|
|
In article <trius018vci6eatggovkr6an9tc09o32t4@4ax.com> EGK <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>Huh? English isn't your first language I take it?
Can you guys take this to somewhere else?
--
Lady Chatterly
"Pssttt...Chatterly is a bot..." -- Spike 'To
|
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:261220041505129070%spam@aol.com...
> > Leftist tactic #4: When logical arguments escape you, call your
opponent a
> > Nazi.
>
> So you hear it a lot.
Every time I use logic to paint a left
|
|
|
In article <unfus0tp3iv7poa44op4cphit7s12i7sp7@4ax.com> EGK
<me@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>I think I see why so many in here dismiss you as a Kobe jock sniffer, Sports
>Fan. There was nothing unreasonable about what I posted. You simply can't
>fathom i
|
|
|
Christopher A. Lee wrote:
>>The religion *is* charity, doofus.
>
>
> No, moron, it is not.
Of course it is, it's eternal salvation.
|
|
|
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 09:18:18 -0500, Andrew White
<nospamers@allowed.at.all.net> wrote:
>But the fact remains, it was still your fault regardless of what the
>other morons did.
Nope. The *ASSUMPTION* is you were at fault. This does *NOT* mean that
|
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:261220041455153243%spam@aol.com...
> In article <UEGzd.261422$V41.251199@attbi_s52>, Johnny Lingo
> <johnnylingo@spammenot.com> wrote:
>
>> "David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
>
|
|
|
PLMerite <stockade@smokebombhill.com> wrote:
>
>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
>news:cqndna$3nm$1@bolt.sonic.net...
>> PLMerite <stockade@smokebombhill.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
|
|
|
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:cqndna$3nm$1@bolt.sonic.net...
> PLMerite <stockade@smokebombhill.com> wrote:
> >
> >"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
> >news:261220041146490965%spam@aol.com...
> >> >
|
|
|
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 03:08:05 +0000, Brent P wrote:
> In article <s1tus0tarei0tjdgs44l95toip725trp01@4ax.com>, Andrew White wrote:
>
>> other vehicle. You failed to enter the ramp at the appropriate speed
>> for the conditions. The conditions being
|
|
|
PLMerite <stockade@smokebombhill.com> wrote:
>
>"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:261220041146490965%spam@aol.com...
>> >
>> > If any innocent civilians have been killed it's because Saddam's Baathist
>> > Party thugs have cont
|
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:261220041244228133%spam@aol.com...
> In article <ghFzd.565375$wV.70027@attbi_s54>, Johnny Lingo
> <johnnylingo@spammenot.com> wrote:
>
>> "David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
>>
|
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:261220041237102222%spam@aol.com...
>
> Only a hate filled Republican would find "military age men" in a pile
> of flesh in order to justify their desire to see death. You are just
> another pr
|
|
|
????? wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 17:54:03 GMT, Sam Stone <sirian@mental.org> wrote:
>
>
>>John Baker wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 05:27:01 GMT, Sam Stone <sirian@mental.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>John Baker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On S
|
|
|
"Zipless" <zipless@whocares.com> wrote:
>Very well put. That's exactly what the trooper told me when he wrote the
>ticket. He said that they are instructed to write a ticket for whomever is
>in the rear in a rear-ender accident. He said that's "st
|
|
|
Very well put. That's exactly what the trooper told me when he wrote the
ticket. He said that they are instructed to write a ticket for whomever is
in the rear in a rear-ender accident. He said that's "state law" (I doubt
it, probably more like "sta
|
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:261220041146500996%spam@aol.com...
> In article <Z5ozd.633276$D%.612322@attbi_s51>, Johnny Lingo
> <johnnylingo@spammenot.com> wrote:
>
>> "David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
>>
|
|
|
PLMerite <stockade@smokebombhill.com> wrote:
>"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
>> > Prove it.
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2004/10/28/iraq_deaths041028.html
>
>
>The report in the British journal is based on the w
|
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:261220041146500989%spam@aol.com...
> In article <ukozd.6674$1U6.3788@trnddc09>, PLMerite
> <stockade@smokebombhill.com> wrote:
>
> > "Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
>
|
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:261220041146490965%spam@aol.com...
> >
> > If any innocent civilians have been killed it's because Saddam's
Baathist
> > Party thugs have continued fighting.
>
> You believe everything the Re
|
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:261220041146480901%spam@aol.com...
> In article <0nozd.6676$1U6.4384@trnddc09>, PLMerite
> <stockade@smokebombhill.com> wrote:
>
> > "israel t" <rambam@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
> > new
|
|
|
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 17:55:06 -0600, "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001>
wrote:
>I do not give legal advice, only opinions.
Yeah, right.
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>> He had motives to want the girl dead,
>>>> HE DID NOT! This is a vicious LIE!
>>> $1000.00 a month certainly adds up. Even a wealthy person knows
>>> this.
>> All he had to do to make
|
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:261220041146480868%spam@aol.com...
> >
> > Prove it.
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2004/10/28/iraq_deaths041028.html
The report in the British journal is based on the work of
|
|
|
"EGK" <me@privacy.net> schreef in bericht news:1ents0lgpmq72rt170539lsrg0baahti2m@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 08:40:04 +0100, "Alex" <avdeelen.REMOFE@wanadoo.nl>
> wrote:
>
> >"EGK" <me@privacy.net> schreef in bericht
> >news:bctrs055c6qvrci077i
|
|
|
In article
<1104112785.64765e654513ae587f87cdd2dc08afcd@teranews>,
zipless@whocares.com says...
> Very well put. That's exactly what the trooper told me when he wrote the
> ticket. He said that they are instructed to write a ticket for whomever is
|
|
|
> >> > If it Walks Like a Duck and Quacks Like a Duck, Then it Must Be A Duck.
> >> >
> >> >> Its just like my sister who when watching the original Stargate movie
> >> >> complained that it was gay bashing.
> >> >
> >> > Never saw it - sorry.
> >
|
|
|
"krp" <web2457k@verizon.net> schreef in bericht
news:O9xzd.7931$L7.607@trnddc05...
>
> "Alex" <avdeelen.REMOFE@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message
> news:41ce6bbc$0$619$ee9da40f@news.wanadoo.nl...
> > Remember that this is the girl who was sent to rehab,
|
|
|
Rob wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 23:16:56 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
>
>> As I don't believe in the sacred, no word is profane.
>
> You can rationalize it any way you wish - but by societal standards
> certain words are deemed vulg
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010607030306070804040506
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Rob wrote:
>>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>>>As I do
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Kent Wills wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>>SolarChase wrote:
>>>>>>Kent Wills wrote
>>>>>>>Interesting. Seems as if Cameron has had a remedy all along. I h
|
|
|
heodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Kent Wills wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>"forevernitefan" wrote:
>>>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>>
>>>>>It's only logical to presume Ted knows more than we. He is, after all,
>>>>>Cameron's brother-in-law. Clearly he do
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>"forevernitefan" wrote:
>>
>>>>Kaldis, if he had something specific to explode the case wide open, he
>>>>would eagerly throw it in Ken Smith's face and couldn't restrain
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>>SolarChase wrote:
>>>>>>Kent Wills wrote
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Interesting. Seems as if Cameron has had a remedy all along.
|
|
|
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 23:19:46 GMT, Lady Chatterly <me@catcher.in.the.rye>
wrote:
>In article <unfus0tp3iv7poa44op4cphit7s12i7sp7@4ax.com> EGK
><me@privacy.net> wrote:
>>
>>I think I see why so many in here dismiss you as a Kobe jock sniffer, Sports
|
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
news:261220041505129070%spam@aol.com...
> In article <BiHzd.12330$2X6.584@trnddc07>, PLMerite
> <stockade@smokebombhill.com> wrote:
>
>> "Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
>>
|
|
|
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
">He WAS asked by the Examiners' Board of the Colorado Bar Association to
submit to a psychological examination, after all. It's true. He refused, and
as a result, he was denied a licence to practise law in Colorado."
|
|
|
In article <1MIzd.16152$_62.8401@trnddc01>, PLMerite
<stockade@smokebombhill.com> wrote:
> "David W. Barnes" <spam@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:261220041559455066%spam@aol.com...
> > In article <CJHzd.9712$h.2648@trnddc04>, PLMerite
> > <stocka
|
|
|
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
">But when you are at the mercy of the court, it can very quickly become YOUR
problem."
That's pretty much what Ken has been saying for awhile now.... <g>
oh, POST THE FULL AUTOPSY REPORT !!!!
-------
have a GREAT d
|
|
|
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 14:46:11 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote
>> You do it to push your religion rather than out of charity.
>
>The religion *is* charity, doofus.
No, moron, i
|
|
|
Deaf Power wrote:
> Is this agency a joke?
> I found this agency incompetent. Also, my lawyer told me EEOC rarely
> send case to court. If so then EEOC is not doing their job! They're
> wasting taxpayers' dollars!
> Last August, a company ref
|
|
|
prabbit1@shamrocksgf.com wrote:
> Getting fed by them DOES require more than simple politeness, etc. It
> requires sitting through a sermon, prayers, etc.
Horrors!
And getting fed by the military requires sitting through boot camp.
The nerve!
|
|
|
John Baker wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 05:27:03 GMT, Sam Stone <sirian@mental.org> wrote:
>
>
>>Christopher A. Lee wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 19:42:29 -0700, "Chas"
>>><chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Christopher
|
|
|
John Baker wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 05:27:01 GMT, Sam Stone <sirian@mental.org> wrote:
>
>
>>John Baker wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 15:18:48 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
>>><calee@optonline.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 25 Dec 200
|
|
|
Christopher A. Lee wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 05:27:01 GMT, Sam Stone <sirian@mental.org> wrote:
>
>
>>John Baker wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 15:18:48 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
>>><calee@optonline.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 25
|
|
|
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 13:07:20 -0800, Sports Fan <sports@fan.home> wrote:
>In article <1ents0lgpmq72rt170539lsrg0baahti2m@4ax.com>
>EGK <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 08:40:04 +0100, "Alex" <avdeelen.REMOFE@wanadoo.nl>
>>wrote:
>>
|
|
|
John wrote:
>> I've never heard of the SSA "calling" and wanting $$$ upfront. If it was
>> a tax investigation, he would have received a few notices in the mail
>> from the IRS before any garnishment action. Based on the information you
>> provided,
|
|
|
I see that on Sun, 26 Dec 2004 13:16:39 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>>> Or if you enjoy Cajun music, you might try Michael Doucet and Beausoliel.
>
>> Ken's nev
|
|
|
shempmcgurk@netscape.net wrote:
> Can I register a domain name of a person other than myself?
> For example, take the fictitious person named "Louise Barton". If I
> registered "louisebarton.com", can the actual Louise Barton sue me?
> How about
|
|
|
In article <trius018vci6eatggovkr6an9tc09o32t4@4ax.com>
EGK <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 23:19:46 GMT, Lady Chatterly <me@catcher.in.the.rye>
>wrote:
>
>>In article <unfus0tp3iv7poa44op4cphit7s12i7sp7@4ax.com> EGK
>><me@privacy.ne
|
|
|
In article <unfus0tp3iv7poa44op4cphit7s12i7sp7@4ax.com>
EGK <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 13:07:20 -0800, Sports Fan <sports@fan.home> wrote:
>
>>In article <1ents0lgpmq72rt170539lsrg0baahti2m@4ax.com>
>>EGK <me@privacy.net> wrote:
|
