|
|
thanks.. i dont mean to be ignorant of ur answers.. i reallly do
appreciate all ur hlep.. i m just wondering, that lets say a cop
catches John Smith for public urinatino.. no SS no realy address.. and
gives a ticket to Jon Smit... how can it possibly b
|
|
|
n 12 Apr 2005, "forum@transley.com" <forum@transley.com> wrote:
> My divorcing spouse has accused me of being mentally
> ill and of having abused my child.
Your present tense use of "divorcing" suggests you are in or are about
to become engaged in
|
|
|
In article <1113338836.204110.194910@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
dufffman@gmail.com wrote:
> hi.. so i got a ticket in new york city for public urination at 4 in
> the morning when i was drunk out of my mind.. apparently a cop followed
> me let
|
|
|
In article <425BC7C5.3030200@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> jls wrote:
> > "Larry" <larry@x.com> wrote in message
> > news:larry-BF7E99.22081111042005@news1.east.earthlink.net...
> >>
> >>Ken, it has nothing to do with your views. You
|
|
|
In article <425BC744.3060907@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> > In article <425A6A1B.3000305@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Remarkably, several attorneys in the NG have argued that it is a good
> >>
|
|
|
"Phil" <> wrote
>>As I understand it, the law is only about removing the option for civil
>>action in the case of a justified shooting - people with CCW permits in
>>Florida can already carry firearms in public...
>>
>
> Should this bill become
|
|
|
"Gichin" <timrhughes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1113332270.918925.87910@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>
....
>
> Given that circumstance, I would not read much into it. Could be your
> opponent decided they could handle it on their own with
|
|
|
"Jill" <pbelci@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:1113360084.022850.44170@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Hello
>
> I hope someone can help me with this; I am seeking anyone's opinion who
> may have experience with labor and disability law. I
|
|
|
"Gichin" <timrhughes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1113333372.854124.87120@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> The copyright protection is really easy -- I think it is only a $30 fee
> and a very short form to fill out.
Yah, guess you're probabl
|
|
|
"Gichin" <timrhughes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1113332728.441448.49600@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>
> Falky foo wrote:
> > make sure they're on your side. If not, depose 'em.
> >
> >
> > "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote in message
> > news:j
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:03:32 GMT, chainsaw <xxx@ooo.biz> wrote:
>
>
>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>
>>
>>> How is expressing an opinion an act of treason? Please be
>>>specific as I don't see it.
>>
>>He has given public aid and co
|
|
|
Calling Mugabe a scumbag is an insult to scumbags.
|
|
|
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:03:32 GMT, chainsaw <xxx@ooo.biz> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>
>> How is expressing an opinion an act of treason? Please be
>> specific as I don't see it.
>
>He has given public aid and comfort to al Qaeda.
No he hasn't
|
|
|
slim wrote:
> " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" wrote:
> >
> > chainsaw wrote:
> > > "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> > >
> > > <the @$#*ing TRAITOR scum!>
> > >
> > The only traitor here is you Sam Bam, and your fascist neo-con
> > crony scumbags who sent 1700+ U
|
|
|
chainsaw wrote:
> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
>
> > The only traitor here is
>
> The connection lurking pox vopmitus.
>
> 4/12/2005 9:34 PM
Ooooh weee. Good one, 1 minute flat.
|
|
|
chainsaw wrote:
> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> 4/12/2005 9:32 PM
> My, my, my...you do like to lurk my connection....
You're 6 minutes slow in response, asshat.
|
|
|
chainsaw wrote:
> Kent Wills wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:03:32 GMT, chainsaw <xxx@ooo.biz> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Kent Wills wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > How is expressing an opinion an act of treason? Please be
> > > > specific as I don't see
|
|
|
chainsaw wrote:
> jls wrote:
>
> > Amen. Boys, keep talking.
>
> You do realize that one of them is an outrigh traitor, or doesn't that
> bother you?
The only traitor here is you Sam Bam, and your fascist neo-con
crony scumbags who sent 1700+
|
|
|
chainsaw wrote:
> Kent Wills wrote:
>
> > How is expressing an opinion an act of treason? Please be
> > specific as I don't see it.
>
> He has given public aid and comfort to al Qaeda.
LOL!
>
> He's done it by posting their beheading videos,
|
|
|
Thank you Dane. This is really bugging me. I was never really
comfortable with this program anyway; I always had the feeling that the
director was providing the home with some really good cheap workers who
were not prone to complaining. Maybe I was
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> How is expressing an opinion an act of treason? Please be
> specific as I don't see it.
He has given public aid and comfort to al Qaeda.
He's done it by posting their beheading videos, and by endorsing their
strike on Ame
|
|
|
"Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:425BC793.2020902@it.com...
> Wayne Delia wrote:
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> >
> >> Kent Wills wrote:
> >>
> >> [A right load of good sense, as did Ken Smith before him.]
> >>
> >> Reasonable
|
|
|
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:13:19 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 09:51:53 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
>> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>>
>> > > So, now are we supposed to start convicting pe
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:42593B37.E7D9244D@worldnet.att.net...
> Kent Wills wrote:
>
> > "Prof. Jonez" wrote:
> >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> >>> Ken Smith wrote:
> >>>> Kent Wills wrote:
> >>>>> Theo
|
|
|
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:55:00 GMT, chainsaw <xxx@ooo.biz> wrote:
> jls wrote:
>
>> Amen. Boys, keep talking.
>
>You do realize that one of them is an outrigh traitor, or doesn't that
>bother you?
How is expressing an opinion an act of tr
|
|
|
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:39:28 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>> > So their religion is wrong, eh? Got any proof of that?
>>
>> It's in the Bible.
>> Where's your proof that atheism is correct?
>
>It's in the Bible!
No it
|
|
|
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 04:32:48 GMT, Wayne Delia <waynedelia@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:34:36 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
>> <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>
>>>So their religion is wrong, eh? Got any proof of that?
|
|
|
what state are you in
"tm7" <hu.man@excite.com> wrote in message
news:1113337721.880840.197400@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> This is a debt on medical services. Insurance company paid some, I paid
> some and between the annual deductible and t
|
|
|
wat i meant to say it, how cud they pin it on me w/my name spelled
wrong? granted i have a rather unusal name.. but can they put it on my
name (SS number?)just based on that?
Larry wrote:
> In article <1113338836.204110.194910@z14g2000cwz.googlegro
|
|
|
" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
news:VaU6e.40$XL1.576@news.uswest.net...
> Cognitus44@hotmail.com wrote:
>> - Prof. Jonez© wrote:
>> > Republicans condemn DeLay
>> > Shays calls for him to resign as House majority leader
>> >
|
|
|
On Apr 2005, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
> What if any precautions govern the approaching
> of witnesses for arranging discovery by a pro se
> litigant in a civil court hearing?
Your "include" as used below does not exclude the answer to the
quest
|
|
|
Hello
I hope someone can help me with this; I am seeking anyone's opinion who
may have experience with labor and disability law. I apologize for the
length.
I have a brother, 21 years old, who has severe ADHD (for which he take
medication) and a
|
|
|
"~ Typhøid Mary ~" <typhoid@mary.va> wrote in message
news:hVK6e.92$Ua4.2282@news.uswest.net...
>~ Typhøid Mary ~ wrote:
>> Published: Sunday, April 10, 2005
>> Bylined to: Arthur Shaw
>>
>> How can the United States welcome an infamous terrorist
|
|
|
jls wrote:
> Amen. Boys, keep talking.
You do realize that one of them is an outrigh traitor, or doesn't that
bother you?
"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote:
> the USA *deserved* the 9.11
> kick in the nuts --
|
|
|
Benjamin Lozoya v. State
1996 OK CR 55
932 P.2d 22
8 As we read Ursery, this Court must first make a determination whether our
Legislature intended the forfeiture proceedings to be civil or criminal. Id.
at ___, 135 L.Ed.2d at 568. Once we make tha
|
|
|
"fulio" <fuliopen@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113254032.405178.267170@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>I retired with disability from a federal job in Arizona, then moved to
> FL. I am looking for a lawyer in work compensation. But all attorne
|
|
|
In article <1113347016.533375.47010@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> global_infantilist@hotmail.com writes:
>Well you see, 'publish parts of it' is exactly what she didn't do.
>Breach of confidence or something - they might try it. Copyright
>infringement
|
|
|
I've written a couple of screenplays and had people look at them.. if they
then turned around a published parts of them then yeah, I'd have a problem
with that. So no, I don't want to 'join the protest' thanks.
<global_infantilist@hotmail.com> w
|
|
|
"Chuck" <charleshhoffmann@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1113294127.279720.251780@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> Given that in order to create a "hash", which is used by P2P software
> as a unique identifier for a specific file on the network,
|
|
|
Mark Probert <Mark Probert@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
>"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
>> Mark Probert <Mark Probert@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
>> >Your status of being a nurse is irrelevant. It a state where the right to
>> >li
|
|
|
" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
news:IuS6e.18$uW5.1444@news.uswest.net...
> G W Shrub wrote:
> > "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message
> > news:4258C581.2090305@it.com...
> >
> > > > Ted has stated words to the effect
|
|
|
Hello, I'm curious about something.
I've this really neat Image which sort of acts as part of my servicemark for
my company (successful online info site).
My question revolves around the protection I'd be afforded from someone else
attempting to
|
|
|
Chas wrote:
> "Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote
>
>>>but that's precisely the sort of attorney I'd like to see more of-
>>>men of principle, integrity, pointless idealism- even when people aren't
>>>watching.
>>
>>It would seem such traits a
|
|
|
Well you see, 'publish parts of it' is exactly what she didn't do.
Breach of confidence or something - they might try it. Copyright
infringement - no way Jos=E9. I can describe a movie (and even quote
from it) the way she does all I want to - my descri
|
|
|
I should probably explain my question a bit better. If a copyrighted
work either begins as or is converted from some other source into a
computer file, the copyright extends to that file.
A "derivative work" is defined as "a work based upon one or mo
|
|
|
>A young American girl living abroad got offered a role in a major new
>movie. After reading the script, she decided not to do it, and
>published her reasons (including 'prejudiced', 'derogatory' and
>'silly', but also 'funny') in her blog at
>http://
|
|
|
hi.. so i got a ticket in new york city for public urination at 4 in
the morning when i was drunk out of my mind.. apparently a cop followed
me let me take a piss and gave me a ticket.. wat a bastard.. if he had
seen me, cud've told me to not piss on t
|
|
|
This is a debt on medical services. Insurance company paid some, I paid
some and between the annual deductible and the 20% I owed them $869.
They have also asked for $125 in additional interest.
To make a long story short, it has gone into collection
|
|
|
My divorcing spouse has accused me of being mentally ill and of having
abused my child. He has so slandered me that I'm practically
shunned. My former best friend even now 'protects' my child from
me, in the delusion I abused her (this is also hostil
|
|
|
jls wrote:
> "Larry" <larry@x.com> wrote in message
> news:larry-BF7E99.22081111042005@news1.east.earthlink.net...
>>In article <425A6BC6.2060702@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>David Martel wrote:
>>>
>>>>Dane,
>>>>
>>>> I'm not su
|
