misc.legal

VictoryUSA@jail4judges.org (www.jail4judges.org) Subject: "Caught In The Act! - So What?" J.A.I.L. News Journal ______________________________________________________ Los Angeles, California=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0

"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote: FRAUD! 65.100.183.57 Prohibited Conduct. Inappropriate Content. Users shall not use the Qwest Network and Services to transmit, distribute or store material that is inappropriate, as reasonably determined by Qwest, or

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:26:50 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Ken Smith wrote: >>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>> Ken Smith wrote: >>>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:15:49 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >Why, like exactly, would they frame Cameron Brown? He's a nobody, >a loser, a zero. That's the major problem with Ted's conspiracy theory. Cameron isn't importan

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:01:35 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Ken Smith wrote: > >>>> Now that I finally know what it is, do you care to tell us *THE TRUTH* >>>> a

posted: >> and you are having fun. > > Indeed, and the torture is working so well, you can't help but keep > posting and posting. Yet you claim torture is inneffective. It's > working pretty well on you. it is? i wasn't even aware. how i

Kent Wills wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> As expert witnesses normally get paid by the hour (and paid very well!), >> Scuttlebutt is that Hum managed to get him a new car under the table as >> part of the deal. (Can

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:41:41 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Ken Smith wrote: >>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>> Ken Smith wrote: > >>>>>> There is only one fac

Kent Wills wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> Kent Wills wrote: >>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>> I think it's quite obvious. Is this the kind of man who should be >>>>> practising law? The question answers itself.

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:26:42 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Kent Wills wrote: >>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>>> I haven't lost any argument. Ken is apparent

Fenris wrote: > My understanding of the word is that atheist believe that > god does not exist. Those who don't believe that he does > and don't believe that he doesn't are called agnostics. No, an agnostic is simply someone wwho says that he/she

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 07:05:23 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Progress City wrote: >> >>>Doug left because he was losing nearly every argument he started. You're >>>losing too, so maybe you should make this a pe

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:12:35 -0800, Sangfroid <cold@comcast.net> wrote: > >and IF his claim were true, then strong atheists would not BE atheist, since >they have a BELIEF. Can you tell the difference between beliefs held by a person who is part o

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:57:38 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Kent Wills wrote: >>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> >> >>>>I haven't lost any argument. Ken is apparently having delusions again. >>> >>>You've los

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:49:38 GMT, Fenris <howl@themoon.com> wrote: >That is just *your* definition. Not everyone agrees with you, and you do >not speak for all atheists. You keep confusing the difference between "beliefs held by someone who is a

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:48:41 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Ken Smith wrote: > >>>> -- a practice he routinely does in that capacity. Assuming, of course, >>>> t

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:45:43 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Although Brown told investigators he cried hysterically during >> his 911 call, a tape of the call played before the grand jury

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:16:37 GMT, Fenris <howl@themoon.com> wrote: > >"Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message >news:slrnd3q25c.rc.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu... >> On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:21:17 GMT, Fenris <howl@themoon.com>

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:53:16 GMT, Fenris <howl@themoon.com> wrote: >That is the point, dimwitted one. Not everyone agrees with your definition. >In fact, according to the dictionary, most people (i.e. common usage) define >atheist as "one who deni

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:09:39 -0800, Sangfroid <cold@comcast.net> wrote: >but it creates no problem for the underlying reality, which is that "god >does not exist" is a statement of belief, based on a leap of faith, I agree that in the alternate un

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:39:40 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>> I haven't lost any argument. Ken is apparently having delusions again. > >> You've lost BIG TIME,

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 21:04:31 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> So, it's a battle of the experts. > >Not if their "expert" gets discredited before this thing reaches trial. Won't happen in this

On 20 Mar 2005 18:54:03 -0800, soli13taire@juno.com wrote: > >Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >NOTHING INTERESTING That's pretty much standard for Ted :) We *are* discussing a current crime, dullard. Cameron Brown is charged with killing his d

n Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:49:09 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Ken Smith wrote: > >> Kent Wills wrote: >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>> I think it's quite obvious. Is this the kind of man who should be >>>> practi

"Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message news:slrnd3q25c.rc.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu... > On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:21:17 GMT, Fenris <howl@themoon.com> wrote: >> >>"Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in me

Death of airline passenger subdued by other passengers probed NEW YORK (AP) -- Prosecutors are investigating the death of a man who was subdued by several fellow airline passengers after he became disruptive on a New York-bound flight, a sp

Born Again Sam wrote: > Officials: Student's rampage leaves 10 dead > Witness describes gunman grinning, waving > > > > (CNN) -- A student on Monday killed two of his grandparents, then > went on a shooting rampage at his Minnesota high school, kil

Officials: Student's rampage leaves 10 dead Witness describes gunman grinning, waving (CNN) -- A student on Monday killed two of his grandparents, then went on a shooting rampage at his Minnesota high school, killing seven people and wounding as

On 20 Mar 2005 18:26:09 -0800, "Progress City" <progresscity@gmail.com> wrote: >Doug left because he was losing nearly every argument he started. >You're losing too, so maybe you should make this a permanent thing? Doug wasn't obsessed with Ken.

Fredric L. Rice wrote: > Study: Abstinence pledgers risk STDs > > NEW HAVEN, Conn. (AP) -- Teens who pledge to remain virgins until > marriage are more likely to take chances with other kinds of sex that > increase the risk of sexually transmitted di

"robpar" <robpar@airmaildelete.net> wrote in message news:b9gr315151hkqihd3clk51aear41thpb5t@4ax.com... > On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 17:21:18 -0700, "Smilin' Bob" > <fsgjnnujgrj@newscast.com> wrote: > >> >>"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrot

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:52:40 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: [...] >> Or luggage you just tossed off a truck. > > That's INCONCEIVABLY sick. Maybe Geragos should see what he can do >with a not guilty by reason of insanity plea. Te

" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message news:2Q9%d.66$uA3.2137@news.uswest.net... > Smilin' Bob wrote: >> "Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message >> news:bvbp319g9dhvk6dkbmuat7li6j4q6li73k@4ax.com... >> > On Sat,

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:24:36 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >> This revelation really freaked me out. You would expect >> Cameron to have carried her in his arms. According to at least one >> witness, he carried Lauren like

"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote: FRAUD! 65.102.225.16 Prohibited Conduct. Inappropriate Content. Users shall not use the Qwest Network and Services to transmit, distribute or store material that is inappropriate, as reasonably determined by Qwes

"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote: > Or your pathetic Religion of Agnosticism. > > FRAUD! 65.102.225.16 Prohibited Conduct. Inappropriate Content. Users shall not use the Qwest Network and Services to transmit, distribute or store materi

"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote: >Go away! ." FRAUD! 67.40.52.61 Prohibited Conduct. Inappropriate Content. Users shall not use the Qwest Network and Services to transmit, distribute or store material that is inappropriate, as reasonably dete

New York Times March 22, 2005 EDITORIAL A Blow to the Rule of Law If you are in a "persistent vegetative state" and there is a dispute about whether to keep you alive, your case will probably go no further than state court - unless you are Terri