|
|
In article <41E0141F.814BA61D@worldnet.att.net>, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
-Because, thankfully, Bill Clinton is no longer the President.
---
-TAre you still living in Australia Mr.Kaldis?
Is that why tiu have no clue
|
|
|
"Werner Hetzner" <whetzner@mac.com> wrote in message
news:41E05D4A.506@mac.com...
>
>
> The Pretzel wrote:
>
> >"Werner Hetzner" <whetzner@mac.com> wrote in message
> >news:41E019C5.9020708@mac.com...
> >
> >
> >>...
> >>
> >>Isn't that the
|
|
|
On 8 Jan 2005 14:29:04 -0800, "Sushmi" <sushmi65@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Thanks for your reply. Thanks for your help. X has to pay me 40k. Am
>I eligible to file in Small claims court ?
Not for 40K.
http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/civil/civ-02.
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Werner Hetzner wrote:
>
>> ...
>
>
>
>> Should we be ruled by anyone? Should values be forced on us and
>> choices restricted by any party? Cant we try to liberate instead of
>> regulate each other? Wasnt America supp
|
|
|
The Pretzel wrote:
>"Werner Hetzner" <whetzner@mac.com> wrote in message
>news:41E019C5.9020708@mac.com...
>
>
>>...
>>
>>Isn't that the tragedy of a powerful government? It imposes the values
>>of some on others. Whether the religioius ri
|
|
|
"David Fabian" <david.m.fabian@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:2MVDd.13353$iC4.2061@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
> The legal system favors people who can pay their way out of any
> crime they commit. For example, O.J. Simpson paid big money,
|
|
|
"Werner Hetzner" <whetzner@mac.com> wrote in message
news:41E019C5.9020708@mac.com...
>
>
> Larry Heath wrote:
>
> >...
> >
> >This is hardly a big surprise!
> >
> >The whole Bush administration is built on this type of nonsense, well, I
> >s
|
|
|
I don't think anybody believes that "no database maintained" story.
|
|
|
Werner Hetzner wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> Because he's a psycho religious nutter who wants us to be governed
>> by *HIS* Taliban. He is against adultery -- when it isn't him in the
>> sack. He rails against those people who make "poor life
|
|
|
Werner Hetzner wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>
>>> Because, thankfully, Bill Clinton is no longer the President.
>>
>> I take it that you find it perfectly acceptable for religious nutters
>> to flagrantly violate the law
|
|
|
<compton75@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1105150328.995586.40900@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>
> Larry Jhonson wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> I need your advise on the ticket that I received recently. I was on
> my
>> way to work in the
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
>
> Because he's a psycho religious nutter who wants us to be governed
> by *HIS* Taliban. He is against adultery -- when it isn't him in the
> sack. He rails against those people who make "poor life-choices,"
> like hav
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>> Because, thankfully, Bill Clinton is no longer the President.
>
>
> I take it that you find it perfectly acceptable for religious nutters
> to flagrantly violate the law, but not state judges
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
>
> Because he's a psycho religious nutter who wants us to be governed by
> *HIS* Taliban. He is against adultery -- when it isn't him in the
> sack. He rails against those people who make "poor life-choices," like
> having
|
|
|
In article <GsVDd.12321$wi2.2119@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>, "jgreimer"
<jgreimer@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>What is the probability for a false positive match with fingerprints?
>Nobody knows. It's never been studied. The police and the courts assume
|
|
|
"J B" <dinegame@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1105151037.717699.226670@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Just as the practice of enforcing the death penalty to minorities is
> widespread in America:
>
> http://www.hrw.org/wr2k1/usa/
>
> "Althou
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Jez wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>
>>> Because, thankfully, Bill Clinton is no longer the President.
>>
>>
>> And you prefer Bush, because of why ?
>
>
> Because he's a psycho religious nutter who wants us to b
|
|
|
What is the probability for a false positive match with fingerprints?
Nobody knows. It's never been studied. The police and the courts assume
that when the FBI reports a match, there is no room for doubt. However with
hundreds of millions of prints
|
|
|
Larry Glasser <larry-g@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:larry-g-0801051402220001@192.168.2.4...
> In article <GsVDd.12321$wi2.2119@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>, "jgreimer"
> <jgreimer@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >What is the probability for a fals
|
|
|
Werner Hetzner wrote:
> millerl wrote:
>
>> Bush Urges Congress on Asbestos Litigation Friday January 7, 2005 6:16 PM
>>
>> CLINTON TOWNSHIP, Mich. (AP) - Claiming that asbestos lawsuits clog
>> the courts and cost jobs, President Bush urged Congre
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Because, thankfully, Bill Clinton is no longer the President.
I take it that you find it perfectly acceptable for religious nutters
to flagrantly violate the law, but not state judges, prosecutors, and/or
law enforce
|
|
|
Chas wrote:
> "George Ricker" <gSPAMFREEricker@cfl.rr.com> wrote
>
>>You're quite right that Jefferson's "Creator" did not imply the god of
>>any revealed religion. I do think it was a reference to the god of
>>Deism or "Nature's God" as he refers
|
|
|
millerl wrote:
>Bush Urges Congress on Asbestos Litigation
>Friday January 7, 2005 6:16 PM
>
>CLINTON TOWNSHIP, Mich. (AP) - Claiming that asbestos lawsuits clog
>the courts and cost jobs, President Bush urged Congress Friday to
>change the w
|
|
|
Jez wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>> Because, thankfully, Bill Clinton is no longer the President.
>
> And you prefer Bush, because of why ?
Because he's a psycho religious nutter who wants us to be governed by
*HIS* Taliban. He is
|
|
|
horseman wrote:
>...
>
>Dobson was not only misguided in threatening the senators, he crossed
>the line between free speech and politicking. His organization's
>nonprofit status prohibits it from partisan political activity, in
>which Dobson c
|
|
|
Larry Heath wrote:
>...
>
>This is hardly a big surprise!
>
>The whole Bush administration is built on this type of nonsense, well, I
>suppose it's not really nonsense it works for the Bush administration very
>well. It is the religious ri
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Because, thankfully, Bill Clinton is no longer the President.
And you prefer Bush, because of why ?
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions
|
|
|
In our last episode <BdOdnWQJaJ2rjH3cRVn-uw@comcast.com>, Chas lept out of
the bushes shouting:
> The standing to even make a 'Constitution' is voiced in the DoI.
The "standing" to make a Constitution was what we call "guns." If we'd
*lost, the Do
|
|
|
Chas wrote:
> "George Ricker" <gSPAMFREEricker@cfl.rr.com> wrote
>
>>You're quite right that Jefferson's "Creator" did not imply the god of
>>any revealed religion. I do think it was a reference to the god of
>>Deism or "Nature's God" as he refers
|
|
|
In our last episode <bMednT0jybY23H3cRVn-1Q@comcast.com>, Chas lept out of
the bushes shouting:
> "Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote
>>>The DoI wasn't just some political pamphlet. It was a legal necessity of
>>>the
>>>time, for the sort o
|
|
|
In our last episode <-4-dnQvMo_R3jX3cRVn-vA@comcast.com>, Chas lept out of
the bushes shouting:
> Read the DoI as a legal
> document
Can't. It's not.
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism websit
|
|
|
Northwestern U. had a copy of it but it's gone now. Do you suppose FBI or
OAG goons made them take it down?
You can read the Schenck case here:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=249&invol=47
I have not been able to f
|
|
|
We need to get these sedators fast, before they sedate the whole
country.
My God! Sedition is making us weekly. Or do I mean weakly?
Gotta get ahold of myself. The Rapture is coming, and I've got to be
Millennium Ready. That's what my millenarian
|
|
|
In article <crpmcm02k9e@news1.newsguy.com>, Richard <Anonymous@127.001> wrote:
>
>"Lee Hollaar" <hollaar@antitrust.cs.utah.edu> wrote in message
>news:crplma$tuc$1@antitrust.cs.utah.edu...
>> In article <crpdt202ab9@news1.newsguy.com>, Richard <Anonym
|
|
|
David Fabian wrote:
> "J B" <dinegame@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1105151037.717699.226670@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > Just as the practice of enforcing the death penalty to minorities
is
> > widespread in America:
> >
> > http://www
|
|
|
kuacou241@yahoo.com wrote:
> Venue for bankruptcy is the place where the filer has lived for 180
> days or the longer period in those 180 days than anywhere else.
>
> The filer needs to be present (with certain exceptions, mainly for the
> very ill
|
|
|
kuacou241@yahoo.com wrote:
> Without knowing much about the case, it would appear that the
> prosecutor's psychiatrist was a professional prosecution witness who
> knew his livelihood depended upon his reliably telling juries what the
> prosecution wa
|
|
|
Christopher A. Lee wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 21:35:15 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:29:44 -0600, "Mark K. Bilbo"
>><alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In our last episode <grudnV1qv458p0HcRVn
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Paul" <Laura Bush murdered her boyfriend is a moron@moron.us> wrote:
><compton75@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:1105150328.995586.40900@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>> He assumes you were avoiding traffic. Maybe you were going to go
|
|
|
Thanks for your advice.
|
|
|
Hi,
Were you able to find a newsgroup for public housing residents?
I would be interested in finding one also.
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>The DoI wasn't just some political pamphlet. It was a legal necessity of the
>time, for the sort of information that they needed to establish before any
>other 'official' action taken.
Wrong. It was
|
|
|
Thanks for your reply. Thanks for your help. X has to pay me 40k. Am
I eligible to file in Small claims court ?
|
|
|
"Larry Glasser" <larry-g@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:larry-g-0801051358050001@192.168.2.4...
> In article <crp66401vkh@news1.newsguy.com>, "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001>
wrote:
>
> >www.somestuff.batcave.net
> >
> >Considering the image s
|
|
|
"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote
>>The DoI wasn't just some political pamphlet. It was a legal necessity of
>>the
>>time, for the sort of information that they needed to establish before any
>>other 'official' action taken.
> Wrong. It w
|
|
|
"Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1105205124.714121.183350@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> According to the article, the cops "ask" if they can fingerprint you
> and you can refuse, but you have to fig
|
|
|
Paul wrote:
>
> "Well, Your Honor, I was going to stop at the <place of business>
when I
> realized I forgot <*> and exited the business parking lot to return
home
> to <**>. "
>
> <*>: ..when I realized I forgot: (select one)
> My: cellphone, ca
|
|
|
"horseman" <nop@A-1.com> wrote in message
news:24svt055p8sjhus12cen5plgb2dqfl470u@4ax.com...
> Austin American-Statesman
> January 08, 2005
>
> Threatening senators over judicial choices was a political blunder
> EDITORIAL BOARD
>
> A major vol
|
|
|
"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote
>>It's nothing *but* a legal document, dude.
> The DOI is a letter of treason by subjects against their King.
That's exactly what it's not.
The King claimed rule by divine right. The DoI claims that Divine Right lies
|
|