> SANTA BARBARA, Calif. (AP) - Kenneth Starr says he never
|
|
|
"Kavik Kang" <Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<j3esd.978$yr1.388@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
> "gutrench" <nabbas69@softhome.net> wrote in message
> news:589d9550.0412031327.2ad01d6c@posting.google.com...
> > "Don Wagner" <donw10
|
|
|
"Kavik Kang" <Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<s3esd.979$yr1.896@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
> "gutrench" <nabbas69@softhome.net> wrote in message
> news:589d9550.0412031805.6bbf42c6@posting.google.com...
> > forahmad@hotmail.com
|
|
|
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 08:30:03 -0500, "StanB" <stanbooz@comXXXcast.net>
wrote:
>
>"Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message
>news:41b12975.23029968@ca.news.verio.net...
>
>>>I believe she is seriously considering my request, because she kno
|
|
|
arbara Schwarz (StilllovingMarty@myway.com) wrote:
>>>>>>> If you want to read some racial remarks, read what
>>>>>>> Dave Touretzky wrote about blacks and others.
Like this one:
================================================================
"S
|
|
|
Eventually, just about everybody figured out that Ken Starr was gay,
which explained why he was so obsessed with the subject of blow jobs.
At least, if he is finally sent to prison, they will put him in the
gay tank, where he will find lots of friend
|
|
|
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 10:59:09 -0700, Bobby wrote:
> "keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
> news:pan.2004.12.02.03.37.30.191422@att.bizzzz...
>> On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 17:18:29 -0700, Bobby wrote:
>>
>>> "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in mess
|
|
|
Ray Fischer opined thusly on Dec 4:
> Scott Marquardt <wasREMOVEket5@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>Ray Fischer opined thusly on Dec 2:
>>> Scott Marquardt <wasREMOVEket5@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Palliative care for those
>>>>known to be dying is not ad
|
|
|
Kenneth Starr says he shouldn't have been involved in Lewinsky case
The Associated Press
SANTA BARBARA, Calif. (AP) - Kenneth Starr says he never should have
led the investigation that resulted in the impeachment of former
President Bill Clinton.
|
|
|
>Agrypa Wielki wrote
>"Hi,
Let me cite what they actually ask for: On the Application supplement for a
correction officer it reads:
++++++++++++++
2) Have you been convicted or fined for any offense including traffic but not
parking or speeding?
|
|
|
Hi Rob.
Thank you for this address to a central topic.
"Rob Mitchell" <robmtchl@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:b78177d4.0412032225.435cb1f8@posting.google.com...
> Phil,
> My dear friend.
> I was shocked at the sheer number of 501(c)3 org
|
|
|
On 1 Dec 2004 13:22:36 -0800, faxhor@hotmail.com (Faxhor)
>Why did you snip all the relevant information about Touretzky
>from my posting?
Because it wasn't even accurate let alone relevant.
> Are you afraid of knowledge or was it
>censorship
|
|
|
On 4 Dec 2004 02:14:53 -0800, leo@leopoldoperdomo.com (leopoldo)
>Mike Z. Helm <mhelm@not.known> wrote in message news:<j7uuq0hp9e4vu3gej1qmck899o6kcppnmg@4ax.com>...
>> On 1 Dec 2004 09:40:13 -0800, jtnospam@yahoo.com (jitney)
>>
>> >Pat Sajak,
|
|
|
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 18:52:32 -0800, OrionCA <OrionCA@earthlink.net>
>You're screwed.
>
>Bush won, Kerry lost.
We would have been screwed either way.
--
There's no way to delay that trouble comin' everyday
|
|
|
John Oliver <joliver@john-oliver.net> wrote in message news:<slrncr1m28.q7q.joliver@ns.sdsitehosting.net>...
> On 2 Dec 2004 19:05:10 -0800, Barbara Schwarz wrote:
> > I wish I would understand what you guys are posting about. But
> > Hipcrime and Dips
|
|
|
John Oliver <joliver@john-oliver.net> wrote in message news:<slrncr1m28.q7q.joliver@ns.sdsitehosting.net>...
> On 2 Dec 2004 19:05:10 -0800, Barbara Schwarz wrote:
> > I wish I would understand what you guys are posting about. But
> > Hipcrime and Dips
|
|
|
> Stephen M. Adams wrote
">And when someone shows the report in the newspaper to the employer, what does
he say? "
Welllllll, "Prove it" comes to mind.
So, suppose he was *falsely* arrested for something --- and thats why the
matter was expun
|
|
|
>Stephen M. Adams wrote
">Once somebody starts name-calling, it's a sure sign they have lost the
argument."
LOL !!!!!!!!! In misc.legal ??!!! Around here, thats *normal*....
-----
have a GREAT day !!!!
Solar
|
|
|
Thenotifier@africamail.com (The Notifier) wrote in message news:<b7e1ffad.0412040558.2f6b90e8@posting.google.com>...
> http://www.tahoebonanza.com/article/20041203/Business/112030008
>
> Makes North Lake Tahoe Bonanza. Registration required. Article
|
|
|
S. O. Damocles wrote
">None likely since the expungement law itself gives you the legal authority to
DENY any event took place."
And one *would* think the thread would die here.... <g>
------
have a GREAT day !!!!!
Solar
|
|
|
>Stephen M. Adams wrote
">I don't think you know what you are talking about. In fact, I'm sure of it.
If the guys friends or neighbors are asked about it, and they tell the truth,
there is no chance they will be prosecuted for it. If they say "yes,
|
|
|
Phil,
Thank you for your kind words. I believe them to be true. In my
involvement in previous organisations dealing with volunteers ect; one
thing became evident. If we did not recruit new membership we would
die. The second part of the equation was g
|
|
|
Phil,
Thank you for your kind words. I believe them to be true. In my
involvement in previous organisations dealing with volunteers ect; one
thing became evident. If we did not recruit new membership we would
die. The second part of the equation was g
|
|