|
|
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 02:24:24 GMT cell phone repair wrote:
> i live in Tampa, Florida
> almost 3 yrs ago i filed for chapter 7, he ordered me to pay one half
> of my
> tax return refund becaue my wife was making 40k, anyhow i gave a check
> for
> $
|
|
|
On 2 Jan 2005 20:06:13 -0800 Johnr wrote:
> This is something my business law 101 class just didn't cover.
> In your opinion would including 45-second video clips of various video
> games which instruct people how to cheat at said games, be covered
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>>>>I can't even come up with a scenario in which it would make sense for
>>>>anyone to "frame" a complete nobody like Cam Brown.
>>>
>>>It's not somet
|
|
|
On 4 Jan 2005 01:33:45 -0800 maypo wrote:
> If an offence (civil or criminal) has been committed,
> does US law limit the time within which the aggrieved
> party should file a complaint with the police? If yes,
> is that time period governed by fede
|
|
|
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:27:25 GMT Rick wrote:
> "Biwah" <sdnsdbaq8734632623@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:BE0216A4.40F2F%sdnsdbaq8734632623@yahoo.com...
>> On 5/1/05 8:50 pm, in article
>> voYCd.3598$75.2643@bignews4.bellsouth.net,
>> "jls" <
|
|
|
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:23:53 GMT Rick wrote:
> If a jury finds a defendant "not guilty" and it is later learned that
> the
> jury was tampered with, can the defendant be re-tried on the same
> charge?
In this case, the judge would rule a mistri
|
|
|
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:44:04 GMT ballerina wrote:
> Just the facts, ma'am.
> (names are fictionalized)
> John Doe goes to court to settle a right of way dispute. During this
> dispute he and his wife sign a sworn statement which supports the
> s
|
|
|
On 5 Jan 2005 16:37:39 -0800 qapla97@yahoo.com wrote:
> Hello...
> I'd like to hear the opinion of members of this group on the following
> scenario, as described to me by a neighbor.
> 1) A legal-age user installs software which automatically d
|
|
|
"Harry" <hmags@NSexcite.com> wrote in message
news:kuWCd.8455$5R.8183@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
>> Of course there is also the tyranny of the MINORITY to worry about as
>> well. This is another case of the LUNATIC FRING trying to DOMINATE
|
|
|
"Naidoo" <atlashrugg@yahoo.com> wrote in message...
> Chomsky is a daft cunt.
So say any number of op-ed hawks and other right-wing screwballs
who can't deal with the facts, and whose best recourse is to simply
misrepresent Chomsky's work.
|
|
|
William Sargant was a meticulous Clinician... he likely fully
completed his research, concluding that Aberactive Therapy was a dead
end... ( Thats Dianetics ) and then published in 1955...
See:
http://www.lermanet.com/scientology/scientologyandc
|
|
|
On 5/1/05 8:50 pm, in article voYCd.3598$75.2643@bignews4.bellsouth.net,
"jls" <jls1016@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Well, here's a case
> where the judge was bribed and the defendant was found not guilty by the
> judge (He waived jury trial.), and the d
|
|
|
Just the facts, ma'am.
(names are fictionalized)
John Doe goes to court to settle a right of way dispute. During this
dispute he and his wife sign a sworn statement which supports the
survey of their property but not their deed (the survey shows ex
|
|
|
Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote in
news:41DBF5E7.E2E4FE42@serv.net:
> The Senate did not convict on the indictment. In the US legal system,
> that is an aquittal.
No, it is not. An acquittal is an acquittal. And you are a
total moron.
|
|
|
Good advice from Chief Tecumseh
"Live your life that the fear of death can never enter your heart.
Trouble no one about his religion. Respect others in their views and
demand that they respect yours. Love your life, perfect your life,
beautify all t
|
|
|
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 03:41:42 GMT, Landis D. Ragon
<landis.ragon.nospam@attglobal.nospam.net> said in alt.atheism:
>Sometimes I think a Literacy Test wouldn't be a bad thing
That would reduce the electorate.
>or at least some sort of civics test.
|
|
|
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 16:21:25 +0000, Therion Ware
<autodelete@city-of-dis.com> said in alt.atheism:
> On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 16:09:38 GMT in alt.atheism, Al Klein (Al Klein
><rukbat@pern.invalid>) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism
>>Which is
|
|
|
"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote
> Uh, having the entire school say you and your parents aren't part of
> country - you think that's not divisive?
Who said someone 'isn't part of (our) country'?
What are you just making #@($ up?
> And there's
|
|
|
http://www.outsupport.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=52904#52904
|
|
|
"Don W. McCollough" <letters@softhome.net> wrote in message
news:gKPCd.35569$h.10901@trnddc04...
> Don't know about you, but I payed attention to the Scott Peterson case.
>
> It appeared that a couple of hangnail jurors were sent home arbitrarily s
|
|
|
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 06:27:55 -0800, Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net>
wrote:
>PMDavis wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:48:48 -0500, Al Klein
>> <CellPhones@optonline.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 21:39:08 GMT, PMDavis <pmdlandarch@eart
|
|
|
"SJH" <reply_to_me@at_this_newsgroup.com> wrote in message
news:aQRCd.13485$7N4.10518@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
>
> On 4-Jan-2005, wprien@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > I have read some of her books and watch her TV show, and have never
> > heard her give
|
|
|
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 17:39:38 GMT, "qwerty" <nospam@all.noway.com>
wrote:
>
>"PMDavis" <pmdlandarch@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:678lt0ta04v8bha99e26cv1l8rumjq9h80@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:48:48 -0500, Al Klein
[snipped]
>
|
|
|
Don't fall for fake red light camera or speeding tickets, mostly in
California, so far.
The fake red light camera tickets come in the mail, from the police!
Yours will say "Traffic Violation Notice" at the top, and will tell you
that you MUST ide
|
|
|
If a jury finds a defendant "not guilty" and it is later learned that the
jury was tampered with, can the defendant be re-tried on the same charge?
|
|
|
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:07:19 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Gregory Gadow" <techbear@serv.net> wrote
>> The Declaration of Independence is nothing more than revolutionary
>> rhetoric, an
>> official document offering excuses
|
|
|
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:27:45 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote
>> Uh, the declaration of independence is not a law making document. We
>> weren't a country at that time.
>
>Duh.
>We claim ou
|
|
|
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:21:47 -0700, "Chas"
<chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Kate " <cobalt@newscene.com> wrote
>> By the way, did you know that the jewish have a specific rule against
>> using the name 'God'? So it's in direct violation of t
|
|
|
I haven't left - I managed to talk her into a two week extension in
exchange for acting like a slave and being talked to like a piece of
crap. In the meantime I'm trying to covertly gain knowledge and
representation. One thing I just did - because sh
|
|
|
Harry wrote:
> "krp" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:ShHCd.34808$h.5379@trnddc04...
>>"jedi" <lightspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:%DDCd.35723$Ht2.9422@fe08.lga...
>>>>who choose not to believe in a deity should never be
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ua-dnfecw4p6z0HcRVn-pg@comcast.com...
> "Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote
>> Why have it in there to begin with?
>
> Why not?
> A huge statistical percentage of Americans profess a
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> So what are your plans in 8 days from now?
> Obsess much?
No.
--
Theodore A. Kaldis
kaldis@worldnet.att.net
|
|
|
SolarChase wrote:
>>Kent Wills wrote
>
> ">Your posts indicate that you do. You can't go one day of posting without
> mentioning Ken's case. If you don't have OCD, you certainly play the part very
> well."
>
> Of course, the penultimate upsho
|
|
|
"krp" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:ShHCd.34808$h.5379@trnddc04...
>
> "jedi" <lightspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%DDCd.35723$Ht2.9422@fe08.lga...
> >> http://www.restorethepledge.com/
> >>
> >> New challenge to "under Go
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>forevernitefan wrote:
>>>
>>>>>YOU have motives to want Ken Smith dead.
>>>>
>>>>Wha-a-a-a-at??? No I don't! Why should I want Ken dead?
>>>
>>>V
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>
>>I can't even come up with a scenario in which it would make sense for
>>anyone to "frame" a complete nobody like Cam Brown.
>
> It's not something that's readily apparent.
It's not someth
|
|
|
I see that on Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:50:35 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>So what are your plans in 8 days from now?
Obsess much?
Kent
--
If you have a bad cough, take a large dose of laxatives, then you will
b
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
>> [...]
> Whatever Ted is complaining about has to be SOOOOOO overwhelming that the
> reasonable person's conscience would have to be shocked by it,
I would say that it is.
> and Cam's innocenc
|
|
|
http://sfdct.com/home.cfm?agree=9&lang=eng
DECEMBER 10, 2004
This Administrator's Corner
Last Updated: 12/01/2004 @ 6:14 PM
Dear Claimants and Counsel: As you know, November 29, 2004 marked the
deadline to Opt-Out of the Settlement option to l
|
|
|
ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Actually, we would like to see all charges dropped, with prejudice.
> The California Supreme Court has ruled that charges should be dropped with
> prejudice in only the most extreme situat
|
|
|
skWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote:
> In misc.survivalism Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
>
>> With respect, Esk, you're laboring under the dubious presumption
>>that, simply because published precedent says X, the law is X. What I
>>conte
|
|
|
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message
news:41DC36ED.6020603@it.com...> Harry wrote:
> > "krp" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote in message
> > news:ShHCd.34808$h.5379@trnddc04...
> >>"jedi" <lightspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>news:%DDCd.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Family Man" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote
> Now do you get it?
I know you rilly rilly wish it was any other way, but it's not.
Chas
|
|
|
I see that on Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:10:33 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>No, I _DON'T_ think.
This is something of which we can all agree :)
Kent
--
You need only two tools: WD-40 and duct tape.
If it doesn't mo
|
|
|
Hello...
I'd like to hear the opinion of members of this group on the following
scenario, as described to me by a neighbor.
1) A legal-age user installs software which automatically downloads new
posts as found on usenet (newsgroups) to their hard
|
|
|
Ernest wrote:
[...]
> >There is no possible way for copyright to last
> >more than another decade.
> >
> >Still, many large organisations try to keep this dying old man
alive.
> >It must be a great time to be a copyright lawyer (enjoy it while it
|
|
|
In California...
My son accidentally knocked out his friends tooth at school while horse
playing around. They have dental insurance but asked us to pay his
dental costs of $260, which I will agree to pay. They sent us a
certified letter stating th
|
|
|
"McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> wrote in message
news:342vjpF43dl0tU1@individual.net...
> "Rick" <72242.3606@compuserve.com> wrote in message
> news:d9XCd.10566$by5.1970@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com...
> > If a jury finds a defendant "not guilty" and it
|
|
|
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 20:03:27 GMT, Ken Smith
<forget@it.com> wrote:
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Blue Oracle wrote:
>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>>and as a result ensure that a fair transaction is for the ri
|
|
|
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 14:58:56 -0800, Robert Sturgeon
<rsturge@inreach.co |
