|
|
"Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message
news:41c2de67.137277015@ca.news.verio.net...
> even as Booz-like creatures cart across the stage Sam Sloan nailed to
> a cross.
Bibuld is the one that would be nailed to the cross. You'd be the
|
|
|
Accounting for nearly two thousand years of inflation of the economya
(system of things), Gold might actually be in use.
--
Tom Klem
"Size matters not"
---Yoda
"Matt Nemmers" <qcchess@mcnospamhsi.com> wrote in message
news:fqQwd.519208$wV.
|
|
|
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 22:53:57 -0500, "Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
<a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote:
>In rec.motorcycles, Scott en Aztlán wrote:
>
>> I invite everyone who has used the word "whit" in casual
>> conversation within the last month to re
|
|
|
In rec.motorcycles, Scott en Aztlán wrote:
> I invite everyone who has used the word "whit" in casual
> conversation within the last month to respond to this post by
> saying "aye."
"Aye."
--
-bts
-The ayes have it.
|
|
|
>> Gee, that must really suck for the advertisers, and for Google. Wonder
>> what they can do to fix this.
>
> They can watch for patterns in use of automated click-thru programs.
> Catching hordes of low-paid Chinamen is another story. Some sugge
|
|
|
S. O. Damocles wrote:
> Talk much, eh Neanderthal?
....pathetic scatology obsessed subhuman scum.
|
|
|
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 07:34:07 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Heretic wrote:
>
>> Not ready to let this traitor Bush off the hook for all of his crimes
>> against the nation, [blah, blah, blah ...]
>
>I would encourag
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <cpv6n005nd@news1.newsguy.com>, "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001>
> wrote:
>>
>>To deny even a foreign dissident the right to publish, is in essence,
>>denying the person the "right to freedom of speech", which is in total
|
|
|
"Scott en Aztlán" <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote in
message news:k997s05ar32bejv7tmjkmkv45vhnubqj9e@4ax.com...
SNIP
> I invite everyone who has used the word "whit" in casual
> conversation
> within the last month to respond to this post by
|
|
|
Heretic <pashdfpihsd_heretic@unrealitycheck.com> wrote in
news:mah6s09si8i58o7hft8s6c505ah4lo3qdk@4ax.com:
> Repulicanism is now the party of the KKK, not the
> Democrats
Last I knew, Byrd was still a Democrat. Try again, numbnuts.
--
"Say n
|
|
|
>>> "I mean, when's the last time you heard of a college where the Young
>>> Republicans staged a 'Sit In' to close down the Humanities building?
>>> On the flip side, how many 'sit ins' were staged to close the ROTC
>>> building back in the '60s? L
|
|
|
tell us something we dont know...
"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:161220042052429306%spam@aol.com...
> This was too good to pass up.
>
> Recently, Bush supporters out here have been claiming that innocent
> civilian deaths a
|
|
|
In article <k997s05ar32bejv7tmjkmkv45vhnubqj9e@4ax.com>,
slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com says...
> I invite everyone who has used the word "whit" in casual conversation
> within the last month to respond to this post by saying "aye."
"Aye"
--
Cam
|
|
|
John F. Carr wrote:
> Well SOMEBODY was going 35 in the right lane of Route 128 in dry
> weather with no traffic a few weeks ago while every other car was
> at least five over the 55 MPH limit. If the driver wasn't an old
> person, what was it?
|
|
|
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:32gtemF3mbmvoU1@individual.net:
> PLMerite wrote:
>
>> They're not huddled together.
>
> They are not only huddled together, but one or two of them appear to be
> holding onto a se
|
|
|
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:32gsteF3h8j94U3@individual.net:
> Gactimus wrote:
>
>> --sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:32gg3uF3lknv5U6@individual.net:
>>
>>
>>>Gactimus wrote:
|
|
|
"Zigler" <reply@group.please> wrote in news:xXCwd.13$jc1.931
@news.uswest.net:
> That worked out quite nicely with black slavery
Moonbats are so good at throwing out irrelevant statements, then
patting themselves on the back as if they had scored
|
|
|
Elmo <anto@sales.com> wrote in news:171220041016357860%anto@sales.com:
> In article <1103305612.9c48c11f4bf481fda548faea756185a8@bubbanews>,
> Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:
>
>> --sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news
|
|
|
I know far more than that. But I will concede that you have far more
knowledge of hateful troll and their loneliness, given your constant
trolling.
--
Laura Bush Murdered Her Boyfriend (Xeton2001@yahoo.com)'s words of
wisdom (spelling and grammat
|
|
|
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 18:00:18 -0700, Big Bill <bill@pipping.com> wrote:
>>Oh PUH-LEEZE! "Whit" hasn't been in common use since Jefferson was
>>president. That cop was just trying to sound edumacated. Instead, he
>>came off as laughably stuffy.
>
>Li
|
|
|
There are Right Wing Idiots out here like Gactimus and Osprey, who
laugh when they see video of US pilots bombing innocent civilians
http://www.alexisparkinn.com/photogallery/Videos/F-16%20in%20Falluja.wmv
Or shooting unarmed civilians as the lie
|
|
|
"Elmo" <anto@sales.com> wrote in message
news:171220041016357860%anto@sales.com...
> In article <1103305612.9c48c11f4bf481fda548faea756185a8@bubbanews>,
> Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:
>
> > --sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrot
|
|
|
>Xeton2001IsAMoron.20.dwp...@spamgourmet.com Dec 17, 12:18 pm
>Interesting. The vast majority of people I know drive over the speed
>limit, and yet none of them have ever killed anyone. Could it be that
>you're associating your limited driving abil
|
|
|
Sir Ray Dec 17, 9:25 am
So, in your happy little world, absolutely no municipality anywhere
ever underposted a segement of road? Because, you know, if a road is
underposted and someone drives the correct, safe design speed of the
road, he/she then
|
|
|
In article <asKdnYS6z7iu3F7cRVn-rQ@comcast.com>, Osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
> "Gactimus" <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
> news:1103314565.357394bc7e87e7a4093401372a5e541c@bubbanews...
> > Elmo <anto@sales.com> wrote in news:17122004
|
|
|
In article <32gtemF3mbmvoU1@individual.net>, --sexkitten--
<ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:
> PLMerite wrote:
>
> > "Elmo" <anto@sales.com> wrote in message
> > news:171220041016357860%anto@sales.com...
> >
> >>In article <1103305612.9c
|
|
|
In article <32ge9iF3mna3pU1@individual.net>, Dave C. <mdupre@sff.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> You're OBVIOUSLY not from MA. Only people over 80 would drive that slow.
>>
>> /dan
>
>You're obviously not from MA. Even people over 80 SHATTER the speed limit
|
|
|
In article <cpomqr0hfq@news4.newsguy.com>,
"Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote:
> "The Pet Goat" <PetGoat@7minutes.com> wrote in message
> news:PetGoat-E32B7C.20223614122004@news.supernews.com...
> > My landlord is a bit strange. We started out wit
|
|
|
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 16:09:07 -0800, Scott en Aztlán
<slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:07:40 -0700, Big Bill <bill@pipping.com> wrote:
>
>>>"Whit?" "WHIT?!?!!?" WHO THE FUCK USES WORDS LIKE "WHIT" IN EVERYDAY
>>>CONVERSATIO
|
|
|
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:32gg3uF3lknv5U6@individual.net:
> Gactimus wrote:
>
>> --sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:32gbctF3mpltrU4@individual.net:
>>
>>
>>>Gactimus wrote:
|
|
|
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:07:02 -0600, "ouroboros rex"
<c-bee1@itg.uiuc.edu> wrote:
>
>"PMDavis" <pmdlandarch@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:tj26s0hp5tv8qv1n2hsrrtmru16nv1bl0d@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:28:15 -0600, "Zigler" <reply@g
|
|
|
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:28:15 -0600, "Zigler" <reply@group.please>
wrote:
>
>"Asmodeus" <asmodeus@REMOVEinsightbb.com> wrote in message
>news:Xns95C246C464638asmodeusinsightbbcom@204.127.199.17...
>> Heretic <nospam#^%&%------------->heretic@unreali
|
|
|
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 07:34:07 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
Has the tyre-iron loony changed his ISP again?
<plonk> this latest incarnation.
|
|
|
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:07:40 -0700, Big Bill <bill@pipping.com> wrote:
>>"Whit?" "WHIT?!?!!?" WHO THE FUCK USES WORDS LIKE "WHIT" IN EVERYDAY
>>CONVERSATION?!?!?!? I had to really bite my tongue to keep from
>>laughing!
>
>Please! Because someone e
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:41C34CD1.34BD460C@worldnet.att.net...
> Heretic wrote:
>
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> >> Heretic wrote:
>
> >>> Not ready to let this traitor Bush off the hook for all of his
|
|
|
"Heretic" <pashdfpihsd_heretic@unrealitycheck.com> wrote in message
news:qci6s0dfao9rbme2dvdvib3dukal0dg956@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 07:34:07 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
> <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> >Heretic wrote:
> >
> >> Not
|
|
|
>
> Well SOMEBODY was going 35 in the right lane of Route 128 in dry
> weather with no traffic a few weeks ago while every other car was
> at least five over the 55 MPH limit. If the driver wasn't an old
> person, what was it?
>
A tourist in a
|
|
|
"Asmodeus" <asmodeus@REMOVEinsightbb.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95C2A293351EAasmodeusinsightbbcom@63.240.76.16...
> Heretic <pashdfpihsd_heretic@unrealitycheck.com> wrote in
> news:mah6s09si8i58o7hft8s6c505ah4lo3qdk@4ax.com:
>
> > Repulicanism i
|
|
|
Ray Gordon wrote:
>>>>And you think you can afford it? Boy are you stupid. If you start
>>>>running ads on Google, people will start doing click-thrus for the
>>>>express purpose of costing you money by draining your ad budget.
>>>
>>>Are you say
|
|
|
Gactimus wrote:
> --sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:32gtemF3mbmvoU1@individual.net:
>
>
>>PLMerite wrote:
>>
>>
>>>They're not huddled together.
>>
>>They are not only huddled together, but one or two of them app
|
|
|
"Gactimus" <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:1103314565.357394bc7e87e7a4093401372a5e541c@bubbanews...
> Elmo <anto@sales.com> wrote in news:171220041016357860%anto@sales.com:
>
>> In article <1103305612.9c48c11f4bf481fda548faea756185a8@bubba
|
|
|
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 13:32:54 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:
>On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 18:15:53 GMT, Douglas Berry
><penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
>
>>In our last thrilling episode, "David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> was
|
|
|
515 sets EXEMPTions to the OT law. 515.5 specifically defines for COMPUTER
SOFTWARE PROFESSIONALS the characteristics of employment under which they
are considered EXEMPT.
Re-read it. If you still don't see it, read it again. If you still have
|
|
|
--sexkitten-- <ladyhawk_two_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:32gbctF3mpltrU4@individual.net:
> Gactimus wrote:
>
>> "David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in
>> news:161220042052429306%spam@aol.com:
>>
>>
>>>Here is even more proof that th
|
|
|
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 10:44:56 -0600, "Zigler" <reply@group.please>
wrote:
>
>Inevitability of civilian death or not, its irrelevant. Its the
>un-inevitability of war that matters.
>\
What 'uninevitability' would that be?
--
Contempt of C
|
|
|
ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
> Prisoner releases shock victims
> CONCERNS: State corrections, private contractor often fail to notify in
> a timely fashion.
At first I thought the guy had been tried and CONVICTED of murder as your
subject line sugge
|
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in
news:161220042052429306%spam@aol.com:
> Here is even more proof that the US is systemically murdering innocent
> civilians in Iraq. This, of course, convinces the Muslim extremists
> that Bush was serious
|
|
|
I rear ended a guy a few years back ...
He changed to my (right) lane just before an intersection ... the light went
yellow, and he threw out the anchor ... he didn't even get stopped before
the 'stop line'
I slid into him ... probably going 15 -
|
|
|
> said they will settle it legally if she does not give them the money.
> I talked to my mom and she has a paper where he had written down a
> couple of times money that she had borrowed and also that she has
paid
> but she didn't keep the papers he g
|
|
|
I see ads on the net for stuff like this all the time. Can you find
out (without leaving my chair) who they actually give these to? They
do have to give the prize away don't they?
You're going to need to give us a little more detail than that, but
c
|
