|
|
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> writes:
>For reasons I don't want to explore, on 31 Jan 2005 22:09:55 -0600,
>Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote:
>>"forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> writes:
>>>If he claimed to have had a "fatal" car
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on 30 Jan 2005 17:37:26 -0800,
"Buster" <courtservices@webtv.net> wrote:
>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42474
Your subject title is very misleading. All illegal aliens, not
just tho
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on 31 Jan 2005 22:09:55 -0600,
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote:
>"forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>>If he claimed to have had a "fatal" car accident, he would not be
>>alive/ Fatfality
|
|
|
I've been looking around for images to use on my gallery from NASA.
Tonight I run across one site and would you believe these idiots have the
nerve to claim a copyright on an image taken by an astronaut?
http://www.acclaimimages.com/_gallery/_pages/0
|
|
|
"forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> writes:
>If he claimed to have had a "fatal" car accident, he would not be
>alive/ Fatfality means death, dead. corpse( or road kill in his case).
>Therefore his alleged car crash was NOT fatal--to him at least.
|
|
|
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> writes:
>For reasons I don't want to explore, on 31 Jan 2005 10:32:34 -0600,
>Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote:
>>Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> writes:
>>>For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sun,
|
|
|
I am seeking an attorney who is willing to take on a decent-sized
(total at stake is well over a million, at present) case against a
mortgage lender/servicer which has engaged in predatorial and deceptive
practices. There is a pending state superior c
|
|
|
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/eo/20050201/en_celeb_eo/15819
According to a new multimillion-dollar lawsuit, Snoop has been a bad Dogg.
The rapper was sued on Friday by a woman who claims she was raped by Snoop
and members of his posse fo
|
|
|
"Larry" <larry@x.y> wrote
>>"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
>>>
>>> Didn't we discuss all of this to death a couple of years ago? Doesn't
>>> it just boil down to a single proposition: We regard a person's word
>>> as evidence because that'
|
|
|
On 31 Jan 2005 13:31:29 -0800, "paul" <paul_eitchison@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>We are saddled with a "faggot" government. Support nothing. Give
>nothing. Keep #@&@^ing, keep voting.
>Paul
Amen Brother Paul. Didja see the one where PBS was trying to
in
|
|
|
"Olaf Gustafson" <none@dev.null> wrote in message
news:afqsv01b5ev9os9dafh7mpu244iaurb9j7@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:19:00 -0800, "Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"James C. Reeves" <jcnospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
>
|
|
|
Hi all, the company I worked for was sold about a year ago. I recently found
out that the former company has filed Chapter 13. My question is how is my
retirement with the former company guaranteed? And, is there any way for me
to get that retirement m
|
|
|
Thank you to all who answered.
You all had good points for the family to consider. Yes, I believe the
elder daughter does have POA, but not sure. The real estate agent isn't
going to make much on this deal anyway. The house is located in depress
|
|
|
"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
>>>>You keep saying that, but you haven't shown that it is indeed
>>>>reasonable.
>>>>You're just assuming for convenience, for then you don't have to state
>>>>WHY
>>>>it is believable by proving the validit
|
|
|
are there any was that people can get out is answering a subpoena or a
company/agency not offer written information that a subpoena may dictate?
thank you
--
~~~~~~Courtesy is free...please use it generously ~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
Razzer wrote:
> Dana wrote:
<massive snip to address one issue>
>>Darwin has shown it is unnatural.
>
> If it is unnatural, then why do animals in nature do it?
>
A: Darwin has shown NO such thing.
B: It occurs in animal husbandry, typi
|
|
|
Shadow Walker wrote:
> Razzer wrote:
> > Dana wrote:
> <massive snip to address one issue>
> >>Darwin has shown it is unnatural.
> >
> > If it is unnatural, then why do animals in nature do it?
> >
> A: Darwin has shown NO such thing.
I d
|
|
|
Dana wrote:
> Razzer wrote:
>
> > Dana wrote:
> >> Ken Smith wrote:
> >>
> >> > Maverick wrote:
> >> >> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message
> >> >>news:41FD0A5F.2080609@it.com...
> >> >>> Maverick wrote:
> >> >>>> "Ken Smith" <forget@
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on 31 Jan 2005 14:27:23 -0800,
"forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
>If he claimed to have had a "fatal" car accident, he would not be
>alive/ Fatfality means death, dead. corpse( or road kill in his case).
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:14:11
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>> Kent Wills
|
|
|
" \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> > jls wrote:
> >
> > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> > > > Ken Smith, mendacious prevaricator, wrote:
> >
> > > > > [mendacious prevarications, elided]
> >
> > > Bad Engli
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote
> Ted once claimed that he was brain dead after an accident.
Haiti, by any chance?
> I'm
> not familiar enough with medicine to know if one can reasonably
> recover from such a state or not.
Wid' enuff c
|
|
|
My brother and I are dad's only hiers and he left everything to us in his
will.and named me executer. The estate is small enough to not requier
probate. Do we need to transfer title of the house to us first.or can we
bring suit immediatly to evict th
|
|
|
"forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote
> STFU usualy is short for shut the @$#* up. Gee Callous, how CHRISTIAN
> of you.
> Would Jesus tell someone to shut the @$#* up?
and to get the @$#* out of the temple to boot.
It's a vulgarism; nothing pr
|
|
|
Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1050131120337.11366A-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, jls wrote:
>
> > Kenneth R. Pangborn, aka: "~krp~" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote in
> message news:3TqLd
|
|
|
On 30 Jan 2005 20:00:27 -0800, "Novato" <rodriguezluise@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Seems like illegal immigration is a necessary evil in this country.
>Just like drug dealers will exist while there is a drug consumers.
Drug dealers are a NECESSARY evil?
|
|
|
STATE Outpatient Commitment Criteria
Comparison with Inpatient Criteria
Consequences of Non-Compliance with Outpatient Commitment Order
Other Important Citations
PENNSYLVANIA
50 § 7304
Court may order outpatient treatment for
|
|
|
I was rear ended in California 8 months ago. I went to ER with
ambulance with strong back/neck pain. My car was total and the other
party insurance company paid me the property damage for $3000. Xrays
showed not bone injuries. But I had a strong pain
|
|
|
http://msnbc.msn.com/ID/6814673/
|
|
|
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:52:32 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
>Yes, I have no problem with a jury deciding matters that can obviously be
>deduced from the evidence presented. But I should think everyone would have
>a problem letting a jury m
|
|
|
"Jane" <jane1@icubed.com> wrote in message
> A woman in her 40's is living with her mother rent free. Her mother
becomes
> incompendant<sp?> and her eldest daughter is made her keeper. The eldest
> daughter has given the woman (her sister) 15 da
|
|
|
a=2E..@yahoo.com wrote:
> Hi, I live in Massachusetts and got involved in a car accide=ADnt a
> yearago in which I was at fault. I have a question about the
> sta=ADtutory time limit for the other party to file any damage claims
> against =ADme. Rea
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060707090808010507090905
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
|
|
|
CB wrote:
> "Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
> news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1050131122234.11366E-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
> > On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Dana wrote:
> >
> >> > Where does the Bill of Rights limit itself to only extendin
|
|
|
CB wrote:
> "Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
> news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1050131121419.11366C-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
> > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, CB wrote:
> >
> >> > ... The "general public" doesn't get to decide who
> >> > is en
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Dana wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>Dana wrote:
>>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>>Maverick wrote:
>>>>>>"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:41FD0A5F.2080609@it.com...
>>>>>>>Maverick wrote:
>>>>>>>>"Ken Smith" <for
|
|
|
Dana wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
> > Dana wrote:
> >> Ken Smith wrote:
> >>>Maverick wrote:
> >>>>"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:41FD0A5F.2080609@it.com...
> >>>>>Maverick wrote:
> >>>>>>"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrot
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Mon, 31 Jan 2005 08:18:26
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>
>>>> so I guess you are, in reality, a burden
|
|
|
Razzer wrote:
> Dana wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>> > Maverick wrote:
>> >> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message
>> >>news:41FD0A5F.2080609@it.com...
>> >>> Maverick wrote:
>> >>>> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message
>> >>>>
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Mon, 31 Jan 2005 08:07:56
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>
>>>> Hey, I'm just following
>
>>> Ken Smith
|
|
|
CB wrote:
> "Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message
> news:aphqv0pkm8pjj83jlbqagr62qm88n5hvnc@4ax.com...
> > On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 19:53:11 GMT, "Maverick"
<justgopublic@nomail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrot
|
|
|
I was born in US and lived most of my life in a foreign country.
So English was not my primary English and I'm not a perfect speaker or
listener.
I was called for Jury duty, and I'm afraid I will not understand all
the words in the trial.
I'm a t
|
|
|
jls wrote:
> "Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:FIidnfnkJt-72mPcRVn-vw@comcast.com...
>>" jls" <jls1016@bellsouth.net> wrote
>>
>>>Franklin Pierce did not use a bible.
>>
>>doesn't the cite imply that he did it because h
|
|
|
CB wrote:
> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message
news:41FDAA80.9030502@it.com...
> > Dana wrote:
> >> Ken Smith wrote:
> >>>Maverick wrote:
> >>>>"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:41FD0A5F.2080609@it.com...
> >>>>>M
|
|
|
Paul... You nuke Mexico and the whole population will be in our laps looking for
basics food water and shelter... not to mention we'd have to rebuild everything
we knock down... more foreign aid... most cost...
Larry L
94 RC45 #2
Have a wheelie N
|
|
|
Dana wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
> > Maverick wrote:
> >> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message
> >>news:41FD0A5F.2080609@it.com...
> >>> Maverick wrote:
> >>>> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message
> >>>> news:41FD06A1.5020601@it.co
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on 31 Jan 2005 10:32:34 -0600,
Patrick Lee Humphrey <patrick@io.com> wrote:
>Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:48:05
>>-0800, "Theodore A. Ka
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> Hey, I'm just following
>>>> Ken Smith's
>>>>> rules of debate here.
>>> Wassamatta, widdle TeddiBeer? Don't li
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:53:06
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>
>>>> Hey, I'm just following
>
>>> Ken Smit
|