misc.legal

"Bo Raxo" <invasions_r_us@thepentagon.removethis.com> wrote in message news:Hhn%d.721$H06.511@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > "Dustbin" <dustbin_address@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message > news:Fs6%d.94943$y25.2962@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > I'm not losing. Another keeper.

Kent Wills wrote: > On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:51:12 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > > > > > Oh #@($! What a sick @$#*ing twist to the depravity and > > premeditation with MALICE aforethought -- nice summation Kent. > > > > T

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > > > So, it's a battle of the experts. > > Not if their "expert" gets discredited before this thing reaches > trial. And what kind of hearing does that, exactly?

"Dustbin" <dustbin_address@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:Fs6%d.94943$y25.2962@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk... > > Moreover, his life remains ruined even when > he gets a *not guilty* verdict Yeah, look at poor Kobe. He didn't lose his jo

"Falky foo" <falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:Prr%d.20676$Pz7.11361@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com... > brainwashing at a young age. I see it in my nieces and nephew (who all attend, or will be attending, Catholic school) -Very sc

On 20 Mar 2005, Robibnikoff dropped trou, farted, whirled, then shouted: > > "Falky foo" <falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote in message > news:Prr%d.20676$Pz7.11361@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com... >> brainwashing at a young age. > > > I see it i

"qstn" <qu@est.ion> wrote in message news:p16s31pnf2cat1djepqop0thml23b4vclo@news... > One of the criticisms that atheists often have against believers is > that only dumb/foolish/uneducated/low class type people would believe > in God or participate

At the suggestion of a response to another post, I am reposting this issue with a new header. Sorry for the redundancy. I contracted with an artist to photograph a group of school children and paint them digitally for a single specific use as a

"Petre Cushing" <pincushion@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:_xq%d.2730$9S7.684@fe08.lga... > > (3 Conclusion) I don't have anything (a God) to deny because I don't > believe > what theists believe (ie God exists). > > So.. if I simplify statemen

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:29:36 -0600, John Hanson <jhanson@northernlinks.com> wrote: >On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:10:19 -0500, Hank <"stopbu$h"@war.crimes> wrote >in misc.fitness.weights: > >>John Hanson wrote: >>> On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:34:01 -0500, Han

"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message news:crur311duv1s4qo21lfbr1ufp5polcnook@4ax.com... > >> >>"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message >>news:36cp31hrklbo9ed158drp5ppf077lsp3sf@4ax.com... >>> Hey, moron,

In alt.atheism on Sun, 20 Mar 2005 16:57:40 -0800, qstn <qu@est.ion> let us all know that: Troll Don --- aa #51, Knight of BAAWA, DNRC o-, Member of the [H]orde Atheist Minister for St. Dogbert. "No being is so important that he can usurp

"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message news:113s030cupsfn6a@corp.supernews.com... > ScotMc wrote: > >> >> "Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message >> news:2l5p3152pajp80mm9lnselesrqhtef95f9@4ax.com... >> >>> The ass

qstn wrote: > One of the criticisms that atheists often have against believers is > that only dumb/foolish/uneducated/low class type people would believe > in God or participate in religion. How do atheists reconcile the fact > that many highly educ

Ken Smith wrote: > So, it's a battle of the experts. Not if their "expert" gets discredited before this thing reaches trial. -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@worldnet.att.net

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>> Ken Smith wrote: >>> [betwixt us; what a, er, surprise] >>>>>>> I know the facts that matter. I've been to the crime scene. >>>>>> Then pre

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 16:57:40 -0800, qstn <qu@est.ion> wrote: >One of the criticisms that atheists often have against believers is >that only dumb/foolish/uneducated/low class type people would believe >in God or participate in religion. How do athei

Progress City wrote: > Doug left because he was losing nearly every argument he started. You're > losing too, so maybe you should make this a permanent thing? I'm not losing. You may think I am, but you're wrong. -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldi

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> -- a practice he routinely does in that capacity. Assuming, of course, >>> that you would not be privy to the actual report itself (Hum would have >>> to disclose it to Cam's a

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 01:44:51 GMT, "Bishop" <The Bishop@InTheHall.Com> wrote in misc.fitness.weights: > >On 20-Mar-2005, John Hanson <jhanson@northernlinks.com> wrote: > >> How is my money the taxpayers money? The wealthiest few pay the most >> in

Ken Smith wrote: > Although Brown told investigators he cried hysterically during > his 911 call, a tape of the call played before the grand jury > showed otherwise, Hum said. Brown spoke calmly, and WAS HEARD > APOLOGIZING TO BATHERS A

Kent Wills wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> I haven't lost any argument. Ken is apparently having delusions again. > You've lost BIG TIME, Ted. We now know how Cameron acted after his > daughter, Lauren Key, died. No you don't. What y

On 20-Mar-2005, "Michael Eaton" <olympus112@earthlink.net> wrote: > ok maybe im still new at life but last I remember MJ is far from stupid, > but > I think he just thinks he did nothing wrong much like a pyromaniac can't > help but light somethi

"John Hanson" <jhanson@northernlinks.com> wrote in message news:k7dr31lpd14ipq1gt8hou787731te1c7a1@4ax.com... > On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:34:01 -0500, Hank <"stopbu$h"@war.crimes> wrote > in misc.fitness.weights: > >>John Hanson wrote: >>> On Sat, 1

ok maybe im still new at life but last I remember MJ is far from stupid, but I think he just thinks he did nothing wrong much like a pyromaniac can't help but light something up or a psycho can't help what they do. Sorry for piping in uninvited but Im

Paul Robinson wrote: > > I found the following on a website and have modified it to > cover the issues in his case. In the event he was to sue me > in Pennsylvania, the following would be the type of filing > I would use. As it may be of interest to

qstn <qu@est.ion> wrote: > How do atheists reconcile the fact > that many highly educated, professional, > wealthy individuals (eg. doctors, lawyers, > CEOs, some scientists, etc.) believe in > God and participate in (and are the biggest > benefac

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:25:33 -0500, "ATP*" <eugene@ogedin.com> wrote in misc.fitness.weights: > >"John Hanson" <jhanson@northernlinks.com> wrote in message >news:k7dr31lpd14ipq1gt8hou787731te1c7a1@4ax.com... >> On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:34:01 -0500,

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:10:19 -0500, Hank <"stopbu$h"@war.crimes> wrote in misc.fitness.weights: >John Hanson wrote: >> On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:34:01 -0500, Hank wrote > >> > Tell your bank that you won't be making payments in the >> >future. Tell t

In our last episode <p16s31pnf2cat1djepqop0thml23b4vclo@news>, qstn pirouetted gracefully and with great fanfare proclaimed: > One of the criticisms that atheists often have against believers is that > only dumb/foolish/uneducated/low class type peop

On 20 Mar 2005, qstn dropped trou, farted, whirled, then shouted: > One of the criticisms that atheists often have against believers is > that only dumb/foolish/uneducated/low class type people would believe > in God or participate in religion. How

Kent Wills wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> Now that I finally know what it is, do you care to tell us *THE TRUTH* >>> about Toby Wilson's investigation? >> It's a bunch of fakery. > Sort of like claiming Cameron ha

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: NOTHING INTERESTING

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:48:14 -0500, Bob Roman <robertjroman@hotmail.com> wrote: >On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 14:42:20 -0700, Ima Pseudonym ><akrasian@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote: > >>Poor analogy. You're implying that illegal substances would be sold >>in

en Smith wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> I think it's quite obvious. Is this the kind of man who should be >>> practising law? The question answers itself. >> And the answer is, yes. >>> Ken Smith wrote: >>>>

"McGyver" <Greyprof@msn.com> wrote in news:3a3124F65bt9fU1@individual.net: > "crabshell" <crabshell@nottoohotmale.com> wrote in message > news:IqGdnelgerRQsaHfRVn-ig@giganews.com... > <Snip> > >> Thank you for your well considered answer. Fort

In article <1111303276.844484.160730@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>, "Chris Cathcart" <cathcacr@gmail.com> wrote: > Since Congress has no business legislating about, and hence no need to > know about, vaginal tension amongst Deja Vu strippers, it's g

Bob Roman <robertjroman@hotmail.com> writes: >If Congress is considering legislation on a topic they need to know >more about, they have the right, the power, and the responsibility to >investigate the issue. Fine. But what gives them the power t

STAN BOOZ'S DISHONEST PLOYS See below for my comments in brackets re the latest little dishonesties from resident CPA Stan Booz in response to Sam Sloan's post <Beatriz already in trouble with NY State Department of Labor. Bull#@($.>

Doug left because he was losing nearly every argument he started. You're losing too, so maybe you should make this a permanent thing?

Stephen Gallagher wrote: > What if Congress passed a law that declared all children born > in the US to those other than citizens or PRs, are not subject > to US jurisdiction for the first 24 hours after birth? My gut impression is tha

Yes......... http://www.adlerppt.com/Pages/yardi.html If this isn't what you need, let me know. I write software.

John Hanson wrote: > On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:34:01 -0500, Hank wrote > > Tell your bank that you won't be making payments in the > >future. Tell them you just want to keep more of your money, > >and it won't cost them anything. > Hardly analogous.

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 14:42:20 -0700, Ima Pseudonym <akrasian@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote: >Poor analogy. You're implying that illegal substances would be sold >in Wal-Mart as the justification for the investigation, but that's not >what Congress is in

A situation in which most of the individual respondents are professors at a university; the amendment would become the first amended verified petition; and the reason being that the answer would otherwise not have to be verified by any of the individu

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:38:13 -0500, "Petre Cushing" <pincushion@yahoo.com> wrote: > >"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message >news:36cp31hrklbo9ed158drp5ppf077lsp3sf@4ax.com... >> Hey, moron, is it really so hard to grasp that

"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message news:36cp31hrklbo9ed158drp5ppf077lsp3sf@4ax.com... > Hey, moron, is it really so hard to grasp that atheists haven't got > anything to deny, outside your bigoted and deluded imagination?