misc.legal

<el_roachmeister@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1106024616.516324.115490@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > I am looking for examples from society and history that prove the > following statement false: > > "Laws exist to protect the rich from the

SolarChase wrote: >>Ken Smith wrote > > "> I'm surprised that our resident expert (at least on delis, though as a New > York Jew he shouldn't have much of an opinion on ham sandwiches) has not backed > Ted on his claim that a decent prosecutor could

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:13:26 -0600 Dexter wrote: > Hello! I was attending a bar this past Saturday in Minnesota when a > gentlemen was getting held down by bouncers inside of a bar. There 2 > were > bouncers who were basically just holding the guy d

Carol Lee Smith wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Ken Smith wrote: >>Chas wrote: >>>"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote >> >>>>>>>>What is wrong with the oath of office as the founding fathers wrote >>>>>>>>it? >>>>>>> > (directly quoted from

Jon Beaver wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:06:13 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >>krp wrote: >>>"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message >>>news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1050116191259.866d-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu... >>> >>> >>>>>>>>Wha

Larry wrote: > In article <41EB48ED.8060304@it.com>, Ranger57@concentric.net wrote: > >> Not that you would care overmuch, but two of the character witnesses >>I was planning to call in my hearing (I actually *had* them there for >>the inquiry pa

Jon Beaver wrote: > On 16 Jan 2005 16:49:08 -0800, clifffreeling@yahoo.com wrote: >>Jon Beaver wrote: >> >> >>>Yes, they are a bunch of "snappy #@&@^es" because nobody reads those >>>big signs at every courthouse that says the clerks cannot give leg

On 17 Jan 2005 13:33:26 -0800 drabina wrote: > Hi, > I am new to this group. I am currently employed by a large company in > NJ. Since merge with another company we are working 12 hours a day 7 > days a week. Sometimes we get the Sunday off but th

On 17 Jan 2005 16:40:15 -0800 Curious Mind wrote: > Sorry if this question is asked before -- I understand FAX is a legally > accepted form of contract or document. Since I have scanner and don't > have fax machine and try to save cost of long distan

drabina wrote: > I have no idea what should I do. Everybody I asked tells me not to sign > this letter. On the other hand I really cannot work that much. The job > requires lifting of 50+ lbs drums which slowly kills my back. When I > loose job, I do

Also sprach "Jim Hart" <jzhart@hushmail.com>: > Joker4153 wrote: > > Murder is unlawful killing. If the state is authorizing the act, it > > aint murder. It might be heinous, immoral, bloody awful or whatever. But > > it is not murder. Because the g

"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:41EC75A5.1030400@it.com... > Larry wrote: > > In article <41EC448D.6040106@it.com>, Ranger57@concentric.net wrote: > >>SolarChase wrote: > >>>>Ken Smith wrote > >>> > >>>"> I'm surprised that our r

"SolarChase" <solarchase@aol.com> wrote in message news:20050117142823.23092.00000115@mb-m01.aol.com... > >Ken Smith wrote > > "> I'm surprised that our resident expert (at least on delis, though as a New > York Jew he shouldn't have much of an op

no i am not kidding. History is full of examples where the poor have suffered enormous casualties from easily preventable causes. An example now is the tsunami disaster. How many lawsuits are going to be filed from that disaster? Probably none of any s

"James H. Hood" <jhhoodDIESPAMMERDIE@urdirect.net> wrote in message news:41ec6035$0$49075$39cecf19@news.twtelecom.net... > > Chas <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:5aOdnX9D8-yl43fcRVn-pw@comcast.com... > > > Whatsa 'peep', by

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 01:38:06 GMT, larry@x.y (Larry) wrote: >> Make your case for my purported "anti-Semitism," Cub Pwossecuta! You >>alleged it, you *PROVE* it. Otherwise, I demand that you apologize for >>your ad hominem and arguably libelous

<purple543210@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:1106004155.774926.160510@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > The City of Los Angeles has resorted to extortion. > > I am a cosmetic dentist in Los Angeles and I am faced with a delemma > and I need some a

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:59:07 +0200, someone wrote: >the statement arrived showing a "payoff demand statement fee of $30" which >would indicate that the countrywide rep was at best lying and worst case >fraudulent in not disclosing the true reason for

I am looking for examples from society and history that prove the following statement false: "Laws exist to protect the rich from the poor". Is there any law in a democratic society that protects the poor from the rich? Thx!

scharf@hotmail.com wrote: > > Ray Mathis wrote: > > <snip> > > > seems we are not alone as there is at least one class action case > against > > countrywide (in mortgagedaily.com) > > At least in Illinois, Countrywide lost a lawsuit on appea

HE POWER OF $1 DOLLAR-SAFE AND FAST MONEY MAKING! I found this in a news group and decided to try it. A little while back, I was browsing through news groups, just like you are now and came across a message just like this, that said you could make

"Citizen_Cain" <noemailhere@askmenicely.invaild> wrote in message news:aJYGd.1008$%h1.372@fe39.usenetserver.com... > > "TEH US3NET P4RIAH" <russell.waters@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:41eb7076$0$27683$a82e2bb9@news-out.notoriousnews.com... >

In article <41EB48ED.8060304@it.com>, Ranger57@concentric.net wrote: > > Not that you would care overmuch, but two of the character witnesses >I was planning to call in my hearing (I actually *had* them there for >the inquiry panel proceeding, pre

Bouncers can "eject" people from the premises but that's it. Anything other than ejecting can lead to a charge of battery. "Dexter" <thisismy@validemailaddress.com> wrote in message news:41ec0e57$0$10891$a1866201@visi.com... > Hello! I was atte

>Ken Smith wrote "> I'm surprised that our resident expert (at least on delis, though as a New York Jew he shouldn't have much of an opinion on ham sandwiches) has not backed Ted on his claim that a decent prosecutor could "indict a ham sandwich.""

"TEH US3NET P4RIAH" <russell.waters@gmail.com> wrote in message news:41eb7076$0$27683$a82e2bb9@news-out.notoriousnews.com... > > > "Citizen_Cain" <noemailhere@askmenicely.invaild> wrote in message > news:yrFGd.4039$aa6.731@fe61.usenetserver.com...

"Chuck Lysaght" <c_lysaght@bikerider.com> wrote in message news:1105957158.021840.100040@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > > > Citizen_Cain wrote: > > Or is the paperwork still going through "the system?" > I'm turning myself in this morning. heh.

Chas <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message news:5aOdnX9D8-yl43fcRVn-pw@comcast.com... > Whatsa 'peep', by the way? An indication that the utterer is younger than twenty-five.

we recently contacted Countrywide and told them we would pay off our mortgage. the customer service rep on the phone was unable to immediately tell us what is the amount to sent via wire or check but after researching (5-10 min) it over the phone (we

Phil, You need to immediately notify via e-mail followed by ground mail your former room mate of the cat's ill health and the cost of necessary treatment. You may wish to ask for ownership of the cats at this time. After a short but reasonable

In article <35296sF4gmfv5U1@individual.net>, Ray Mathis <raym@anazi.co.za> wrote: > >we recently contacted Countrywide and told them we would pay off our >mortgage. >the customer service rep on the phone was unable to immediately tell us what >is th

In article <csfmf902t92@news3.newsguy.com>, "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote: > >I had to look it up to make sure what it did say. >The 6th amenment begins with "In all criminal......". >So you make speeding fines a civil issue and your rights ar

Joker4153: > Murder is unlawful killing. If the state is authorizing the act, it aint > murder. It might be heinous, immoral, bloody awful or whatever. But it is not > murder. Because the government says so. > Don't argue with the government. They d

also thread "Prosecutors Fallacy ... " revisited. Courtesy of the good folk on sci.maths and thread titled "Loaded dice problem" I think I now have the general analytic determination of DNA profile false match statistics. Amending for directed pairs

Jeff Strickland wrote: > "Shadow Walker" <shadow@onecall.net> wrote in message > news:cshae8$20f$1@news.onecall.net... >>Jeff Strickland wrote: >>>>Chill out. >>>>> >>>>>I have no intention of revising history, if I said something wrong, >>>point i

"Buster" <courtservices@webtv.net> wrote in message news:1105750923.601674.161730@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > Are we Stoopid Amedicans or what!? Some of our lending institutions > give preference to illegals for mortgage and other loans in prej

You failed to get a witness. Technically, hit from behind is a fault of hitter. His witness from the same car is not 100% admissible in court. Challenge the policeman in court. If your description that you stopped for red light for sometimes before y

Illegal American? It is european who came here hundreds years ago w/o valid passports. Did you have this thought before? or a thought that food is cheap in this country because of "illegal" do all the low pay and dirty jobs in the field while the "lega

"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote > > >> > What is wrong with the oath of office as the founding fathers > > >> > wrote it? > The oath to be taken by the president on first entering office is > specified in Article II, Section 1, of the

On 17 Jan 2005 lanruvi2@yahoo.com wrote: > > >> > What is wrong with the oath of office as the founding fathers > wrote it? > It looks to me as though that is the question which was asked, > not anything about the pledge. Well, yeah. That is w

Sorry if this question is asked before -- I understand FAX is a legally accepted form of contract or document. Since I have scanner and don't have fax machine and try to save cost of long distance fax dialup, I incline to use PDF format and mail it to

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, krp wrote: > >> > Endorsing neutrality in matters of government is not being anti-Xn, > >> > anti-Islam, anti-Hindu, anti-Buddhist, anti-Mormon, anti-Christian > >> > Scientist, > >> > anti-Baptist, anti-Catholic, anti-Pagan, an

Another slip of the lip has ruined another white guy's career: -Las Vegas Weatherman Fired for MLK Slur -LAS VEGAS - A television weatherman was fired after referring to slain -civil rights activist Martin Luther King Jr. as "Martin Luther Coon

Jeff Strickland wrote: >>>Chill out. >>> >>>I have no intention of revising history, if I said something wrong, > point it >>>out and give the correction. >>> >>>I was of the idea that the Federal Sentencing guidelines were given as a >>>result of

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Kenneth R. Pangborn, aka: KennyKakes, aka: krp wrote: > "Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1050116185733.866b-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu... > >> >> > What is wrong with the oath of office as

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Ken Smith wrote: > Chas wrote: > > "Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote > >>>>>>What is wrong with the oath of office as the founding fathers wrote > >>>>>>it? (directly quoted from the Constitution) > >> The

"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote > What does that have to do with the presidential oath of office as written > by the Founding Fathers? Nothing that would stop any 'oath-taker' from adding whatever he wanted to, or use any Book he wanted

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Chas wrote: > "Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote > > > >> > What is wrong with the oath of office as the founding fathers wrote > > > >> > it? > > The oath to be taken by the president on first entering office is >

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, krp wrote: > "Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message > news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1050116191259.866d-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu... >>>>>> What is wrong with the oath of office as the founding fathers wrote >>>>>> it?