|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:12:02 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>
> > Kent Wills wrote:
> > > On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:27:23 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> > > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Kent Will
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:14:52 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>
> > Kent Wills wrote:
> > > On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:08:21 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
> > > <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:16:43 -0500, Joel M. Eichen
> <joeleichen@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Yeah-h-h-h-hh-h-h-hh-h-!
> >
> > That BTK stuff is almost thirty years old!
> >
> > Take it over to alt.fast.food.........
>
>
> What?
|
|
|
When the issues of a challenge fails to live up to that challenge,
there is a term that is used for that person. The term is coward.
You are a coward. You challenged me to a debate on Chicago TV. I
accepted and YOU tried to back out of it by trying
|
|
|
> Mr. Parker......present your plan. I will meet you and defeat you. Of
> course, the moderator of the challenge has to be either a judge, a law
> professor or someone duly licensed to practice law. Also, I will fly to
> Philadelphia at my own expen
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:08:32 -0600, wcb <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
>Follow along numbnuts.
>Dogmatic assertions that a book supposedly divinely
>inspired says so. This is the criteria theology has
>followed for millenia. Denying this claim c
|
|
|
"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message
news:08f341dnkagg3doijm2vg4nd2hlbpqipr2@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:52:56 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
>
>>I thought my arguments were well thought out objections that relate reason
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:08:24 -0700, Dave Thompson <abre@thedoor.comp> wrote:
>When it involves an all knowing creator. If someone defines god as existence
>or a natural constant (which they are free to do), a strong atheist can't
>reject the obvio
|
|
|
http://www.want-to-be-sure.blogspot.com << Click On Link
|
|
|
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 03:46:03 GMT, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote:
>You seem to be using the word "infer" in an equivocal manner. "Infer" is a
>logical term, but you are using it as though it were not.
"Infer" is NOT a "logical" term as used in
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 22:57:06 GMT, Fenris <howl@themoon.com> wrote:
>It is kind of funny. Someone calls you a liar, and you respond that
>disagreeing is not the same as lying. Then you turn around and brand those
>who disagree with *you* as "liars
|
|
|
http://news4colorado.com/gaveltogavel/local_story_062124621.html
Lesson One. If you are a good-looking, rich, young male superstar, married
to a beautiful wife, don't ditch your bodyguards to flirt with a small-town
hotel clerk. Bryant was in trouble
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:27:23 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On 23 Mar 2005 11:41:31 -0800, MsAnthrope <ms@nthr.ope> wrote:
>>
>> > In article <Zti0e.16$pA4.392@news.uswest.net>, \"- Prof. Jonez©\"
>> >
|
|
|
"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote
>>You say we treat them differently. How then do we
>>determine whether they are lying, mistaken, or telling the truth?
>
> We don't.
>
> The baseball umpire says "Strike!" Is it the "truth" that it's a
> "s
|
|
|
http://www.vaildaily.com/article/20050313/NEWS/103130019
"Sexual assault can include unlawful sexual contact and that could include
grabbing somebody's butt," said Hurlbert, whose jurisdiction covers Eagle,
Summit, Lake and Clear Creek counties. "You
|
|
|
"wcb" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:1141s1393r4oi3f@corp.supernews.com...
> Steve Mading wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:53:06 -0600, wcb <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
>>>Steve Mading wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 1
|
|
|
"Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message
news:slrnd43lal.f18.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu...
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:37:28 GMT, Fenris <howl@themoon.com> wrote:
>>
>>"Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in m
|
|
|
"Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message
news:slrnd43lp0.f18.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu...
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 05:26:39 GMT, Sangfroid <jung@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
>>
|
|
|
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:dun341h5sf3432o5h4aljmbn9kskvc07gm@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:08:24 -0700, "Dave Thompson"
> <abre@thedoor.comp> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wr
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:23:44 -0600, wcb <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com>
wrote:
>Steve Mading wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:59:29 GMT, Sangfroid <jung@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>given the beliefs of strong atheists, it is irrefutable (whatever one
|
|
|
Barbara Schwarz wrote:
> Again, likely nobody wants to live like a vegetable, but there is
> enough information that Terry Schiavo isn't one. And that means that
> she could be rehabilitated. I heard her voice on TV, she moans, she
> rolls with her ey
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> Sam wrote:
>
>> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Steve Mading wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:44:51 GMT, Fenris <howl@themoon.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Here is a clue for you, you do not represent
|
|
|
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> Steve Mading wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:44:51 GMT, Fenris <howl@themoon.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Here is a clue for you, you do not represent all atheists. You
>>>must be part of that inbred group from alt.atheism
|
|
|
<esnesmmoc@urthlynk.c0m> wrote in message
news:42417f17.417181@news.east.earthlink.net...
> On 23 Mar 2005, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
>
> ... Even if
> you were to prevail in such a case and you had been represented by
> counsel, an award of attorn
|
|
|
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:08:21 -0800, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
>> Your god is either too busy being dead or sodomizing young boys on the golf
>> course to make it happen.
>
>Kent, do you agree with this?
Whereas I
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:08:56 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>MsAnthrope wrote:
>> In article <Zti0e.16$pA4.392@news.uswest.net>, \"- Prof. Jonez©\" says...
>>
>>>Pig-ignorant neo-con voters entertain the delusion that if they
>>>vote for a
|
|
|
On 23 Mar 2005 11:41:31 -0800, MsAnthrope <ms@nthr.ope> wrote:
>In article <Zti0e.16$pA4.392@news.uswest.net>, \"- Prof. Jonez©\" says...
>>
>>Pig-ignorant neo-con voters entertain the delusion that if they
>>vote for and support those avaricious s
|
|
|
Perverse as it may sound, I favor a martyrdom operation by Special
Forces, with a sniper team taking out the target as he steps off the
plane. This was done to Benigno S. Aquino, Jr. (1932-1983) by Marcos
in the Phillipines.
It would make Fischer a
|
|
|
Free at Last! Free at Last! Bobby Fischer is Free at Last!
Wonderful News! Although it has not hit the major newswires yet, it
appears that Bobby Fischer is out of jail.
The break came when Iceland granted him citizenship two days ago. With
this a
|
|
|
Steve Mading wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:08:32 -0600, wcb <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
>
>>Follow along numbnuts.
>>Dogmatic assertions that a book supposedly divinely
>>inspired says so. This is the criteria theology has
>>followed for m
|
|
|
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 22:29:03 -0600, wcb <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
>Steve Mading wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:53:06 -0600, wcb <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
>>>Steve Mading wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:51:45 -0800, Sangfroid
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:51:32 GMT, Fenris <howl@themoon.com> wrote:
>
>"Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message
>news:slrnd414gu.dg2.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu...
>>
>> Thanks for admitting that you were wrong.
>> From now
|
|
|
Steve Mading wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:59:29 GMT, Sangfroid <jung@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>given the beliefs of strong atheists, it is irrefutable (whatever one
>>chooses to call them) that they are a subset of atheists
>
> I agree. I've n
|
|
|
I am helping a family member file personal bankruptcy under Chapter 7
and want to make sure I am using the right forms. He has not assests to
speak of except his car so I am using Forms 1, 6, 7, 8 and 21. Are
there any other forms I should use for
|
|
|
Steve Mading wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:51:32 GMT, Fenris <howl@themoon.com> wrote:
>>
>>"Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message
>>news:slrnd414gu.dg2.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu...
>>>
>>> Thanks for admitting that
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:51:32 GMT, Fenris <howl@themoon.com> wrote:
>
>"Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message
>news:slrnd414gu.dg2.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu...
>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 01:46:16 GMT, Fenris <howl@themoon.com>
|
|
|
Fenris wrote:
>
> There is no knowledge, only logical or illogical beliefs.
Again, this is wrong and foolishly wrong.
If theists make a claim, and logically I can show
that the claim is self cortradictory and thus inpossible.
We have kn
|
|
|
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:39:29 -0600, robpar <robpar@airmaildelete.net> wrote:
> Nope squares have 4 equal sides, rectangles have two sides of one
>length, and two sides with the same as each other but different length
>from the other side. 4x4 squar
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:59:29 GMT, Sangfroid <jung@hotmail.com> wrote:
>given the beliefs of strong atheists, it is irrefutable (whatever one
>chooses to call them) that they are a subset of atheists
I agree. I've never refuted that. What I HAVE r
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 04:06:07 GMT, Sangfroid <jung@hotmail.com> wrote:
>not to mention that a case can be made that KNOWLEDGE is never possible, iow
>that we can doubt everything we believe (to lesser or greater extent) but
>pragmatism and practicalit
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:44:51 GMT, Fenris <howl@themoon.com> wrote:
>
>Here is a clue for you, you do not represent all atheists. You must be part
>of that inbred group from alt.atheism. You (and the others) keep saying
>"we" and "our" as if you we
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 05:26:39 GMT, Sangfroid <jung@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"sAnToLiNa" <mystery@babylon.com> wrote in message
>news:3acbipF6944pkU1@individual.net...
>>
>> Sangfroid <jung@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:To60e.1712$gI5.913@newsre
|
|
|
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:37:28 GMT, Fenris <howl@themoon.com> wrote:
>
>"Steve Mading" <madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu> wrote in message
>news:slrnd4144l.dg2.madings@lobster.bmrb.wisc.edu...
>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 01:33:20 GMT, Fenris <howl@themoon.com>
|
|
|
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:35:04 -0700, Dave Thompson <abre@thedoor.comp> wrote:
>Could you try supporting anything you say logically?
Reread my previous post. There's no point in my bothering to write
the same thing twice when you dismiss my heartfe
|
|
|
> Terry's parents won't let her go for their own selfish reasons.
That sums up nearly everyone's approach to the suicidal.
|
|
|
"kate" <kcourtesan@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1111586321.390714.129480@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
>> In 1999, then-Gov. Bush signed the Advance
>> Directives Act, which lets a patient's surrogate
>> make life-ending decisions on his o
|
|
|
wcb wrote:
> Fenris wrote:
>
>
> >
> > There is no knowledge, only logical or illogical beliefs.
>
>
>
> Again, this is wrong and foolishly wrong.
>
> If theists make a claim, and logically I can show
> that the claim is self cortradictory and
|
|
|
"Dave Thompson" <abre@thedoor.comp> wrote in message
news:1143v0kfv4r6pe6@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Scot McDermid" <scotmc@SPAMBLOCKoptonline.net> wrote in message
> news:b0l0e.8282$8q.5450@fe09.lga...
>> ummm no. Strong atheists rejecting the th
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:27:23 -0700, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>
> > Kent Wills wrote:
> > > On 23 Mar 2005 11:41:31 -0800, MsAnthrope <ms@nthr.ope> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article <Zti0e.16$pA4.392@news.us
|
|
|
MsAnthrope wrote:
> In article <42417BE8.2080209@it.com>, Ken Smith says...
>
>> Remember that this matter is merely res judicata; that is a
>>common-law doctrine, which Congress could obliterate with one stroke of
>>a pen. Why should special re
|
