|
|
Alan,
I don't think there are any obvious reasons why you guys can't purchase
and co-own this apartment if it is still for sale. Be sure to have a lawyer
from NY at least read, if not write the ownership agreement. Before you
start running aro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 01:08:44 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
>
>"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message
>news:4jes21p60fuqd5l84inpfvjp8clqnupped@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 19:13:35 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waiving the right to remain silent, "Greg.P." <procter@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
> You are the "Evil Empire" - get used to it.
We are the bringers of freedom and prosperity. You are the "Do Nothing
Empire."
--
Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAP
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> Sam Bam wrote:
>
>>•R.L.Measures wrote:
>>
>>>In article <4XaXd.4432109$f47.793603@news.easynews.com>, Sam Bam
>>><sam@bam.slam> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>•R.L.Measures wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In article <Mm_Wd.4375385$f
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> Sam Bam wrote:
>
>> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>>
>>>Sam Bam wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "The people of Samaria must bear the consequences of their
>>>>>guilt because they rebelled
|
|
|
["Followup-To:" header set to or.politics.]
Jeff Welch <prouddem@hotmail.com> wrote:
> " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
> > Jeff Welch wrote:
> >> Just plain old Jesus. Troll refused. Thanks for playing.
> > Kind of like "plain
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> For reasons I don't want to explore, on Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:31:12 GMT,
> Sam Bam <sam@bam.slam> wrote:
>
>
>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>You'll have to provide a cite for that.
>>>
>>>
>>> After you.
>>
>>
>>No, you fir
|
|
|
Hi, in the event of my death, is there any way to exempt my next of
kin from paying my funeral costs? what happens if you have no next of
kin? who pays then?
I am from australia.
|
|
|
By mistake I overpaid an account to a contractor now he won't send me
the amount that I overpaid ($1900). He's good for the money, he's just
being a jerk. Do I have legal leg to stand on?
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:31:12 GMT,
Sam Bam <sam@bam.slam> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>>>You'll have to provide a cite for that.
>>
>>
>> After you.
>
>
>No, you first.
Once you offer a cite proving,
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Tue, 08 Mar 2005 16:07:50 GMT,
Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>All:
>
> It's been almost one full day since Tedious A. Kaldis announced his
>self-imposed gag order, and over 16 hours since he finally STF
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on 8 Mar 2005 05:00:39 -0800,
"forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
>IOw youa re a coward, You challnge me to come toyou and yet when I ask
>for your details to prrvie who you are you don't wan tto give them
|
|
|
"Big Bill"
SNIP
> A lame reason? I can do that:
> I can't hear the order taker at the local
> McDonalds when I wear a
> helmet.
Why the hell would any sane person eat there?
Didn't you know that's not food...it's Cosmetics
disguised as food
|
|
|
["Followup-To:" header set to or.politics.]
Fenris <howl@themoon.com> wrote:
> " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
[...]
> That would be an agnostic, who neither believes or disbelives in god. An
> agnostic, correctly, says I don
|
|
|
Tam <tamsuraiya@yahoo.ca> wrote in
news:BE5350DE.5CCC4%tamsuraiya@yahoo.ca:
> On 8/3/05 7:51 am, in article
> 20050308073357.A31732.richw@whodunit.richw.org, "Rich Wales"
> <richw@richw.org> wrote:
>
>> My assertion was (and is) that declaring s
|
|
|
> why Aboriginal trackers have failed to
> find her boyfriend's body or any footprints from the chase.
There was no chase.
Falconio walked around to the back of the Kombi
and was shot. Probably point blank in the head.
Very impressive pool of blood
|
|
|
This statute states that the name and address of the manufacturer of
the recording has to be inlcuded on the medium being sold. I've heard
some say that this means the original manufacturer who owns the
copyright and other say that if someone makes a m
|
|
|
Marcio Watanabe <Marcio@nospam.com> wrote in
news:cffr21dt71djk54a27p8se26j31ufdnpbq@4ax.com:
> richw@richw.org (Rich Wales) wrote:
>
>>Marcio@nospam.com wrote:
>>
>> > It seems that no one read what I wrote, and you made sure
>> > to sni
|
|
|
Nahh, Paul, the story is a beatup.
The ground had been well gone over by all and sundry
by the time the trackers came in. They're good, but they
ain't magical. The fact that the ties used to restrain Lees
weren't found for weeks shows that they miss
|
|
|
Not only that, but they [Christians] went and changed the Ten
Commandments to their own liking!
They should take down the Ten Commandments, unless they are willing to
put up all 613 Commandments.
They should put up the Seven Laws of Moses which
|
|
|
"Peter H Proctor" <drp@drproctor.com> wrote in message
news:9ies215gu80k7boo7i7osjce55htjmois8@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 11:52:05 -0500, "Larry Hewitt"
> <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote:
>
>
> >> "In the absence of any evidence tending to sh
|
|
|
"RD Sandman" <rdsandman@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1v051dfmj4tv0$.dlg@hopewell.invalid...
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 11:52:05 -0500, Larry Hewitt wrote:
>
> > "RD Sandman" <rdsandman@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:ye3t7p2m65ci$.dlg@hopewel
|
|
|
Richard wrote:
> As a person doing business you have the right to seek work from
> anyone you choose at any time you choose.
Sounds like the OP is already under contract, so they are bound by the
non-solicitation clause.
This clause is quite comm
|
|
|
on Beaver wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:04:10 -0700, Big Bill <bill@pipping.com> wrote:
>
>>It seems that you didn't actually try a Google search on jury
>>nullification.
>>"Jury's decision to acquit a defendant despite explicitly violating
>>the
|
|
|
Defense: Goodrum at home when woman attacked in dorm
By Sarah Vos
HERALD-LEADER STAFF WRITER
OWENSBORO - At the time investigators believe Melissa "Katie" Autry was
raped, bashed into a cement-block wall and burned, Lucas Goodrum was at
his f
|
|
|
Opening Statements in Goodrum Trial
Jon Hardison
Prosecutors and the defense outlined their cases Tuesday afternoon in
opening statements of the Katie Autry murder trial.
16 jurors were seated around 2 Tuesday afternoon to hear what is
expected
|
|
|
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 19:52:34 GMT Travis Jordan wrote:
> Richard wrote:
>> As a person doing business you have the right to seek work from
>> anyone you choose at any time you choose.
>
> Sounds like the OP is already under contract, so they are bou
|
|
|
"Gordon Burditt" <gordonb.5n1jx@burditt.org> wrote in message
news:422ddbc0$0$88027$16895aa@news.airnews.net...
> >I don't get it. What was wrong with Deut. 19:15. It is concise and to the
>>point. All religion aside. That is how I would write the l
|
|
|
" \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in
news:Xo6Wd.77$FJ.922@news.uswest.net:
> Nobody wrote:
>> "Born Again Sam" <eta@carinae.org> wrote in news:38msslF5q8cbtU1
>> @individual.net:
>>
>> > Nobody wrote:
>> > > " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jo
|
|
|
> Uh..I'd be voluntarily not exercising my freedom to do something
> in order to preserve my freedom to do it ?
You got it... California would not have passed a helmet law if ABATE members
rode to the State Capital protest rallies wearing skid l
|
|
|
On 8 Mar 2005 15:29:34 -0800 tinaspeilberg1@yahoo.com wrote:
> IRS Question - How to deal with this ?
>
> If the IRS has contested an item /issue in an audit in the past and has
> yielded to it, can it bring up the same item again in the next audit
|
|
|
On 8 Mar 2005 15:51:27 -0800 ritagoldman101@yahoo.com wrote:
> Can one switch from an EA to a CPA during an IRS audit ?
>
> My daughter is going to be audited by the IRS. She thinks she has her
> records straight. So she is going to use an EA to re
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> forevernitefan wrote:
>
>>IOw youa re a coward, You challnge me to come toyou and yet when I ask
>>for your details to prrvie who you are you don't wan tto give them
>>out.
>
>
> That's Sam Bam's MO, has been for years
|
|
|
michael" <copsR@yourdoor.com> wrote in message
news:422d0dbe_1@news.iprimus.com.au...
> "Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@quickfindit.com> says:
>
> >
>
> ALICE SPRINGS, NT, Feb 28 AAP|Published: Thursday February 28, 2002 10:04
AM
> A forensic scient
|
|
|
c0rs0 wrote:
> now if the clinets that are his contact (on their owne) the new
> company i am an employee at is there any legal action or recorse
> possable ?
You'll need to do a much, much better job at written communications
before you will be ab
|
|
|
Don't Mess With Texas wrote:
> Greg.P. wrote:
> > Don't Mess With Texas wrote:
> >
> > > Greg.P. wrote:
> > > > Don't Mess With Texas wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Two Bears wrote:
> > > > > > the shuvner bleated:
> > > > > > You have to remembe
|
|
|
•R.L.Measures wrote:
> In article <4XaXd.4432109$f47.793603@news.easynews.com>, Sam Bam
> <sam@bam.slam> wrote:
>
>
>>•R.L.Measures wrote:
>>
>>>In article <Mm_Wd.4375385$f47.785324@news.easynews.com>, Sam Bam
>>><sam@bam.slam> wrote:
>>>
>>>
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> Sam Bam wrote:
>
>>Jeff Welch wrote:
>>
>>>"Sam Bam" <sam@bam.slam> wrote in message
>>>news:QC2Xd.583973$Zm5.84268@news.easynews.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Paul Mitchum wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>He doesn't want to be made fun of
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> Jesus was a man, he even said so himself.
He was the lamb of God.
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> Sam Bam wrote:
>
>>Jeff Welch wrote:
>>
>>>"Sam Bam" <sam@bam.slam> wrote in message
>>>news:MF5Xd.4406502$f47.789752@news.easynews.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Jeff Welch wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>I suppose becasue it occurs to me
|
|
|
forevernitefan wrote:
> Naw you are upset that I won't play your gane and ' debate you" by your
> gutter tems. To be honest, you are not willing to have an honest
> duscussion without resorting to personal, juvenile attacks.
I'm not willing to let
|
|
|
forevernitefan wrote:
> Cussing is normal for you sammie.
Well let's say it has become so over the course of my time here in
Uselessnet...
> It also shows a lack of maturity. And
> you wonder why I don't debate you?
You don't "debate" becaus
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Sam Bam wrote:
>
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Sam Bam wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm reminded of the Nazis who wanted to march through Skokie.
>>>>> Their lawyer was Jewish. He understood what Sam fails to
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Sam Bam wrote:
>
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Sam Bam wrote:
>>>
>>>> forevernitefan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If i am so boring, why respond to my posts? :-D
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Easy to score points on you, way TOO easy...
>>>>
>>>> L
|
|
|
forevernitefan wrote:
> IOw youa re a coward, You challnge me to come toyou and yet when I ask
> for your details to prrvie who you are you don't wan tto give them out.
Stop that infernal stuttering Moeron!
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
>>You'll have to provide a cite for that.
>
>
> After you.
No, you first.
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> Sam Bam wrote:
>
>>Jeff Welch wrote:
>>
>>>"Sam Bam" <sam@bam.slam> wrote in message
>>>news:sD5Xd.595071$Zm5.85196@news.easynews.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Don't fall for it Sam Bam, it'
|
|