|
|
| |
| |
From: VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org(<VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org>) Date:
Thu, Dec 23, 2004,
VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org (www.jail4judges.org) Subject: * Judicial
Corruption In Nationwide Epidemic Proportions *
J.A.I.L. News Journal
______________________________________________________
Los Angeles,
California=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0December
22,=A02004
Mission Statement=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 JNJ
Library=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0
PayPal Support
Federal
J.A.I.L.=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0
FAQs=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0
What?MeWarden?
=A0
Judicial Corruption In=A0Nationwide Epidemic Proportions
(By Roger Holcomb - Alabama)
=A0
----- Original Message -----
From: Roger Holcomb
To: victoryusa@jail4judges.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 3:10 PM
Subject: Complain
I had thought of writing you about my family's experience with this
corrupt so-called "Justice" system here in Alabama. I now see that it's
everywhere. There are no unique examples of the kind of injustice we all
bear. We can only hope to band together and fight together to someday
restore this nation to what our forefathers intended.
James R. Holcomb
Beaverton, Al 35544
holcomb@sonet.net
=A0
=A0
J.A.I.L.=A0receives thousands of tales of corruption from all locations
about the injustice in our so-called "Justice System." It is most
difficult to portray personal concern about each one of them, as I know
everyone's problem is real to them. Indeed, mine was to me, in which I
gave eighteen years of my life fighting for justice in the courts.
=A0
Do I really care about people's problems? Even though it may appear to
many that I do not, the fact is Yes, I do. I get to feeling somewhat
like the only medical doctor that has discovered the vaccine to a
national epidemic that has=A0killed millions of people, with millions
more dying,=A0and everyone is demanding that I attend to their illness.
=A0
Truly, J.A.I.L. is the answer to a National Emergency, but there is
neither the money nor the staff to relate to the enormity of the
problem. Shall we despair? Absolutely not! We are inundated with cries
from the oppressed who have or see no hope whatsoever, and is assured of
getting worse.
=A0
Unfortunately, people are willingly=A0ignorant, and have no perception
of the evil that=A0befalls them. "My People are destroyed for lack of
knowledge. Because thou hast rejected knowledge, I also will reject
thee." Hosea 4: 6.
=A0
Should time permit, and the Lord tarry,=A0I have no uncertainty that
J.A.I.L. will prevail as the populace senses the problem growing worse,
and as more and more people sink into despair, loosing everything.
J.A.I.L. is that like the mustard seed, though the smallest of all
seeds, it will grow into a great tree so that all can lodge in it. Even
most preachers are blinded in this matter. Indeed, while they pray
to=A0God to show Himself, they do not know=A0that He has already
answered their prayers, but they knew it not.
=A0
I was so touched when one=A0person=A0wrote me to tell me that they were
imminently in the throes of=A0ending their life by suicide
when=A0learning of J.A.I.L., and that they have now grasped new a ray
of=A0hope with=A0a reason to live on through=A0knowledge of=A0J.A.I.L.
=A0
-Ron Branson
VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org
=A0
J.A.I.L.- Judicial Accountability Initiative Law - www.jail4judges.org
Contribute to J.A.I.L. at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA 91603
See our active flash, http://www.jail4judges.org/national_001.htm
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of gov't. heretofore unrealized.
JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
JAIL is taking America like a wildfire! AddRemove@jail4judges.org
E-Group sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join
Get involved at JAIL_SALE_USA-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
=A0
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless
minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
=A0
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is
striking at the
root."=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0
-- Henry David Thoreau=A0=A0=A0 <><
|
| |
| |
COMPLAINT~FRAUDULENT TRANSFER
OF DAMAGED TRUST FUND~
BY TRUSTEES OF NATIONAL CITY BANK
~
COMPLAINT ~VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES
~TO THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
~
BENEFICIARIES OF TRUST FUND VS.~
LEE SLADE AND KEVIN DUBBINK TRUSTEES OF NATIONAL CITY BANK
~
AND/FROM THE PROBATE COURT IN INDIANAPOLIS...JUDGE DEITER....
UNCONSTITUTIONAL HEARINGS...
~TO DISTRICT COURT....
~
1.UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNETHICAL TREATMENT OF CASE VIOLATIONS OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF INDIANA~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FILED FORMAL OBJECTIONS NOT HEARD~UNCONSTITUTIONAL
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2.DENIAL OF ACCESS TO THE COURTS
~3.DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW
~
4.DEPRIVED OF PROPERTY, MONEY TAKEN FROM TRUST ACCOUNT, FLEECING OF
TRUST ACCOUNT.. AGAINST THE 14TH AMENDMENT WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FILED FORMAL OBJECTIONS NOT HEARD.. UNCONSTITUTIONAL..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
IC 30-4-3-11..LIABILITY OF THE TRUSTEE TO THE BENEFICIARY......
~
UNSUITABILITY, MISEPRESENTATION, NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF FIDUCIARY BY
NATIONAL CITY BANK TRUSTEES..
~DOCUMENT TITLE:~CASE SUMMARY
~NUMBERED.~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0
COMPLAINT OF FRAUD IN THE HISTORY LIST....MISREPRESENTATON.. ERRORS AND
OMISSIONS........INTENTIONAL, DELIBERATE AND IN VIOLATION OF INDIANA
CODE AND CANONS OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT, 3E, AND 2, POLITICAL MONEY ACCEPTED
FROM AND VIA RUTH LILLY
TRUST CASE ANOTHER MISMANAGEMENT BY NATIONAL CITY BANK
~~~~~
JUDGE DEITER'S INVOLVEMTN WITH NATIONAL CITY BANK AND IT'S MISMANAGEMENT
OF TRUST FUNDS......PRECEDENT CASES PRESENTED
~
SEC AND NASD VIOLATIONS BY NATIONAL CITY BANK
~~~~~~~~
NOTICE OF APPEAL SENT INTO PROBATE COURT VIA REGISTERED MAIL NOT
FILED....INTENTIONAL AND DELIBERATE AFTER MOTIONS TO CORRECT , PETITION
FOR HEARING ON THIS ISSUE AND CONSPIRACY WITH APPEALS COURT TO
MISREPRESENT THIS AND ISSUE OF "COMPELLING " A TRANSCRIPT OF THE APRIL
4, 203 HEARING WHEN THERE IS NO TRANSCRIPT OF RECORD ...NO ONE CAN
COMPEL A TRANSCRIPT THAT DOES NOT EXISTS AND USED AS A EXCUSE TO DISMISS
APPEAL..PERJURY OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND VIOLATIONS OF JUDICIAL
CONDUCT TO BE 'FAIR AND IMPARTIAL"
FAILURE TO RECLUSE HIMSELF IN THIS MATTER AS WELL AS NOT FILING MOTIONS
TO CORRECT ERRORS OR HEARING CONFLICT BY LAW FIRN IN THIS MATTER.
~~~~
MISAPPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FROM TRUST FUND AGAINST 14TH
AMENDMENT~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~DOCUMENTS ENCLOSED AND ON FILE IN
PROBATE COURT.
~~
=A0=A0MOTION TO VOID AND AMEND...
RECOVERY OF TRUST FUND PLUS DAMAGES...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BREACHES OF FIDUCIARY DUTY~
ENCLOSED~
~~~~~~~
1.THOUSANDS LOST IN TRUST FUND AGAINST STATED WISHES OF BENEFICIARIES
~BREACHES OF FIDUCIARY DUTY
~
1.~NO ACCOUNTING PROVIDED UPON NUMEROUS WRITTEN REQUESTS HAD TO WRITE
OCC, OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF CURRENCY TO GET ACCOUNTING.... THIS IS
A BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY OWED TO THE BENEFICIARIES AND VIOLATION OF
TRUST LAWS
PURSUANT INDIANA LAW AND INDIANA UNIFORM PRUDENT INVESTOR ACT
~
2..BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY OF LOYALTY..
~
3.BREACH OF CONTRACT TO SETTLOR...MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF HIS FAMILY
FOR ASKING FOR CDs AFTER ALL THE LOSSES AND BEFORE~
~
4.UNSUITABILITY OF INAPPROPRIATE BROKERAGE ACCOUNT ~BREACH OF FIDUCIARY
DUTY AND AGAINST UNIFORM PRUDENT INVESTOR ACT~ ALL BREACHES AS
PRESENTED...
~
5.NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAWS OF INDIANA DESTRUCTION OF TRUST ACCOUNT
BY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BREACHES OF FIDUCIARY DUTY BY TRUSTEES as
presented ,~LEE SLADE , KEVIN DUBBINK OF NATIONAL CITY bank.
~~~~~~~~
=A0=A0ANOTHER BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY~PROOF OF "CHURNING" OF ACCOUNT TO
GENERATE FEES EACH MONTH, LOT OF TRANSACTION EACH MONTH BUT NO MONEY
MADE EXCEPT FOR NATIONAL CITY bank. THIS IS A BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY
AS WELL
~~~
~6.FALSE ASSERTIONS IN COURT ORDERS
,~ATTEMPTS JUST TO DISMISS APPEALS FOR,90 DAYS IN SEVERAL ORDERS WHOLLY
UNSUPPORTED BY THE HISTORY LIST AND RESPONSES THIS ON THE CORRECTLY
FILED NOTICE OF APPEAL FORM FROM IN.GOV, ACCESS INDIANA~FILED WITH THE
HELP OF THE CLERK OF THE APPEALS COURT, GLYNIS PIERCE, AND FILED IN BOTH
PROBATE AND APPEALS COURT AND FILED STAMPED SENT INTO BOTH COURTS
~7.ALL MOTIONS TO CORRECT ERRORS IGNORED
~
8.CONFLICT OF INTEREST BY THE LAW FIRM USED IN THIS CASE AND MATTER, AS
FILED AND PRESENTED, NOT HEARD OR RULED ON, VIOLATION OF INDIANA CODE
=A0=A0~
A CONFLICT OF INTEREST MUST BE RULED ON BEFORE HEARING~MOTION TO VOID
HEARING~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
9.TRUST FUND FLEECED BY PETE DONAHOE OF LAW FIRM THAT THE SETTLOR WOULD
HAVE FIRED FOR THIS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF HIS FAMILY AND DAMAGES TO
THE TRUST FUND~NOT THE INTENT OF THE WILL
~
10.REQUESTED NEW AND SPECIAL JUDGE ,NEW JUDGE BEFORE FIRST "HEARING"
AGAIN NO RESPONSE RULE 53.3 FAILURE TO RULE PRO SE BIAS AND
DISCRIMINATION ,
HARDSHIP OR ANYJURISDICTION QUESTIONED...BENEFICIARIES LIVE IN PA.UNABLE
TO TRAVEL TO INDIANA...IN SNOW, HEALTH ISSUES ..NO LAWYER TO REPRESENT
TRUST~
VIOLATIONS IN THIS MATTER AS PRESENTED
11.VIOLATIONS OF ALL PRO SE ETHICS AND MOTIONS ON PRO SE ETHICS BY
INDIANA COMMISSION OF JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS
~12.MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
~VIOLATIONS OF CANONS 3, 2 OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT~MOTION FOR RECUSAL
FILED, NOT FAIR OR IMPARTIAL, NOT EVEN HELPFUL IN ANY WAY PER PRO SE
ETHICS ~ 14. PURSUANT PRO SE MOTION OF INDIANA COMMISSION OF JUDICIAL
QUALIFICATIONS
~
15.NO LAWYER AS REQUESTED TO REPRESENT THE TRUST HARDSHIP JURISDICTION,
NO POSSIBILITY OF BEING PRESENT AT "HEARING" HELD WITHOUT THE
BENEFICIARIES BEING PRESENT OR REPRESENTED AS REQUESTED OR POSTPONEMENT
AS REQUESTED IN WRITING AND FILED.
~
16.FRAUDULENT TRANSFER, NO FORMAL FILED OBJECTIONS OF THE BENEFICIARIES
WERE HEARD
RECUSAL OF JUDGE REQUESTED FOR TAKING MONEY FROM HIS INVOLVEMENT WITH
NATIONAL CITY BANK AND THE RUTH LILLY CASE
~
17.FAILURE OF JUDGE TO REPLY TO OR RULE ON ANY OF MOTIONS OR PETITIONS
FROM BENEFICIARIES~RULE 53.3~
PROBATE CODES IGNORED, BREACHES OF CONTRACT OF TRUST FUND, BREACHES OF
FIDUCIARY DUTY AS PRESENTED
BREACH OF DUTY OF LOYALTY OF TRUSTEES TO BENEFICIARIES, NO REQUESTED
ACCOUNTING, NO AUDIT, NO STATEMENT THAT THE TRUST HAD BEEN ADMINISTERED
ACCORDING TO THE TERMS OF THE TRUST AS REQUIRED BY PROBATE CODE
~
18.DAMAGES AND DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS TO THE TRUST FROM RESIGNATION OF
TRUSTEE WITHOUT ONE WORD TO BENEFICIARIES FOR ONLY ASKING FOR
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT
IC 30-4-3-29(b)
UNSUITABILITY OF THE INAPPROPRIATE BROKERAGE ACCOUNT. IC 30-4-3-11 IC
30-4-5-17
VIOLATION OF PROBATE CODES , VIOLATIONS OF INDIANA UNIFORM PRUDENT
INVESTOR ACT IC 30-4-3.5-25
Misrepresentations and Misconstructions of Probate Codes by Pete
Donahoe~words of codes changed and misquoted~legal malpractice.
=A0=A0LOSSES IN ACCOUNT OF THOUSANDS,
LOSSES OF OVER $5000 IN TAX CONSEQUENCES OF RESIGNATION,
~
19.LIABILITY OF THE TRUSTEES FOR BREACHES OF FIDUCIARY DUTY ,
~~~~~~~~~~
2O.SEEKING RECOVERY OF FEES, LOSSES IN ACCOUNT, RESTORATION OF TRUST
ACCOUNT, DAMAGES TO BE DETERMINED
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1.OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE... . FAILURE TO FILE DOCUMENTS RECUSAL OF JUDGE
McKINNEY MOTIONED FOR AND COMPLAINT FILED FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW...FRAUD
AND CONSPIRACY WITH LOWER COURT IN HANDLIN
|
| |
| |
so far all the district court and the 7th district court of appeals has
done....and all they want to do to do..... is to "dismiss", not hear the
issues in this case....not any of them, just failure to file
documents......with the 7th Circuit court of
Appeals..."qualifications"...commission letting all the federal judges
...violate the judicial conduct code canon 3 E "to be fair and
impartial"......and let National City Bank get away the breaches of
fiduciary duty...losses in the account.....Unsuitability of the
inappropriate brokerage account, no accounting, and such.......
violation of rights to an appeal , any hearing of filed formal
objections in the probate court....
~COMPLAINT~FRAUDULENT TRANSFER
OF DAMAGED TRUST FUND~
~
COMPLAINT ~VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES
~TO THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
~
BENEFICIARIES OF TRUST FUND.~PLAINTIFF VS.~
LEE SLADE AND KEVIN DUBBINK TRUSTEES OF NATIONAL CITY BANK ~DEFENDANT
~
AND/FROM THE PROBATE COURT IN INDIANAPOLIS...JUDGE DEITER....
UNCONSTITUTIONAL HEARINGS...
~TO DISTRICT COURT....
~
1.UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNETHICAL TREATMENT OF CASE VIOLATIONS OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF INDIANA~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FILED FORMAL OBJECTIONS NOT HEARD~UNCONSTITUTIONAL
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2.DENIAL OF ACCESS TO THE COURTS
~3.DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW
~
4.DEPRIVED OF PROPERTY, MONEY TAKEN FROM TRUST ACCOUNT, FLEECING OF
TRUST ACCOUNT.. AGAINST THE 14TH AMENDMENT WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FILED FORMAL OBJECTIONS NOT HEARD.. UNCONSTITUTIONAL..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
IC 30-4-3-11..LIABILITY OF THE TRUSTEE TO THE BENEFICIARY......
~
UNSUITABILITY, MISEPRESENTATION, NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF FIDUCIARY BY
NATIONAL CITY BANK TRUSTEES..
~DOCUMENT TITLE:~CASE SUMMARY
~NUMBERED.~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0
COMPLAINT OF FRAUD IN THE HISTORY LIST....MISREPRESENTATON.. ERRORS AND
OMISSIONS........INTENTIONAL, DELIBERATE AND IN VIOLATION OF INDIANA
CODE AND CANONS OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT, 3E, AND 2, POLITICAL MONEY ACCEPTED
FROM AND VIA RUTH LILLY
TRUST CASE ANOTHER MISMANAGEMENT BY NATIONAL CITY BANK
~~~~~
JUDGE DEITER'S INVOLVEMTN WITH NATIONAL CITY BANK AND IT'S MISMANAGEMENT
OF TRUST FUNDS......PRECEDENT CASES PRESENTED
~
SEC AND NASD VIOLATIONS BY NATIONAL CITY BANK
~~~~~~~~
NOTICE OF APPEAL SENT INTO PROBATE COURT VIA REGISTERED MAIL NOT
FILED....INTENTIONAL AND DELIBERATE AFTER MOTIONS TO CORRECT , PETITION
FOR HEARING ON THIS ISSUE AND CONSPIRACY WITH APPEALS COURT TO
MISREPRESENT THIS AND ISSUE OF "COMPELLING " A TRANSCRIPT OF THE APRIL
4, 203 HEARING WHEN THERE IS NO TRANSCRIPT OF RECORD ...NO ONE CAN
COMPEL A TRANSCRIPT THAT DOES NOT EXISTS AND USED AS A EXCUSE TO DISMISS
APPEAL..PERJURY OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND VIOLATIONS OF JUDICIAL
CONDUCT TO BE 'FAIR AND IMPARTIAL"
FAILURE TO RECLUSE HIMSELF IN THIS MATTER AS WELL AS NOT FILING MOTIONS
TO CORRECT ERRORS OR HEARING CONFLICT BY LAW FIRN IN THIS MATTER.
~~~~
MISAPPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FROM TRUST FUND AGAINST 14TH
AMENDMENT~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~DOCUMENTS ENCLOSED AND ON FILE IN
PROBATE COURT.
~~
=A0=A0MOTION TO VOID AND AMEND...
RECOVERY OF TRUST FUND PLUS DAMAGES...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BREACHES OF FIDUCIARY DUTY~
ENCLOSED~
~~~~~~~
1.THOUSANDS LOST IN TRUST FUND AGAINST STATED WISHES OF BENEFICIARIES
~BREACHES OF FIDUCIARY DUTY
~
1.~NO ACCOUNTING PROVIDED UPON NUMEROUS WRITTEN REQUESTS HAD TO WRITE
OCC, OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF CURRENCY TO GET ACCOUNTING.... THIS IS
A BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY OWED TO THE BENEFICIARIES AND VIOLATION OF
TRUST LAWS
PURSUANT INDIANA LAW AND INDIANA UNIFORM PRUDENT INVESTOR ACT
~
2..BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY OF LOYALTY..
~
3.BREACH OF CONTRACT TO SETTLOR...MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF HIS FAMILY
FOR ASKING FOR CDs AFTER ALL THE LOSSES AND BEFORE~
~
4.UNSUITABILITY OF INAPPROPRIATE BROKERAGE ACCOUNT ~BREACH OF FIDUCIARY
DUTY AND AGAINST UNIFORM PRUDENT INVESTOR ACT~ ALL BREACHES AS
PRESENTED...
~
5.NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAWS OF INDIANA DESTRUCTION OF TRUST ACCOUNT
BY MALICIOUS PROSECUTION BREACHES OF FIDUCIARY DUTY BY TRUSTEES as
presented ,~LEE SLADE , KEVIN DUBBINK OF NATIONAL CITY bank.
~~~~~~~~
=A0=A0ANOTHER BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY~PROOF OF "CHURNING" OF ACCOUNT TO
GENERATE FEES EACH MONTH, LOT OF TRANSACTION EACH MONTH BUT NO MONEY
MADE EXCEPT FOR NATIONAL CITY bank. THIS IS A BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY
AS WELL
~~~
~6.FALSE ASSERTIONS IN COURT ORDERS
,~ATTEMPTS JUST TO DISMISS APPEALS FOR,90 DAYS IN SEVERAL ORDERS WHOLLY
UNSUPPORTED BY THE HISTORY LIST AND RESPONSES THIS ON THE CORRECTLY
FILED NOTICE OF APPEAL FORM FROM IN.GOV, ACCESS INDIANA~FILED WITH THE
HELP OF THE CLERK OF THE APPEALS COURT, GLYNIS PIERCE, AND FILED IN BOTH
PROBATE AND APPEALS COURT AND FILED STAMPED SENT INTO BOTH COURTS
~7.ALL MOTIONS TO CORRECT ERRORS IGNORED
~
8.CONFLICT OF INTEREST BY THE LAW FIRM USED IN THIS CASE AND MATTER, AS
FILED AND PRESENTED, NOT HEARD OR RULED ON, VIOLATION OF INDIANA CODE
=A0=A0~
A CONFLICT OF INTEREST MUST BE RULED ON BEFORE HEARING~MOTION TO VOID
HEARING~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
9.TRUST FUND FLEECED BY PETE DONAHOE OF LAW FIRM THAT THE SETTLOR WOULD
HAVE FIRED FOR THIS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION OF HIS FAMILY AND DAMAGES TO
THE TRUST FUND~NOT THE INTENT OF THE WILL
~
10.REQUESTED NEW AND SPECIAL JUDGE ,NEW JUDGE BEFORE FIRST "HEARING"
AGAIN NO RESPONSE RULE 53.3 FAILURE TO RULE PRO SE BIAS AND
DISCRIMINATION ,
HARDSHIP OR ANYJURISDICTION QUESTIONED...BENEFICIARIES LIVE IN PA.UNABLE
TO TRAVEL TO INDIANA...IN SNOW, HEALTH ISSUES ..NO LAWYER TO REPRESENT
TRUST~
VIOLATIONS IN THIS MATTER AS PRESENTED
11.VIOLATIONS OF ALL PRO SE ETHICS AND MOTIONS ON PRO SE ETHICS BY
INDIANA COMMISSION OF JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS
~12.MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
~
13.NON COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 40 FORMA PAUPERIS , NO REQUIRED WRITTEN
REASONS FOR DENIAL ~TOTAL INCOME ONLY $800 PER MONTH, NOTICE OF
ELIGIBILITY AND LACK OF ASSETS FILED
VIOLATIONS OF CANONS 3, 2 OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT~MOTION FOR RECUSAL
FILED, NOT FAIR OR IMPARTIAL, NOT EVEN HELPFUL IN ANY WAY PER PRO SE
ETHICS ~ 14. PURSUANT PRO SE MOTION OF INDIANA COMMISSION OF JUDICIAL
QUALIFICATIONS
~
15.NO LAWYER AS REQUESTED TO REPRESENT THE TRUST HARDSHIP JURISDICTION,
SNOWED IN IN PA. LIKE THIS YEAR, ON DAY OF "HEARING" NO POSSIBILITY OF
BEING PRESENT AT "HEARING" HELD WITHOUT THE BENEFICIARIES BEING PRESENT
OR REPRESENTED AS REQUESTED OR POSTPONEMENT AS REQUESTED IN WRITING AND
FILED.
~
16.FRAUDULENT TRANSFER, NO FORMAL FILED OBJECTIONS OF THE BENEFICIARIES
WERE HEARD
RECUSAL OF JUDGE REQUESTED FOR TAKING MONEY FROM HIS INVOLVEMENT WITH
NATIONAL CITY BANK AND THE RUTH LILLY CASE
~
17.FAILURE OF JUDGE TO REPLY TO OR RULE ON ANY OF MOTIONS OR PETITIONS
FROM BENEFICIARIES~RULE 53.3~
PROBATE CODES IGNORED, BREACHES OF CONTRACT OF TRUST FUND, BREACHES OF
FIDUCIARY DUTY AS PRESENTED
BREACH OF DUTY OF LOYALTY OF TRUSTEES TO BENEFICIARIES, NO REQUESTED
ACCOUNTING, NO AUDIT, NO STATEMENT THAT THE TRUST HAD BEEN ADMINISTERED
ACCORDING TO THE TERMS OF THE TRUST AS REQUIRED BY PROBATE CODE
~
18.DAMAGES AND DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS TO THE TRUST FROM RESIGNATION OF
TRUST
|
| |
| |
|
