|
|
Sam Bam wrote:
> forevernitefan wrote:
>
>> Well,. Sammie's repeated posting of a supposedly NAMBLA-influenced
>> pedophilia case is rather odd.
>
> Oh?
>
> It establishes the ACLU as a rogue organization.
Not at all. *Real* Republicans
|
|
|
Sam Bam wrote:
> Bill Shatzer wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Sam Bam wrote:
> >
> > -snip-
> >
> >
> > > You haven't admitted a single proven point, you're a @$#*ing
> > > dishonest piece of #@($!
> >
> >
> > -snip-
> >
> >
> > > W
|
|
|
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 23:27:26 -0600, "Richard" <Anonymous@127.001>
wrote:
>> Umm, there is an eyewitness. The victim.
>True. But it would only clinch the noose around the neck with a 2nd
>eyewitness.
>With only the victim, all you have is word aga
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> For reasons I don't want to explore, on Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:40:11
> -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> Wow. You posted at roughly 10:45AM that you were leaving. Then
> at 4:40PM (both times centr
|
|
|
forevernitefan wrote:
> Odd, Kent is not a useless parasite,
In this medium he is.
> he is a human being and more often
> than not, posts intelligent comments and uses logic and rational
> thought. Hardly parasite behavior.
Oh?
Yet you and
|
|
|
forevernitefan wrote:
> Well,. Sammie's repeated posting of a supposedly NAMBLA-influenced
> pedophilia case is rather odd.
Oh?
It establishes the ACLU as a rogue organization.
> What he cites is the differencte
> between speaking about some
|
|
|
forevernitefan wrote:
> No, just makeing an observation. Usually whens oemoen focuses on one
> thing and not onthe whole picture, there is some sortof personal
> reason.
Erm the "whole picture" was the ACLU's tendency to take stances that are
far
|
|
|
forevernitefan wrote:
> NAw debating with me can be interesting IF the other party actually
> uses soem intelligence and avoids personal ad hominen insults.
There's little of interest in debating you, as you generally dissemble
to context-removed
|
|
|
- wrote:
>>"I am going
Yes Poxie, I believe YOU wrote that.
Knock it off with the forged posts you treasonous asshole.
<392g2jF5rqdjcU1@individual.net>
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> Sam Bam wrote:
>
>> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>>
>>>Sam Bam wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>
>>>>http://www.m-w.com/mw/art/remora.gif
>>>>
>>>>Drop dead remora-trash.
>>>
>>>
>>>What's "remora-trash" Sam Ba
|
|
|
BiG Orange wrote:
>>My prayers continue to be with Ken Smith, that God might through His Holy
>>Spirit reveal unto Ken the Truth of His Glorious Gospel, and that Ken
>>would receive Jesus Christ as his Saviour, and pass from death unto life.
>>--
>
|
|
|
forevernitefan wrote:
> More personal attacks, My point is your aspersion to ACLU ,
And an easily proven aspersion it was!
> assuming
> you actually want to have a HONEST discussion, is that for people like
> me the ACLU defends MY rights
Th
|
|
|
forevernitefan wrote:
> Give me your phone number, name and adress, coward.
What am I bid for this valuable information Moeron?
|
|
|
forevernitefan wrote:
> I am not advocating the vionet overthrow of our government.
That's nice to know - I take it then you're NOT a Churchill supporter?
> If you
> want to pigeonhole me into some asinine red-baiting image,, sorry butI
> don't
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> For reasons I don't want to explore, on Mon, 7 Mar 2005 10:10:28
> -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>
>
>>Sam Bam wrote:
>>
>>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>>
>>>http://www.m-w.com/mw/art/remora.gif
>>>
>>>Drop
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> Sam Bam wrote:
>
>> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>>
>>>Sam Bam wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>•R.L.Measures wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In article <vLJWd.4282771$f47.768095@news.easynews.com>, Sam Bam
>>>>><sam@bam.slam> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> - wrote:
>
>>>"I am going to make you my personal pet project," the e-mail
>>>promised. The sender also said "you should be ashamed of yourself"
>>>and "I cannot put into words how disgusted I am with you and your
>>>vile
|
|
|
enris wrote:
> " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
> news:CJ8Xd.113$zv2.2160@news.uswest.net...
> > Fenris wrote:
> > > " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
> > > news:fevWd.91$Pj1.1013@news.uswest.net...
> > > >
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------090606080302080200050903
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
[snip]
>>If
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
[snip]
>>I mean no jury is going to have any sympathy for Cam Brown.
>
> Are you sure of that?
Yes. No doubt in my mind of that.
>>Even if the jury finds reasonable doubt and acq
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> For reasons I don't want to explore, on Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:53:54 GMT,
> Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> Perhaps the District Attorney's office should depose you under oath,
>>>>Ted. You are a potential witn
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------020804020809080707050007
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060406000008060508060405
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030404050802080800090004
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
Uh, TeddiBeer, can you, like, EVER tell the
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:53:54 GMT,
Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
[...]
>>> Perhaps the District Attorney's office should depose you under oath,
>>>Ted. You are a potential witness, and what you know, you wi
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on 7 Mar 2005 14:35:15 -0800,
"forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Hookay, Kaldis CLAIMS he's no longer gonna post. Sounds lieke a repeat
>of his "religious restructuring," or whatever he called it.
>
>
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> Scratch wrote:
>
>> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>>
>>>UffDa! wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"alohacyberian" <alohacyberian@att.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:2iVWd.341141$w62.143069@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>>>>
>>>>
>>
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------040102090905080907070005
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> [This is my last posting for awhile, I promise
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Mon, 07 Mar 2005 22:05:23 GMT,
Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> For reasons I don't want to explore, on Mon, 07 Mar 2005 08:45:04
>> -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net>
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:40:11
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
Wow. You posted at roughly 10:45AM that you were leaving. Then
at 4:40PM (both times central), you're back. A whole
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010303070603040301020908
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> The time has come for me to drop out of these
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Sam Bam wrote:
> > Ken Smith wrote:
> > > Sam Bam wrote:
> >
> > > > It establishes the ACLU as a rogue organization.
> > >
> > > Not at all. *Real* Republicans understand
> >
> > Try not to soapbox on that which you so flag
|
|
|
Sports Fan <sports@fan.home> wrote:
> On 6 Mar 2005 18:47:49 -0500, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>
>>In article <vYKWd.3693$CW2.1897@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
>>Dave Zero <davezero@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>>Sports Fan <sports@fan.home> wro
|
|
|
n Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:04:10 -0700, Big Bill <bill@pipping.com> wrote:
>
>It seems that you didn't actually try a Google search on jury
>nullification.
>"Jury's decision to acquit a defendant despite explicitly violating
>the law because the jury
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 02:34:32 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
>
>"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message
>>
>> Your concept of making the jury count witnesses instead of weighing
>> the convincing power of the evidence runs contrary
|
|
|
"LeMod Pol" <modpol@igs.net> wrote in message news:42273485.B79C699B@igs.net...
> A careful analysis by the author of the new book,
> "Abuse of Power: How the Government Misuses
> Eminent Domain."
>
>
> In eminent domain case, court threatens to s
|
|
|
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 02:25:19 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
>
>"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message
>news:mrlp2150oav6mohi9vb65sv32meg85fbne@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 17:26:26 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
>>
|
|
|
" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
news:HS8Xd.114$zv2.2210@news.uswest.net...
> Dave Thompson wrote:
>> " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
>> news:Yf7Xd.101$zv2.2003@news.uswest.net...
>> > FreeThink wrote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> For reasons I don't want to explore, on Mon, 07 Mar 2005 08:45:04
> -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
>>The time has come for me to drop out of these forums once again. I am asking
>
> That time w
|
|
|
roger_pearse@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>> roger_pearse@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>> > "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>> > > Jeff Welch wrote:
>> > > > > Really? Most "christians" are "good chrisitians" ?
>> > > > > What, exactly is a "good c
|
|
|
ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Well, however it's played no defense lawyer can attack Sarah. At the
> end of the day Sarah is still the grieving mother. She gave birth to
> her child, she undoubtedly loved her child grea
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> The time has come for me to drop out of these forums once again. I am asking
> myself, where is the wisdom in associating with people who wish me ill? I
> should be like Doug and make this a permanent thing. Because strif
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>
>>>>Oh Ted, what happens to your claims that Cam had no vindictiveness if
>>>>Lauren Key's mother takes the stand and testifies that he was
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>>>Cameron Brown is not the only accused killer facing heinous charges where
>>>>the DA declined to pursue death.
>>>
>>>From what I understa
|
|
|
\"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>Theodore A. Kaldis (purported brother-in-law of the Defendant) wrote:
[snip]
>> The heart and soul of this case is simple: Either Cam is as dumb as
>>a kumquat, and didn't recognize the mortal pe
|
|
|
"Michael A. Clem" <macsnafuatintergatedotcom> wrote in news:112p9ojj73momc8
@corp.supernews.com:
> One doesn't normally expect one's coffee cup to melt and start
> leaking hot coffee, regardless of how hot the coffee is.
It didn't melt, or lea
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Mon, 07 Mar 2005 08:45:04
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>The time has come for me to drop out of these forums once again. I am asking
That time was quite a while ago.
>myse
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 20:54:51
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> Oh Ted, what happens to your claims that Cam had no vindictiveness if
>> Lauren Key's mot
|
