misc.legal

In article <05tes0ltghql88s5hdd4t23reej0l52ji5@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > I see that on Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:29:18 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> > wrote: > > > So why is it, if you are in fact beating me into an absolute pulp (as >

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 20:35:43 -0000, "Bystander" <marlovian@fsmail.net> wrote: > >"Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote in message >news:32ok1vF3p6uv1U1@individual.net... >> Monday, December 20, 2004 - 12:00 AM | >> http://www.harkthe

In article <1103608759.191148.114320@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, <wolfbat359@mindspring.com> wrote: > http://www.undermars.com/gallery52.html The "pro-life" find this acceptable.

>Ken Smith wrote "> Did Cam murder Lauren? Based on what I've seen, probably. Will he be convicted of it? I'd lay odds against it. Will he ever be exonerated? Not a chance in hell." There is still something missing in the puzzle that probably

On 20 Dec 2004 13:25:57 -0800, Messalina <messalinana@yahoo.com> wrote: > Tell them your date of first use pre-dates theirs, then tell them to > pound sand. > > Mez > > I'm not an attorney, this is not legal advice. Your correct in pointing ou

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Now, if Lauren had broken her lower jaw on the way down, that may have been >>a lot more consistent with a slip-and-fall. > > > She fell HEADFIRST, you idiot! But if it was a slip-and-fall, sh

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > jls wrote: > > >>On the question of discovery and the release of information by the district >>attorney, the state never gives everything up, and certainly never its work >>product or the theories of its case. >

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: [snip to focus on this point] >>For the record, you *ARE* @$#*ing stupid. > > No I'm not. But YOU are, given your boneheaded moves in suing the Colorado > Supreme Court in Federal District Court

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > jls wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>The more I think about it, the more I think that the Colorado Bar >>>Examiners' Board was right. >> >>Boy are you hateful and childish. > > No, I am candid and forthright.

Was this ordered? http://www.undermars.com/gallery52.html 52 +

>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote ">Uh-huh. So how do we know that Cameron Brown is guilty? According to you, because he's been indicted. And why was he indicted? Because he's guilty, of course." ">Does anyone see anything wrong with the above reason

>Ken Smith wrote ">Exactly what does this have to do with the question of whether Cam Brown was properly charged and/or indicted by California authorities?" Everything--- because if Ted *could* he'd blame YOU for little Lauren's death. Unfortuna

>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote >>Kent Wills wrote: >> If Ted E-mails me the report, ">Dream on." >> I'll be able to understand what is written. ">I don't know about that. You've failed the first exercise so far." Email it to Chris Green th

>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote ">I have no reason to protect Cameron -- other than that he's innocent of the charges! He's not blood to me. If he were indeed guilty of what he has been charged with, I would NOT be supporting him. Fool." Innnnnnteres

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 01:59:58 GMT, "amigo cabal" <pinkspider123@earthlink.net> >>> I fail to see why the US is liable. >> >> Because the U.S. army seized the property, dumbass. If they seized your >> property, you'd be suing the government too.

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > jls wrote: > >>No prosecutor indicts without getting his ducks in a row, unless he wants >>to lose the next election. We'll see if the accused made statements or >>acted against his penal interest. > > Uh-huh. So how

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: >>"jls" <jls1016@bellsouth.net> wrote: > >>>No prosecutor indicts without getting his ducks in a row, unless he wants >>>to lose the next election. We'll see if the accused made statements or >>>acted

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > SolarChase wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>"Broken jaw"? Where are you getting this from? Did I miss something? >> >>Evidently. > > No I did NOT! For the record, there was NO "broken jaw". It's just that

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: >> >>>>Let's keep our eye on the ball here. >>> >>>And one ball that we should definitely keep front and center is that Ken >>>Smith was asked to submit t

heodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > >>Let's keep our eye on the ball here. We're talking about whether Cam >>Brown's rights were violated by L.A. officials. If they were, everyone >>should be upset about it; if they weren't, there is not

We are in an interesting situation. We have had a domain name and used it actively since 1998. Today, we received a letter from a firm representing the owner of the service mark which matches are domain. They want the domain transfered to them. C

jls wrote: > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message > news:41C72F96.AADF1CBB@worldnet.att.net... > [...] > >>There is MUCH that you don't know about THIS case. >>-- > > I know very little about it, probably almost as li

"Bystander" <marlovian@fsmail.net> wrote in message news:32orcoF3n599vU1@individual.net... > > "Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote in message > news:32ok1vF3p6uv1U1@individual.net... > > Monday, December 20, 2004 - 12:00 AM | > > htt

"Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote in message news:32ok1vF3p6uv1U1@individual.net... > Monday, December 20, 2004 - 12:00 AM | > http://www.harktheherald.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&s > id=43190&mode=thread&orde

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 12:22:06 -0500, Life-in-Hell <name@company.com> wrote: >And freely >punches the male workers with his fist. Well if anyone ever hit me I would be filling criminal charges without hesitation. If the boss fires me I don't want

On 21 Dec 2004 01:06:44 -0000, anonymous@remailer.hastio.org wrote: >Subject: Jews Looting America >Newsgroups: ba.general,soc.culture.jewish,misc.legal I have never figured out why if the Jews are looting America that those that are jealous just

"Anthony Buckland" <buckland@direct.ca> wrote in message news:O-KdnUKQWb66syLcRVn-oQ@look.ca... > Nicholas Smid wrote: > > >"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote in message > >news:bA8jd.372436$D%.213118@attbi_s51... > > > > > >>robert

"Nicholas Smid" <smid2n@clear.net.nz> wrote in message news:41be9e5f@clear.net.nz... > > "robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:bA8jd.372436$D%.213118@attbi_s51... > > > > > > robert j. kolker wrote: > > > > > > > > >

I see that on Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:29:18 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > So why is it, if you are in fact beating me into an absolute pulp (as >you would like to believe in your delusional state), that no one in the >NG has climbed on boa

Kent Wills wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> Let's keep our eye on the ball here. >> And one ball that we should definitely keep front and center is that Ken >> Smith was asked to submit to a psychological examination b

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:12:01 GMT, The Gypsy <john@TheGypsy.com> wrote: >Do they have any rights to the domain that matches their service mark John, they have rights but only in the IC class they filed in. That can restrict your use of your domain

>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote ">After having SLIPPED and FALLEN off the cliff." Ok....we have established that they were never seperated, she landed in the water and Cameron was the FIRST to get to the impact site. And now, we know she *didnt* get a

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> jls wrote: >>> On the issue of the autopsy, if you publish the first page and not the >>> second, there is an inference you are not candid and have something to >>> hide. >> I don't particularly

I see that on Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:04:31 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > >> "jls" <jls1016@bellsouth.net> wrote: > >>> No prosecutor indicts without getting his ducks in a row, unless he wants >>>

Kent Wills wrote: > "jls" <jls1016@bellsouth.net> wrote: >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> There is MUCH that you don't know about THIS case. >> I know very little about it, probably almost as little as you do. > It's only logical to presume T

jls wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> There is MUCH that you don't know about THIS case. > I know very little about it, probably almost as little as you do. Guess again. -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@worldnet.att.net

en Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> Let's keep our eye on the ball here. We're talking about whether Cam >>> Brown's rights were violated by L.A. officials. If they were, everyone >>> should be upset about it; if

I see that on Mon, 20 Dec 2004 18:11:35 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>jls wrote: >>>>>Kent Wills wrote: >>>>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> >>>>>>>"Broken j

jls wrote: > "Sam Stone" <sirian@mental.org> wrote in message > news:66lxd.1146939$SM5.84599@news.easynews.com... > >> jls wrote: >> >> >>>Yes. I'm beginning to see a strong case for homicide here. Add motive > > and > >>>the illogic of

jls wrote: > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message > news:41C6EB82.DB62C11E@worldnet.att.net... >>Kent Wills wrote: >>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > On the question of discovery and the release of information by the distri

I see that on Mon, 20 Dec 2004 18:09:15 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > It sounds like he knows what one is, and you don't. But OTOH, we >tend to forget that words have a different meaning in Ted Kaldis' >Thoroughly Fucked Dictionary...

I see that on Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:33:21 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > >> I've seen MANY autopsy reports and witnessed a few autopsies as well. > >Too bad that you don't know the difference betwee

I see that on Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:30:13 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> jls wrote: >>> Kent Wills wrote: >>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > >>>>> What "theory"? My knowledge of the accident i

I see that on Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:24:23 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Let's keep our eye on the ball here. > >And one ball that we should definitely keep front and center is that Ken >Smith wa

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>jls wrote: >>>>Kent Wills wrote: >>>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>>>>"Broken jaw"? Where are you getting that from? There was massive head >>>>>>trauma, especially t

I see that on Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:21:55 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> jls wrote: >>> Kent Wills wrote: > >>>> Bachelor of Science from Worsham College of Mortuary Science. > >> Fascinating.

I see that on Mon, 20 Dec 2004 12:28:17 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >It's not really such a bad place. I lived there for quite a number of years. >At least the citizens of that fair state are protected from having on

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: >>"jls" <jls1016@bellsouth.net> wrote: [snip] >>>Furthermore, I don't think I'd believe a child could receive a broken >>>maxillary bone by falling into the Pacific. She could have received it >>

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>jls wrote: >>>Kent Wills wrote: >> >>>>Bachelor of Science from Worsham College of Mortuary Science. >>> >>Fascinating. Kent's not expert witness material, but anyone with a >>background like that

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > >>Let's keep our eye on the ball here. > > And one