|
|
--
----------
"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:211220040737111767%spam@aol.com...
> Here is a post from Osprey an earlier thread:
>
> FYA - Osprey's wife is pregnant and about to deliver. Osprey is taking
> time off fro
|
|
|
SolarChase wrote:
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
>
> ">After having SLIPPED and FALLEN off the cliff."
>
> Ok....we have established that they were never seperated, she landed
> in the water and Cameron was the FIRST to get to the impact site.
>
> A
|
|
|
SolarChase wrote:
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
>
> ">Pictures don't lie."
>
> Ever read the World Weekly News at your local supermarket ???
Teddy's basing Cam's defense on the really cool Hollywood
movies he's seen about legal stuff, trials and a
|
|
|
Bush flip-flops, opposes Rx drug imports
By William M. Welch, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — A Bush administration task force recommended strongly Tuesday
against letting U.S. citizens import lower-cost prescription drugs from other
countries, saying "i
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> > > Ken Smith wrote:
> > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
> > > > > The difference is that you're living a comfortable life as a
> > > > > CPA, while Cameron is languish
|
|
|
S. O. Damocles wrote:
> Sam Stone wrote:
>
>>S. O. Damocles wrote:
>>
>>
>>>your pathetic perverted child-raping gaaaaawd doesn't exist
>>
>>You're going straight to HELL you vile subhuman sack of crap.
>
>
> To personally fist@$#*
To bu
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
>
> Ted, you don't have to be an Alan Dershowitz to see that when a
> judge refuses to follow binding precedent exactly on-point in an
> unpublished opinion (a lawyer would understand the significance of
> that -- but you obviously
|
|
|
ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
> Too bad that this case is nowhere near going to trial. Geragos still
> has final sentencing for Scott Peterson in February. Than has a
> long-delayed trial in Orange County where a former executive is
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> > > jls wrote:
> > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
> > > > > The more I think about it, the more I think that the Colorado
> > > > > Bar Examiners' Board was right.
>
|
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
> <Apres_Moi_Le_Deluge@linkedto.nosnoop.com> wrote:
> >Right, Barnes. The government watches out for business the same way
the
> >Mafia runs its protection rackets, the only difference being you get
a
> >better shake and much mo
|
|
|
On 22 Dec 2004 12:27:02 -0800, "Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
>Paul Anderson wrote:
>> On 22 Dec 2004 09:04:17 -0800, "Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> ....
>>
>> >> All the above shows is that the Republicans are st
|
|
|
Sam Stone wrote:
> S. O. Damocles wrote:
>
> ( lifted it outta his car didn't ya poxie - explains why his home
> coordinates were so easy to come by...)
We both know that Danny don't live in Denver, Scummy.
So how is it you came by a Garmin GPS ab
|
|
|
On 22 Dec 2004 11:51:23 -0800, "Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
>Merry_Christ...@linkedto.no-spam-allowed.com wrote:
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
>>
>> Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
>> > The other Donald wrote:
>> > >
>> > > "Arthur L. Rubin" <r
|
|
|
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 10:23:24 -0800, "Arthur L. Rubin"
<ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote:
>"David W. Barnes" wrote:
>
>> First, your ignorance. Contrary to what you claim, hiring someone who
>> takes advantage of the FMLA generally doesn¹t cost bus
|
|
|
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 13:45:08 -0800, Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> "S. O. Damocles" wrote:
>
>> S. O. Damocles wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>> "S. O. Damocles" wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Sounds so
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>
[snip]
>>The facts are that Ted has claimed that Cameron Brown is "obviously
>>innocent
|
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
> In article <1103772345.579863.291360@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
> Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Good analogy, too.
> >
> > It would be if every issue that involved a lawyer involved a crime,
> > too.
|
|
|
Screw
Welcome to eScrew!
eScrew is eScrew and this is eScrew story. eScrew will tell you eScrew
story if you promise eScrew to consider eScrew story as joke. eScrew
story is very funny. eScrew story is so funny that eScrew will have to
take break f
|
|
|
Merry_Christmas@linkedto.no-spam-allowed.com wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> Sneech, when you listen to these liberals bleat on about this social
> program and that social program, you soon instictively realize that
> these are also the last kind of p
|
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
> In article <1103772345.579863.291360@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
> Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > So I guess that means you are in favor of more crime so you can
have a
> > job?
>
> Who said that?
You
|
|
|
Apres_Moi_Le_Deluge@linkedto.nosnoop.com wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
>
> Right, Barnes. The government watches out for business the same way
the
> Mafia runs its protection rackets, the only difference being you get
a
> better shake and much mo
|
|
|
Jim Blair wrote:
>
> So why do so many Americans complain about "sending all those jobs abroad"?
Because all animals are equal, only some are more equal than others.
Fair living wages for all unless your fair living wages are mine.
Doublespe
|
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
Sneech, when you listen to these liberals bleat on about this social
program and that social program, you soon instictively realize that
these are also the last kind of people you'd ever want working for you.
I mean, ya just gotta
|
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
> In article <1103772044.569198.275100@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
> Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > There is a
> > > positive side, too. Your employee isn't sitting there worrying
about
> > > her family membe
|
|
|
"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
news:41C9C863.651E5403@sprintmail.com...
> The other Donald wrote:
> >
> > "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:41C9BB9C.D1AA4B52@sprintmail.com...
>
|
|
|
"David W. Barnes" wrote:
>
> In one e-mail, the writer described seeing a "detainee sitting on the
> floor of the interview room with an Israeli flag draped around him,
> loud music being played and a strobe light flashing."
>
> http://www.cnn.com
|
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
> In article <1103773315.113066.3830@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > And morons like your prefer Chaos.
> >
> > Like the chaos that existed before 1993? Oops! There wasn't any.
|
|
|
I am in California.
I filed a Complaint for Grandparent Visitation and a court date has
been sent. I sent served the papers to the defendant via Express Mail
Overnight with Return Receipt.
When i checked the status of the court papers, 2 attempts
|
|
|
On 22 Dec 2004 19:21:45 GMT, chessdon@aol.com (Chessdon) wrote:
>IMO, Bill worked very hard, did not charge for all his expenses, deserved the
>retoactive salary we allotted and no precedent has been established other than
>that every case needs to b
|
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
> In article <1103770914.397009.209440@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
> Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > The program is financed entirely by an increase in employee
payroll
> > > contributions.
> >
> > Well, t
|
|
|
In article <1103773315.113066.3830@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
> David W. Barnes wrote:
> > In article <1103771329.048098.233580@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
> > Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
|
|
|
In article <1103772345.579863.291360@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
> David W. Barnes wrote:
> > In article <1103770656.335525.195200@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
> > Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
|
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
> In article <1103771329.048098.233580@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
> Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > David W. Barnes wrote:
> > > In article
<1103763970.492533.23970@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> > > Snee
|
|
|
On 23 Dec 2004 00:49:04 GMT, ooreroom@aol.com (OOREROOM) wrote:
>All this time you have been saying you
>revailed but Grell actually defered. More
>puffing from Ilena, eh?
LOL ... not at all ... that's just his spin ... the courts didn't buy
|
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
Right, Barnes. The government watches out for business the same way the
Mafia runs its protection rackets, the only difference being you get a
better shake and much more for your money dealing with the mob.
Marie Antionette
|
|
|
In article <1103772044.569198.275100@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
> David W. Barnes wrote:
> > In article <1103731898.215999.41500@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> > <Merry_Christmas@linkedto.no-spam-allowed.
|
|
|
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend a écrit :
> There's a 55mph freeway near where i live and if i do 50, everybody
> passes me. But if i do 60 very few do. The deadly criminal speed loons
> like to tell us that EVERYBODY DOES 20 MPH OVER THE SPEED LIMI
|
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
> In article <1103770656.335525.195200@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
> Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > David W. Barnes wrote:
> > > In article
<1103748212.954473.153900@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> > > Sne
|
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
> In article <1103731898.215999.41500@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> <Merry_Christmas@linkedto.no-spam-allowed.com> wrote:
>
> > x-no-archive: yes
> >
> > Barnes, where in my post did I suggest that the 12 weeks was paid
|
|
|
In article <1103771329.048098.233580@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
> David W. Barnes wrote:
> > In article <1103763970.492533.23970@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> > Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
|
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
> In article <1103763970.492533.23970@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > How is taking a leave of absence "stealing time" from an
employer?
> >
> > Because when a business hires y
|
|
|
In article <1103770914.397009.209440@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
> David W. Barnes wrote:
> > In article <1103744635.502107.247080@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> > <Merry_Christmas@linkedto.no-spam-allowed
|
|
|
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 10:23:08 -0700, S. O. Damocles <so@damocl.es> wrote:
> Isaac wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 00:10:51 -0500, Barry Margolin
>> <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>> > In article <slrncshm52.ca.isaac@latveria.castledoom.org>,
>> > Isaac <
|
|
|
"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message
news:41C9BB9C.D1AA4B52@sprintmail.com...
> "David W. Barnes" wrote:
>
> > First, your ignorance. Contrary to what you claim, hiring someone who
> > takes advantage of the FMLA generall
|
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
> In article <1103744635.502107.247080@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> <Merry_Christmas@linkedto.no-spam-allowed.com> wrote:
>
> > x-no-archive: yes
> >
> >
> > Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> > > The other Donald wrote:
> > >
|
|
|
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 08:28:12 -0500, Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> In article <slrncsil1s.15f.isaac@latveria.castledoom.org>,
> Isaac <isaac@latveria.castledoom.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 00:10:51 -0500, Barry Margolin <barm
|
|
|
In article <1103770656.335525.195200@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
> David W. Barnes wrote:
> > In article <1103748212.954473.153900@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> > Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
|
|
|
David W. Barnes wrote:
> In article <1103748212.954473.153900@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > BY THE WAY:
> >
> > I do not believe it is a violation of FMLA for an employer to grant
the
> > time off,
|
|
|
In article <1103763970.492533.23970@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Paul Anderson wrote:
> > On 22 Dec 2004 12:27:02 -0800, "Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> The FMLA allows unpaid leave so
|
|
|
In article <1103734956.483624.261210@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Merry_Christmas@linkedto.no-spam-allowed.com wrote:
> > x-no-archive: yes
> > Again, whenever you liberals can't defend an argument rational
|
|
