|
Hi All, I have heard many times that in US child under 12 years old can't stay home alone. What code regulates this? What penalties and exceptions? Thanks, Leo
|
| |
| |
Hi All, I have heard many times that in US child under 12 years old can't stay
home
alone. What code regulates this? What penalties and exceptions? Thanks, Leo
That varies from state to state. 12 is generally accepted when a child can handle certain duties that younger ones can not. Also, a 12 year old is now allowed to do the babysitting.
|
| |
| |
"Leonid" <le_le_to@hotmail.!!!NO-SPAM!!!.com> wrote in news:x4idnQb6Maxk1CLcRVn-qQ@comcast.com:
Hi All, I have heard many times that in US child under 12 years old can't stay home alone. What code regulates this? What penalties and exceptions? Thanks, Leo
This would be covered under each state's laws, so the exact codes, specifics details regarding what's covered, and the penalties and exceptions will vary from state to state.
|
| |
| |
Well, since the Red Cross sponsors baby-sitting classes for 11 yo and up, I would question your notion that a 12 yo cannot stay home alone. Haven't you seen the movie "Home alone?" Seriously, it depends on the maturity of the child, and his mental capacity. There are some special needs children who might never be able to stay home alone. AFAIK, very few states would codify such an indivdualized situation. IOW, I am guessing there are NO statutes on the books. Now, CPS involvement is a different story. Often individual caseworkers, shall we say, misrepresent laws. See NG alt support child protective services. Or write Leonard, Webmaster at: http://www.familyrightsassociation.com Leo asked:
Subject: Why under 12 years old can't be home alone? From: "Leonid" le_le_to@hotmail.!!!NO-SPAM!!!.com Date: 12/14/2004 3:12 P.M. Eastern Standard Time Message-id: <x4idnQb6Maxk1CLcRVn-qQ@comcast.com> Hi All, I have heard many times that in US child under 12 years old can't stay home alone. What code regulates this? What penalties and exceptions? Thanks, Leo
|
| |
| |
Leonid wrote:
Hi All, I have heard many times that in US child under 12 years old can't
stay home
alone. What code regulates this? What penalties and exceptions? Thanks, Leo
It's a matter of state law, and even then it's not stated in so many words. Neglecting a child is an offense of some kind anywhere. Usually, if the neglect puts the child in significant danger, it becomes a felony. So the interesting question is whether leaving a child under 12 home alone constitutes neglect. This will vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and situation to situation. There are responsible 11-year olds who may even safely be entrusted with other people's children in safe situations where help is easily summoned. There are irresponsible 17-year-olds who can't be trusted not to burn down the house by accident. It's entirely possible to have both in the same family. Two situations in which a possibly unnecessary big deal may be made over a child left at home are: A divorce, with disputes over custody and child support. One parent may see an advantage in portraying an innocent situation as neglect. As with other divorce issues, this can get really vicious. When abuse or neglect is reported to Child Protective Services (or whatever the relevant agency is known as locally). When CPS gets involved, it is obliged to investigate any report that can't clearly be dismissed as unfounded. CPS investigators may be short on perspective or compassion, and they are frequently obliged to avoid being criticized for missing a case of serious neglect rather than to use common sense. -- Not a lawyer, Chris Green
|
| |
| |
Neglecting a child is an offense of some kind anywhere. Usually, if the neglect puts the child in significant danger, it becomes a felony. So the interesting question is whether leaving a child under 12 home alone constitutes neglect. This will vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and situation to situation. There are responsible 11-year olds who may even safely be entrusted with other people's children in safe situations where help is easily summoned. There are irresponsible 17-year-olds who can't be trusted not to burn down the house by accident.
The same applies to some 50-year-olds.
It's entirely possible to have both in the same family. Two situations in which a possibly unnecessary big deal may be made over a child left at home are: A divorce, with disputes over custody and child support. One parent may see an advantage in portraying an innocent situation as neglect. As with other divorce issues, this can get really vicious.
Isn't it generally considered malpractice by a divorce attorney to NOT advise their client to accuse their soon to be ex-spouse of abusing the children? (Even if the children are now in their 40's?) A big deal, often justified, is likely to be made if the child was left alone and is found in potential danger, such as crossing a freeway in diapers, or found in a hot parked car in a Texas summer with the windows shut (lots of dogs and a few children die each year this way).
When abuse or neglect is reported to Child Protective Services (or whatever the relevant agency is known as locally). When CPS gets involved, it is obliged to investigate any report that can't clearly be dismissed as unfounded.
Except a report that putting a child in CPS custody in and of itself constitutes child abuse.
CPS investigators may be short on perspective or compassion, and they are frequently obliged to avoid being criticized for missing a case of serious neglect rather than to use common sense.
Gordon L. Burditt
|
| |
| |
Gordon Burditt wrote: Neglecting a child is an offense of some kind anywhere. Usually, if the neglect puts the child in significant danger, it becomes a felony. So the interesting question is whether leaving a child under 12 home alone constitutes neglect. This will vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and situation to situation. There are responsible 11-year olds who may even safely be entrusted with other people's children in safe situations where help is easily summoned. There are irresponsible 17-year-olds who can't be trusted not to burn down the house by accident.
The same applies to some 50-year-olds.
Hey, I resemble that remark. [snip]
A big deal, often justified, is likely to be made if the child was left alone and is found in potential danger, such as crossing a freeway in diapers, or found in a hot parked car in a Texas summer with the windows shut (lots of dogs and a few children die each year this way).
I was thinking about "almost 12", in sync with the OP's question, but you're right. Similarly, leaving a teen or near-teen home alone in a neighborhood or apartment complex frequented by gangs and drug dealers could be dangerous enough to amount to felony neglect. -- Chris Green
|
| |
| |
|