misc.legal

hi I am manisekaran from india we outsoursing ethical seo developemnt from india.I read your atricle in google nice. Have u need any othe support from india www.seocontact.com www.eworldtechnologies.com best regards manisekaran call me 0091445

>> Indeed. But I suspect that you'd have to have both the participants and >> the organizer of the matches enter into an agreement -- any one could >> scuttle it. > > Not only the participants and organizer, but also anyone who ever got > access to t

> The right to publicity does not stop someone from selling pictures of > you. It most definitely does, if I haven't assigned the right to use my likeness.

I see that on Fri, 31 Dec 2004 17:45:28 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >There's really nothing more to say here. If, as you imply, I am ignorant of something (actually, being a mere human, I'm ignorant of a great man

Don Priebe wrote: >> but I believe the ID check thing may have >> been something that was passed in the myriad of new anti-terrorist >> laws. > Section 326 of the Patriot Act. See > http://www.aba.com/aba/pdf/InsResourceGuide.pdf According to

David Martel wrote: > Richard, > To whom are you replying? This was an editorial on property rights by > Sowell, a highly respected editorialist. I don't believe the poster > intends to flaunt his treasures from the back bath window. > Dave

Charlie K wrote: > U.S. Department of Agriculture has minimum care standards for animals > used in commerce ie. Circuses, pet shops, Las Vegas acts, zoos etc. I > don't believe Wal-Mart employees shooting a stray cat would qualify as > violating tho

Rob wrote: > "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message > news:cr231v01au8@news3.newsguy.com... >> fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote: >> >>> The tube has been playing an item about WalMart employees >>> facing _Federal_ animal cruelty charges.

Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote: > >Ray Fischer wrote: >> Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >Ray Fischer wrote: >> >> >> >> >Indeed. The Bill of Rights was not written to give rights to >the >> >> >> >government. >> >> >> >> >> >>

In article <OH%Ad.24162$Ff3.10544@trndny04>, "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote: > > Isn't this the sme as a newspaper publishing the box scores and > > descriptions of a baseball game? > > "...descriptions and accounts" is in the MLB discla

In article <Je2Bd.22289$vF5.7119@trndny07>, "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote: > >> So do two football teams, but that doesn't mean you can show an NFL game > >> on > >> your website. > > > > That's because the telecast is copyrighted. Tha

In article <5J%Ad.18087$EL5.10065@trndny09>, "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote: > > > I'm pessimistic -- there have been discusions of this matter from > > mid-1800s > > and forward, and in those I have seen the conclusion has been 'ches

In article <hGQAd.5998$PY6.125@trndny02>, "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote: > As a publisher, I have standing to get a court to resolve the issues of > copyright and right-to-publicity as they relate to chessgames without having > to publi

On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 18:49:03 +0000, dangett wrote: > Such disrepect to our commander in chief during wartime would be > unprecedented. Just shows how low the democrats will go to embarass the > president. HAHAHA. GW doesn't need any help to be e

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>This was a BIG story. Top left 4 columns on the front page of a Sunday >>>edition -- the MOST prominent placement they could give it -- continued in >>>another 5 column

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > He WAS asked to submit to a psychological examination by the Colorado Bar > Examiners' Board, after all. By that logic, Cam Brown must be a cold-blooded child-killer; HE WAS *INDICTED* BY A GRAND JURY for the apparent

Ken Smith wrote: > Wanna bet? What makes you think the First Amendment still protects us > from anything? What makes you think it doesn't? So far I see no shortage of neo-terrorist America-hating loudmouths in these groups. In fact I

Bush is the AntiChrist!! wrote: > Unless I was born in some third world country, I can yell at the top of > my lungs that Bush isn't my president and there isn't a darn thing > anyone can do about it. Gee...you mean Ashcroft didn't silence you?

dangett <dangett@yahoo.com> wrote in news:Xns95568A3E49CACdann@ 151.164.30.48: > Such disrepect to our commander in chief during wartime would be > unprecedented. Just shows how low the democrats will go to embarass the > president. Just goes

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040407030905020204040202 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit [sorry -- forgot the attachment] Ken Smith wrote: > Kent Wills wrote:

SolarChase wrote: >>Ken Smith wrote > > > ">If you are trying to persuade the jury that Cam was a responsible and caring > father, and that it was just a horrible accident that could have happened to > any of us, it isn't a good fact. (But then a

In our last episode <Xns95568A3E49CACdann@151.164.30.48>, dangett lept out of the bushes shouting: > Such disrepect to our commander in chief during wartime would be > unprecedented. Just shows how low the democrats will go to embarass the > presid

ah yeah, and that's coming from a traffic cop or a traffic judge, one of those that depends on you paying your ticket. <ephedralover@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1103216983.558438.307910@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > That crap doesn't

>Ken Smith wrote ">If you are trying to persuade the jury that Cam was a responsible and caring father, and that it was just a horrible accident that could have happened to any of us, it isn't a good fact. (But then again, it might not matter all

Sam Stone wrote: > Bush is the AntiChrist!! wrote: > >> Unless I was born in some third world country, I can yell at the top >> of my lungs that Bush isn't my president and there isn't a darn thing >> anyone can do about it. > > > Gee...you

War Blog By FrontPage Magazine FrontPageMagazine.com | December 29, 2004 NAVY SEALS SUE ASSOCIATED PRESS http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=16480 Six Navy SEALs are suing the Associated Press for publishing personal

Such disrepect to our commander in chief during wartime would be unprecedented. Just shows how low the democrats will go to embarass the president.

Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote: >Ray Fischer wrote: >> >> >Indeed. The Bill of Rights was not written to give rights to the >> >> >government. >> >> >> >> Nor was it written to give any right that you like. >> > >> >The Constitution/Bill

Ray Gordon wrote: > As a publisher, I have standing to get a court to resolve the issues of > copyright and right-to-publicity as they relate to chessgames without having > to publish any games first (it's a "legitimate conflict" issue). > > Basi

On 30 Dec 2004 14:47:16 -0800, fredfighter@spamcop.net in misc.legal, wrote the following: >The tube has been playing an item about WalMart employees >facing _Federal_ animal cruelty charges. > >Is there such a thing? If so, does the statute some

Nemo Erehwon wrote: > My UAC preferences are : > USyd ( probably wont get in) :-( > UNSW ( probably wont get in) :-( > Macquarie ( I have a decent chance ) > ANU ( I have a decent chance ) > I live on the north shore of Sydney and Macquarie is

There's really nothing more to say here. -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@worldnet.att.net

I see that on Fri, 31 Dec 2004 16:35:16 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: [...] >>>And we haven't even gotten underway here on this case yet. > >> Which I find real annoying! > > As I've said before, having been on the business end of th

Kent Wills wrote: > I see that on Thu, 30 Dec 2004 07:38:03 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" > <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >>Ken Smith wrote: [snip to focus on this discrete point] >>BZZZZZZZZZZZZZTTTT!!! LIE! This is what mendacious preva

I see that on Fri, 31 Dec 2004 16:32:40 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: [...] > >> Actually, a valid question. We all know Lauren was a bastard. I >> don't see the what this has to do with anything. > > Unfortunately, what Ted is say

I see that on Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:58:18 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >He WAS asked to submit to a psychological examination by the Colorado Bar >Examiners' Board, after all. If we follow your logic, Cameron is guil

In article <BrlBd.17054$152.14653@trndny01>, "Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote: > > The right to publicity does not stop someone from selling pictures of > > you. > > It most definitely does, if I haven't assigned the right to use my likene

I see that on Fri, 31 Dec 2004 12:14:06 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>> This was a BIG story. Top left 4 columns on the front page of a Sunday >>> edition -- th

Ray Fischer wrote: > Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> That was sarcasm. > > > >I know, moron. > > _Now_ you know. Now I don't care. And I didn't then, either. > >> > Essentially, we can debate rights until the cows come > >>

Kent Wills wrote: > I see that on Thu, 30 Dec 2004 07:38:03 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" > <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >>Ken Smith wrote: >>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>ienjball@yahoo.com wrote: [snip to this point] >>>>And just exactl

SolarChase wrote: >>Ken Smith wrote > >> All you have to do is follow Geragos' sound advice, and shut the @$#* up -- >> when you went away, this discussion went away. :) > > Geragos, now ???? LOL !!!!!!!!!!! I was honestly shocked by Te

Bush is the AntiChrist!! wrote: > Steven L. wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> Sam Stone wrote: >>>> Bush is the AntiChrist!! wrote: >>>> >>>>> Huh? >>>>> Bush is re-elected, fly the flag upside down! >>>> >>>> You @$#*ing traitor. >>> >>> Some

Hmmm. If true, maybe Sam Sloan IS the human resources director of USCF afterall. -- Tom Klem "The Vulcan Science Council has determined that Time Travel is impossible" ---Commander T'Pol "StanB" <stanbooz@comXXXcast.net> wrote in message

Richard, To whom are you replying? This was an editorial on property rights by Sowell, a highly respected editorialist. I don't believe the poster intends to flaunt his treasures from the back bath window. Dave M.

Michelle, Such books are general in nature and the laws in your locale may vary, which is why you should speak with a lawyer. I think that listing this stuff would be wise. Also, I'm not convinced that you have a "residence", it sounds like yo

HOW TO WIN A LAWSUIT WITHOUT HIRING A LAWYER! Having your day in court can be agonizing when you don't know the rules of procedure or the laws governing your case. Nobody knows the facts of your case as well as you do, but do you know how to f

On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 18:49:03 GMT, dangett <dangett@yahoo.com> wrote: >Such disrepect to our commander in chief during wartime would be >unprecedented. Just shows how low the democrats will go to embarass the >president. The irony - have you alr

Maybe you're right, but it's cruelty the way Indiana law has it. Any sort of battery against an animal is cruelty to animals there. If the animal is tortured or mutilated (and I think shooting with a pellet gun could qualify as both), it's a felony the