|
|
DanielSan wrote:
> ScotMc wrote:
> > "Smilin' Bob" <fsgjnnujgrj@newscast.com> wrote in message
> > news:113mjst6c4k9uf3@corp.supernews.com...
> >
> >
> > > > > As an agnostic, one who bases his position by definition on
> > > > > knowledge, both
>
|
|
|
On 18 Mar 2005 13:57:35 -0800, "Solar" <williamtmaxwell@aol.com>
wrote:
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
>
>>"When Coloradoans say "Fort Logan", they are referring to a specific
>facility located in Fort Logan. In New York, they might say "Pilgrim
>Stat
|
|
|
Jebediah Springfield wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:54:59 -0600, Mickey
> <mickeys@hotpop.com> wrote:
>
>> tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>>
>>> In article <r40l311tupeaad4ptnc70v1qc2gs8bat3v@4ax.com>,
>>> L Sternn <lincolnfs@hm.net> wrote:
>>>>
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 08:19:33 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
[...]
>
>> Wasn't it you who recently said it is easy to win an argument when the
>> other side lets you get away with gratuitous statements? :)
>
>I'm no
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:14:11 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
[...]
>
>
>>>You may as well accept it too.
>>
>> You don't know what you're talking about.
>
> You've told us what Cam's defense will be. Solar, Kent, and Jonezy
>all ro
|
|
|
..
How do you like this Dave?
If you would like to see my case filing let me know. the
information you sent was invaluable and talked to some nice
legal folks who gave me wording requireing the judge to rule
on the points of law addressed etc..w
|
|
|
To Trust Or Not to Trust..
~~~~
NCB lost thousands in our trust accounts .
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
&..destroyed an Old Polio Victim Cripple's Account with UNSUITABILITY OF
AN INAPPROPRIATE BROKERAGE ACCOUNT, NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF FIDUCIARY,
MI
|
|
|
In article <mtdm31d8p0h270l1m1ankvhp0rvqik5cll@4ax.com>,
Jebediah Springfield <spam@spamspamspamspam.org> wrote:
>On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:54:59 -0600, Mickey <mickeys@hotpop.com> wrote:
>
>>tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote:
>>
>>>In article <r40l311tup
|
|
|
>>>>That's been the case for most of American history, except for a special
>>>>immunity carved out for ISPs that has been expanded by the courts, but a
>>>>recent decision in California indicates that this immunity is on its
>>>>last legs.
>>>>
>
|
|
|
Thanks David,
Whenever I post on these groups I always have to deal with jerks, but
it is all worth it when I get posts like this.
I did charge up the balances on these cards (did not take much except
for Best Buy (1500)), but in the last week I h
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:37:23 -0700,
Smilin' Bob <fsgjnnujgrj@newscast.com> wrote:
>
>I have a friend who states that there is no god and a brother who just has
>no religious beliefs. Neither agree with each other and both are atheists. I
>don't see
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:28:31 -0700,
Smilin' Bob <fsgjnnujgrj@newscast.com> wrote:
>
>As an agnostic, one who bases his position by definition on knowledge, both
>a theist and an atheist, those who base their position on belief from my
>standpoint,
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:05:22 -0800, Sang <gfroid@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
>news:5n7m31t12rtua8l754p4gfmt8kmf6gqklo@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:15:33 -0800, "Sang" <gfroid@hotmail.com>
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:35:42 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>You never cease to be a stammering jackass, even when
>you have time to check your Kaldistupidity before blurting
>it out, do you?
>
>Dubious is an adjective Teddy
|
|
|
FRAUDULENT "CASE SUMMARY"`~FRAUD UPON THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL "COURT`
CLERK OF COURT
ATTORNEY GENERAL
JUDICIAL REVIEW~FAILURE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW~
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE TO STATE OF INDIANA~ IN REGARDS TO DOCKET IN
|
|
|
Ray Gordon wrote:
>>>>The distributor is liable now? Strange.
>>>
>>>
>>>That's been the case for most of American history, except for a special
>>>immunity carved out for ISPs that has been expanded by the courts, but a
>>>recent decision in Cali
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 07:10:25 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>
>>>> Uh, that's not the point he's making, Ted. Rather, with you arguing for
>>>>
|
|
|
"Smilin' Bob" <fsgjnnujgrj@newscast.com> wrote in message
news:113mjst6c4k9uf3@corp.supernews.com...
>>>As an agnostic, one who bases his position by definition on knowledge,
>>>both
>>>a theist and an atheist, those who base their position on bel
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ray Gordon wrote:
>>>>>That's been the case for most of American history, except for a special
>>>>>immunity carved out for ISPs that has been expanded by the courts, but
>>>>>a recent decision in California indicates that this immunity is on its
>>
|
|
|
"ScotMc" <scotmc@SPAMBLOCKoptonline.net> wrote in message
news:5tM_d.20574$t02.15587@fe12.lga...
> "Smilin' Bob" <fsgjnnujgrj@newscast.com> wrote in message
> news:113mjst6c4k9uf3@corp.supernews.com...
>
>>>>As an agnostic, one who bases his po
|
|
|
Ray Gordon wrote:
>> 'yet'.. 4+ years now?
>
>> No, 4+ MINUTES if you restart the time clock perpetually.
>
>
> You are suing Google for archiving
>> your OWN posts....??...
>
> No, for archiving yours.
>
>
thats what google does, w
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez=A9" wrote:
nothing even vaguely _intelligent_
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez=A9" wrote:
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING INTERESTING TO ALT.TRUE-CRIME
|
|
|
Brown and Portman in their latest Calif Landlord book state on page
18/4 that if "The tenant is extremely obnoxious or vulgar to you,
your manager, or other tenants." is just cause for eviction.
Where or how does one find his in Calif laws? How does
|
|
|
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:21:17 GMT, "Fenris" <howl@themoon.com> wrote:
>
>"Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message
>news:slrnd3m3ir.tip.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu...
>> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 02:44:08 GMT, Fenris <howl@themoon.
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:28:53 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
> <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> >Kent Wills wrote:
> >
> >> Ken Smith wrote:
> >
> >> [...]
> >
> >>>>> You may as well accept it too.
> >
> >>>> You don't k
|
|
|
"PRSmith" <prsmith@houston.rr.com> wrote in message
news:rVJ_d.24091$8D.4165@tornado.texas.rr.com...
> Jebediah Springfield wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:54:59 -0600, Mickey
> > <mickeys@hotpop.com> wrote:
> >
> >> tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrot
|
|
|
Smilin' Bob wrote:
> "Smilin' Bob" <fsgjnnujgrj@newscast.com> wrote in message
> news:113mlk3o23quv6d@corp.supernews.com...
> >
> >
> > "grandwazoo" <grand@nospam.com> wrote in message
> > news:1111186227.715153@news.commspeed.net...
> > >
>
> >
|
|
|
Ray Gordon wrote:
>>>>But how can you sue a third party for archiving another person's words?
>>>
>>>
>>>Distributor liability.
>>>
>>
>>The distributor is liable now? Strange.
>
>
> That's been the case for most of American history, except fo
|
|
|
>>>The distributor is liable now? Strange.
>>
>>
>> That's been the case for most of American history, except for a special
>> immunity carved out for ISPs that has been expanded by the courts, but a
>> recent decision in California indicates that
|
|
|
Dave Lister wrote:
> Except for those explictly granted immunity, diplomats and
> heads of state, ANYONE in the US is subject to prosecution
> for crimes. They can argue all they want, but your premise
> is crappola. One need not b
|
|
|
>Well, my issue with Google's archive is that you can search posts by author
>(effectively compiling their work), and that you can search for people by
>their names. This isn't bad in and of itself, but when the name-search
>turns up anything de
|
|
|
Morton Davis wrote:
> "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" <mortschnerd@carolina.rr.com.remove> wrote in
> message news:gAz_d.39314$_i3.1892024@twister.southeast.rr.com...
> > The Lone Weasel wrote:
> > > Bowie knives are almost always illegal on the street. Why d
|
|
|
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:18:06 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
>
>"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message
>news:np5k319l1q9oj7bfs4fkmdmdkj63lclu8q@4ax.com...
>> Buy the way, Mike, your "modus ponens" argument is really silly.
>>
>> Y
|
|
|
his is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------080501010709060409060406
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
[snip]
>>>>>>>>Uh, th
|
|
|
ScotMc wrote:
> " "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
> news:2Kr_d.74$5d2.1921@news.uswest.net...
>
>
>>Nope, an A-theist is one who lacks Theism.
>>
>>Now go look up and comprehend what Theism is,
>>then take that away,
|
|
|
soli13taire@juno.com wrote:
> Mo Che Dong wrote:
>
> <OFF-TOPIC CRAP, SNIPPED>
<restored>
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:16:50 -0500, "Paul R" <no@way.com> wrote:
>
> "Mo Che Dong" <mochepot@socialistworker.duh> wrote in message
> news:4238aed1.2115
|
|
|
Smilin' Bob wrote:
> "Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message
> news:slrnd3mt6s.uln.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu...
> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:41:02 -0700,
> > Smilin' Bob <fsgjnnujgrj@newscast.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:56:44 -0800, "Sang" <gfroid@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
>news:ecG_d.29$FU2.3231@news.uswest.net...
>> Sangfroid wrote:
>> > "Dubh Ghall" <puck@pooks.hill.fey> wrote in message
|
|
|
Beatriz already in trouble with NY State Department of Labor
Ever since Beatriz Marinello took control of the USCF by having
herself named as Chief Operating Officer, she has put a tight lid on
any information coming out.
However, word has leaked
|
|
|
Smilin' Bob wrote:
> "Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message
> news:slrnd3mlsc.u50.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu...
> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:28:31 -0700,
> > Smilin' Bob <fsgjnnujgrj@newscast.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > As an a
|
|
|
"swami" <sriswami@ashram.com> wrote in message
news:423a3354$1_1@127.0.0.1...
> But the war isn't the biggest thing sucking the money out . . . the tax
cuts
> (to the rich) are about twice what the war costs.
Explain, hard as that might be for yo
|
|
|
"Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message
news:slrnd3mt6s.uln.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu...
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:41:02 -0700,
> Smilin' Bob <fsgjnnujgrj@newscast.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>"Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmr
|
|
|
Sang wrote:
> "Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message
> news:slrnd3mlsc.u50.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu...
> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:28:31 -0700,
> > Smilin' Bob <fsgjnnujgrj@newscast.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > As an agnostic
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:41:02 -0700, "Smilin' Bob"
<fsgjnnujgrj@newscast.com> wrote:
>
>
>"Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message
>news:slrnd3mlsc.u50.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu...
>> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:28:31 -0700,
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:37:44 -0700, "Smilin' Bob"
<fsgjnnujgrj@newscast.com> wrote:
>
>"Smilin' Bob" <fsgjnnujgrj@newscast.com> wrote in message
>news:113mlk3o23quv6d@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>>
>> "grandwazoo" <grand@nospam.com> wrote in messag
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:34:49 -0800, "Sang" <gfroid@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message
>news:slrnd3mlsc.u50.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu...
>> On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:28:31 -0700,
>> Smilin' Bob <f
|
|
|
Smilin' Bob wrote:
> "Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:plfm311iqrj9mihvanaq7h2pb62sqm4rj2@4ax.com...
> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:44:37 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
> >
> > > Smilin' Bob wr
|
|
|
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:32:31 -0800, "Sang" <gfroid@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Definitional arguments are often thinly vieled attempts to get
>> one's predjudices accepted as axioms by crafting the language
>> in such a way that groups of people get pai
|
