misc.legal

> No one is claiming that riding bare headed is good for us. That's where > you went off thinking without using logic. You're right... not only is bare headed riding not good for us... it's illogical to ride without a helmet... Larry L 94 RC4

"Trianna" <triannadunord@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1110150105.797925.42310@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > > Michael Snyder wrote: > > "Trianna" <triannadunord@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:1110147763.945813.213280@g14g2000cwa.g

Ken Smith wrote: > Sam Bam wrote: > >> forevernitefan wrote: >> >>> My you ARE obsessed about NAMBLA, aren't you? > > >> Shouldn't any reasonable citizen be outraged that such a group exists? >> >> It appears the limits of your ethics stop a

Kent Wills wrote: > For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 18:07:18 GMT, > Sam Bam <sam@bam.slam> wrote: > > >>forevernitefan wrote: >> >>> DIdn't you plonk me? IOW put me on iggy? >>> >>>Sounds like you say one thing but do a

WinGuru wrote: > "Sam Bam" <sam@bam.slam> wrote in message > news:WVJWd.473044$Zm5.69253@news.easynews.com... > >>Christopher A. Lee wrote: >> >> >>>The God the believer insists on telling us all about is a logical >>>impossibility. >> >>So wa

Charles & Mambo Duckman wrote: > Sam Bam wrote: > > >>> The God the believer insists on telling us all about is a logical >>> impossibility. >> >> >> >> So was a spherical earth at one time. > > > A spherical earth was a logical impossibil

Born Again Sam wrote: > "Sam Bam" <sam@bam.slam> wrote in message > news:nLJWd.4282750$f47.768374@news.easynews.com... > >>Anonymous wrote: >> >> >>>I'm going to kill Ward Churchill >> >><c85175119d7fe5bd33addacdb9138742@paranoici.org> >>abuse@

Kent Wills wrote: > For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 20:30:27 GMT, > Sam Bam <sam@bam.slam> wrote: > > [...] > > >>>>> Is there any evidence to support this? >>>> >>>>You need you clock cleaned pissant! >>> >>> >>>

Kent Wills wrote: > For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 20:28:02 GMT, > Sam Bam <sam@bam.slam> wrote: > > >>Kent Wills wrote: >> >> >>>OMG! It's Lar$on. Who else could be so hypocritical? >> >>You and the Ken Smith acoly

"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote: > Jeff Welch wrote: >> " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message >> news:jGMWd.56$jW1.1606@news.uswest.net... >> > Jeff Welch wrote: >> >> > > That's a really stupid question. Yes - most Christians are "the >

On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 03:25:36 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote: > >"RHR" <RHR@nospammy.com> wrote in message >news:5aen21pu4ch5kp1fk4822qar9vlovivptm@4ax.com... >> On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 02:10:24 GMT, x@y.com (Larry) wrote: >> >>>>I'd be curiou

"Trianna" <triannadunord@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1110147763.945813.213280@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > Michael Snyder wrote: > > > > Public Defender Kelly Spahn said aside from a few traffic > citations, > > Angela > > > Johnson h

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Ken Smith wrote: >>>>Kent Wills wrote: >>> >>>>>Capital murder isn't a slam dunk, and no one has claimed it is. It's a >>>>>hard sell in the best of cases, and this one do

Sam Bam wrote: > forevernitefan wrote: > >> My you ARE obsessed about NAMBLA, aren't you? > Shouldn't any reasonable citizen be outraged that such a group exists? > > It appears the limits of your ethics stop at trying to cast aspersions > re

"Steven O." <null@null.com> wrote in message news:slnm21di727fi1pqpas28lvpn5q0kg4eo0@4ax.com... > Hypothetical: Suppose you have some startup high tech company, and > they offer options to employees with some typical period of vesting, > say five y

On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 19:28:04 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote: >Or maybe I'm 3,500 years behind a well written law that covers all cases. > A fool's quest! - Jon Beaver

On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:28:48 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote: > >Go on then, make a complete ass of yourself! Go, tell the jury that "I don't >have to prove that this lone witness is telling us the truth. I only have to >prove BARD that it

"King of the Lawnchair" <p3x935@gmail.com> wrote in message news:tenm211ir3muvma1kjb90kk0p8j17pin4h@4ax.com... > On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 10:13:00 -0600, "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001> > wrote: > > >> > > > >When they say, "Sign on x people every month

I am not an expert in this area, so I'm just guessing here. It seems to me that the charges are a lien against the property. Since you don't own the property, you don't care if there is a lien. The mortgage holder should care, and eventually they wil

> That only applies to treason, because that particular charge was badly >> abused in the past. > >And the founders would approve of the same kind of abuse in other kinds of >cases? What about the latest witch hunt of child molestation, where >inte

On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 19:23:38 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote: >I think I may be a little confused between sufficiency and relevance. When >they say that relevant evidence make it more LIKELY, then how is that >different than sufficient? O

" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message news:%2qWd.57$Pj1.590@news.uswest.net... > Sangfroid wrote: > > "TCS" <The-Central-Scrutinizer@p.o.b.o.x.com> wrote in message > > news:slrnd2ifuq.k61.The-Central-Scrutinizer@linux.client.comcas

Sports Fan <sports@fan.home> wrote: > In article <r8JWd.26$jW1.1214@news.uswest.net> > " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > >>Sure, as long as that applies to ALL criminal charges, on acquittal >>the Cops and/or Prosecutors must serve a p

"s_knight8" <s_knight8nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:d0fm4k$hk3@dispatch.concentric.net... > http://www.oceancity.md/octoday/headline.cfm?PubID=2729 > > (March 4, 2005) An Ocean City woman, who pleaded guilty to giving a false > statemen

Sports Fan <sports@fan.home> wrote: > In article <cAJWd.3595$CW2.1465@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net> > "Dave Zero" <davezero@mindspring.com> wrote: > >>iverson was never falsely accused of a hideous felony, just had a bad >>rep for being a thug an

Are they considered as humans, animals, plants or objects ? Is killing aliens legal ?

"RD Sandman" <rdsandman@comcast.net> wrote in message news:18iwv2jgz741e.dlg@hopewell.invalid... > On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:42:12 -0500, Larry Hewitt wrote: > > > "RD Sandman" <rdsandman@comcast.net> wrote in message > > news:18tak1pqj1gti$.dlg@hopewel

On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 12:58:07 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >Grizzlie Antagonist wrote: >> Perjury is a felony, but filing a false police report is only a >> misdemeanor - doesn't matter what the consequences of that police >>

On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 02:10:24 GMT, x@y.com (Larry) wrote: >>I'd be curious to know how you felt when you wrote this response. Were you >>sickened to write this. Or were you laughing inside when you wrote this. >>Just what are the sympoms of a crazy

In article <oLJWd.4282751$f47.768432@news.easynews.com> Sam Bam <sam@bam.slam> wrote: > >Ho, he is NOT Sam bam, that part you have right. About anything. >Yes he is. Security is only 2 arsenic. >Send the subpoena to Vox Populi. He is not

Well, yes, pretty much anybody can put anything on your credit report. Then you'd have to convince the credit reporting agencies to expunge it for some reason or you'd have to convince the bank to remove it. Neither of those would probably fly as lon

In article <9uom21h1unf0q2dsvl8s7ci2ftkq6pt1oh@4ax.com>, null@null.com wrote: >You say, below, that jury nullification is "illegal". Does that mean >that if I, as a juror, knowingly and willingly vote not guilty, even >though I know the facts of the

For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 13:01:25 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Ken Smith wrote: > >>>> We don't have kids, but Kent does, and he

In article <uAJWd.4460$h06.737603@monger.newsread.com>, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote: >"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message news:x-0503052245580001@192.168.2.4... >> In article <8roWd.4398$h06.720026@monger.newsread.com>, "Mike" >> <no.spam@pleas

For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 20:30:27 GMT, Sam Bam <sam@bam.slam> wrote: [...] >>>> Is there any evidence to support this? >>> >>>You need you clock cleaned pissant! >> >> >> >> You are quite stupid, Sam. Here

For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 20:28:02 GMT, Sam Bam <sam@bam.slam> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > >> OMG! It's Lar$on. Who else could be so hypocritical? > >You and the Ken Smith acolytes... When have I been hypocriti

For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 18:07:18 GMT, Sam Bam <sam@bam.slam> wrote: >forevernitefan wrote: >> DIdn't you plonk me? IOW put me on iggy? >> >> Sounds like you say one thing but do another. >> >> I am not going to

" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message news:LZPWd.94$jW1.1692@news.uswest.net... > Dave Thompson wrote: >> " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message >> news:kQOWd.80$jW1.1715@news.uswest.net... >> > Dave Thompson wrote:

For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 20:28:01 GMT, Sam Bam <sam@bam.slam> wrote: >>>> That's a completely different matter. >>> >>>That IS what NAMBLA does! >> >> >> We were discussing their right to express the view, not a

In article <_wJWd.4459$h06.737544@monger.newsread.com>, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote: >"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote > >>>ANY set of less than ten thousand people could have conspired before >>>the fact, with relatively little chance of anyone else

ienjball@yahoo.com wrote: > Oh Ted, what happens to your claims that Cam had no vindictiveness if > Lauren Key's mother takes the stand and testifies that he was vindictive, > and that her daughter did not want to go cliff hiking that day and that sh

ienjball@yahoo.com wrote: > Cameron Brown is not the only accused killer facing heinous charges where > the DA declined to pursue death. From what I understand the D.A. (Hum) wanted to seek death, but the death penalty evaluation committee (which

For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 08:10:45 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> It's amazing what you realize when you let a case germinate for a while in >> your head. > >This

Christopher A. Lee wrote: > The God the believer insists on telling us all about is a logical > impossibility. So was a spherical earth at one time. > Their insistence that "the evidence is all around us", "they'd give > us the evidence but we

Dave Thompson wrote: > " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message > news:kQOWd.80$jW1.1715@news.uswest.net... > > Dave Thompson wrote: > > > " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message > > > news:7fOWd.72$jW1.1692@news.uswest.n

Kent Wills wrote: > For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:55:14 GMT, > Sam Bam <sam@bam.slam> wrote: > > >>Kent Wills wrote: >> >>>For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sat, 5 Mar 2005 14:54:37 >>>-0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez

•R.L.Measures wrote: > In article <8pmWd.358007$Zm5.49156@news.easynews.com>, Sam Bam > <sam@bam.slam> wrote: > > >>•R.L.Measures wrote: >> >> >>>• Perhaps he will give an interview to enlighten the world? >> >> >>Wouldn't surprise me , Henr

•R.L.Measures wrote: > In article <8pmWd.358006$Zm5.49233@news.easynews.com>, Sam Bam > <sam@bam.slam> wrote: > > >>•R.L.Measures wrote: >> >> >>>• Say anything to get attention. >> >>Endorse anything to draw attention... > > > • _____

In article <doJWd.4457$h06.737077@monger.newsread.com>, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote: >"Gordon Burditt" <gordonb.z02hh@burditt.org> wrote > >> >The U.S. Const has it right in Art 3 Sect 3 where it take two witnesses >> >to >>>the same overt