|
|
Matt Davis wrote:
..
>
> Tee.
>
> hee.
>
> > <I'm a festering douche bag>
put pee in my enema mother.....and we can @$#* the dog
|
|
|
"Dave Lister" <retsildivad33@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns960F8B617EE3Cretsildivad33hotmail@68.6.19.6...
> "bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in news:GQ3Wd.792$Q83.298
> @bignews5.bellsouth.net:
>
>>
>> "Dave Lister" <retsildiv
|
|
|
Web.
Tee.
Vee.
<oliver7@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:17022-42295C88-633@storefull-3136.bay.webtv.net...
<I'm a festering douche bag>
|
|
|
On 3 Mar 2005 05:36:33 -0800, "Carlos" <carlosmachina@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>
>Sam Bam is a communist. He's masquerading here as an insane,
>imbecilic
>neo-con, but in reality, he is a communist agent working to subvert
>support for Bush
|
|
|
"RD Sandman" <rdsandman@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:cgd2xev0tvlt$.dlg@hopewell.invalid...
> On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 14:11:47 -0500, Les Claypool wrote:
>
>> SaPeIsMa wrote:
>>>
>>> "Roy Estrada" <Beef@heart/zappa.gov> wrote in message
>>> new
|
|
|
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:d02np4$24l8$1@news3.infoave.net...
>
> "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeIsMa@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1129fdgbc9ell95@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>> "Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> w
|
|
|
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:d0303c$29hp$1@news3.infoave.net...
>
> "Les Claypool" <loud@Primus.gov> wrote in message
> news:4224F6F3.D4F778F@Primus.gov...
>>
>>
>> Larry Hewitt wrote:
>> >
>> > "Les Claypool"
|
|
|
"Les Claypool" <loud@Primus.gov> wrote in message
news:4224F6F3.D4F778F@Primus.gov...
>
>
> Larry Hewitt wrote:
>>
>> "Les Claypool" <loud@Primus.gov> wrote
>> > What do and can you keep and bear, lefty?
>> > Lipstick?
>>
>> Nope. "Arms" inc
|
|
|
"Les Claypool" <loud@Primus.gov> wrote in message
news:4224BE73.9FD02EBD@Primus.gov...
>
>
> SaPeIsMa wrote:
>>
>> "Roy Estrada" <Beef@heart/zappa.gov> wrote in message
>> news:Sv1Vd.27085$7n7.9614@fe08.lga...
>> >
>> >
>> > Laura Bush murder
|
|
|
"bat" wrote in misc.consumers:
> SB> But the issue in any event is not illegal immigrants, but natural-
> SB> born citizens whose parents may have been illegal immigrants.
>
>What would you propose in order to stop or limit the abuse of this
>provis
|
|
|
> You still don't get it do you. Of course you don't, you're a hypocrite.
> I DO NOT want to wear a helmet, so wearing a helmet to prevent a helmet law is
> tantamount to having a @$#*ing helmet law.
Bare headed riding is a selfish act... it's
|
|
|
jmhall@apex.home.loc wrote :
> Actually that's not true. Coffee, as made in coffee makers that
> McD's uses is suppose to be brewed at 185F.
>
> I never really followed the case so could be wrong but I
> thought the problem was the customer aske
|
|
|
his is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030808090106010000020004
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
>>Ted, there
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> For reasons I don't want to explore, on Fri, 04 Mar 2005 05:08:51 GMT,
> Sam Bam <sam@bam.slam> wrote:
>
>>"Dark and scurvy"?
>>
>>Does that include the ACLU?
>
> I thought the definition of the ACLU was "Dark and scurvy."
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------090402000305060106090802
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> jls wrote:
[snip]
>>You make a good argument that he is an able lawyer in every way except that
>>the Colorado Bar has blackballed him.
>
> I certainly don't make that argument. He might be skillful in some of th
|
|
|
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 22:18:10 -0500, "Magnulus" <magnulus@bellsouth.net>
wrote:
> Cars have lots of airbags. Motorcycles don't.
>
> Why is it the Harley riders that protest the most about wearing helmets?
>These are the same mouth breathing fools
|
|
|
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 20:45:41 -0500, "Larry Hewitt"
<larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote:
>_I_ did not allude to the ship of war or the cannon --- you brought themn
>up, I noted that they are, in fact, arms, and then pulled out historical
>and US Navy refe
|
|
|
" \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" wrote:
>
> Magnulus wrote:
> > Cars have lots of airbags. Motorcycles don't.
>
> You get paid to make stupid statements, or do you do it
> for free?
>
> >
> > Why is it the Harley riders that protest the most about we
|
|
|
Keith Schiffner wrote:
>
> "Phoenix"
> SNIP
>
> >
> > Daniel's not about facts, Scott. He's about
> > imposing his personal will on other
> > free adults.
>
> In which case I'll have my Jack Boots over to show
> him the error of his ways.
|
|
|
Magnulus wrote:
>
> Cars have lots of airbags. Motorcycles don't.
>
> Why is it the Harley riders that protest the most about wearing helmets?
> These are the same mouth breathing fools that think it's OK to drive around
> with no muffler on
|
|
|
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 14:16:42 GMT, "bat" <bat@bats.com> wrote:
> SB>>> The 14th Amendment says "All persons born or naturalized in the
> SB>>> United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.
> SB>>> ..."
> ??>>
> ??>> Are illeg
|
|
|
Piggy backing.
" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
news:639Wd.119$FJ.1270@news.uswest.net...
> Sam Bam wrote:
>> Dave Thompson wrote:
>>
>> > Because too many idiots like you spend so much effort putting
>> > monuments up to t
|
|
|
Larry xlax Lovisone wrote:
>
> > I agree that Helmets for ALL drivers/passengers should be absolutely madatory
> > and part of any mandatory cycle helmet law. Then we'll see how much support
> > Mrs. Muffy Soccer-mom has for the law.
>
> The only
|
|
|
In article <d60i215lvg1l51032883mu9e4h95h7l6qs@news>, oops@yikes.hmm
wrote:
>Man survives doctor-assisted suicide attempt
And how does this relate to this newsfroup?
Oh yeah, it doesn't.
|
|
|
> I agree that Helmets for ALL drivers/passengers should be absolutely madatory
> and part of any mandatory cycle helmet law. Then we'll see how much support
> Mrs. Muffy Soccer-mom has for the law.
The only way to stop support for helmet laws is
|
|
|
Cars have lots of airbags. Motorcycles don't.
Why is it the Harley riders that protest the most about wearing helmets?
These are the same mouth breathing fools that think it's OK to drive around
with no muffler on their bike.
Nobody has a rig
|
|
|
Scott Gardner wrote:
>
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 20:34:58 -0500, "Daniel J. Stern"
> <dastern@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
> >My, don't *you* know how to win friends and influence people. Helmets
> >haven't been shown to significantly reduce deaths or injuries
|
|
|
"Daniel J. Stern" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Tim wrote:
>
> > > > > > And, of course, you would apply the same rules to unhelmeted
> > > > > > automobile drivers and passengers
>
> > > > > No
>
> > > > Why not hipocrite?
>
> > > My, do
|
|
|
On 4 Mar 2005 12:26:08 -0800, "kate" <kcourtesan@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Ralph wrote:
>
>> Just in case you missed it. Statisticly one in 54 male babies will
>> kill themselves. This is by design.
>
>Designed by whom? Could you provide evidence for you
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Fri, 04 Mar 2005 05:08:51 GMT,
Sam Bam <sam@bam.slam> wrote:
>"Dark and scurvy"?
>
>Does that include the ACLU?
I thought the definition of the ACLU was "Dark and scurvy."
Kent
--
You need only two
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
>>The thing that makes a lone witness insufficient and/or irrelevant is that
>>there is no generalities that can be correlated to whether they are
>>telling
>>the truth or not. It is a complete speculation party.
>
> Mik
|
|
|
"Born Again Sam" <eta@carinae.org> wrote in news:38msslF5q8cbtU1
@individual.net:
> Nobody wrote:
>> " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in
>>
>>> Nobody wrote:
>>>> On one day, if the dealer does something to the vehicle, give me the
>
|
|
|
Fenris wrote:
> " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
> news:Xv9Wd.126$FJ.1358@news.uswest.net...
> > Sangfroid wrote:
> > > " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
> > > news:w47Wd.87$FJ.1036@news.uswest.net...
> > >
|
|
|
"bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net> wrote in news:GQ3Wd.792$Q83.298
@bignews5.bellsouth.net:
>
> "Dave Lister" <retsildivad33@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns960F7167FED9Fretsildivad33hotmail@68.6.19.6...
>> "bam" <mcca5761@bellsouthbl
|
|
|
" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
news:cl3Wd.51$FJ.654@news.uswest.net...
> London mayor: Sharon is a "war criminal"
> 3/4/2005 3:00:00 PM GMT
>
>
> London's mayor, Ken Livingstone, wrote in The Guardian Newspaper
|
|
|
Phoenix wrote:
> " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" wrote:
> >
> > Magnulus wrote:
> > > Cars have lots of airbags. Motorcycles don't.
> >
> > You get paid to make stupid statements, or do you do it
> > for free?
> >
> > >
> > > Why is it the Harley ride
|
|
|
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 01:51:37 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
>
>"RHR" <RHR@nospammy.com> wrote in message
>news:t1hh21lmbv08dl6er5tfcd49r49ja4o7hg@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 20:12:08 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
>>
>>>We
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
>> In otherwords, if it is inherently impossible to
>>prove that a person is lying, then it is impossible to prove that they are
>>telling the truth,... for the same reason. Or in otherwords, apart from an
>>admission, yo
|
|
|
Fat Burns <Fat-Burns@overcooked.com> writes:
> "Michael Price" <nini_pad@yahoo.com> wrote :
>
> >> Negligence my ass.
> >
> > Well what do you call selling a product that you know people will
> > spill on themselves at a temperature that caus
|
|
|
ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
> Ted, there have been accusations that the prosecution of Robert Blake
> was motivated purely by the desire for the police and prosecutors to
> make a name for themselves by nailing a celebrity. It's rubbish, but
> at least
|
|
|
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 20:34:58 -0500, "Daniel J. Stern"
<dastern@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>My, don't *you* know how to win friends and influence people. Helmets
>haven't been shown to significantly reduce deaths or injuries in passenger
>vehicle crashes.
>
|
|
|
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Tim wrote:
> > > > > And, of course, you would apply the same rules to unhelmeted
> > > > > automobile drivers and passengers
> > > > No
> > > Why not hipocrite?
> > My, don't *you* know how to win friends and influence pe
|
|
|
"Phoenix" <tomorrow@erols.com> wrote in message
news:42292B3A.9778FAD8@erols.com...
> Keith Schiffner wrote:
>>
>> "Phoenix"
>> SNIP
>>
>> >
>> > Daniel's not about facts, Scott. He's about
>> > imposing his personal will on other
>> > free
|
|
|
"Daniel J. Stern" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>
> > > > And, of course, you would apply the same rules to unhelmeted
> > > > automobile drivers and passengers
> > >
> > > No,
> >
> > Why not hipocrite?
>
> My, don
|
|
|
Magnulus wrote:
> Cars have lots of airbags. Motorcycles don't.
You get paid to make stupid statements, or do you do it
for free?
>
> Why is it the Harley riders that protest the most about wearing
> helmets?
Harley riders are fags, who g
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
>
> Jon explained this what seems like weeks ago. It's a cost-benefit
> analysis. We know perjury is a serious offense. People generally don't
> do things for which there are significant detrimental consequences without
>
|
|
|
"RD Sandman" <rdsandman@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:us2fqsflz8lz.dlg@hopewell.invalid...
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 21:25:41 -0500, Larry Hewitt wrote:
>
> > "RD Sandman" <rdsandman@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:171ahagv2zcu0.dlg@hopewell
|
|
|
"Daniel J. Stern" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Tim wrote:
>
> > "taxpayer779@hotmail.com" wrote:
>
> > > If there is going to be no requirement to wear helmets then insurance
> > > companies will be allowed to deny coverage for injuries sustai
|
|
|
Richard wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 07:22:02 -0500 hinojo_b@bellsouth.net wrote:
>
>>
>>> I think I got everything covered as far as the paperwork and the house
>>> itself. My problem is that I just got several applications returned
>>> today an
|
