|
|
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:30:51 -0700, "Gaurdenman"
<m.frisch@charter.net> wrote:
>
>"L Sternn" <lincolnfs@hm.net> wrote in message
>news:utdr51pha6unlc3n9tsjlmhfp6bcgo2kck@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:56:17 -0700, "Gaurdenman" <m.frisch@chart
|
|
|
Let's see if I can make it simple for you...You are paying for a service.
Currently, that service is associated with a number...your number. Should
you decide to cancel the service and not port the number, it goes back into
the pool, and will event
|
|
|
From February 25, 1990 to March 31, 2005, Michael Schiavo had a wife
(Terri) who was in a Persistent Vegetative State. How was that handled
on his tax returns? I assume that he would have been filing a joint
return, since Terri would not have been ab
|
|
|
homer simpson wrote:
> Cellular phone number portability makes me, in a sense, the effective owner
> of my phone number. By accident, it just so happened that my number spells
> something that could be considered very desirable by a whole lot of
> com
|
|
|
What is a "PLONK"? Is it a new swear word?
Thanks,
Bubba
"homer simpson" <homer@simps.on> wrote in message
news:1267337.NIxNUq2XS8@yahoo.com...
> "NoNoBadDog!" <mypants_bjsledgeATpixi.com> wrote:
>
>> Surely this is simple enough for even yo
|
|
|
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:30:51 -0700, "Gaurdenman"
<m.frisch@charter.net> wrote:
>Virginia is one of the most beautiful places on this planet. We just don't
>believe in making roads that we only use half of.
So tell me: what's the road utilization
|
|
|
homer simpson wrote:
> Notan wrote:
>
>> homer simpson wrote:
>>>
>>> Who does it belong to?
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>
>> The FCC?
>
> I don't have the answers, that's why I'm asking
> questions. But if it belongs to the FCC, I can probably
> just si
|
|
|
"NoNoBadDog!" <mypants_bjsledgeATpixi.com> wrote:
> Surely this is simple enough for even you to
> understand.
Get a life, creep. Insulting strangers on USENET under the pretense of
answering questions, while hiding behind your monitor, does not c
|
|
|
homer simpson wrote:
>
> Who does it belong to?
>
> <snip>
The FCC?
Notan
|
|
|
" "- Prof. Jonez©"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in message
news:6Gj7e.94$Nk2.1111@news.uswest.net...
> Roedy Green wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 00:22:18 GMT, Roedy Green
>> <look-on@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote or quoted :
>>
>> > blog urls go stale
|
|
|
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:46:26 -0700, homer simpson <homer@simps.on>
wrote:
>Who does it belong to? My service provider? What if I port it to another
>service provider? If the number is the property of the original service
>provider, how come I can ea
|
|
|
Notan wrote:
> homer simpson wrote:
>>
>> Who does it belong to?
>>
>> <snip>
>
> The FCC?
I don't have the answers, that's why I'm asking questions. But if it belongs
to the FCC, I can probably just sign a contract with someone saying that
|
|
|
Prof Jonez wrote
>>Kent Wills wrote
>> Can we call you Mini T from now on?
"I like that, @$#*ing hilarious and apropos in its visual
imagery -- Spam Bam is now -- "mini T""
You know, its not as snazzy as "baby Beaver".... but its got potential.
|
|
|
<retrogrouch@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:b54e51966rl94i7ja9jmqq4sembh6dn9b1@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 23:13:56 GMT, "Bishop" <The Bishop@InTheHall.Com>
> wrote:
>
>>> What idiocy. Nothing above has anything to do with taxation. AND B
|
|
|
Sgt. Sausage wrote:
> <retrogrouch@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:b54e51966rl94i7ja9jmqq4sembh6dn9b1@4ax.com...
>
>>On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 23:13:56 GMT, "Bishop" <The Bishop@InTheHall.Com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>What idiocy. Nothing above has any
|
|
|
Who does it belong to? My service provider? What if I port it to another
service provider? If the number is the property of the original service
provider, how come I can easily deprive them of their property without
their concent?
Isn't the situatio
|
|
|
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:25:22 -0600, " \"- Prof. Jonez©\""
<jonez@norcom.ca> wrote:
>> In my opinion, George W tries his best to enforce the most unfortunate
>> of all American streaks: The feeling that the US is the only happy
>> place on a strang
|
|
|
<* US *> wrote in message
news:rqsq51lt732ocgoeme169qrkjspi1at1l5@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:59:10 GMT, "Martin McPhillips"
> <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>... I've seen jerk-offs come ...
>
> And from real close up, too, huh Martin.
|
|
|
Roedy Green wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 00:22:18 GMT, Roedy Green
> <look-on@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote or quoted :
>
> > blog urls go stale fast. Try this replacement:
> > http://coveries.blogspot.com/2005_04_01_coveries_archive.html
>
> In my o
|
|
|
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 20:03:37 -0400, "Sgt. Sausage"
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>Federal income Tax -- 33%
For starter's you can't tell the difference between a marginal rate
and the overall rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:56:17 -0700, "Gaurdenman" <m.frisch@charter.net>
wrote:
>
>Does the law (in Colorado) apply if you are going the maximum speed limit?
>He in Virginia if you are traveling at an illegal speed all rights of way
>are forfeited.
|
|
|
Cellular phone number portability makes me, in a sense, the effective owner
of my phone number. By accident, it just so happened that my number spells
something that could be considered very desirable by a whole lot of
companies (I won't say what it sp
|
|
|
"Scott en Aztlán" <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:visr51topldi5lc91oaedtbshhldq046i8@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:30:51 -0700, "Gaurdenman"
> <m.frisch@charter.net> wrote:
>
>>Virginia is one of the most beautiful places
|
|
|
On 12 Apr 2005, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
> What if any penalties can be imposed on a public
> agency or individuals which has/have destroyed
> all or portions of an administrative record of an
> evidentiary agency hearing?
Here again you contin
|
|
|
How did I confuse you with the above?
"Tim Bruening" <tsbrueni@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
news:425CCCA3.85FDBBD5@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
>
>
> Sho Nuff wrote:
>
>> A no-brainer!
>>
>> Homosexual relationships are WRONG and are NOT
|
|
|
Nope. It all relates to MONEY.
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:d3j47a$v1u$1@bolt.sonic.net...
> Robert J. Kolker <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>Tim Bruening wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Until the 1860s, many people in
|
|
|
Exactly.
"Robert J. Kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:3c4ch2F6ig2kmU6@individual.net...
> Tim Bruening wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Until the 1860s, many people in the U.S. thought that slavery was right
>> or at
>> least ethical.
>
|
|
|
Exactly.
"Robert J. Kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:3c4cdfF6ig2kmU5@individual.net...
> Tim Bruening wrote:
>
>>
>> Sho Nuff wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Another no-brainer!
>>>
>>>The hospital needs to let the creature die. Why sh
|
|
|
NO!
"Tim Bruening" <tsbrueni@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
news:425CCD08.70568BC7@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
>
>
> Sho Nuff wrote:
>
>> Another no-brainer!
>>
>> The hospital needs to let the creature die. Why should the taxpayers
>> sup
|
|
|
i mean LURCH...
|
|
|
"z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote in message
news:n%g6e.731$t85.8@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
> Because of this, petitioner had to send out a fourth written request
> for the administrative record in a writ of mandate action.
> It literally seems like tryi
|
|
|
"Chuck" <charleshhoffmann@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1113343448.116887.17390@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>I should probably explain my question a bit better. If a copyrighted
> work either begins as or is converted from some other source
|
|
|
hey...iz dat you WARDO?!
|
|
|
I assume you broke off the engagement--and they DO have a financial
loss, on top of the hurt to them. At the least, why not tell them that
you're sorry, and that's WHY you aren't asking for the ring back? So
they can use proceeds from the sale of the
|
|
|
I assume you broke off the engagement--and they DO have a financial
loss, on top of the hurt to them. At the least, why not tell them that
you're sorry, and that's WHY you aren't asking for the ring back? So
they can use proceeds from the sale of the
|
|
|
"Malibu Skipper" <mad@my.mama> wrote in message
news:zfb7e.45739$QB6.2665597@twister.southeast.rr.com...
> Martin McPhillips wrote:
>> "BlackWater" <bw@barrk.net> wrote in message
>> news:42597b99.1506185@news.east.earthlink.net...
>
>
>>> Oh my
|
|
|
Martin McPhillips wrote:
> "BlackWater" <bw@barrk.net> wrote in message
> news:42597b99.1506185@news.east.earthlink.net...
>> Oh my !!! You DO realize that it will become possible
>> to create short-lived viruses that activate the cortex
>> i
|
|
|
I meant that people don't get fired for taking UNauthorized breaks.
|
|
|
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:59:10 GMT, "Martin McPhillips" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>... I've seen jerk-offs come ...
And from real close up, too, huh Martin.
|
|
|
Your cellular phone number does *NOT* belong to you any more than your
landline phone number belongs to you. Just because the number can now be
used with most cellular providers does not make it yours.
Bobby
"homer simpson" <homer@simps.on> wro
|
|
|
"pickle" <pickle@iddb.net> wrote in message
news:1j97e.3546$26.3419@chiapp18.algx.net...
>I had a contractor give me an estimate of 1200 USD to perform som work for
>me. This estimate is in writing. Between the estimate and the start of
>the work
|
|
|
"BlackWater" <bw@barrk.net> wrote in message
news:42597b99.1506185@news.east.earthlink.net...
> On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:51:57 +0100, "chris.holt"
> <chris.holt@ncl.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>>BlackWater wrote:
>>
>>> Anyway, 'humanity' is gonna become a b
|
|
|
I sold a car to someone and owner-financed with a written sales
agreement. She stopped paying and I insisted that she sign over the car
back to me. She refused. About two months later, I got a small claims
court appearance. (She moved out of the county
|
|
|
Robert J. Kolker <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote:
>Ray Fischer wrote:
>
>>
>> Incorrect. Most people firmly believed that slavery was part of a
>> just and moral hierarchy for many hundreds of years. The notion of
>> equality is fairly recent in hum
|
|
|
McGyver wrote:
> "Chuck" <charleshhoffmann@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:1113343448.116887.17390@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >I should probably explain my question a bit better. If a copyrighted
> > work either begins as or is converted
|
|
|
Thank you Bob, Yes that helps very much, I did file a claim with the
Labor Board a couple weeks ago, they said it could take 6-8 weeks to
process. I had an estimate of over $29,000 unpaid in overtime.
|
|
|
I had a contractor give me an estimate of 1200 USD to perform som work
for me. This estimate is in writing. Between the estimate and the
start of the work he called me and said he needed another 200 USD
because he needed to rent a tool and that wa
|
|
|
n New Jersey, when a student is 18 years old or older, and is involved in a
special education program, the school district is not required to involve
the student's parent(s) in his/her educational plan. Technically, the
school district cannot even dis
|
|
|
So, I pulled my credit reports today, and on each one there's an entry
from "Medclear" that looks like:
Account Name MEDCLEAR INC
Account Type Open
Date Opened 07/01/2003
Balance $730
Date Reported 01/2005
Past Due $730
Account Status 120+ DAYS
|
|
|
Robert J. Kolker <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote:
>Tim Bruening wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Until the 1860s, many people in the U.S. thought that slavery was right or at
>> least ethical.
>
>Actually many people knew it was wrong from the git-go, but it was s
|
