misc.legal

"PMDavis" <pmdlandarch@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:qpejt0ls2ikvdtp5eovgtni633b3b1c5vd@4ax.com... > On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 06:42:17 -0800, Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> > wrote: > >>"Mark K. Bilbo" wrote: >> >>> In our last episode <0t7

Sam Sloan wrote: ,SN[P> > Why would a person who is seriously ill, perhaps even terminal, who > spends we believe two or three days a week undergoing kidney > treatments, we do not know if it is Kidney Dialysis or what it is, > become so determin

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote: >>Ken Smith wrote: > > >>>Counsel, how do you advise, and why? > >>I advise that you figure out what you really, truly want, how much you want >>it, and what the most efficient mea

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Jeffrey Salzberg wrote: >>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>>EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote: >>>> >>>>>>Winner: Mill Owner >>>>>>Winner: 12 year old girl, paid $2 to w

"NadCixelsyd" <nadcixelsyd@aol.com> wrote in message news:20050103193030.21604.00002391@mb-m11.aol.com... > Amy and Betty are gay and live in NH. NH doesn't recognize gay marriages. Two > years ago Amy and Betty went to Vermont to have a "ceremony"

"Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1104802024.526207.134720@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... When love matters more than blood Jeff Jacoby January 3, 2005 >From the moment my wife and I decided to adopt a child, we p

On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 06:42:17 -0800, Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote: >"Mark K. Bilbo" wrote: > >> In our last episode <0t7dt0d0jc4ok49m09ugs6tccbv7f4jgsg@4ax.com>, PMDavis >> lept out of the bushes shouting: >> >> > an impeachment convict

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote: >>Ken Smith wrote: > > >>>Counsel, how do you advise, and why? >> >>I advise that you figure out what you really, truly want, how much you want >>it, and what the most efficient mea

skWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote: > In misc.survivalism Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >>EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote: >>>In misc.survivalism Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >>>> Personally, I'd be interested in Esk's 'take' on whether

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Blue Oracle wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: [snip] >>and as a result ensure that a fair transaction is for the rich only. > > Under capitalism, a fair transaction is for everybody. But cap

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Blue Oracle wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>The worst part is that there are winners and losers, >>> >>>BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZTTTT!!! WRONGO, DRONGO! The key facet of a transaction in >>>a purel

In misc.survivalism Scott Hillard <shillard@_nospam_ozemail.com.au> wrote: > <EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com> wrote in message > news:cr6qut$7pa$1@reader1.panix.com... > > But laissez-faire capitalism can result in some entities being able to > > di

n misc.survivalism Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote: > > In misc.survivalism Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > > > >> Personally, I'd be interested in Esk's 'take' on whether he goes into > >>the courtroom

McGyver wrote: > Since your name isn't xyz.com, you are doing business under a > ficticious business name. Most states have laws requiring you to > file a notice of that fact with the county recorder. In some > states and counties, only one xyz.com

On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 08:11:41 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Blue Oracle wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Ken Smith wrote: > >>>> The worst part is that there are winners and losers, > >>> BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT

"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:krcet0p0jrc4stpf39m5tlri16vomsp8s5@4ax.com... > I see that on Sat, 01 Jan 2005 10:01:22 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" > <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > > >Kent Wills wrote: > > > >> Ken Smi

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote: > > >>>My job is to craft a deal in which both sides are satisfied. So far, so >>>good. >> >>This presupposes that you can *craft* a deal in which both sides are

On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:30:14 -0800, Robert Sturgeon <rsturge@inreach.com> wrote: >On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 12:03:28 +0000 (UTC), >EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote: > >>In misc.survivalism Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >> >>> BZZ

On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:28:21 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>> BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZTTTT!!! WRONGO, DRONGO! The key facet of a transaction in >>> a p

On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:51:43 +0000 (UTC), EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote: >In misc.survivalism Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > >> So what are the "good points" of capitalism, and what are its "rough edges"? > >The best att

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Jeffrey Salzberg wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote: > >>>>Winner: Mill Owner >>>>Winner: 12 year old girl, paid $2 to work 12 hours. >>> >>>False example. Did the 12-year-old g

On Sat, 1 Jan 2005 18:42:38 +0000 (UTC), EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote: >In misc.survivalism Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: > >> Capitalism isn't "brutal". Capitalism functions on the basis of agreement. >> You airhead.

The same thing is happening in Venezuela right now, with President Hugo Chavez, a strident leftist who has promised a war on poverty. And this is what the U.S. fears the most - the threat of a good example. As Noam Chomsky notes: The weaker and

On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 21:39:08 GMT, PMDavis <pmdlandarch@earthlink.net> said in alt.atheism: >On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 06:42:17 -0800, Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> >wrote: >>So as you said, Clinton was charged but cleared by the jury. >President

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>SolarChase wrote: > >>>Granted, had all that happened we wouldnt be discussing it, but also we >>>wouldnt have been discussing it if Ted hadnt opened his pie hole about >>>being related to the guy eith

"RH" <halcon7roho@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1104768222.002411.312650@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > The ruling elite seem to have some sort of code of conduct. They want > to appear to always to 'play by the rules' - when they're in the

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>>McGyver wrote: >>>> >>>>>>The court do not cook up plots to deprive you of rights and liberty, >>>>>>and there is no ne

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>After you've read a few of Ken's messages, you might better understand why >>>the Examiners' Board were inclined to question his psychological fitness. >> >>And then aga

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > >>["Bar" -- shorthand for Colorado Board of Law Examiners.] > >>The Bar actually admits up-front that they were upset that I showed an >>"inordinate interest" in exposing everyone's favorite corrupt

heodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>SolarChase wrote: > > >>>Granted, had all that happened we wouldnt be discussing it, but also we >>>wouldnt have been discussing it if Ted hadnt opened his pie hole about >>>being related to the guy e

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > SolarChase wrote: >>Ken Smith wrote > > >>>None whatsoever. You probably don't see it in a.f.b-l, but Solar has put >>>this question to rest. >> > NO HE HAS NOT! Perhaps in some contrived hypothetical, but CERTAINLY

Tom Kunich wrote: > zerge@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:1104658148.697473.299020@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > >>Oh, don't worry too much about it. There is a good chance that within >>this century the US, Mexico and Canada will fu

Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote in news:41D95AA4.42DAE11A@serv.net: > Dangett, I notice you have yet to respond So do you follow yourselp up often, or were you just dying to hear yourself talk? -- /"\ || \ /

Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote in news:41D95A6B.9E7FF2E2@serv.net: > Totally incorrect No, he's correct. There was no acquittal. -- /"\ || \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN || An American Hero X AGAINST HTML MAI

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: >> > >>>>Since you obviously agree with McGyver on this, you can agree that the >>>>apparent murderer in your family is behind bars legally. >>> >>>The

On 3 Jan 2005 08:12:41 -0800, "jwk" <jwkinraleigh@yahoo.com> wrote: > >PMDavis wrote: >> On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 21:50:26 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo" >> <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote: >> >> >In our last episode <0t7dt0d0jc4ok49m09ugs6tccbv7f4jgsg@4ax.c

When love matters more than blood Jeff Jacoby January 3, 2005 >From the moment my wife and I decided to adopt a child, we planned on an international adoption. Adopting a child from another country is more complicated, time-consuming, and expensi

On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 17:33:54 GMT, PMDavis <pmdlandarch@earthlink.net> said in alt.atheism: >I guess that it's typical of the criminal mind to accord blame on the >justice system when you get caught, rather than accept the direct >consequences of cri

I see that on Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:19:55 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Ken Smith wrote: > >>>> Since you obviously agree with McGyver on this, you can agree that t

I see that on Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:18:15 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> SolarChase wrote: > >>> Granted, had all that happened we wouldnt be discussing it, but also we >>> wouldnt have been disc

Obwon wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote: >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>> BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZTTTT!!! WRONGO, DRONGO! The key facet of a transaction >>>> in a purely capitalistic system is that, unless BOTH p

EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote: > In misc.survivalism Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > >> Personally, I'd be interested in Esk's 'take' on whether he goes into >>the courtroom > > I'm not a litigator. I never "go into the courtroom". >

Clinton was cleared by a "fixed" jury. Like Olympia Snow, pseudo-Republican Senator from New England said, "In voting to acquit the president I do so with grave misgivings for I do not mean in any way to exonerate this man," Collins' statement rea

On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 19:09:20 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@alt.net> wrote: >On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:30:14 -0800, Robert Sturgeon ><rsturge@inreach.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 12:03:28 +0000 (UTC), >>EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote: >> >>>In misc.

On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 13:26:49 -0800, The Independent of Clackamas County <jamesed@web-ster.com> wrote: >Robert Sturgeon wrote: >> On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 08:39:08 -0800, The Independent of >> Clackamas County <jamesed@web-ster.com> wrote: >> >> (snips

My Mom wishes to make a simple change to her will, basically changing $20,000 to $50,000. Does she need a whole new will or just some kind of amendment?

1. ANDREAS WAS ARRESTED. 2. SCIENTOLOGY DID NOT LIE ABOUT 1. 3. ANDREAS LIES ABOUT SCIENTOLOGY AND HIMSELF: "Another lie from Scientology, I was not arrested... " -- Andreas Heldal-Lund - Anonymous =============================================

"MozillaIsBest" <IDontWantAnySpam@fake.fake.com> wrote in message news:WXgCd.6011$Cc.5763@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net... > McGyver wrote: > > Since your name isn't xyz.com, you are doing business under a > > ficticious business name. Most states