Legal Spring Logo

"You've helped me decide which company to choose!"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:38:24 -0700, "Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote: >"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote >> Yes it does. The captial 'G' is for the Christian 'God.' > >Nah; or they'd have said so in the DoI- five references to the Divine


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:29:44 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote: >In our last episode <grudnV1qv458p0HcRVn-uA@comcast.com>, Chas lept out of >the bushes shouting: > >> "Gregory Gadow" <techbear@serv.net> wrote >>> The Declara


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:32:16 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote: >In our last episode <DeqdnaoEx9ibm0HcRVn-tw@comcast.com>, Chas lept out of >the bushes shouting: > >> As well, the free practice of religion means that the gove


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:43:58 -0700, "Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote: >"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote >> The DOI is not a legal document, > >Of course it's a 'legal document'; it's called 'a Declaration'. >It holds standing to be a sel


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:39:37 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >Mark K. Bilbo wrote: >> In our last episode <ua-dnfecw4p6z0HcRVn-pg@comcast.com>, Chas lept out of >> the bushes shouting: >> >> >>>A huge statistical percentage of Americans pr


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:35:35 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote: >In our last episode <ua-dnfecw4p6z0HcRVn-pg@comcast.com>, Chas lept out of >the bushes shouting: > >> A huge statistical percentage of Americans profess a belie


Re: Double Jeopardy Question
"Larry" <larry@x.com> wrote in message news:larry-0601050126150001@192.168.2.4... > In article <criiaq015q8@news3.newsguy.com>, "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> > wrote: >> >>Oj can be retried if new evidence clearly shows him at the scene of the >


Re: Land dispute
On 05 Jan 2005, ballerina <dancing@monsters.ball> wrote: > Just the facts, ma'am. > (names are fictionalized) > > John Doe goes to court to settle a right of way > dispute. * * * [H]e and his wife sign a . . . > statement which supports the s


Re: Five Simple Reasons Why Copyright Cannot Survive:
"democratix" <demokratix@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1105068514.683550.140290@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > Scott Hillard wrote: > > What's the biggest business on the INTERNET? > > Amazon - a BOOK seller. > > Whoops. > If you fro


Moving While In Bankruptcy
I know someone who may file for Ch. 7 bankrupty very soon. There is also a possibility that a couple of months after filing, but likely before discharge, this person will get a job not only in a different district but in an altogether different state,


Re: "lighting-up time"?
Nigel Greenwood wrote: > > Peter T. Daniels wrote: > > > > > "Building a fence around the Torah." > > This reminds me of a converse case, in which a technicality legalizes > what is normally unlawful. See the description of the N London Eruv


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
In article <ajktt0t7l1jlhckc79iskc9165v35gsqak@4ax.com>, Christopher A. Lee <calee@optonline.net> wrote: > On 7 Jan 2005 18:05:56 GMT, dkl24@cas.org (David K. Lewis) wrote: > > >In article George Ricker <gSPAMFREEricker@cfl.rr.com> writes: > >>


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
In article <crmj24$mdp$1@srv38.cas.org>, dkl24@cas.org (David K. Lewis) wrote: > In article George Ricker <gSPAMFREEricker@cfl.rr.com> writes: > > > > What Jefferson and the others who authored the Declaration held to be > > self-evident truths


Re: Andrea Yates Trial ---Lying Shrink Now Blaming the Prosecutor's Office
jls wrote: > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message > news:41DEC3CB.10900175@worldnet.att.net... >>Ken Smith wrote: >>>jls wrote: >>>>This is the kind of country you live in --- where the insane are >>>>punished as crimi


Re: Five Simple Reasons Why Copyright Cannot Survive:
On 6 Jan 2005 19:38:21 -0800, "democratix" <demokratix@yahoo.com> wrote: >Ray Gordon wrote: >> > Good will and faith are not "control". Court orders are >prohibitively >> > expensive if you're faced with a situation in which there are no >> > cent


Re: Ted Kaldis: "Not Arguing My Case, As 'Arguing' Is Commonly Defined"
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>>>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>>>>>SolarChase wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>


Re: Five Simple Reasons Why Copyright Cannot Survive:
"democratix" <demokratix@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1105070473.241137.289220@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > Scott Hillard wrote: > > "democratix" <demokratix@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:1104898638.007684.89180@f14g2000cwb.googlegro


Re: NJ Ticket for driving on a public or private property
Larry Jhonson wrote: > Hello folks, > > I need your advise on the ticket that I received recently. I was on my > way to work in the morning rush hour and the traffic was backed up so > badly on RT130. > It was almost talking 10 mins to cross each


Re: Five Simple Reasons Why Copyright Cannot Survive:
"democratix" <demokratix@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1105068257.489088.121360@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > 2 - Physical records are now, from a purely logistical standpoint, the > least efficient and most expensive way to distribute music


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
In article George Ricker <gSPAMFREEricker@cfl.rr.com> writes: > > What Jefferson and the others who authored the Declaration held to be > self-evident truths were that all men were created equal and were > endowed by their "Creator" with certain in


Re: Ken Smith: Spewing Same Old Bollocks as Usual
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:31:32 -0600, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Just the way things work in the real world. >> >>As they did this morning in Houston. > > Huh? Did I miss something important?


Re: Andrea Yates Trial ---Lying Shrink Now Blaming the Prosecutor'sOffice
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:15:55 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> jls wrote: > >>> This is the kind of country you live in --- where the insane are punished >>> a


Re: Ken Has BEEN Doing Desperation for a VERY Long Time!
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Fri, 07 Jan 2005 06:59:59 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> ienjball@yahoo.com wrote: >>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>>>


Re: Ken Smith: Asked by Colorado Bar Examiners To Submit To Psychological Examination
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Fri, 07 Jan 2005 06:57:10 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Get a grip, Dude! Take Lindsay's *PROFESSIONAL* advice > >I've never spoken with Lindsay. >


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
In article <9K-dnR7dPpoqXUPcRVn-uw@comcast.com>, "Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote: > "George Ricker" <gSPAMFREEricker@cfl.rr.com> wrote > > Besides which, the Declaration of Independence states, quite clearly, > > that governments deriv


Re: Andrea Yates Trial ---Lying Shrink Now Blaming the Prosecutor's Office
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:29:40 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >jls wrote: >> So now he's saying the prosecutors told him of the television episode on >> _Law and Order_ in which a mother got away with murder


Re: Five Simple Reasons Why Copyright Cannot Survive:
n 5 Jan 2005 16:09:22 -0800, "democratix" <demokratix@yahoo.com> wrote: >Ernest wrote: >[...] >> >There is no possible way for copyright to last >> >more than another decade. >> > >> >Still, many large organisations try to keep this dying old man


Re: Court overturns Yates' convictions
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>SolarChase wrote: >>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote >>> >>>>>The prosecutor needs to have her facing forward in order to explain the >>>>>injuries which she sustained, in an A


Re: Court overturns Yates' convictions
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>SolarChase wrote: >> > >>>>Remember, kids ... Ted *never* tells us anything about this case !!!!!! >>> >>>I do, as the need arises -- provided it is already in the public


Re: Ted Kaldis: WHACK-JOB! Needs Immediate Psychiatric Help
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:13:21 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: >> I see that on Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:38:46 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" >> <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >>>ienjball@yahoo.


Re: Court overturns Yates' convictions
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>SolarChase wrote: >> > >>>>(Also remember that in Ted's dictionary "maxilla" has nothing to do with >>>>the jaw <g>) >>> >>>You're misrepresenting the issue. My content


Re: Ken Smith: Spewing Same Old Bollocks as Usual
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:41:18 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Ken Smith wrote: >>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>> Ken Smith wr


Re: Andreas Heldal-Lund
REPOST ================================================================ Copied from Religious Freedom Watch Organization http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/lund1.html ANDREAS HELDAL-LUND According to Andreas Heldal-Lund, Free Speec


Re: Andreas Heldal-Lund: Biased & Unobjective Heathen
REPOST: ================================================================ Copied from Religious Freedom Watch Organization http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/lund1.html ANDREAS HELDAL-LUND According to Andreas Heldal-Lund, Free Spee


Re: Ken Has BEEN Doing Desperation for a VERY Long Time!


Re: Ken's Shit Stinks to High Heaven!
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:26:44 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Ken Smith wrote: > >>>> Ted's infuriated by the fact that I've bea


Re: Ken Smith Continues To Be NUTZ!
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:22:09 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >ienjball@yahoo.com wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>> You know squat. > >> I don't know Cam Brown, [...] and


Re: Ken Smith: Perfecting the Art of Mendacity
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:49:39 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Ken Smith wrote: > >>>> The cross might go something like this: >


Re: Ken Smith's Shit DOES Stink. But Ken Seems Unaware of It.
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:44:44 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Ted's infuriated by the fact that I've beaten him silly in debate, and he's >> become obsessed wit


Re: Communism Has Become a Cancerous Tumor
It's communism and socialism that need to go. -- A Voice Of Freedom in the United States of America


Re: "lighting-up time"?
Aidan Kehoe wrote: > Also, we have (in Ireland) many small, bad, roads on which itâ*™s > theoretically legal to drive up to 60MPH. (To be changed to 80 km/h on the > 20th of this month, yay metrication.) Were you to do so, though, you could Thus l


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
In article <apOdnc2bcawNBkPcRVn-uw@megapath.net>, "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote: > In our last episode <5aCdnZzzYujxmkHcRVn-3w@comcast.com>, Chas lept out of > the bushes shouting: > > > The DoI sets the standing from which to


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
In our last episode <x9CdnYeT2e5eLUPcRVn-1Q@comcast.com>, Chas lept out of the bushes shouting: > or with your torturous construction of it in any case. Yeah, damn me for reading James Madison! -- Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423 EAC Department o


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
In our last episode <StSdnSm-_7--LEPcRVn-vA@comcast.com>, Chas lept out of the bushes shouting: > "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote >>> The DoI sets the standing from which to Constitute a government and >>> make laws at all. >> It


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
In our last episode <D-adnW2zFbEILEPcRVn-hA@comcast.com>, Chas lept out of the bushes shouting: > "Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote >>> It's far more than some political pamphlet. >> And yet it's never cited in actual legal cases as


Re: Ken Smith: Perfecting the Art of Mendacity


Re: "lighting-up time"?
In sci.lang Aidan Kehoe <kehoea@parhasard.net> wrote: > ... Again, the letter of a > specific law is overridden by the wider context. (Is there a specific legal > term for this?) Yes. Never-mind-the-law--if-a-judge-feels-like-screwing-you-he-can.


Re: Capitalism Has Become a Cancerous Tumor
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:49:35 -0800, Robert Sturgeon <rsturge@inreach.com> wrote: >On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:20:41 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@alt.net> >wrote: > >(snips) > >>>> It's the "defense", that the employers of illegal >>>>immigrant labor use to a


Re: Court overturns Yates' convictions
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > SolarChase wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote > > >>>My brother-in-law isn't charged with "pushing/throwing" his daughter off a >>>Palos Verdes cliff -- he is charged SPECIFICALLY with _THROWING_ his >>>daughter off the


Re: Give Us A REASON To Care About Alleged Child-Killer Cam Brown, Ted!
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>ienjball@yahoo.com wrote: >>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> >>>>>You know squat. >>>> >>>>I don't know Cam Brown, [...] and I do know that while this case may end >>>>in