|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sat, 05 Mar 2005 14:19:21
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>> ienjball@ya
|
|
|
"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
news:38ujb3F5p5rckU1@individual.net...
>
> Bob Crowley <bobcrowley@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
> news:adff117.0503050457.1ffa7574@posting.google.com...
>
>> >
>> > You butcher the word and
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sat, 05 Mar 2005 14:10:16
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> The biggest problem with you is that you are a pathological liar -- we
>> can't count on you to EV
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sat, 05 Mar 2005 13:57:53
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> One thing, we can be absolutely assured of: they can't prosecute the
>> D.A. under 242 ...
>
>Ho
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sat, 5 Mar 2005 14:54:37
-0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> For reasons I don't want to explore, on 4 Mar 2005 03:05:30 -0800,
>> "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> w
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------090106070801020308090901
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> "Prof. Jonez" is
>
>>a pathological psychot
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000001060804000801050409
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>
>>The biggest proble
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>But in this case, there WAS a press conference, called by the PROSECUTOR,
>>>held just after the arraignment. And it DID light up quite a firestorm.
>>>It w
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------080804050908010304040201
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>
>>One thing, we can be absolutely assured of: they can't prosecute the
>>D.A. under 242 ...
>
> How can you be so sure?
Reading the statute is a sure-fire giveaway, Ted. It's the "on
acco
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>
>>>>Ted did try to convince us that this was an attempt by Hum to win an
>>>>election.
>>>
>>>LIE! I never did any such thing.
>>
>>Ted, you REALLY
|
|
|
No you're not Sam Bam, you're going to jail!
Anonymous wrote:
> I'm going to kill Ward Churchill
Path:
uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!news.wiretrip.org!news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mai
l2news
From: Anonymous <nobody@paranoici.org>
Comments: This mes
|
|
|
Bloggers not protected by Constitution, says Apple
Posted on : 2005-03-05| Author : Nigel Wright
News Category : Technology
A tentative ruling yesterday by Superior Court judge James Kleinberg is
likely to have serious implications for the onlin
|
|
|
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 04:01:21 GMT Larry wrote:
> In article <d0d63r018ok@news2.newsguy.com>, "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001>
> wrote:
>
>>On 5 Mar 2005 09:28:22 -0800 thedarkman wrote:
>>
>>> It seems to me this guy is damned if he does, damned if he
|
|
|
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 00:47:39 +0200 Clough wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 14:50:56 -0600, "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001>
> wrote:
>
>>Unless they have an unrefutable eye witness to the account, it's highly
>>unlikely Jackson will see a day in prison.
>
|
|
|
"Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> wrote in message
news:d0d63r018ok@news2.newsguy.com...
> On 5 Mar 2005 09:28:22 -0800 thedarkman wrote:
>
> > It seems to me this guy is damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. It
> > is quite possible that he will cr
|
|
|
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 20:55:51 -0500, Odinn wrote:
> toto wrote:
>
>> Different solutions for different vehicles. Seatbelts and airbags
>> prevent such injuries in cars. However, there are no seatbelts
>> on motorcycles (and they would not be effec
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sat, 05 Mar 2005 17:19:14 GMT,
Sam Bam <sam@bam.slam> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> For reasons I don't want to explore, on 4 Mar 2005 03:05:30 -0800,
>> "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sat, 05 Mar 2005 17:21:46 GMT,
Sam Bam <sam@bam.slam> wrote:
>forevernitefan wrote:
>> Oh okay I see. Yeah Sammie does that a lot. But it wouldn't suprise me
>> that mr christian republican has some disgusting
|
|
|
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sat, 05 Mar 2005 17:21:44 GMT,
Sam Bam <sam@bam.slam> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sat, 05 Mar 2005 00:52:00 GMT,
>> Sam Bam <sam@bam.slam> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>forevern
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:40:57 GMT,
Sam Bam <sam@bam.slam> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>> Sam Bam wrote:
>>
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bedpan SamBam doesn't believe in free speech --
>>>
>>>
>>> CHILD ABU
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sat, 05 Mar 2005 08:55:59
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>>> Because Ken Smith is out in the ozone.
>
>> Why not directly a
|
|
|
Falky:
I ran a credit report through Experian today and this did not even show
up as a bad debt. That's all I'm really concerned with at this point.
I don't want to pay the bank $600 just for covering my checks when they
charge $30 a pop. I know i
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sat, 05 Mar 2005 09:00:52
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>>>> Because Ken Smith is out in the ozone.
>
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sat, 05 Mar 2005 09:44:29
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> Ted did try to convince us that this was an attempt by Hum to win an
>> election.
>
>LIE! I ne
|
|
|
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:33:59 -0500, Odinn <bqvaa@ngynagnovxre.arg>
wrote:
<snip>
>You can't have it both ways. Either you have helmet laws for passengers
>in cars if you want them on motorcyclists, or you have no helmet laws
>for both and let
|
|
|
or reasons I don't want to explore, on Sat, 05 Mar 2005 09:38:44
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>>>> Ted, there have been accusations
|
|
|
Stormlx <sdnsdbaq623@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Personally, I agree that a person born abroad of two American parents is
>"natural born" in any logical sense.
I'm not sure it is. Let's say two Americans move to Europe and have a
child. This child grows
|
|
|
Sam Bam wrote:
GEORGE WASHINGTON--Treaty of Tripoli 1796: The government of the United
States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.
JOHN ADAMS: "This would be the best of all possible worlds,
if there were no religions in it
|
|
|
"Rick N." <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:4v7Wd.1089$oO4.1065@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> [I]f a public defender believes a defendent is actually guilty of
> the crime, can he decline to defend him and choose another case, lettin
|
|
|
toto wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 20:55:51 -0500, Odinn <bqvaa@ngynagnovxre.arg>
> wrote:
>=20
>=20
>>toto wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:33:59 -0500, Odinn <bqvaa@ngynagnovxre.arg>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>So why shouldn't the cager who
|
|
|
|
|
|
>The U.S. Const has it right in Art 3 Sect 3 where it take two witnesses to
>the same overt act in order to convict.
That only applies to treason, because that particular charge was badly
abused in the past.
>But I would not go so far as to say 2
|
|
|
> So if you and your ilk would just shut the @$#* up, then
> we wouldn't need the 1st Amendment right, because
> there'd be no need for free speech if no one used it, eh?
Haven't you learned Prof Jonez that Reeky is a place where you can say what
|
|
|
toto wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:29:11 -0700, "Keith Schiffner"
> <schistan@3rivers.net> wrote:
>
>
>>"toto" <scarecrow@wicked.witch> wrote in message
>>news:m8kk21pd0s58r57o1l924d2q5f20dd5vi4@4ax.com...
>>
>>>On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:33:59 -0
|
|
|
Positive Sex Fiend wrote:
> "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > If felons are disenfranchised, why not misdemeanants too? I'd love
to
> > see all convicted drunk drivers lose the right to vote. That would
> > inc
|
|
|
toto wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:33:59 -0500, Odinn <bqvaa@ngynagnovxre.arg>
> wrote:
>
>
>>So why shouldn't the cager who was hit by the semi who is now in a
>>similar state not be forced to wear a helmet?
>>
>>You can't have it both ways.
|
|
|
>>>> For your homework assignment, Mike, write down a precise law that
>>>> would guarantee that nobody would be convicted on single individual's
>>>> word alone. You must insure that the jury, or whomever decides, uses
>>>> no other information.
>>>
|
|
|
Stephen! wrote:
> Odinn <bqvaa@ngynagnovxre.arg> wrote in news:38ttelF5qqa9hU3
> @individual.net:
>
>
>>>If any of y'all ever need a good example of stupidity or irony, here it
>>>si...
>>>
>>
>>And he keeps repeating it over and over like a b
|
|
|
Larry xlax Lovisone wrote:
>>You have no advantage over me, and their is no friendship. You are simply an
>>arrogant hypocrite.
>
>
> I think we get along fine... because we each think we hold the advantage over
> the other...
>
There you g
|
|
|
Larry xlax Lovisone wrote:
> > Yes, we can and will blame you for that. As history has blamed all
> > the scumbags who sought to take "someone else's" freedoms away.
>
> Negative... 100% of the blame rides with the bare headed biker... not
> the helm
|
|
|
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
STATE OF INDIANA =A0 ) IN THE MARION
COUNTY
COUNTY OF MARION) SUPERIOR COURT
SS: PROBATE DIVISION
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sat, 5 Mar 2005 14:54:37
> -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>
> > Kent Wills wrote:
> > > For reasons I don't want to explore, on 4 Mar 2005 03:05:30 -0800,
> > > "fore
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message news:x-0503051421010001@192.168.2.4...
> Mike, under your theory that one witness doesn't prove anything, you would
> really require more than one witness for each element, wouldn't you?
>
> For exmaple, I had a tr
|
|
|
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 20:55:51 -0500, Odinn <bqvaa@ngynagnovxre.arg>
wrote:
>toto wrote:
>> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:33:59 -0500, Odinn <bqvaa@ngynagnovxre.arg>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>So why shouldn't the cager who was hit by the semi who is now in a
|
|
|
Hi guys,
I have a legal question; maybe somebody can help me...
I received last summer (Aug-04) a letter from my former chiropractor in
Boulder requesting payment of $900.00 for alleged treatments in March 1999.
First I ignored this
|
|
|
"RHR" <RHR@nospammy.com> wrote in message
news:e7tj21930l90rl5b63081tg7k5e2jnmmmh@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 17:30:01 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"RHR" <RHR@nospammy.com> wrote
>>
>>>>> For your homework assignment, Mike
|
|
