|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> "- Prof Jonez©" wrote:
>
>>Ward Churchill Statement
>>February 1, 2005
>>
>>The following statement from Ward Churchill was posted on the
>>University of Colorado's Web site under the Department of Ethnic
>>Studies on M
|
|
|
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylc=X3oDMTBpZmFlcXBpBF9TAzk1ODYxOTQ4BHNlYw
N0aA--?slug=ap-lakers-bryantcase&prov=ap&type=lgns
DENVER (AP) -- An attorney for the woman accusing Kobe Bryant of rape said
Tuesday she is willing to hand his lawyers some
|
|
|
What does it matter to you? Tax rate for welfare hand-outs isn't that
high.
|
|
|
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, ~krp~ wrote:
> "Harry" <hmags@NSexcite.com> wrote in message
> news:SEuLd.23129$wZ2.22571@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
> > Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
> > news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1050131120337.11366A-1000
|
|
|
"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message
news:qtkvv01bskieih0pqk26s8vns68bkf3sn7@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 02:57:54 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
>>
>>
>>>>Yes, I'm sure I will n
|
|
|
Dear fellow dentists and others affected by Letterese,
The intent of this notice is to inform you of certain facts so you can
make up your own mind concerning the Dental consulting services of
Peter Letterese and SAVE International self defense train
|
|
|
jcd1234@kattare.com wrote in news:1107280159.112776.165140
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
> The first paragraph is spot on.
>
> I was not privy to many of the plans, as the bride selected her and her
> bride's maid dresses without consulting me as
|
|
|
nd Annual THIS YEAR IN WORKERS' COMP: TOP 10 ISSUES & CASES - Tues.,
Mar. 8, 2005
A panel of state and national experts address TEN issues that can make
or break your case, including a concise analysis of key cases that have
been decided during the pa
|
|
|
<yotango@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1107278834.254230.57410@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> To start off, let me say hypothetically, let's say a scientist
> invents a device that extracts energy from the vibrating atoms and
> moving electron
|
|
|
http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Update2005-01-29.htm
U.S. Court of Appeals Rules IRS
Cannot Apply Force Against A Tax Payer
Without A Court Order
Tax Payers Free To Ignore An IRS Summons
Queensbury, NY - On January 25, 2005, the U.S
|
|
|
Razzer wrote:
>
> CB wrote:
>> "Razzer" <coolmandan@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1107217597.146228.244960@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > CB wrote:
>> >> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message
>> > news:41FDAA80.9030502@i
|
|
|
Razzer wrote:
>
> CB wrote:
>> "Razzer" <coolmandan@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1107229715.735526.252380@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > Dana wrote:
>> >> Razzer wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Dana wrote:
>> >> >> Ken Smith wrote:
>>
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> > " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" a.k.a. "vox populi" a.k.a. "S.O. Damocles"
> > wrote:
> >
> > > God will punish racists.
> >
> > Whew! I'm glad I'm not a racist then.
> >
> > > Won't Teddy be surpris
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" a.k.a. "vox populi" a.k.a. "S.O. Damocles"
> wrote:
>
> > God will punish racists.
>
> Whew! I'm glad I'm not a racist then.
>
> > Won't Teddy be surprised when his maker turns out to be an "ugly
|
|
|
Matt Beckwith wrote:
> I'm not sure whether the issue is one of profanity or one of foreign
> policy.
>
> Regarding the profanity issue,
It ain't profanity dip#@($, it's vulgarity. Learn the difference.
>I think the police officer should
> simp
|
|
|
CB wrote:
> "Razzer" <coolmandan@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1107229715.735526.252380@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Dana wrote:
> >> Razzer wrote:
> >>
> >> > Dana wrote:
> >> >> Ken Smith wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Maverick wro
|
|
|
You live in California.
Apply for Medi-cal.
|
|
|
CB wrote:
> "Razzer" <coolmandan@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1107217597.146228.244960@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > CB wrote:
> >> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message
> > news:41FDAA80.9030502@it.com...
> >> > Dana wrote:
|
|
|
"- Prof Jonez©" wrote:
> Ward Churchill Statement
> February 1, 2005
>
> The following statement from Ward Churchill was posted on the
> University of Colorado's Web site under the Department of Ethnic
> Studies on Monday. Churchill noted these are
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> For reasons I don't want to explore, on Tue, 01 Feb 2005 14:02:20
> -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> > Kent Wills wrote:
> >
> > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> > > > Ken Smith wrote:
> >
> > > >
|
|
|
|
|
|
" \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" a.k.a. "vox populi" a.k.a. "S.O. Damocles" wrote:
> God will punish racists.
Whew! I'm glad I'm not a racist then.
> Won't Teddy be surprised when his maker turns out to be an "ugly towelhead
> woman".
"Towelhead" women
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Tue, 01 Feb 2005 14:02:20
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>>>> Try as I might, it's hard to read, "Raghe
|
|
|
<wkhedr@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1107217755.296862.265180@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>I was born in US and lived most of my life in a foreign country.
> So English was not my primary English and I'm not a perfect speaker or
> listene
|
|
|
It is my understanding that government documents, including pictures are
not subject to copyright.
j.
David Martel wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Sorry, I'm not an expert but the picture with the copyright has the words
> "Acclaim Images" on it. M
|
|
|
gmark@svs.com wrote:
> Isn't this question answered by the title, "competitor"? The simple
> fact
> is that if your current employer isn't competitive, you should give his
> competitor a chance. It's only fair. You just have to fairly consider
> both
|
|
|
"Sam O'Nella" <sonella@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9_WdnbyKP_GEomPcRVn-3g@comcast.com...
>
>> I don't know. Cheney has used the word a few times...he's hardly
>> liberal leaning. It remains vulgar regardless if the source is
>> liberal/pr
|
|
|
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message
news:365te2F4t4hklU1@individual.net...
>
> It's a word, whoopy @$#*.
>
Words have specific meanings and generate specific emotions...that is part
of how they work in communication. If they were
|
|
|
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:48:34 -0500, James C. Reeves <jcnospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>"Sam O'Nella" <sonella@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:9_WdnbyKP_GEomPcRVn-3g@comcast.com...
>>
>>> I don't know. Cheney has used the word a few times...he's hard
|
|
|
Choobie,
Your post doesn't provide much info about your problem. I gather that you
ended an engagement to be married. That plans for the wedding were well
advanced and deposits had been given by someone for a hall, florist,
photographer, et c.
|
|
|
Hello, there, my cracker friend:
I must be an abnormal white. The word "racism" doesn't intimidate me.
|
|
|
n Tue, 01 Feb 2005 06:57:17 GMT, <hLFLd.5976$QS5.1386@trndny06> "University
Studies" <gov-statistics@no.spam> wrote:
>"Kenneth McVay OBC" <kmcvay@shell.vex.net> wrote in message
>news:10vu70gbv2g5826@corp.supernews.com...
Why can't Ken McVay refut
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on 1 Feb 2005 07:47:24 -0800,
19ranger57@earthlink.net wrote:
[...]
>> > Such as your claim to never having expressed malice, on-line or
>otherwise?
>>
>> Exactly. (And jocular pretensions don't count.)
>
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:36:11
-0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>Any sane god would certainly
>condemn you.
You have to understand TEDDISM. His god isn't found within the
covers of the Bibl
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Tue, 01 Feb 2005 11:45:03
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>" \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" a.k.a. "vox populi" a.k.a. "S.O. Damocles" wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> " \"- Prof. J
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Tue, 01 Feb 2005 08:05:47
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>" \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> jls wrote:
>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>> Ken Sm
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Tue, 01 Feb 2005 07:58:14
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>> Kent Wills
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on 1 Feb 2005 12:55:23 -0800,
"forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
>The " darling", "fat chick" and " fenimine logic" quotes were
>responses to my posts. They sure as hell were not jokes. He MEANT those
>t
|
|
|
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:48:34 -0500, "James C. Reeves"
<jcnospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"Sam O'Nella" <sonella@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:9_WdnbyKP_GEomPcRVn-3g@comcast.com...
>>
>>> I don't know. Cheney has used the word a few times...he'
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on 1 Feb 2005 12:36:10 -0800,
"forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Yeah, for some reason he's dropped the racist and sexist slurs. Could
>be the whole Cam Brown thing if he thinks the prosecution is monito
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Tue, 01 Feb 2005 08:10:29
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> Try as I might, it's hard to read, "Raghead women are too ugly to be flight
>> attendants" as even
|
|
|
"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:ctmrg8$ne5@dispatch.concentric.net...
> http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/eo/20050201/en_celeb_eo/15819
>
> According to a new multimillion-dollar lawsuit, Snoop has been a bad D
|
|
|
Under U.S. patent law, once an invention has been published anywhere in
the world, an inventor has only one year to apply for a patent. After
one year, regardless of who invented first, the opportunity to patent
the invention is lost.
In most count
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>> Try as I might, it's hard to read, "Raghead women are too ugly to be
>>> flight attendants" as even a lame attempt at jocularity.
>> That particular statement was made on the
|
|
|
Joseph,
Sounds like a low offer to me. You have losses that total almost $6000
for your medical expenses and lost wages, and you must still pay your
lawyer. You deserve some compensation for the "pain and suffering" also.
What is your lawyer d
|
|
|
> Several carburators have been designed to achieve 100mpg.
> Why are they not on the market?
Because they do not exist. Review your freshman thermodynamics.
--
John Goulden
|
|
|
Richard,
Sorry, I'm not an expert but the picture with the copyright has the words
"Acclaim Images" on it. Ms. Alfred can certainly copyright such a picture.
You may wish to inquire whether she has copyright to the underlying image.
It's possi
|
|
|
"Say not the Struggle nought Availeth" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:ZGPLd.25404$by5.11882@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com...
> It is my understanding that government documents, including pictures are
> not subject to copyright.
>
> j.
Is
|
|
|
In article <ctol5u01l7n@news3.newsguy.com> "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> writes:
>Isn't NASA a private enterprise though?
NASA is a United States goverment agency.
|
|
|
"Lee Hollaar" <hollaar@antitrust.cs.utah.edu> wrote in message
news:ctoip5$in7$1@antitrust.cs.utah.edu...
> In article <ctofqh01cea@news3.newsguy.com> "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001>
writes:
> >Since the work involves superimposing of two images,
>
|
|
