|
|
On 11 Jan 2005 22:40:34 GMT Unholy Dirtbag wrote:
> Anybody know who has the rights to FM channel 49? I've got some new
> wireless headphones that are set to FM49 (not selectable) with base
> unit
> consumption 30watts (don't know if that's close t
|
|
|
"Ted R." <ted_r1980@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1105503725.972741.109700@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> My birth certificate was stolen while I was in the Philippines. Can
> the perpetrator (or someone else) use it to assume my identity fo
|
|
|
Paul! - I control myself from calling you "Nutteing".
Do as my mum told me 60 years ago.
"THINK BEFORE YOU SPEAK!!!"
And to think that I once believed, because you were such a expert
on computers, you must be a bright one!!! (;-0((
|
|
|
I am The Truman of Jim Carrey fame. Please help stop me being tortured since April 2002
with constant microwave laser from the Truman satelite splitting my head and tormenting me
and people around me. Not a prank, I am not crazy, The Truman Show ma
|
|
|
Perhaps! You may have an oral contract for which you could get
"expectation" and "reliance damages".. maybe even specific performance (they
have to rent the place to you) or an injunction (they can't rent the place
to anyone else.)
If the stuff you
|
|
|
Anybody know who has the rights to FM channel 49? I've got some new
wireless headphones that are set to FM49 (not selectable) with base unit
consumption 30watts (don't know if that's close to the broadcast strength).
Not surprisingly, whenever the
|
|
|
On 11 Jan 2005 22:40:34 GMT, Unholy Dirtbag <not@available> wrote:
>Anybody know who has the rights to FM channel 49?
Everybody has the right to use 49 MHz for low power transmitters.
>I've got some new
>wireless headphones that are set to FM
|
|
|
Falconnier wrote:
> But in order to play the Game, you have to get into the Game. I don't
> advocate keeping your tongue in your pocket forever - just long enough
> to get into the Game.
Just out of curiosity, did you have a life before you went
|
|
|
And a psychiatrist expert witness referred to today by Marcel
Berlins (an aside he's still looking for the "Who are theBeatles" citation )
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/metropolitan/2981526
<...>
This devastating section of the opinion conc
|
|
|
Falconnier wrote:
> Where exactly did I throw the first ad hom, boy?
>
> And I can throw stones, since I am better than you. In every way.
"All I did was know enough to keep my mouth shut."
As they used to say in law school, "res ipsa lo
|
|
|
Falconnier wrote:
> Again, I haven't violated any Rules. I take great pains to stay
> strictly within the bounds.
I will repeat the question, for those of you in 'slow class': Which
"rules" have I violated? Pissing off bar examiners by standin
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000000050204000902060008
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Falconnier wrote:
> Where exactly did I throw the first ad hom, boy?
|
|
|
forevernitefan wrote:
> Kalids, I am not a vampire, never claimed to be one. I like the
> vampire GENRE. I never, ever said I was a vampire or I believe Anne
> Rice type of vampires exist in reality. Maybe you should get a good
> understanding of re
|
|
|
Falconnier wrote:
> I never said "the Bar loves me." All I did was know enough to keep my
> mouth shut,
Thank you for that admission, Counselor.
> Why couldn't you do the same?
Because unlike you, I actually think that I have certain ina
|
|
|
On 11 Jan 2005 11:35:56 -0700, Voice of freedom
<VoiceFreedom@freedom.naa> wrote:
>Obwon <ob110ob@alt.net> wrote :
>
>> On 7 Jan 2005 16:15:18 -0700, Voice of freedom
>><VoiceFreedom@freedom.naa> wrote:
>>
>>>It's communism and socialism that n
|
|
|
"Daedalus" <jade@net-kooks.org> wrote in message
news:tfg8u0lvofhsn1nm4i7apar4ff03i4ksij@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:58:15 -0500, K. A. Cannon
> <kcannon@insurgent.orgy>, wrote:
>
> >"Chuck Lysaght" <theguyonthebike@email.com> posted
> ><1
|
|
|
Is it legal to pay a credit card settlement amount with balance
transfer from another card?
Curtis CCR wrote:
> Second letter? This is why I started my forst reply with "also
> received?" My reply is based on an assumption that this is a
> settle
|
|
|
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 07:30:54 -0600, Harry F. Leopold
<hleopold@coxyx.net> wrote:
>On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:11:15 -0600, wildbluskies@hotmail.com wrote
>(in article <1105384275.948938.277410@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>):
>
>>
>>> -|erc wrote:
>>>
|
|
|
My birth certificate was stolen while I was in the Philippines. Can
the perpetrator (or someone else) use it to assume my identity for
criminal or fraudulent purposes, and if so, what steps can I take to
prevent this?
Ted
|
|
|
jls wrote:
> "Falconnier" <falconnier@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1105463698.490493.317340@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
>>I am your better. At least I could get admitted to the Bar.
>
> No, you're not anybody's better.
Don't y
|
|
|
> >
> > All I did was send a couple love letters and knock on her door. THAT WAS IT!
> > She went to pigs over it, drop dead gorgous hollywood model looks turning up
> > at the cop shop, perfect blonde with BRIGHT GREEN STUNNING EYES
> > so of cour
|
|
|
jls wrote:
> "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:41E4177E.CB2A4FF8@worldnet.att.net...
>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>>>So much for the book and movie deal. :)
>>>>
>
|
|
|
Falconnier wrote:
> But I'm still a member, cuz I haven't violated any Rules.
That you have been prosecuted for.
> Unlike Hirschfeld.
If Hirsch had had the right connections, he'd still be malpracticing
today. ;)
> And You.
And
|
|
|
jls wrote:
> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:41E41651.9080103@it.com...
>>Falconnier wrote:
>>
>>>I am your better. At least I could get admitted to the Bar.
>>
>> So did Hirschfeld.
> I used to defend Hirschfeld occasionally
|
|
|
Falconnier wrote:
> You can't win, so you resort to puerile little schoolboy attitudes.
Which is why you resorted to ad hominem argument in the first place,
right? Because you had such a compelling case? Feh.
> Go play in the middle of a h
|
|
|
ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
> Gag gets tighter
> Judge warns all involved that newspaper ads, other mass communication
> out of bounds
>
> By Hayli Fellwock, hfellwock@bgdailynews.com -- 270-783-3240
>
> Tuesday, January 11, 2005
>
> LucasIsInno
|
|
|
Falconnier wrote:
> The word is "microcephalic" you ignorant twit.
"Microcephalic" refers to abnormal smallness of the head, whilst I am
referring to your seriously under-developed brain. "Cephalic" refers to
the head; "encephalic" refers to
|
|
|
Falconnier wrote:
> I've never done cocaine.
Doesn't mean you haven't bribed a judge or bar examiner with it.
> Is that why Colorado wouldn't admit you? Because you did?
Nope. They have no problem *whatsoever* with coke-heads. See, e.g
|
|
|
|
|
|
As opposed to you, as you are just a complete ingoramus. Ever figure
out the difference between "6" & "60", idiot?
|
|
|
I am just finishing up a correspondence program to become a paralegal. (Just
have to write the final exam, and I'm done).
What would you recommend for someone who is looking to start a new job in
the legal field?
--
Jennifer Norton
|
|
|
In message <mlu7u0t7q4863malbc9kf637j76rhck8lt@4ax.com>, pete
<peterturtill@hotmail.com> writes
>On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 07:27:46 -0000, "Paul Nutteing"
><nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote:
>
>>Its only fair. How else are their likes to mend their ways
>
|
|
|
Wow! Bruce sounds upset! Do you think Bruce voted for Bush? No, I
don't think so either. He sounds more like a Kerry or Dean or Gore
supporter, actually....
"Harold Burton" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:nospam-BD3A07.134
|
|
|
"LeMod Pol" <modpol@igs.net> wrote in message
news:41E34835.4FFD0B47@igs.net...
>
> Iraqi prisoners 'treated no worse than cheerleaders'
> By Alec Russell in Washington - 11/01/2005
>
> The lawyer for Charles Graner, the alleged ringleader
> of t
|
|
|
Fuck off asshole.
--
http://www.jokerstears.com
http://www.dacruestudios.com
filmmaker70546@charter.net
"kb" <know_buddee@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1105464401.164512.113200@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Congratulations Michael Moor
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:45:25 GMT,
Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>
> [betwixt us -- snipped]
>
>
>>>Remember, *Cam Brown* is responsible for Cam Brown's situ
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>>>>So much for the book and movie deal. :)
>>>
>>>Oh, they're still on track, don't worry about that! When a man who is
>>>OBVIOUSLY innocent is ja
|
|
|
Falconnier wrote:
> I am your better. At least I could get admitted to the Bar.
>
> And your homophobic comment shows just how juvenile you are
The comment is about servility, you microencephalic idiot.
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Falconnier wrote:
>>> I never said "the Bar loves me." All I did was know enough to keep my
>>> mouth shut,
>> That's asking too much of Ken Smith, you know. After all, he has 1st
>> Amendment
|
|
|
Oh, I do admit, in some places, the system is quite broken. And in
others, it operates just fine.
As for the so-called "non-publication" rule, I am whole-heartedly
against such. I mean, why even bother to write an opinion if it can't
be cited? Yo
|
|
|
Falconnier wrote:
> I am your better. At least I could get admitted to the Bar.
So did Hirschfeld.
|
|
|
Falconnier wrote:
> I am your better. At least I could get admitted to the Bar.
And God only knows how much cocaine *THAT* must have cost.
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:45:25 GMT,
Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> It's close enough -- we can always look it up (unless you
>cancelbotted the post).
That reminds me...
I mentioned once that posts can
|
|
|
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Jesus loves us all. Jesus doesn't love anyone more than He loves
everyone
>> else.
> Prove it.
>The Bible says it. Q.E.D.
Oh puhleeez. Grow up and stop believing in fairy tales.
The Mabinogion is just as author
|
|
|
"Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote in message
news:34j0ckF4b83k1U1@individual.net...
[...]
> Defense attorney Parnham learned of the false testimony and asked for a
> mistrial. It was the judge's decision to deny the mistrial that the
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:21:58 GMT,
Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> For all we know, he is a religious nutter like you and Sarah Smith --
>and GAWD told him to push her off that cliff.
Ted's god only speak
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:14:22
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>>>> So much for the book and movie deal. :)
>
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:35:55 GMT,
Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Death penalty ruled out for man accused of killing girl in RPV
>>>By Denise Nix
>>>Daily Breeze
Looks as if my guess was wrong. Probabl
|
|
|
Falconnier wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Jesus loves us all. Jesus doesn't love anyone more than He loves everyone
>> else.
> Prove it.
The Bible says it. Q.E.D.
>> You need to receive Christ as your Saviour.
> No, I don't.
|
|
|
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 07:20:07 -0800, Robert Sturgeon
<rsturge@inreach.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 02:28:20 GMT, Bolwerk
><bolwerk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I guess you don't know what a monopoly is.
>
>Sure I know what a monopoly is: it's what ha
|
|
|
|
