Legal Spring Logo

"Why would I go anywhere else for Legal Services?"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

NY Legal Separation Agreement
Can someone please tell me if legal separation papers filed in NY state need to contain child visitation provisions. The wife isn't limiting access to the children, but I was wondering if these visitation arrangements were standard inclusions in those


Update from Dow Settlement Facility
http://sfdct.com/home.cfm?agree=9&lang=eng Administrator's Corner Last Updated: 01/10/2005 @ 5:00 PM Dear Claimants and Counsel: As you know, November 29, 2004 was the end of the Opt-Out period. The Settlement Facility is no longer processing


Re: CBS and the Evidence Tampering Checklist
P wrote: > "Harold Burton" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message > news:nospam-98A253.14151710012005@comcast.dca.giganews.com... > >>In article <34fun8F4aggjhU1@individual.net>, "P" <p@p.org> wrote: >> >> >>>The unofficial propaganda wing of


Re: Can I still be responsible for balance after credit card debt settlement?
Second letter? This is why I started my forst reply with "also received?" My reply is based on an assumption that this is a settlement that the OP has negotiated. If it was un unsolicted settlement that jus popped up out of the blue, I would be skep


Iraqi prisoners 'treated no worse than cheerleaders'
Iraqi prisoners 'treated no worse than cheerleaders' By Alec Russell in Washington - 11/01/2005 The lawyer for Charles Graner, the alleged ringleader of the Abu Ghraib prison abuse scandal, yesterday compared heaping naked Iraqi prisoners in a tan


Re: ATHEIST COWARDS...... JAB JAB QUOTE JAB JAB QUOTE
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:54:09 -0600, Harry F. Leopold <hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote: >On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:49:52 -0600, CQMMAN wrote >(in article <34fj0lF45qhndU1@individual.net>): > >>> -|erc <h@r.c> wrote: >>>>> What blather. Don't reply, Herc. I


Re: ATHEIST COWARDS...... JAB JAB QUOTE JAB JAB QUOTE
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:25:15 +0000, Levy Oates <levy_oates@hotmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:42:51 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote: > >>they don't wear white hoods in alt.atheism for nothing. > >My hood's more pink, although it sometimes go


Re: CBS and the Evidence Tampering Checklist
In article <VOGEd.3464$KJ2.3433@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>, "Steven L." <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote: > beber wrote: > > > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:15:17 -0500, Harold Burton <nospam@nospam.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >>In article


Re: ATHEIST COWARDS...... JAB JAB QUOTE JAB JAB QUOTE
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:25:15 +0000, Levy Oates <levy_oates@hotmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:42:51 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote: > >>they don't wear white hoods in alt.atheism for nothing. > >My hood's more pink, although it sometimes g


Re: Can I still be responsible for balance after credit card debt settlement?
On 10 Jan 2005 16:28:20 -0800 vn-mkjlopue wrote: > I also receive a debt settlement letter as below: > "Be advised that both this agency and xx credit company agree to > accept $1xxx as settlement on the above referenced account. Make your > check


Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT
> "Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> > > > > Oh, but I *do* comprehend it, which is why I know you are in meltdown > > mode. "YOU ARE IN MELTDOWN MODE" Pretty clear to me you were asking for it > > tak


Re: Green Bay starts fingerprinting for traffic stops
What next? Will cops ask for nude photos? The big question I have now is, what is the purpose of law enforcement? To be a royal pain in the ass for American citizens or to protect and to serve? I'm voting for the former because they certainly do a po


Re: Can I still be responsible for balance after credit card debt settlement?
"vn-mkjlopue" wrote in misc.consumers: >"Be advised that both this agency and xx credit company agree to >accept $1xxx as settlement on the above referenced account. Make your >check payable to xx credit company and return it to our attention no >la


Re: Update : Settlement Facility Dow Corning Trust
Thanks for posting this, Nana. Out of 100,000 there may be some ladies who will need assistance with curing claim defects. There are people reading here who are willing to assist anyone who requests help. "Nana Weedkiller" <nanaweedkiller@y


Re: Paycheck error in my favor
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:05:40 -0800, Keith <kilowattradio@myway.com> wrote: >On 9 Jan 2005 21:04:17 -0800, Paycheck@mailinator.com wrote: > >>Eventually they will figure this out. They haven't yet though. >> >>What is the legal status of this mone


Re: Accuser's lawyer boasts he will get Kobe's attention
>Richard Jan 10, 12:56 >Actually, as a civil case, it can be filed practically anywhere. >In order to win, Like hell, you legal ignoramus.


Re: CBS and the Evidence Tampering Checklist
In article <34gj0cF463cjkU1@individual.net>, "P" <p@p.org> wrote: > "Harold Burton" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message > news:nospam-A1CB18.18204110012005@comcast.dca.giganews.com... > > In article <41e30a1e$0$69055$39cecf19@news.twtelecom.net>, >


Re: Capitalism Has Become a Cancerous Tumor
So a market owned, operated, and controlled without interference from any outside force, complete with ludicrous barriers to entry, somehow constitutes a "free market"? Robert Sturgeon wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:39:39 GMT, Obwon <ob110ob@alt.


Re: Accuser's lawyer boasts he will get Kobe's attention
"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cru75n$o66@dispatch.concentric.net... > http://www.latimes.com/sports/basketball/nba/lakers/la-sp-bryant10jan10,1,67 > 91913.story?coll=la-headlines-sports-nba-lakers > > > > "He is


Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 02:45:33 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote: >T R U e M A N W I T N E S S E S They're making fun of you, idiot.


Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT
but you were all bad. Herc


Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:29:34 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote: >No I am not crazy Yes, you are.


Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:27:30 +1000, "|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote: > >> "Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> >> > >> > Oh, but I *do* comprehend it, which is why I know you are in meltdown >> > mode. > > >"YOU ARE IN MEL


Re: CBS and the Evidence Tampering Checklist
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:15:17 -0500, Harold Burton <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >In article <34fun8F4aggjhU1@individual.net>, "P" <p@p.org> wrote: > >> The unofficial propaganda wing of the Bush 4th Reich, Fox News Network, tells >> all the uneducated


Re: CBS and the Evidence Tampering Checklist
P wrote: > "Harold Burton" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message > news:nospam-98A253.14151710012005@comcast.dca.giganews.com... >>In article <34fun8F4aggjhU1@individual.net>, "P" <p@p.org> wrote: >> >> >>>The unofficial propaganda wing of the Bush 4


Re: PUBLIC REPRIMAND OF HARRY C. DePEW, ATTORNEY AT LAW
jls wrote: > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:41E2BEC6.2080308@it.com... >>jls wrote: >>>"Court Services" <courtservices@webtv.net> wrote in message >>>news:15875-41E1BE6F-293@storefull-3172.bay.webtv.net... >>> >>> >>>>This lawyer


Re: Trademark "motion" question
cbc wrote: > What is the name of or type of motion to file if you > want to ask the board in a proceeding to > disregard or throw-out another motion made by > the opposing party? Or is there such a thing ? > > Thanks in advance. A "motion" -


Re: Green Bay starts fingerprinting for traffic stops
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 17:55:36 GMT, an orbiting mind control laser caused larry@x.y (Larry) to write: >There isn't any evidence that I know of that could NEVER have a false >positive result, especially if the testing was done by someone not >qualified


Re: Copyright notice and non-legal-person organization?
Thanks, McGyver. That's clear enough. Regards, Pascal Damian


Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT


Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT
> > He threatened to slit the throats of ALL of my children. > The topic of the thread was what you can get away with saying on usenet DUMBASS You've tormented me in 50 newsgroups for one out of context jokeline signature You've replied to my p


Re: SKEPTICS ARE IGNORANT
|-|erc wrote: > I am The Truman of Jim Carrey fame. Please help stop me being tortured since April 2002 > with constant microwave laser from the Truman satelite splitting my head and tormenting me > and people around me. I'll see what I can


Re: Can I still be responsible for balance after credit card debt settlement?
In article <1105403300.292015.267820@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, "vn-mkjlopue" <fwhero@yahoo.com> wrote: > I also receive a debt settlement letter as below: > > "Be advised that both this agency and xx credit company agree to > accept $1xxx as


Re: Copyright versus public domain
>If I design >my own flag or other symbol, I can copyright it just the same as any >other graphic work. > The flag is not the ideal example because there are laws which explicitly place it in the public domain. But you can create copyrighted works


Re: CBS and the Evidence Tampering Checklist
"Harold Burton" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:nospam-A1CB18.18204110012005@comcast.dca.giganews.com... > In article <41e30a1e$0$69055$39cecf19@news.twtelecom.net>, > "James H. Hood" <jhhoodDIESPAMMERDIE@urdirect.net> wrote: > > > P <p@


Re: CBS and the Evidence Tampering Checklist
"P" <p@p.org> wrote in message news:34g5ppF49cp5pU1@individual.net... > > "Harold Burton" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message > news:nospam-98A253.14151710012005@comcast.dca.giganews.com... >> In article <34fun8F4aggjhU1@individual.net>, "P" <p@p.o


Re: CBS and the Evidence Tampering Checklist
In article <41E2E135.3060504@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > P wrote: > > "Harold Burton" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message > > news:nospam-98A253.14151710012005@comcast.dca.giganews.com... > >>In article <34fun8F4aggjhU1@individual.n


Re: CBS and the Evidence Tampering Checklist
In article <41e30a1e$0$69055$39cecf19@news.twtelecom.net>, "James H. Hood" <jhhoodDIESPAMMERDIE@urdirect.net> wrote: > P <p@p.org> wrote in message news:34g5ppF49cp5pU1@individual.net... > > > I forgot, you're an American. Your media is censored


Re: Capitalism Has Become a Cancerous Tumor
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:34:20 GMT, Bolwerk <bolwerk@gmail.com> wrote: >So a market owned, operated, and controlled without interference from >any outside force, complete with ludicrous barriers to entry, somehow >constitutes a "free market"? I h


Re: Civil Rights Lawsuits
>He is a legal educator assisting pro-se litigants and appellants only. >Bob Hirschfeld, JD Hirshfeld commits the offense of Unauthorized Practice of Law. >From the Arizona Bar Website www.azbar.org: What is the "unauthorized practice of law?"


Re: Questions about math tutoring
"Mike Turco" <miketurco@yahoo-nospam4me.com> writes: > "Allan Adler" <ara@nestle.csail.mit.edu> wrote: > >> However, in spite of these obvious reasons not to like tutoring as >> a way of earning money, I'm thinking of offering some tutoring >> ag


Re: Questions about math tutoring
"Mike Turco" <miketurco@yahoo-nospam4me.com> writes: > Well, you can't buy much food for your camel (?!) on a couple hundred bucks > a month. Make that a couple of hundred bucks a year. Just for clarification: I have no intention of offering


Re: Can I still be responsible for balance after credit card debt settlement?
"vn-mkjlopue" <fwhero@yahoo.com> wrote: >I also receive a debt settlement letter as below: > >"Be advised that both this agency and xx credit company agree to >accept $1xxx as settlement on the above referenced account. Make your >check payable to


What's REALLY Wrong With Lawyers (was Re: "Tort Reform" Scam
Jon Beaver wrote: > I'm having a hard time believing that President Bush is that stupid. I find it easy to believe that President Bush is that stupid, or even worse. Ever heard him speak? ;) > Is it possible he doesn't know that the "cost" o


Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS
"|-|erc" <h@r.c> wrote in message news:34fqgvF4aggl0U1@individual.net... >> > >> > I recognise this newbie slag from last week, filthy @$#*ing skanks in >> > that mob of trash >> > got the mouths of whores but nothing to match >> > >> > Herc >>


Re: PUBLIC REPRIMAND OF HARRY C. DePEW, ATTORNEY AT LAW
jls wrote: > "Court Services" <courtservices@webtv.net> wrote in message > news:15875-41E1BE6F-293@storefull-3172.bay.webtv.net... > >>This lawyer got BUSTED! Now he's disgusted. What a scoundrel! Click >>below to read about it. >> >>www.law.scsux


Re: Paycheck error in my favor
Paycheck@mailinator.com wrote: > Last month I received a paycheck, written by a leading off-site payroll > service, that seems to have mistakenly given me ten times my salary. > It looks like whoever submitted my hourly rate and the number of hours


Re: CBS and the Evidence Tampering Checklist
P <p@p.org> wrote in message news:34g5ppF49cp5pU1@individual.net... > I forgot, you're an American. Your media is censored You are delusional.


Re: Trademark "motion" question
A Motion to Strike is used to ask a court to strike pleadings or parts of pleadings that are improper. It can be used against complaints, answers, motions, whatever. But when you said: "disregard or throw-out another motion" you don't say why. If th


Re: Questions about math tutoring
"Allan Adler" <ara@nestle.csail.mit.edu> wrote in message news:crs2lg02ijd@enews3.newsguy.com... > > > During the year, about 20 years ago, when I made the most money I ever > made from tutoring math, I only earned a few hundred dollars from it.


Re: ATHEISTS ARE EVEN BIGGER FUCKHEADS THAN SKEPTICS