|
|
Not withstanding her deliberate fraudulent complaint against Garry
Scarff, Barbara Schwarz filed deliberately false complaints against
two police detectives of the LAPD who would not entertain her
delusional demands:
False Report of Criminal Offe
|
|
|
"richard schumacher" <no-spam@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:no-spam-3F8617.07464023032005@news.isp.giganews.com...
> Yep. A state founded by failed Kentuckians; the only way they could
> find to make a living was to rob a bunch of Mexican peasa
|
|
|
In alt.politics.usa.republican Yibbels <yibbels@yahoo.com> wrote:
: www.electionfraud2004.org
: www.gregpalast.org
All the looney tune brain dead loser lib dems are the left wing kook site and fantasies.
--
Keep working millions on welfare
|
|
|
76-9-501. "Libel" defined.
For the purpose of this part: "Libel" means a malicious defamation,
expressed either by printing or by signs or pictures or the like,
tending to defame or darken the memory of one who is dead, or to
impeach the hones
|
|
|
76-9-404. Criminal defamation.
1) A person is guilty of criminal defamation if he knowingly
communicates to any person orally or in writing any information which
he knows to be false and knows will tend to expose any other living
person to public
|
|
|
LOL.
It all depends how the code is interpreted or in this screaming loon's
case, deliberately misinterpreted.
If Scarff has violated the penal code, how come no police agency is
doing anything about it...and totally ignoring Barbara Schwarz...
|
|
|
ocuments: U.S. condoned Iraq oil smuggling
Trade was an open secret in administration, U.N.
From Elise Labott and Phil Hirschkorn
CNN
(CNN) -- Documents obtained by CNN reveal the United States knew about, and
even condoned, embargo-breaking oi
|
|
|
"Gaurdenman" <m.frisch@charter.net> wrote in
news:_MA7e.4412$c42.41@fe07.lga:
>
> "Scott en Aztlán" <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote in message
> news:visr51topldi5lc91oaedtbshhldq046i8@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:30:51 -0700, "Gaurde
|
|
|
I stay home with my two kids doing what I love, watching them grow up!
My daughter got her toe to her mouth today after weeks of trying! LOL
I wouldn't of been able to do that if I wasn't working from home when I
feel like it! I have to share this wi
|
|
|
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:03:18 -0700, homer simpson <homer@simps.on>
wrote:
>Cellular phone number portability makes me, in a sense, the effective owner
>of my phone number. By accident, it just so happened that my number spells
>something that could
|
|
|
Ok on the first part
> threat of force, willfully injure, intimidate, interfere with, oppress,
> or
> threaten any other person in the free exercise or enjoyment of any
> right or
> privilege secured to him or her by the Constitution or laws of thi
|
|
|
EPOST
NewzForYou wrote:
>>> Psychiatrist, "I make some of my patients brain damaged
>>> on purpose."
>>>
>>> Years ago, when I was working at NPI at the U. of Michigan
>>> Hospital, I was director of a research project that
>>> compared the effec
|
|
|
From
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A51466-2005Apr13.html?referrer=email
Idr was accused of plotting with five others to blow up the U.S.
Embassy in Sarajevo in November 2001. All were acquitted by a Bosnian
court in January 2002, but
|
|
|
Save the life of my child'
By Ahtesham Qureshy
Op-Ed
The Pioneer
Friday, April 15, 2005
WE are told that the Union Cabinet has approved a Bill on
children's rights, and that the legislation will be
brought before Parliment soon. Yet another p
|
|
|
Checking the builder
By Nitin Saxena
Editorial
The Pioneer
Friday, April 15, 2005
India has no comprehensive legislation against the
illegal activity of builders and property developers.
Besides, its legal system is too over-burdened and
exp
|
|
|
Judge strikes down FDA ban on ephedra
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7504443/
Hmmmmmmmmmm
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsg
|
|
|
The 1st Amendment does not cover hate speech. Scarffs postings against
me constitutes hate
speech. The exact Penal Code is cited as follows:
The State of California's Penal Code, Sections 422.6 (Ca), (b) and (c)
provides the following definition o
|
|
|
Slope wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:03:18 -0700, homer simpson
> <homer@simps.on> wrote:
>
>> Cellular phone number portability makes me, in a sense,
>> the effective owner of my phone number. By accident, it
>> just so happened that my number spe
|
|
|
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:55:43 -0700, "Gaurdenman"
<m.frisch@charter.net> wrote:
>>>Virginia is one of the most beautiful places on this planet. We just don't
>>>believe in making roads that we only use half of.
>>
>> So tell me: what's the road util
|
|
|
On 14 Apr 2005, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
> If [in a Calif. state court proceeding for a writ of
> of mandate] the agency . . . does not respond with
> the complete administrative record, the petitioner
> needs to figure out how to submit a motion
|
|
|
Hi,
I am told that Thomas Edison gave some medical technology to the world
by means of publishing. What is the best path if I want to immediately
and freely give the world the exact build instructions, yet maintain
control to prevent anyone else 1.
|
|
|
On 14 Apr 2005, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
> I believe the conventional practice is for
> the [assertedly] injured party to write a
> letter to the alleged liable person and
> request compensation for damages with
> specific monetary amounts specif
|
|
|
<nospam@isp.com> wrote in message
news:425e9281.7085222@news.east.earthlink.net...
> On 14 Apr 2005, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
>
> > If answering, please try to keep the answer
> > relatively simple for a non-lawyer to understand.
> > TIA...
>
|
|
|
On 13 Apr 2005, "forum@transley.com" <forum@transley.com> wrote:
[[ I contend that my husband has been lying about my behavior and
mental condition and I am angry and also confused about our
relationship and paralyzed in terms of ending it and that
|
|
|
"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message
news:77ls51hvm656lihq0ht4vl9o583btq9g3g@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 23:42:04 -0700, Tim Bruening
> <tsbrueni@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
>
> >From February 25, 1990 to March 31, 2005, Michael Schi
|
|
|
"z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote in message
news:c%l7e.1498$J12.1029@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
<snip>
> Slightly off topic but illustrative of the principle in a different area,
> in order to sue a person for alleged injury damages, I believe the
> con
|
|
|
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/04/315455.shtml
Most of what is happening in New York City is nothing new to many
Portlanders. The police arrest lawful protestors, lie about the
circumstances in court, then get caught when video evidence is
|
|
|
Go sit down.
"Tim Bruening" <tsbrueni@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
news:425E2D8E.1FFC319@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
>
>
> Sho Nuff wrote:
>
>> How did I confuse you with the above?
>
> I don't know, and what above?
>
>> "Tim Bruening"
|
|
|
"homer simpson" <homer@simps.on> wrote in message
news:1157546.CKdT0RIOnR@yahoo.com...
> Cellular phone number portability makes me, in a sense, the effective
> owner
> of my phone number. By accident, it just so happened that my number spells
> so
|
|
|
On 14 Apr 2005, "Yibbels" <yibbels@yahoo.com> wrote:
> [I]f you might know of where I could find a
> pro bono contract law attorney I would certainly
> appreciate any such info. Thanks
Some (too many?) persons use the term "pro bono" as unacknow
|
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050608050309060705080405
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Don't you mean 8675309 ???
E wrote:
>Ha, that's funny. I think there
|
|
|
Ha, that's funny. I think there was a big stink not to long ago about this
topic. Someone had 867-5312 from the song and tried to sell it on ebay. I
think it was taken down because they did not have authority to sell the
number.
"Jack Zwick" <jzwick
|
|
|
<* US *> wrote in message
news:kp6t51hsp7q9o9u55rh7fqluhic1qb2mcr@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:09:01 GMT, "Martin McPhillips"
> <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>Oh? You mean ...
>
> I mean what I say, as I say it.
> Learn to read, and somed
|
|
|
Just about anything that the disturbed death threat maker and terror
man Gerry Scarff posts and files about me is malicious libel,
completely fabricated or awfully twisted. If anybody wants to know the
truth, contact me, but Scarff, who has no life an
|
|
|
On 14 Apr 2005, "Yibbels" <yibbels@yahoo.com> wrote:
>I have a question: I understand that all lawyers are
>supposed to do pro bono work at some point. My question is,
>if a lawyer focuses on contract law, but most pro bono
>work is actually (as I h
|
|
|
On 14 Apr 2005, "z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote:
> If answering, please try to keep the answer
> relatively simple for a non-lawyer to understand.
> TIA...
O.K. Here's an "executive summary" :
> Can anyone give a capsule overview of the
> differenc
|
|
|
Chris wrote:
>
> Don't you mean 8675309 ???
I was thinking the same thing, but couldn't remember the number.
Thanks!
Notan
|
|
|
Conversations with the SLC Police & the FBI reveal they are all very
aware of mentally deranged kook Barbara Schwarz and the persons of ill
repute that she attracts like bees to honey...and laughs at her as a
harmless, mentally disturbed loser that at
|
|
|
On 14 Apr 2005 09:49:24 -0700, "Yibbels" <yibbels@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Well, if you might know of where I could find a pro bono
>contract law attorney I would certainly appreciate any such info.
There is no actual legal obligation for any attorney to
|
|
|
So breaking a law is not criminal... got it.
Far Canal wrote:
> Polarhound wrote
>
> > Mj=F8ln=EBr wrote:
> >
> > > Libel is not criminal in the Unites States. Her actions may piss
you off, but
> > > are not illegal.
> >
> > For not being illega
|
|
|
Frankster wrote:
>>Just because he's providing you with an answer that disagrees with what
>>you want to hear does NOT mean that he's insulting you.
>
>
> And what do you think THIS quote from his message was meant to convey?
That quote wasn't
|
|
|
I replied the way I did because the OP just did not want to take NO for an
answer. Every post that said he could not sell the number he would come
back saying BLAH BLAH BLAH...I was trying to make a point is saying that my
post was simple enough th
|
|
|
So, are you two "in" to start an unofficial Timeslips support group?
If you are, I'll probably need your help. (And I'm happy to take help
from anyone else who is silently reading these messages but not
participating/posting yet!)
I like Gichin's s
|
|
|
My sister-in-law is going through a divorce at the moment.
Her husband's family wants her out of the home that they purchased
together. She is looking to purchase a new home on her own but since
they are not yet divorced she needs him to sign-off on
|
|
|
> That quote wasn't his whole message. Read the original again:
Yep, it's still there. "Surely this is simple enough for even you to
understand."
You know, just because someone types a few helpful sentences doesn't give
them the right to then i
|
|
|
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 16:38:36 GMT, "Martin McPhillips" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>... not bright
>enough to know what you're saying ...
Of course you're not bright: you believe
Bush when he says he speaks for God.
>probably never understand ..
|
|
|
www.electionfraud2004.org
www.gregpalast.org
|
|
|
<* US *> wrote in message
news:v9qs51h1md5q0l370tdkaaafsnbsd9ihce@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:30:53 GMT, "Martin McPhillips"
> <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>I don't know
>
> You're not permitted to know.
Oh? You mean you don't *want*
|
|
|
I spoke with one attorney and he said he charged $350 for filing and
40% of whatever he was able to get... Does that sound kind of steep?
|
|
|
Bubba,
Some news reader programs will allow you to exclude certain people from
being listed by the newsreader. Another words you never see things posted by
that person. This is called plonking. Outlook Express allows you to do this.
Look under
|
|
