The City of Los Angeles has resorted to extortion.
I am a cosmetic dentist in Los Angeles and I am faced with a delemma
and I need some advice.
In August some woman from the City of Los Angeles Department of
Public
Works Showed up at my office while I was out on personal business.
She handed an application for an Industrial Waste Permit which
involved
a registration fee and a video on proper handling of amalgam waste
dually created by the ADA/CDA. This woman did not examine this
office
and was ademant about convincing my staff that we are in violation
of
the city ordinance just because they met with The ADA/CDA and it was
determined that all dentists are.
I am in a medical building where we have centralized air and suction
system.
Appearently this fee is supposed to allow you to dispose of
gluteraldehyde, ketones, alcohols, and elemental amalgam particles
plus
other similar materials into the public sewage system by providing
you
with a permit to do so. GO FIGURE THE LOGIC?????
It also is supposed to supervise the collection of fixer developer
and
amalgam and precious metal scrap and lead foils from x-ray film but
nobody ever shows up to check this.
At this point I am not ever sure that this foil is actually lead
probably aluminum since the film is so sensitive now a days but only
KODAK knows for sure and that's another discussion and doesn't apply
to
my case since i have digital x-rays.
NOw I do not place any Amalgam nor have I for many years, I have
digital x-rays which I invested in earlier this year. I also do not
remove amalgam I'm mostly a veneer practice. And the rare occasion
that
I run into a silver filling I have an independent suction system
separate from the city and we have the waste picked up when enough
of
it accumulated. Also we do not dump gluteraldehyde into the drain it
is
used for wiping down equiptment only. The ultrasonic cleaner we use
is
biodegradable enzymatic and is not on the city's forbidden list.
Extacted teeth are soacked on bleach and given to their respected
owners enamel, amalgam and all. And they can either store these
teeth
in their mouths as recommended by the FDA or in class jars under
mineral oil.
So where you may ask this is going??? Last week I recieve an
invoice/violation notice from the city with a fine for $350 for
being
in violation of illegally discharging condemened mercury into the
city
sewage system. this invoice contains further threats of this being
punishable by a misdemeanor jail time and an additional $1000.00
fine.
They can test for these acts by taking a sample or photograph. What
if
my patient had too much sushi and rinsed their mouth in my cuspidor?
or
what if there is something in the lines from the previous dentists
who
practiced in my office before I bought it??
And the piss of the whole thing is I am not guilty of any of this
stuff
this woman just walks by picks up a business card with DDS or DMD
behind it and all of a sudden I am accused of being guilty.
I am begining to suffer anxiety attacks and mental anguish as a
result
of these threats. Where is the ADA/CDA on this harassment?
This amalgam thing is like a nightmare you can't escape it, you try
not
not put it in and yet it still haunts you. Since I am not
contributing
to it's placement I feel it is unethical for me to pay for the
actions
of others. Dentists that refused to place it had their licences
revoked
in the past now they are being penalized for what everybody else is
doing with these HMO games. The dental boards still have the amalgam
as
past of their licensure exam. What the hell is this system coming
to,
makes you just want to hang up the handpiece.
Defend it or pay it. What's the problem? If you want to appeal the
fine, you can. You can present evidence and argument. You can
present expert witnesses. If you would rather pay the $350 and get
back to work, you can do so. If you don't want to buy an unnecessary
permit, you can defend yourself against a fine for the alleged
violation. What do you mean, what is this system coming to? The cops
accuse, the defendant defends, a judge (or an administrative law
judge) decides. That sounds like a good system. Do you think its
reasonable to expect the cops (or other enforcement type people) to
conduct the sort of investigation that would prove all of the facts
you stated above?
Your attitude is not unusual. Innocent people often think they should
be immune from accusations. They think (I guess) that the system
ought to know that the accusations are not true, that the accused
should be believed automatically and that innocent people should never
have to defend themselves. There is no such system.
McGyver