Legal Spring Logo

"You've helped me decide which company to choose!"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
But Bush Keeps Him On



"David W. Barnes"
12/14/2004 8:22:28 PM


PHOENIX, Arizona (AP) -- U.S. Sen. John McCain said Monday that he has
"no confidence" in Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, citing
Rumsfeld's handling of the war in Iraq and the failure to send more
troops.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/12/14/mccain.ap/index.html
Even Republicans are turning on Bush. But where was McCain when he
could have helped Kerry?
 
 
Heretic heretic@unrealitycheck.com>
12/15/2004 5:03:09 AM


On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:22:28 -0800, "David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com>
wrote:
PHOENIX, Arizona (AP) -- U.S. Sen. John McCain said Monday that he has
"no confidence" in Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, citing
Rumsfeld's handling of the war in Iraq and the failure to send more
troops.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/12/14/mccain.ap/index.html
Even Republicans are turning on Bush. But where was McCain when he
could have helped Kerry?
He hates Bush with a passion for slandering him last time, but it
would have been political suicide for him to support Kerry. We get
used to McCain's integrity, but sometimes we forget that he is still a
human being. He didn't want throw away his career. He is a real
conservative, unlike Bush, so he would not have been welcome in either
party. I guess I don't blame him. But you would think a guy who
could stand up to a North Vietnamese prison would be able to stand up
baby Bush.
EVIGILARE PECUA!
http://unrealitycheck.com
 
 
raven1
12/15/2004 6:41:42 AM


On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:22:28 -0800, "David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com>
wrote:
PHOENIX, Arizona (AP) -- U.S. Sen. John McCain said Monday that he has
"no confidence" in Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, citing
Rumsfeld's handling of the war in Iraq and the failure to send more
troops.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/12/14/mccain.ap/index.html
Even Republicans are turning on Bush. But where was McCain when he
could have helped Kerry?
*Sigh*. Campaigning for Bush. Which is even more astounding when you
consider that smearing Kerry's war record was the *same* tactic the
Bush campaign used against McCain himself in the 2000 primaries.
 
 
Christopher A. Lee
12/15/2004 8:01:20 AM


On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 06:41:42 GMT, raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:22:28 -0800, "David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com>
wrote:
*Sigh*. Campaigning for Bush. Which is even more astounding when you
consider that smearing Kerry's war record was the *same* tactic the
Bush campaign used against McCain himself in the 2000 primaries.
I was astonished.
If I had been McCain (or Cleland) and been treated the way the Bush
Machine treated them, there would have been a major resopnse. but they
did nothing.
And McCain licked his arse for him.
 
 
"Witziges Rätsel"
12/15/2004 8:52:30 AM


U.S. Sen. John McCain said Monday that he has
"no confidence" in Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, citing
Rumsfeld's handling of the war in Iraq and the failure to send more
troops.
Even Republicans are turning on Bush. But where was McCain when he
could have helped Kerry?
Bush cares nothing for Republicans. He panders to them
and the fundies for support, but he and his gang only care
about wealth and power and will strive for those by any means
necessary.
 
 
Heretic heretic@unrealitycheck.com>
12/15/2004 9:28:14 PM


On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:52:30 -0500, "Witziges Rtsel" <zer@roer.com>
wrote:
U.S. Sen. John McCain said Monday that he has
"no confidence" in Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, citing
Rumsfeld's handling of the war in Iraq and the failure to send more
troops.
Even Republicans are turning on Bush. But where was McCain when he
could have helped Kerry?
Bush cares nothing for Republicans. He panders to them
and the fundies for support, but he and his gang only care
about wealth and power and will strive for those by any means
necessary.
I thought that was the definition of Republican.
EVIGILARE PECUA!
http://unrealitycheck.com
 
 
stoney
12/15/2004 4:33:52 PM


On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:01:20 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 06:41:42 GMT, raven1 <quoththeraven@nevermore.com>
wrote:
I was astonished.
If I had been McCain (or Cleland) and been treated the way the Bush
Machine treated them, there would have been a major resopnse. but they
did nothing.
And McCain licked his arse for him.
Sychophant.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
 
 
"James H. Hood"
12/16/2004 11:47:00 PM




David W. Barnes <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:141220042022281062%spam@aol.com...

PHOENIX, Arizona (AP) -- U.S. Sen. John McCain said Monday that he has
"no confidence" in Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, citing
Rumsfeld's handling of the war in Iraq and the failure to send more
troops.
So you think the President should make cabinet appointments based on the
statements of one senator who has his own agenda.
 
 
Report this post for offensive content


site map |  disclaimer |  privacy
All Rights Reserved, Legal Spring, Inc. 2004