Legal Spring Logo

"Why Shop or Review Legal Services anywhere else?"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: Why isn't the IRS investigating "Focus on the Family"?
In article <41E0141F.814BA61D@worldnet.att.net>, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: -Because, thankfully, Bill Clinton is no longer the President. --- -TAre you still living in Australia Mr.Kaldis? Is that why tiu have no clue


Re: Why isn't the IRS investigating "Focus on the Family"?
"Werner Hetzner" <whetzner@mac.com> wrote in message news:41E05D4A.506@mac.com... > > > The Pretzel wrote: > > >"Werner Hetzner" <whetzner@mac.com> wrote in message > >news:41E019C5.9020708@mac.com... > > > > > >>... > >> > >>Isn't that the


Re: Employer not paying Salary
On 8 Jan 2005 14:29:04 -0800, "Sushmi" <sushmi65@yahoo.com> wrote: >Thanks for your reply. Thanks for your help. X has to pay me 40k. Am >I eligible to file in Small claims court ? Not for 40K. http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/civil/civ-02.


Re: Why isn't the IRS investigating "Focus on the Family"?
Ken Smith wrote: > Werner Hetzner wrote: > >> ... > > > >> Should we be ruled by anyone? Should values be forced on us and >> choices restricted by any party? Cant we try to liberate instead of >> regulate each other? Wasnt America supp


Re: Why isn't the IRS investigating "Focus on the Family"?
The Pretzel wrote: >"Werner Hetzner" <whetzner@mac.com> wrote in message >news:41E019C5.9020708@mac.com... > > >>... >> >>Isn't that the tragedy of a powerful government? It imposes the values >>of some on others. Whether the religioius ri


Re: U.S. Legal System Discrimination?
"David Fabian" <david.m.fabian@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:2MVDd.13353$iC4.2061@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com... > The legal system favors people who can pay their way out of any > crime they commit. For example, O.J. Simpson paid big money,


Re: Why isn't the IRS investigating "Focus on the Family"?
"Werner Hetzner" <whetzner@mac.com> wrote in message news:41E019C5.9020708@mac.com... > > > Larry Heath wrote: > > >... > > > >This is hardly a big surprise! > > > >The whole Bush administration is built on this type of nonsense, well, I > >s


Re: Green Bay starts fingerprinting for traffic stops
I don't think anybody believes that "no database maintained" story.


Re: Why isn't the IRS investigating "Focus on the Family"?
Werner Hetzner wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > >> Because he's a psycho religious nutter who wants us to be governed >> by *HIS* Taliban. He is against adultery -- when it isn't him in the >> sack. He rails against those people who make "poor life


Re: Why isn't the IRS investigating "Focus on the Family"?
Werner Hetzner wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> >>> Because, thankfully, Bill Clinton is no longer the President. >> >> I take it that you find it perfectly acceptable for religious nutters >> to flagrantly violate the law


Re: NJ Ticket for driving on a public or private property
<compton75@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1105150328.995586.40900@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > > Larry Jhonson wrote: >> Hello folks, >> >> I need your advise on the ticket that I received recently. I was on > my >> way to work in the


Re: Why isn't the IRS investigating "Focus on the Family"?
Ken Smith wrote: > > Because he's a psycho religious nutter who wants us to be governed > by *HIS* Taliban. He is against adultery -- when it isn't him in the > sack. He rails against those people who make "poor life-choices," > like hav


Re: Why isn't the IRS investigating "Focus on the Family"?
Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> Because, thankfully, Bill Clinton is no longer the President. > > > I take it that you find it perfectly acceptable for religious nutters > to flagrantly violate the law, but not state judges


Re: Why isn't the IRS investigating "Focus on the Family"?
Ken Smith wrote: > > Because he's a psycho religious nutter who wants us to be governed by > *HIS* Taliban. He is against adultery -- when it isn't him in the > sack. He rails against those people who make "poor life-choices," like > having


Re: Green Bay starts fingerprinting for traffic stops
In article <GsVDd.12321$wi2.2119@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>, "jgreimer" <jgreimer@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >What is the probability for a false positive match with fingerprints? >Nobody knows. It's never been studied. The police and the courts assume


U.S. Legal System Discrimination?
"J B" <dinegame@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1105151037.717699.226670@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > Just as the practice of enforcing the death penalty to minorities is > widespread in America: > > http://www.hrw.org/wr2k1/usa/ > > "Althou


Re: Why isn't the IRS investigating "Focus on the Family"?
Ken Smith wrote: > Jez wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> >>> Because, thankfully, Bill Clinton is no longer the President. >> >> >> And you prefer Bush, because of why ? > > > Because he's a psycho religious nutter who wants us to b


Re: Green Bay starts fingerprinting for traffic stops
What is the probability for a false positive match with fingerprints? Nobody knows. It's never been studied. The police and the courts assume that when the FBI reports a match, there is no room for doubt. However with hundreds of millions of prints


Re: Green Bay starts fingerprinting for traffic stops
Larry Glasser <larry-g@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:larry-g-0801051402220001@192.168.2.4... > In article <GsVDd.12321$wi2.2119@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>, "jgreimer" > <jgreimer@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > >What is the probability for a fals


Re: Bush wants to immunize corporations like Halliburton from lawsuits
Werner Hetzner wrote: > millerl wrote: > >> Bush Urges Congress on Asbestos Litigation Friday January 7, 2005 6:16 PM >> >> CLINTON TOWNSHIP, Mich. (AP) - Claiming that asbestos lawsuits clog >> the courts and cost jobs, President Bush urged Congre


Re: Why isn't the IRS investigating "Focus on the Family"?
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Because, thankfully, Bill Clinton is no longer the President. I take it that you find it perfectly acceptable for religious nutters to flagrantly violate the law, but not state judges, prosecutors, and/or law enforce


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
Chas wrote: > "George Ricker" <gSPAMFREEricker@cfl.rr.com> wrote > >>You're quite right that Jefferson's "Creator" did not imply the god of >>any revealed religion. I do think it was a reference to the god of >>Deism or "Nature's God" as he refers


Re: Bush wants to immunize corporations like Halliburton from lawsuits
millerl wrote: >Bush Urges Congress on Asbestos Litigation >Friday January 7, 2005 6:16 PM > >CLINTON TOWNSHIP, Mich. (AP) - Claiming that asbestos lawsuits clog >the courts and cost jobs, President Bush urged Congress Friday to >change the w


Re: Why isn't the IRS investigating "Focus on the Family"?
Jez wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> Because, thankfully, Bill Clinton is no longer the President. > > And you prefer Bush, because of why ? Because he's a psycho religious nutter who wants us to be governed by *HIS* Taliban. He is


Re: Why isn't the IRS investigating "Focus on the Family"?
horseman wrote: >... > >Dobson was not only misguided in threatening the senators, he crossed >the line between free speech and politicking. His organization's >nonprofit status prohibits it from partisan political activity, in >which Dobson c


Re: Why isn't the IRS investigating "Focus on the Family"?
Larry Heath wrote: >... > >This is hardly a big surprise! > >The whole Bush administration is built on this type of nonsense, well, I >suppose it's not really nonsense it works for the Bush administration very >well. It is the religious ri


Re: Why isn't the IRS investigating "Focus on the Family"?
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Because, thankfully, Bill Clinton is no longer the President. And you prefer Bush, because of why ? -- Jez 'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable notion that you should base your actions


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
In our last episode <BdOdnWQJaJ2rjH3cRVn-uw@comcast.com>, Chas lept out of the bushes shouting: > The standing to even make a 'Constitution' is voiced in the DoI. The "standing" to make a Constitution was what we call "guns." If we'd *lost, the Do


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
Chas wrote: > "George Ricker" <gSPAMFREEricker@cfl.rr.com> wrote > >>You're quite right that Jefferson's "Creator" did not imply the god of >>any revealed religion. I do think it was a reference to the god of >>Deism or "Nature's God" as he refers


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
In our last episode <bMednT0jybY23H3cRVn-1Q@comcast.com>, Chas lept out of the bushes shouting: > "Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote >>>The DoI wasn't just some political pamphlet. It was a legal necessity of >>>the >>>time, for the sort o


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
In our last episode <-4-dnQvMo_R3jX3cRVn-vA@comcast.com>, Chas lept out of the bushes shouting: > Read the DoI as a legal > document Can't. It's not. -- Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423 EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion Alt-atheism websit


Sedition Laws ---Schenck Pamphlet Removed from Internet
Northwestern U. had a copy of it but it's gone now. Do you suppose FBI or OAG goons made them take it down? You can read the Schenck case here: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=249&invol=47 I have not been able to f


Re: Sedition Laws ---Schenck Pamphlet Removed from Internet
We need to get these sedators fast, before they sedate the whole country. My God! Sedition is making us weekly. Or do I mean weakly? Gotta get ahold of myself. The Rapture is coming, and I've got to be Millennium Ready. That's what my millenarian


Re: Copyright versus public domain
In article <crpmcm02k9e@news1.newsguy.com>, Richard <Anonymous@127.001> wrote: > >"Lee Hollaar" <hollaar@antitrust.cs.utah.edu> wrote in message >news:crplma$tuc$1@antitrust.cs.utah.edu... >> In article <crpdt202ab9@news1.newsguy.com>, Richard <Anonym


Re: U.S. Legal System Discrimination?
David Fabian wrote: > "J B" <dinegame@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1105151037.717699.226670@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > > Just as the practice of enforcing the death penalty to minorities is > > widespread in America: > > > > http://www


Re: Moving While In Bankruptcy
kuacou241@yahoo.com wrote: > Venue for bankruptcy is the place where the filer has lived for 180 > days or the longer period in those 180 days than anywhere else. > > The filer needs to be present (with certain exceptions, mainly for the > very ill


Re: Andrea Yates Trial ---Lying Shrink Now Blaming the Prosecutor's Office
kuacou241@yahoo.com wrote: > Without knowing much about the case, it would appear that the > prosecutor's psychiatrist was a professional prosecution witness who > knew his livelihood depended upon his reliably telling juries what the > prosecution wa


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
Christopher A. Lee wrote: > On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 21:35:15 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote: > > >>On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:29:44 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo" >><alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote: >> >> >>>In our last episode <grudnV1qv458p0HcRVn


Re: U.S. Legal System Discrimination?


Re: NJ Ticket for driving on a public or private property
"Paul" <Laura Bush murdered her boyfriend is a moron@moron.us> wrote: ><compton75@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:1105150328.995586.40900@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > > >> He assumes you were avoiding traffic. Maybe you were going to go


Re: Employer not paying Salary
Thanks for your advice.


Re: NEWSGROUP NEEDED--Public housing residents
Hi, Were you able to find a newsgroup for public housing residents? I would be interested in finding one also.


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote: >The DoI wasn't just some political pamphlet. It was a legal necessity of the >time, for the sort of information that they needed to establish before any >other 'official' action taken. Wrong. It was


Re: Employer not paying Salary
Thanks for your reply. Thanks for your help. X has to pay me 40k. Am I eligible to file in Small claims court ?


Re: Copyright versus public domain
"Larry Glasser" <larry-g@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:larry-g-0801051358050001@192.168.2.4... > In article <crp66401vkh@news1.newsguy.com>, "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote: > > >www.somestuff.batcave.net > > > >Considering the image s


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote >>The DoI wasn't just some political pamphlet. It was a legal necessity of >>the >>time, for the sort of information that they needed to establish before any >>other 'official' action taken. > Wrong. It w


Re: Green Bay starts fingerprinting for traffic stops
"Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1105205124.714121.183350@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > According to the article, the cops "ask" if they can fingerprint you > and you can refuse, but you have to fig


Re: NJ Ticket for driving on a public or private property
Paul wrote: > > "Well, Your Honor, I was going to stop at the <place of business> when I > realized I forgot <*> and exited the business parking lot to return home > to <**>. " > > <*>: ..when I realized I forgot: (select one) > My: cellphone, ca


Re: Why isn't the IRS investigating "Focus on the Family"?
"horseman" <nop@A-1.com> wrote in message news:24svt055p8sjhus12cen5plgb2dqfl470u@4ax.com... > Austin American-Statesman > January 08, 2005 > > Threatening senators over judicial choices was a political blunder > EDITORIAL BOARD > > A major vol


Re: THE PLEDGE Round #2
"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote >>It's nothing *but* a legal document, dude. > The DOI is a letter of treason by subjects against their King. That's exactly what it's not. The King claimed rule by divine right. The DoI claims that Divine Right lies


Re: THE P