|
|
"NeoOne" <Dariusjkelly@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1104719701.747314.204540@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Neo Tech Party Administration
>
> Posted By: 21st Cent Neo-Tycoon
> Date: January 2, 2004, at 7:00pm
> 21st Century E-Commerce Money Ma
|
|
|
Dane,
Thanks for the detail info.
At the time, I was alone (i.e. no witness), how much is this gonna
hurt?
Also, how do I know if the officer used any radar unit? What would the
defense be if, say, he used pacing instead?
Would photos be some
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050806050505060103070508
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>indigent wrote:
> After
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>>Truthfully, you won't get useful advice here -- the legally trained won't
>>give it (at least, not to the level of specificity you will need in a
>>particular case), and yahoos like Ted Kaldis scarc
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> McGyver wrote:
>
>>The court do not cook up plots to deprive you of rights and liberty, and
>>there is no need to put them off balance. And you can't anyway.
>
> Ken Smith, call your office.
Ted Kaldis, call your
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000505060005040607030700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
|
|
|
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:25:47 GMT, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
>On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 01:05:10 GMT, PMDavis <pmdlandarch@earthlink.net>
>said in alt.atheism:
>
>>Do you believe that its ethical to undermine public and international
>>confid
|
|
|
On 1 Jan 2005 22:30:14 -0600, cobalt@newscene.com (Kate ) wrote:
>On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 01:05:10 GMT, PMDavis <pmdlandarch@earthlink.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On 1 Jan 2005 09:47:12 -0600, cobalt@newscene.com (Kate ) wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 12:53:13
|
|
|
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 21:50:26 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
>In our last episode <0t7dt0d0jc4ok49m09ugs6tccbv7f4jgsg@4ax.com>, PMDavis
>lept out of the bushes shouting:
>
>> an impeachment conviction in the House
>
>No,
|
|
|
<EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com> wrote in message
news:cr6qut$7pa$1@reader1.panix.com...
> But laissez-faire capitalism can result in some entities being able to
> dictate the terms of thise ageements.
No.
If you do not like the terms of an agr
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:41D6E5FF.C16399D4@worldnet.att.net...
> Capitalism isn't "brutal". Capitalism functions on the basis of
agreement.
> You airhead.
He's clealry made the mistake of whistling w
|
|
|
> If a debtor fails to list a judgement, but lists the same creditor
> under Unsecured debt, i.e., the same creditor should have been included
> in the Secured Creditors list, since subsequent to the judgment it is
> now a Secured Debt, what is the lik
|
|
|
Rob,
It's amazing how ones life can change from one moment to the next, I'm very
sorry that happened to you. I used to be a "tough on crime" kind of guy and
I believed all of the bull out there. I once worked for the county court of
Maricopa, A
|
|
|
>> Are you an attorney?
>
> No,
Thanks for playing.
|
|
|
just fyi, have you checked out the prisontalk.com forums? pretty good
places for others going through similar stuff. i was sentenced to a year
and a half in federal prison for copyright infringement (uploading and
downloading software from the net
|
|
|
Far be it from a telemarketer to tell you lies. In fairness to the
people who do this lowlife job for a living, they are instructed in how
to answer objections like yours and have the choice of doing as they're
told or losing their job.
If either pa
|
|
|
Well my wife and her friends at work would like to find out about what
agency they contact for the fact that they were not paid until four
days after a scheduled and normal payday.
On top of the lateness they forced everyone to wait until after 5pm t
|
|
|
This is something my business law 101 class just didn't cover.
In your opinion would including 45-second video clips of various video
games which instruct people how to cheat at said games, be covered
under fair use?
The substantiality of the mate
|
|
|
Merry_Christmas@linkedto.no-spam-allowed.com wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> Sneech, when you listen to these liberals bleat on about this social
> program and that social program, you soon instictively realize that
> these are also the last kind of
|
|
|
eo Tech Party Administration
Posted By: 21st Cent Neo-Tycoon
Date: January 2, 2004, at 7:00pm
21st Century E-Commerce Money Making Formula
This works better than letters & it's all electronic!
Posted By: E'Sean Date: Wednesday, 21 July 2004 eM
|
|
|
<bobfuller30004@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1104706071.084440.259430@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> I own a home with my Brother who will soon be getting married. If my
> Brother's marriage ends in divorce should I be concerned with getting
|
|
|
indigent wrote:
> Theodore,
[snipped]
> No Theodore, I am not as strong as your friend.
>
> Regards,
>
> Indigent Guy
Theodore don't give a #@($ about anyone but him and his. To curry
his "favour," you must pledge undying affect
|
|
|
Chas wrote:
> "McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> wrote
>
>>The court do not cook up plots to deprive you of rights and
>>liberty, and there is no need to put them off balance. And you
>>can't anyway.
>
> The court constantly cooks up plots to deprive
|
|
|
I was just curious if anyone here is familiar with the legal pleadings and
strategies devised by mr mitchell and available to be perused at the
following url?
http://www.supremelaw.org
Dane
|
|
|
Theodore,
Can you imagine the feeling of having your own home with about $60,000 in
equity, two late model cars paid off, good credit...and a decent life all
gone in almost the blink of an eye. And a career that paid a fair salary
but required a
|
|
|
RH wrote:
> Confessions of an Economic Hit Man: How the U.S. Uses Globalization to
> Cheat Poor Countries Out of Trillions
>
> http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/12/31/1546207
>
> Watch/Listen to an hourlong interview with John Perkins,
|
|
|
"Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message
news:cr9e120kom@news2.newsguy.com...
> the newsgroup misc.legal, is a discussion group for the use of any one who
> has access to it like any other newsgroup.
> There are no requirements that one MUST b
|
|
|
McGyver wrote:
> "Dane Metcalfe" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:41d78fa9$1_4@127.0.0.1...
>> I would consider it advantageous to put the courtin a
>>position out of balance to what they are expecting though, just
>>to keep them
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote:
>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>
>
>>>>So what are the "good points" of capitalism, and what are its "rough
>>>>edges"?
>>>
>>>The best attribute of capitalism is
|
|
|
In article <B2_Bd.24070$_62.3162@trnddc01>,
"Ray Gordon" <ray@cybersheet.com> wrote:
>
> >> Are you an attorney?
> >
> > No,
>
> Thanks for playing.
Just be sure to tell us when you lose.
--Harold Buck
"I used to rock and roll all
|
|
|
Thank you kindly for the snippets, I've read them and will keep them for
future reference and consideration. I appreciate that.
> How 'bout them Sooners?
I don't watch sports and in fact, I had to look up 'Sooners'.
Respectfully,
Indigent G
|
|
|
zerge@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1104658148.697473.299020@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Oh, don't worry too much about it. There is a good chance that within
> this century the US, Mexico and Canada will fuse into a single, 92
> state cou
|
|
|
"truckinsp" <truckinsp@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Qg_Ad.2649$Cc.879@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> >If you think I'm just like anyone else that you know (speed and doesn't
> >admit it), by all means, skip this thread and move on. You
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> McGyver wrote:
>>> The court do not cook up plots to deprive you of rights and liberty, and
>>> there is no need to put them off balance. And you can't anyway.
>> Ken Smith, call your office.
>
|
|
|
Theodore A. "Tyre-Iron Teddi" Kaldis wrote:
> indigent wrote:
>
>>I was convicted of a felony (3rd degree) a couple of years ago. The very
>>same act in a number of other states would be a misdemeanor--period. I was
>>not jailed but put on probati
|
|
|
----- Original Message -----
From: "indigent" <none@indigent.com>
Newsgroups: misc.legal
Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 12:09 PM
Subject: Re: Misdemeanor in one state is a felony in another
> Theodore,
>
> Can you imagine the feeling of having
|
|
|
In misc.survivalism Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote:
> > In misc.survivalism Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> >
> >>So what are the "good points" of capitalism, and what are its "rough edges"
|
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
> Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Ray Fischer wrote:
> >> Sneechres <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> > However,
> >> >> >> >the ones that are enumerated as specifically protected do
in
> >fact
> >> >> >giv
|
|
|
EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote:
> In misc.survivalism Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
>>So what are the "good points" of capitalism, and what are its "rough edges"?
>
> The best attribute of capitalism is that it efficiant
|
|
|
SolarChase wrote:
>>Ken Smith wrote
> Granted, had all that happened we wouldnt be discussing it, but also we wouldnt
> have been discussing it if Ted hadnt opened his pie hole about being related to
> the guy either... <g>
Ted couldn't shut
|
|
|
SolarChase wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
>
> ">And in a week from Thursday, you will be eligible to reapply to the Bar in
> Colorado. What measures have you taken to assure that you will be able to get
> past the Bar Examiners this time?"
>
|
|
|
SolarChase wrote:
>>Kent Wills wrote
>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
> ">> I said you could find out where to order it from on the web. So go do a
> little footwork if you want it that bad."
>
> ">You are the one who claims Cam is obviously innoce
|
|
|
In misc.survivalism Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> So what are the "good points" of capitalism, and what are its "rough edges"?
The best attribute of capitalism is that it efficiantly produces the
maximum amounts of wealth,
|
|
|
I own a home with my Brother who will soon be getting married. If my
Brother's marriage ends in divorce should I be concerned with getting
dragged into the legal battle that will follow? Is it possible to
somehow isolate myself from this? What type of
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Truthfully, you won't get useful advice here -- the legally trained won't
> give it (at least, not to the level of specificity you will need in a
> particular case), and yahoos like Ted Kaldis scarcely know enough law to be
> dang
|
|
|
McGyver wrote:
> The court do not cook up plots to deprive you of rights and liberty, and
> there is no need to put them off balance. And you can't anyway.
Ken Smith, call your office.
--
Theodore A. Kaldis
kaldis@worldnet.att.net
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> indigent wrote:
>> Theodore,
> [snipped]
>> No Theodore, I am not as strong as your friend.
>> Regards,
>> Indigent Guy
> Theodore don't give a #@($ about anyone but him and his. To curry his
> "favour," you must
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> indigent wrote:
>>> I was convicted of a felony (3rd degree) a couple of years ago. The very
>>> same act in a number of other states would be a misdemeanor--period. I
>>> was not jailed but put o
|
|
|
Any information or clarifications that can be made addressing the substance
of
this post will be greatfully appreciated and carefully considered.
I have a few questions concerning law and legal procedure in a criminal
matter.
Details a
|
|
|
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in
news:cfmet09g55diee421cammabm12f7nbr93e@4ax.com:
> Which has nothing to do with how Bush achieved office.
It's called an election. Bush won. So did a Republican majority
in both houses of Congress, and the
|
