|
|
>You can still get in deep trouble even with health insurance. With a
serious
>illness, the insurance usually pays about 80-90%. This mean that if
you
>rack up a $30,000 illness, you may still have to pay $6,000. Many
people
>do not have $6k sitting
|
|
|
>I watched a neighbor go through something like this for his daughter.
>She got leukemia. She got sicker and sicker. When dead took too much
>time off to care for her and take her to appointments he got fired.
>The insurance company denied her treatmen
|
|
|
"Fred J. McCall" <fmccall@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:tase51dtje8te0m2rbe70q6441u7bi6uch@4ax.com...
>" \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>
> :Fred J. McCall wrote:
> :> " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
> :>
> :>
|
|
|
Phil <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote in
news:v93e515eq5cof0llom1mhla370b9im5oag@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:46:54 GMT, Johnny Bravo
> <baawa_knight@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:13:23 -0400, Phil <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote:
>
|
|
|
>Have no problem with going after deadbeats but the Democrats offered
>an amendment to exempt those with catastrophic medical bills, those
>called to active duty and victims of identity theft.It never passed.
Of course it didn't. Bankruptcy has been
|
|
|
>Fine, let's start with having members of Congress and their staffs
>pay for their own health insurance,
Have you always been jealous of the rich and successful or is this a
new thing for you?
|
|
|
>You can't explain anything to these nonsocial me-first yahoos.
You mean the ones who earn their medical insurance by paying for it. Is
that such a foreign concept for you?
>Most of the bankruptcies with medical expenses had coverage and then
>got
|
|
|
On 8-Apr-2005, "Chas" <chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
> "nospam" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote
> > Are they custodians of the miniscule amount of land they own as well? If
> >
> > so
> > when will they relinquish control of this humble amount
|
|
|
Attuarii wrote:
> Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote:
>
>
>>Attuarii wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I doubt we will get to twelve billion. Most places in the world are
>>>>levelling off and those that don't will fac
|
|
|
>borrowed under a set of rules. Their expectations were changed
>after the transaction. that seems to only bother you when it involves
>the lenders.
They're the ones who lent the money with the expectation that it'd be
paid back with interest. Do yo
|
|
|
On 8-Apr-2005, "Church of Jesus Christ" <news@churchofjc.org> wrote:
> > When you look at the luxery of the Vatican, always remember, my money
> > contributed to it.
> >
> > Barbara Schwarz
> >
>
> Dear Barbara
>
> Are you an active Christi
|
|
|
WEEEEZ HUNTIN SMART ASSED YANKEES DOWN HERE NOW.
Got a bounty on yer asses... :-)
|
|
|
On 8-Apr-2005, retrogrouch@comcast.net wrote:
> >> >You can still get in deep trouble even with health insurance. With a
> >> >serious
> >> >illness, the insurance usually pays about 80-90%. This mean that if
> >> >you
> >> >rack up a $30,000 il
|
|
|
jonez@norcom.ca said:
> Seth Breidbart wrote:
>> In article <hti9511pqtpa6ajsdhnq0ggbmuku91s3qv@4ax.com>,
>> Phil <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:57:02 -0600, "~ Typhøid Mary ~"
>> > <typhoid@mary.va> wrote:
>> >
>> > >
|
|
|
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 02:47:01 GMT, DeepSea <deep_sea01@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>Phil <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote in
>news:hvbe515vcf3j8q9gg1udp5umg75bia1cei@4ax.com:
>
>> On 8 Apr 2005 16:13:03 -0700, r_c_brown@hushmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> >The p
|
|
|
Attuarii wrote:
> Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote:
>
>
>>I doubt we will get to twelve billion. Most places in the world are
>>levelling off and those that don't will face a severe dieback. We can
>>already see the beginnings in Africa. I think may
|
|
|
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 02:44:18 GMT, Johnny Bravo
<baawa_knight@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 22:03:35 -0400, Phil <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:23:34 GMT, Johnny Bravo
>><baawa_knight@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On F
|
|
|
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 02:31:30 GMT, Johnny Bravo
<baawa_knight@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>I'd hate to be in a subway station at rush hour if this bill passes.
>>>
>>> I'll be the first to relieve your concerns then, Florida is devoid
>>>of subway stati
|
|
|
"123" <789> wrote
> So the guard didn't do anything to stop it? Sounds like a lie to me.
He wasn't guarding the boy- he was guarding Jackson.
Who's he going to call? What's he going to do?
He's already working for a frootloop- what's he going to fi
|
|
|
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:59:11 GMT, slim <pickin's@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>Phil wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 04:51:45 GMT, Johnny Bravo
>> <baawa_knight@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:41:26 -0400, Phil <dogglebe@yahoooo.com>
|
|
|
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:23:34 GMT, Johnny Bravo
<baawa_knight@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:01:05 -0400, Phil <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote:
>
>>>Look, FUCKTARD, it hasn't happened in nearly 20 years of shall-issue CCE and
>>>this law ain
|
|
|
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:14:19 GMT, Johnny Bravo
<baawa_knight@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:07:56 -0400, Phil <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote:
>
>>> Because the definition of forcible felony is already a part of
>>>Florida law, he didn't b
|
|
|
The Lone Weasel wrote:
> jonez@norcom.ca said:
> > The Lone Weasel wrote:
> > > jonez@norcom.ca said:
> > > > Seth Breidbart wrote:
> > > > > In article <hti9511pqtpa6ajsdhnq0ggbmuku91s3qv@4ax.com>,
> > > > > Phil <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote:
> >
|
|
|
"Phil" <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote
> The state decides, though the city can also make a decision.
what part of 'shall not be infringed' escapes you?
that's a prohibition on the powers of government; state or city.
> Those with firearms should be
|
|
|
"Phil" <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote in message
news:jksc51pg80er41jht67lt19f9qrbva2gcd@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 04:51:45 GMT, Johnny Bravo
> <baawa_knight@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:41:26 -0400, Phil <dogglebe@yahoooo.com
|
|
|
"Phil" <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote
> I'd hate to be in a subway station at rush hour if this bill passes.
Why?
Were you hoping to bother somebody unchallenged?
Chas
|
|
|
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:30:17 GMT, chainsaw <xxx@ooo.biz> wrote:
> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>
><the @$#*ing TRAITOR scum!>
>
[...]
Get over it.
OK, Jonez is a pompous ass. We got it.
OK, Jones holds unpopular opinions. We got it.
You thi
|
|
|
"nospam" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote
>> > so
>> > when will they relinquish control of this humble amount of art and
>> > land?
>> 'Relinquish' to whom?
> That's what I'd like to know. If they're just "custodians" they must be
> holding it for someon
|
|
|
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 07:00:44 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>>>>>>> http://www.freecambrown.org/995Motion.pdf
>
>>>>
|
|
|
Colin Campbell wrote:
> On 7 Apr 2005 23:37:03 -0700, omarenoryt@aol.com wrote:
>
> > Still crying like a little girl that there won't be a draft, huh?
> > Continue imagining conspiracy theories as the rest of Earth moves
> > on, loser.
>
> The dra
|
|
|
On 8 Apr 2005 11:43:40 -0700, ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
[...]
>
>What I know is the judge has three options. He can agree with the
>defense motion, tossing Hayes out and tossing the case, which would be
>without prejudice because jeopardy doesn'
|
|
|
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 07:35:10 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Solar wrote:
>
>>>> Sayyyyyyy ... Didnt Mark Geragos *just* lose a case where the State
>>>>
|
|
|
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:23:34 GMT, Johnny Bravo
<baawa_knight@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:01:05 -0400, Phil <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote:
>
>>>Look, FUCKTARD, it hasn't happened in nearly 20 years of shall-issue CCE and
>>>this law ain
|
|
|
BlackWater wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:58:40 +0100, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
> <dirk@neopax.com> wrote:
>
>
>>BlackWater wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:05:36 GMT, "Godzilla Pimp" <me7@privacy.net>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I beli
|
|
|
On 8 Apr 2005 16:13:03 -0700, r_c_brown@hushmail.com wrote:
>> >The poster you responded to indicated intervention in crimes, not
>> >arguments.
>>
>> Harassing someone is a crime.
>
>I expect that is true. You mentioned arguments, not harrassm
|
|
|
On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:12:07 GMT, Johnny Bravo
<baawa_knight@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 18:53:43 -0400, Phil <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:12:30 -0600, "Chas"
>><chasclementsSPOOF@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"P
|
|
|
http://www.amatterofjustice.org/amoj/51librarypage.cfm?libraryno=8#thetop
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= Ea
|
|
|
chainsaw wrote:
> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>
> <the @$#*ing TRAITOR scum!>
>
The only traitor here is you Sam Bam, and your fascist neo-con
crony scumbags who sent 1700+ US solders off to get slaughtered
for your avaricious lies and deceptions, you
|
|
|
chainsaw wrote:
> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>
> <the @$#*ing TRAITOR scum!>
>
The only traitor here is you Sam Bam, and your fascist neo-con
crony scumbags who sent 1700+ US solders off to get slaughtered
for your avaricious lies and deceptions, you
|
|
|
chainsaw wrote:
> Kent Wills wrote:
> > On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:30:17 GMT, chainsaw <xxx@ooo.biz> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> > >
> > > <the @$#*ing TRAITOR scum!>
> > >
> > [...]
> >
> > Get over it.
>
> No.
>
> > OK, Jon
|
|
|
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:18:42 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>>> Are you on drugs? Even if the judge does allow this thing to
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:15:44 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>
> > Kent Wills wrote:
> > > On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 18:55:32 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
> > > <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ken
|
|
|
chainsaw wrote:
> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>
> <the @$#*ing TRAITOR scum!>
>
The only traitor here is you Sam Bam, and your fascist neo-con
crony scumbags who sent 1700+ US solders off to get slaughtered
for your avaricious lies and deceptions, you
|
|
|
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 12:42:05 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:59:26 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
>> <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>>>That he hasn't done so with Cameron tells me
|
|
|
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:36:12 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
[...]
>
>>
>> As for the "engineering certainty", when you are working with flawed
>> figures, you will have flawed results. And we haven't done so as
>> yet, bu
|
|
|
<forbisgaryg@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1112966599.010414.327110@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Binyamin Dissen wrote:
>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 12:09:06 GMT "Rick" <nospam@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> :>Union fatcats? Paid more than they're wo
|
|
|
http://www.amatterofjustice.org/amoj/50casespage.cfm?caseno=3
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-
|
|
|
"turk" <turk96@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:BcCdncvVNvjlWsvfRVn-ug@comcast.com...
> "Jim E" <FatboyPlinker@ FU.gov> wrote in message
> news:3bj51iF6g7u8cU1@individual.net...
>>
>> "Jez" <iced_spear@NODAMNSPAMpipex.com>
>>
>>
>>> A Briti
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8.2005
Personal Invitation to Web Domain Owners, Webmasters:
New web listing directory seeks legitimate site link trades.
My domain sells pet, animal & wildlife statues and gets over
5,000 unique hits per day. The site also hosts an online arts
|
