misc.legal

"Mark Probert" wrote in message news:LHD6e.1263$bh7.738@fe12.lga... > > "David Moffitt" <moffitcl@prodigy.net> wrote in message > news:6bD6e.7376$44.2348@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net... > > > > "Mark Probert" <M

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:37:59 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: >> On 11 Apr 2005 00:11:59 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Kent a number of menbers of your own religion claim the

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:41:28 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Solar wrote: >>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>> Solar wrote: > >>>>>> So ... which vehicle were yo

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:04:24 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >solitaire5@juno.com wrote: >> - Prof. Jonez© wrote: >> >> again, nothing on-topic for alt.true-crime > >So raping altar boys ain't a crime in your perverted >wo

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:19:07 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>> Gal. 5:15 (a passage that applies equally to Kent Wills). > >> But, it would seem, not to Theodore

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:34:36 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: >> On Sat, 9 Apr 2005 22:09:25 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" >> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >> >> > > Ted has stated words to the effect that God wou

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >> forevernitefan wrote: >> >> >>> Let's see I am female and in your posts responding to ME you called me >>> names and made crude sexual references aboutme. >> >> >> Being female doesn't necessari

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 09:51:53 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >> So, now are we supposed to start convicting people on the basis of >> their APPEARANCE? > >Happens ALL the time, Teddy. Otherwise juries and the defendant(s)/witn

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> So, now are we supposed to start convicting people on the basis of their >> APPEARANCE? > > > YOU are the one claiming that Cam should be exonerated on the basis of > those photographs, Ted.

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:41:19 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Wayne Delia wrote: > >> Kent Wills wrote: >>> Ken Smith wrote: > >>>>> And you've seen the pictures at: > >>>>> <http://www.freecambrown.org/Pictures/p

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:19:56 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Ken Smith wrote: > >>>> If you think I'm a tough room, try PT and the Beaver. You'll notice that >>>

n Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:16:26 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>>>> Without taking into account that there must be MUCH UNavailable >>>>>> evidence here as well. >

"Mark Probert" wrote in message news:2KC6e.4247$_r1.2107@fe11.lga... > > "David Moffitt" <moffitcl@prodigy.net> wrote in message > news:ECC6e.5386$sp3.5256@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net... > > > > "Mark Probert"

Kent Wills wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:34:36 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > > > Kent Wills wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Apr 2005 22:09:25 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" > > > <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > > > > > > > > Ted has

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > "Prof. Jonez" wrote: > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > > > "Unable", or unWILLING? Why should I supply you ANY exculpatory > > > evidence? You're not the jury. > > > Actually Ted, we are the jury, and if you had the

solitaire wrote: > "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote: > > NOTHING WORTH READING Here, read it again and see if you have the same conclusion: Kent Wills wrote: > On 10 Apr 2005 23:55:38 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > Actually

solitaire wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: > > NOTHING WORTH READING So who's forcing you to read it jackass? On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:37:59 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: > > On 11 Apr 2005 00:11:59 -0700,

solitaire wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: > > NOTHING VAGUELY INTERESTING Here, read it again, asshat. On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:04:24 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: > solitaire5@juno.com wrote: > > - Prof. Jonez© wrote: > >

"Mark Probert" wrote in message news:hEu6e.2599$Rn6.109@fe09.lga... > > "David Moffitt" <moffitcl@prodigy.net> wrote in message > news:jfj6e.6895$44.2284@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net... > > > > "Mark Probert" <M

Chas wrote: > "Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote > > They didn't ask. They demanded. If one can be punished for > > refusing a request, it isn't a request. > > And who stated he was afraid? Not following an illegal order > > can not be viewed

On 11-Apr-2005, "Falky foo" <falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote: > > Study suggests sales clerks discriminate in subtle ways. > > > > Maybe now they know how us smokers feel. > Proper grammar: "... how WE smokers feel.." I know that, but I lik

In article <425adff3_2@news.chariot.net.au>, Ray Murphy <raymur@chariot.net.au> wrote: > >---------- >In article <05V334.w.04111511@nospam.blueyonder.co.uk>, >alco@nospam.demon.co.uk (Alan Williams) wrote: > > > >[Whining again about imagined pla

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:37:28 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: >> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 13:16:01 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" >> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >> >> > > There is only One Jesus. And I note that you

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 07:01:03 -0400, "TFF" <private> wrote: [...] > > >You can find Consolidated's "Friendly Fascism" for sale at Amazon. Good >album. Thank you. I'm not sure what this says about me, but I always like listening to "Typical

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:57:00 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >Teddy's wiggling like Clinton over his definition of >the word "lady". Ah... Another out for Ted, and one I didn't consider. Kent

On 11 Apr 2005 00:22:07 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote: >Let's see I am female and in your posts responding to ME you called me >names and made crude sexual references aboutme. > > IOW you are a liar. > Ted has an out. He W

On 11 Apr 2005 00:11:59 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote: >Kent a number of menbers of your own religion claim the Bible is God's >WORD, inflallibe and so forth, and is a guidebook for living. The >condoning of rape in the Bible wa

On 10 Apr 2005 23:55:38 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote: >Actually Kent did a reasonable thing, When he realized that his efforts >to defend his Bible was "falling on deaf ears", he decided not to >waste any more time on what woul

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:35:50 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Solar wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Solar wrote: > >>>> So ... which vehicle were you talking about that was blocked in the >>>> driveway so i

A man, dressed all in black and carrying two small suitcases, prompted alarm at the U.S. Capitol when he walked onto the West Terrace steps facing the National Mall about 12:55 p.m. and demanded to talk to President Bush, police said. Authorities

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:18:26 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Kent Wills wrote: >>>> Ken Smith wrote: > >>>>> However, I will note for the record that at first gla

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 09:43:10 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: >Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Kent Wills wrote: >> >> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> > > Dane Metcalfe wrote: >> > > > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> > > > > ienjba

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:17:37 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > >> Larry wrote: >>> "Prof. Jonez" wrote: >>>> Dane Metcalfe wrote: >>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>>> ienjball@yahoo.com wrote: >

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 00:08:21 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote: [...] >> >> Odd that the eval. Ken had done states he's sane. Kind of >> ruins your position, but that can't be helped. > >And who says one has to be sane to be

\"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>Kent Wills wrote: >>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>And you have OCD, >> >>LIE! I do NOT! > > Yes Teddy, you clearly do. > Your denial is but another symptom of the pathology. > >>>an

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Dane Metcalfe wrote: >> > >>><http://www.amatterofjustice.org/amoj/51librarypage.cfm?libraryno=8#thetop> >> >>>Ken's problem is: "The courts are extremely hostile to acti

Wayne Delia wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Wayne Delia wrote: >>>> I'm not willing to go that far, > >> But then, you're not Ken Smith. > > If you were, Toad would be writing a lot about you. A WHOLE lot. :-D > >>>> but there i

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>>>And what would you have done if you were in his position? (If we can >>>>>>expect an answer without mendacious prevarication.) I know what the answer is for me

heodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > >>>>>>Without taking into account that there must be MUCH UNavailable >>>>>>evidence here as well. >>>>> >>>>>So where is it? The unavailable evidence ... >>>> >>>>I

the mother @$#*ing bush gestapo strikes again.

<klcrouch@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1113262309.693379.249030@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > Hi all, > > I'm currently attending a non-ABA night program while working full time > in an unrelated field. [Snip] > I realize the non-ABA d

....or another man's confusion.. "Mark Probert" wrote in message news:aFu6e.2600$iB4.642@fe09.lga... > One's man's truth is another man's bigotry. > > > "Sho Nuff" <shonuff@papernapkin.net> wrote in message > ne

Phil <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote in news:u24i51tk63us3up1asjvhgq50vp6thb4vf@4ax.com: > On 9 Apr 2005 22:34:17 -0700, lhcarter@gmail.com wrote: > >>Phil wrote: >>> On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 02:31:30 GMT, Johnny Bravo >>> <baawa_knight@yahoo.com> wrote

- Prof. Jonez=A9 wrote: > Republicans condemn DeLay > Shays calls for him to resign as House majority leader > > > > WASHINGTON (AP) -- Private GOP tensions over Tom DeLay's ethics controversy > spilled into public Sunday, as a Senate leader calle

"David Moffitt" <moffitcl@prodigy.net> wrote in message news:6bD6e.7376$44.2348@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net... > > "Mark Probert" wrote in message > news:2KC6e.4247$_r1.2107@fe11.lga... > > > > "David Moffitt"

"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote > They didn't ask. They demanded. If one can be punished for > refusing a request, it isn't a request. > And who stated he was afraid? Not following an illegal order > can not be viewed as a sign of fear.

Phil wrote: > If people think they're immune from prosecution, yes. People like the NYPD? :-) -- "This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply ridiculous. Having said that, all options are on the tabl

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: >>Larry wrote: >>>"Prof. Jonez" wrote: >>>>Dane Metcalfe wrote: >>>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>>>ienjball@yahoo.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Original Subject: "Question for Ken Smith, will Musladin affec

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>Dane Metcalfe wrote: >>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>>>ienjball@yahoo.com wrote: >>>> >>>>>Original Subject: "Question for Ken Smith, will Musladin affect a 2003 >>>>>ca