|
|
We live in a society that discriminates against boys.
Girls get everything. All the attention. All the love. All the care.
Girls are told they are special. They are hugged, and kissed, and
encouraged to be sensitive. Even in school girls are s
|
|
|
No One wrote:
<snip>
> Well, Corey Feldman stated he's straight ... and the case has nothing
> to do with legal issues (it's just a run of the mill trial with a
> flamboyant defendent.) I'm not sure what it has to do with arts
> either.
So, Co
|
|
|
No One wrote:
>
> Bill <batcave1963@adelphia.net> writes:
>
> <rant snipped>
> > Do you really believe that Mez or any defense attorney wanted his client
> > to be sitting there in his pj's?
> >
> > > Yeah sure. I live in California. There'
|
|
|
No One wrote:
>
> Bill <batcave1963@adelphia.net> writes:
>
> > No One wrote:
> > >
> > > mari <mbh1023@yahoo.com> writes:
> > >
> > > See
> > > <http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/03/11/MNGLVBNSVN1.DTL>
> <snip>
>
|
|
|
No One wrote:
>
> Bill <batcave1963@adelphia.net> writes:
>
> > And somehow in the hours that court was in session, his people weren't
> > able to get him a pair of pants to change into? Or better yet, meet him
> > at the courthouse with a pa
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:11:48
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>> Really, Ted. I've had way more than enough of your act. It's old.
>
>Contrary to what Ken might suppose, I am actuall
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on 11 Mar 2005 07:02:32 -0800,
"forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
> TWO days Callous!! TWO FUCKING DAYS and you're BACK?
When one only needs to go as far as the toilet to seek one's god,
it doesn't ta
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Fri, 11 Mar 2005 06:49:34 GMT,
Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
[...]
>>
>>>(see attached).
>>
>> [There was nothing attached. Does this mean that Ken Smith LIED?]
>
> Nope. Just means Ken forgot.
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on 11 Mar 2005 07:32:40 -0800,
"forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote:
> You talk about Ken's definition of lying when YOU lied about leaving
>usenet?
He left himself an out. He didn't say how long he wo
|
|
|
For reasons I don't want to explore, on Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:23:30
-0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>>>> I won't de
|
|
|
No One wrote:
>
> mari <mbh1023@yahoo.com> writes:
>
> > No One wrote:
>
> > Think about it...what are we talking about? Are we talking about the
> > testimony of the victim today? Are we talking about the effect that
> > testimony has ha
|
|
|
The Time Has Come, No One said
To Talk Of Many Things...
>Also, I'm not "one of you" - I'm probably on a different newsgroup and
>someone simply cross posted this thread here. Besides, I can't even
>remember what Jackson sounds like.
Shamona! W
|
|
|
"Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message
news:slrnd341ro.9cn.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu...
> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 03:01:11 GMT, Sangfroid <jung@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>example: imagine a room behind a closed door. there m
|
|
|
"Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message
news:slrnd3422l.9cn.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu...
> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 04:30:56 GMT, Fenris <howl@themoon.com> wrote:
>
>>While I hate to support the religious nuts, whit (who is n
|
|
|
No One wrote:
>
> Bill <batcave1963@adelphia.net> writes:
>
> > MJ went to the hospital without calling his attorney Thomas Mesereau.
> > Mesereau found out when he arrived to court and MJ wasn't there.
> > Mesereau called and found out where
|
|
|
The Time Has Come, No One said
To Talk Of Many Things...
>Silly Me <uhhuh@yeahright.com> writes:
>
>> In article <m38y4tpt7n.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net>, noone@nospam.pacbell.net
>> says...
>> > If he was trying to get out of it for a day, he wouldn'
|
|
|
mari wrote:
>
> Think about it...what are we talking about? Are we talking about the
> testimony of the victim today? Are we talking about the effect that
> testimony has had on the jury?
>
> Nope. We're talking about Wacko Jacko and his
|
|
|
|
|
|
rosignol schrieb:
> In article <vvbv21dm20uocb5ihkgp0o9ikcsk0d93bm@4ax.com>,
> Roedy Green <look-on@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> What are you hinting at? It sounds like you are implying the US
>> soldiers killed Nicola Calipari and wounded G
|
|
|
No One wrote:
>
> Silly Me <uhhuh@yeahright.com> writes:
>
> > In article <m38y4tpt7n.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net>, noone@nospam.pacbell.net
> > says...
> > > If he was trying to get out of it for a day, he wouldn't have shown up
> > > only an hou
|
|
|
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
> > I have read everything on this page, and it seems to me that the jury
> > entered into a "reality distortion field". The writer of the page
> > obviously supports the verdict against McDonald's, but I do
|
|
|
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 04:38:33 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
>Your legal system seems to have completely abandoned to concept of
>corroboration.
It's always desirable. Sometimes it's required, e.g., treason and the
accomplice testimony.
|
|
|
"Neverwas" <etmtrader@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1110566841.843170.48850@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>A brief check of Mccorm's posts show's he an out of the closet, flaming
> bigot... and a wannabetroll to boot.
I was just trying to
|
|
|
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 04:20:27 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
>
>"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote
>.
>.
>.
>>
>>>Let's hear you quote some of the citations in support of these mere jury
>>>instructions that justify their use instead of just assert
|
|
|
"Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:SNCdneoJpatTU6zfRVn-rw@comcast.com...
> "MorComm" <morcomm@comcast.net> wrote
>> Yea, but, but . . . who defines IQ and intelligence anyway?
>
> mostly it's the culture that was sophisti
|
|
|
"RD Sandman" <rdsandman@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:7d0my6m1p3s6$.dlg@hopewell.invalid...
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 21:19:33 -0500, Larry Hewitt wrote:
>
> > "RD Sandman" <rdsandman@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:8f9etzo8mssr$.dlg@hopewe
|
|
|
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 04:13:48 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
>As I've said before, when the verdict rests on the credibility of one
>witness, then no verdict can be reached without the jury's ability to
>determine the truthfulness of that w
|
|
|
Hi Friends,
Justia's New Legal SEO Blog is now up and running with enough posts that
it might be worth reading :)
The URL is http://onward.justia.com
The RSS Feed is http://onward.justia.com/index.rdf
The Legal SEO Blog focuses on search engin
|
|
|
In article <cbfv21lh1no16pa2hf7uue43nv69vnsv1h@4ax.com>,
Don N. <dnascimentonfgn@socal.rr.com> wrote:
>I live in California.
>
>Okay here is the story. My wife and I signed a lease (ACTUALLY our
>signatures dont even appear on the lease!) on April 1
|
|
|
In misc.legal.moderated Don N. <dnascimentonfgn@socal.rr.com> wrote:
> ....after the natural expiration of this lease, a new month-to-month tennancy
> shall be created bewteen the Lessor and the Lesse. Now:
> 1. "Shall be created". It never says a
|
|
|
Don N. wrote:
> I live in California.
>
> Okay here is the story. My wife and I signed a lease (ACTUALLY our
> signatures dont even appear on the lease!) on April 1998 for one year which
> expired on April of 1999.
IMO, because you operated as
|
|
|
"Don N." wrote in misc.legal.moderated:
>Okay here is the story. My wife and I signed a lease (ACTUALLY our
>signatures dont even appear on the lease!)
[shakes head in bafflement]
>on April 1998 for one year which expired on April of 1999.
>The
|
|
|
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 04:30:56 GMT, Fenris <howl@themoon.com> wrote:
>While I hate to support the religious nuts, whit (who is not a religious
>nut, as far as I know) is correct here. To say, definitely, that god does
>not exist because there is no
|
|
|
"Silly Me" <uhhuh@yeahright.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1c9be9547de160e598971d@news.newsguy.com...
> In article <m38y4tpt7n.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net>, noone@nospam.pacbell.net
> says...
>> If he was trying to get out of it for a day, he wouldn't h
|
|
|
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Steve Mading wrote:
> >Actually, the only sort of statement about godly existence that does not
> >take either faith or evidence is along the lines of "I don't know".
> And what you don't understand is that when talking
|
|
|
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 03:01:11 GMT, Sangfroid <jung@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>example: imagine a room behind a closed door. there may or may not be a
>tiger in it. you might have some evidence one way or the other (like you
>hear a sound. is it a tiger?
|
|
|
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylc=X3oDMTBpZmFlcXBpBF9TAzk1ODYxOTQ4BHNlYw
N0aA--?slug=ap-bryantcase&prov=ap&type=lgns
DENVER (AP) -- The woman who accused Kobe Bryant of rape has repaid $20,000
to Colorado's victim compensation fund, a week after
|
|
|
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 03:47:33 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
>
>You are suggesting that this postulate cannot be examined, that it must
>either be accepted on faith or not. You are wrong.
It's law, not religion.
- Jon Beaver
|
|
|
russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) wrote in
news:k4-dnUBJjq005K3fRVn-sA@speakeasy.net:
> In article <zNKXd.32424$%Y4.4043@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
> Magnulus <magnulus@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> Ok, so bikers have alot of libertarians.
|
|
|
Well if you can figure out how you can go @$#* yourself
~
(Richard=A0the rectum eater}
~
If you can figure out how, open the link below with your web-browser.
http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
|
|
|
russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) wrote in
news:xYOdnXCoqpxq663fRVn-pg@speakeasy.net:
> In article <vJxXd.28652$%Y4.16466@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
> Magnulus <magnulus@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>> Also note the US Supreme Court has
|
|
|
"Quentin" <Quentin@yahoogroups.com> wrote in message
news:NBrYd.37851$JH1.1667054@news20.bellglobal.com...
>
>
> explorer wrote:
>
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
>> "All You Need Is Love" <loveisall@youneedis.all> wrote in message
>> news:MUGZQ6U6384
|
|
|
"No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:m34qfhps8m.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
> "Volfie" <volfie@ccrtc.com> writes:
>
>> "No One" <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote
>> > Your pain tolerance might be just a tad higher than his, but i
|
|
|
"Alun L. Palmer"
SNIP
> Putting this in perspective, Harley-Davidson
> (for example) has yet to
> succeed in making anything (for the street) with
> as much as 100bhp,
LOL! BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! VROD...
> although there are a couple of Japa
|
|
|
"Magnulus" <magnulus@bellsouth.net> wrote in
message
news:rDcYd.20568$5T6.11222@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
>
> "Keith Schiffner" <schistan@3rivers.net> wrote
> in message
> news:mb-dnXuD2rGGy63fRVn-1g@vnet-inc.com...
>> Cite please? A dead pers
|
|
|
"Don" <dwzimm@telus.net> wrote in message
news:bgnYd.26600$gJ3.5891@clgrps13...
> "David B" <bothecat3@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:42315EDF.E99570CE@hotmail.com...
>
>> > Families go naked with their children to nude camps and nude beaches
|
|
|
"explorer" <abcd@123.net> wrote in message
news:j_2dnT7Hh4GG2a_fRVn-pQ@centurytel.net...
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "All You Need Is Love" <loveisall@youneedis.all> wrote in message
> news:MUGZQ6U638422.7746875@si93kru1.poster...
>> We live in a soc
|
|
|
"David B" <bothecat3@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:42315EDF.E99570CE@hotmail.com...
> > Families go naked with their children to nude camps and nude beaches
> > and nobody arrests them.
> >
> > It's obvious that the pedophilia is in the minds
|
|
|
explorer wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> "All You Need Is Love" <loveisall@youneedis.all> wrote in message
> news:MUGZQ6U638422.7746875@si93kru1.poster...
>
>>We live in a society that discriminates against boys.
>>
>>Girls get everything.
|
|
