|
|
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:37:42 -0700, Tim Bruening
<tsbrueni@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
>
>
>blazing laser wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 02:06:43 -0700, Tim Bruening
>> <tsbrueni@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
>>
>> >Barbara had asked Terri to sa
|
|
|
"James" <shiv_@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:115vtue2dj5hmb4@corp.supernews.com...
> DianaC wrote:
<snip to>
>>
>> So what has being a Jehovah's Witness got to do with either story?
Nah.
a good door slam is sufficient. In fact, it rel
|
|
|
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 14:57:24 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>forevernitefan wrote:
>
>> The Fort Hood case showed that Christians are still woefully ignorant of
>> what nonchristians are.
>
>Heathen.
>
>> Sorry Ken
|
|
|
On 15 Apr 2005 03:02:14 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> Kent I am not saying Christianity is bad. There has been some good
>done by Christians, including charitable aid. My basic point as a
>non-christian is that from where I st
|
|
|
Sam Sloan <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in alt.gossip.celebrities:
> I have heard enough ! Michael Jackson is Not Guilty!
Exactly why you would be allowed to sit on a jury. You make your
decision before hearing all the evidence.
--
Brandy Ale
|
|
|
On 15 Apr 2005 02:46:44 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>Quote start
>*************
>In article <425A956F.4DB39...@worldnet.att.net>, Theodore A. Kaldis
>says...
>
>>forevernitefan wrote:
>
>>> Let's see I am female and in yo
|
|
|
On 15 Apr 2005 03:32:43 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>Kent, here's a clue about Jonez. He resorts to ad hominen personal
>attacks rather than go first to rational discourse. Presumably there
>are atheists who can intelligently
|
|
|
~ Typhøid Mary ~ wrote:
> Colombia pursues US troop cocaine smuggling case. 15/04/2005. ABC News
> Online
>
> [This is the print version of story
> http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200504/s1345933.htm]
>
>
> Last Update: Friday, April 15, 2005
|
|
|
Thanks for the most helpful information. Someone emailed me the
following interesting advice. I was wondering what everyone though of
it:
+++++++++++
Patenting takes a lot of money and a lot of time, and will be seen
"first" by the wolves in the
|
|
|
Sho Nuff wrote:
> Go sit down.
I AM sitting down!
> "Tim Bruening" <tsbrueni@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
> news:425E2D8E.1FFC319@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
> >
> >
> > Sho Nuff wrote:
> >
> >> How did I confuse you with the above?
|
|
|
blazing laser wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 02:06:43 -0700, Tim Bruening
> <tsbrueni@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote:
>
> >Barbara had asked Terri to say "I want to live", so wouldn't it be reasonable
> >that that's what Terri was trying to say?
>
|
|
|
"Jorge W. Arbusto" wrote:
> "Tim Bruening" <tsbrueni@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote in message
> news:425E32A3.DC17C5F9@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us...
> >
> >
> > Pat Winstanley wrote:
> >
> >> In article <4247E489.33E06BA1@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us>,
> >> ts
|
|
|
Colombia pursues US troop cocaine smuggling case. 15/04/2005. ABC News
Online
[This is the print version of story
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200504/s1345933.htm]
Last Update: Friday, April 15, 2005. 11:15am (AEST)
Colombia pursues U
|
|
|
In alt.politics.usa.republican Xeton2001IsAMoron.20.dwpj65@spamgourmet.com wrote:
: Frank did a wonderful job addressing it, didn't he? Great job, Frank!
Thank you.
--
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------
fwp
|
|
|
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:20:20 -0500, James <shiv_@hotmail.com> wrote:
>DianaC wrote:
>> <Jabriol@excite.com> wrote in message
>> news:1113579962.768705.16970@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>>http://www.sfexaminer.com/articles/2005/04/11//news
|
|
|
sloan@ishipress.com (Sam Sloan) wrote in news:425fb168.6646109
@ca.news.verio.net:
> I have heard enough ! Michael Jackson is Not Guilty!
I say he is.
--
Meet the f'loons:
Lady Motown: http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=185542
|
|
|
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 18:51:12 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
<rdsandman@(spamlock)comcast.net> wrote:
>> Doesn't this go against what a lot of gun rights activists say? That
>> EVERYONE has a RTKBA?
>
>Not really. Children don't have it, felons, DDs
|
|
|
"Deodiaus" <deodiaus@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1113580149.739865.128360@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Why is it that by making an application for a home loan, I give away
> the right to my privacy so that anyone who can access my credit
|
|
|
Cheap, Deadly And Uncontrolled
Matthew Herper, 04.15.05, 11:30 AM ET
NEW YORK - A federal judge in Utah has struck down part of a U.S. Food and
Drug Administration decision that banned the dietary supplement ephedra from
the market. Two doctor
|
|
|
>> Brings up another good question. Seems that you can keep
>> your number as long as you maintain service but is this just
>> the way it's done or is your number actually part of your
>> service contract?
>
>I think that if you read your service con
|
|
|
"Quick" <quick7135-news@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113453180.55788@sj-nntpcache-3...
> Brings up another good question. Seems that you can keep
> your number as long as you maintain service but is this just
> the way it's done or is
|
|
|
"homer simpson" <homer@simps.on> wrote in message
news:3818099.A1VIuvmXNr@yahoo.com...
> Notan wrote:
>
>> homer simpson wrote:
>>>
>>> Who does it belong to?
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>
>> The FCC?
>
> I don't have the answers, that's why I'm asking
|
|
|
"homer simpson" <homer@simps.on> wrote in message
news:4845992.sQzg2OcbTp@yahoo.com...
> Who does it belong to? My service provider? What if I port it to another
> service provider? If the number is the property of the original service
> provider,
|
|
|
According to Jan Drewe thay, includinge thee judgee
aree alle memberese ofe thee goode olde boye ande girle clubbe.
Joel
"Ilena Rose" <ilena@NOSPAMMINhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:15uv51hkdhpjar43rodc9abmjetduh0k5j@4ax.com...
> Judge str
|
|
|
Phil <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote in
news:3q4j511atas9nr0e1pdhnbpvgut47sb4tc@4ax.com:
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 12:41:15 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
> <rdsandman@(spamlock)comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>That's fair, but I doubt the law in Florida wil
|
|
|
Keith Schiffner wrote:
> "Paul Elliot"
> SNIP
>
> >> Can you imagine if 1000 chaps like Rudolph were
> >> suddenly on the steets?
> >> Not so much on the abortion issue but attacking
> >> the general festering
> >> spots of national degeneracy,
|
|
|
"Delusional Barbara Schwarz' imaginary gay curse Mark Rathbun de
Rothschild" <garry90069@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Here are the pics of the new 2005 nude Los Angeles Police Officers
>Calenadr. Both men and women are featured and there's a few I would not
>
|
|
|
DeepSea <deep_sea01@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:Xns9634979841176deepsea01yahoocom@151.164.30.44:
> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman@(spamlock)comcast.net> wrote in
> news:Xns96346BF61CEABhopewell@216.196.97.136:
>
> SNIP
>
>>>
>>> It's not the r
|
|
|
Sam Sloan, <sloan@ishipress.com>, the befouled, snide grease ball, and
person who makes and sells small baskets made from the dried out gizzards of
sparrows, shouted:
> I have heard enough ! Michael Jackson is Not Guilty!
>
> I have been following
|
|
|
Phil <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote in
news:t74j51phc3i2qp6rqanuklpjdd4il2dop5@4ax.com:
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 12:24:28 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
> <rdsandman@(spamlock)comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>Phil <dogglebe@yahoooo.com> wrote in
>>news:l74i51d81
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> On 15 Apr 2005 03:32:43 -0700, "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Kent, here's a clue about Jonez. He resorts to ad hominen personal
> > attacks rather than go first to rational discourse. Presumably there
> > ar
|
|
|
"Barbara Schwarz" <barbara.schwarz@gmail.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
1113533041.468207.147840@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> The 1st Amendment does not cover hate speech. Scarffs postings against
> me constitutes hate
> speech. The e
|
|
|
This Sam seems to think he is a good judge of character, first with Fischer
and now with Michael J.. He seems to want to conserve his rebel immage by
completely ignoring facts when he writes something. "Fischer is a good
player, Michael is a good si
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 14:57:24 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
> <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> > forevernitefan wrote:
> >
> > > The Fort Hood case showed that Christians are still woefully
> > > ignorant of what nonchristians
|
|
|
<jabriol@fastmail.fm> wrote in message
news:1113603132.250794.188990@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Cracklin' wrote:
> > "Conspiracy of Doves" <mark_dp73@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:1113584215.682776.180550@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.co
|
|
|
Frank did a wonderful job addressing it, didn't he? Great job, Frank!
|
|
|
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 18:52:15 -0700, "Quick"
<quick7135-news@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>Slope wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:03:18 -0700, homer simpson
>> <homer@simps.on> wrote:
>>
>>> Cellular phone number portability makes me, in a sense,
>>> t
|
|
|
The Florida Bar is Corrupt
By: Bob Sherin, non-lawyer
15805 SW 101 Ave., Miami, FL 33157-1630, (305) 253-5006,
sherins@bellsouth.net
The investigation was heralded by letter under seal of a Florida agency
in which a set of questions was propou
|
|
|
> Why would a prosecutor take such a weak case? The answer may
> lie in the fact that in California Law a citizen can force a prosecutor to
> proceed with an indictment.
Wait till Mr Sloan hears the family was contacted by DA Sneddon,
as early as Fe
|
|
|
"Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message
news:425fb168.6646109@ca.news.verio.net...
> I have heard enough ! Michael Jackson is Not Guilty!
>
> I have been following this story like everybody else. When I first
> heard that Michael Jackson
|
|
|
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:46:39 -0700, Mike Murray
<mikemurray@despammed.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 16:41:58 GMT, sloan@ishipress.com (Sam Sloan)
>wrote:
>
>>I am trying to remember but I believe that during the Carter
>>Administration they wan
|
|
|
Cracklin' wrote:
> According to the Watchtower
> Society's teachings anyone who rejects your cult and/or leaves your
cult is
> a demon worshipper, a follower of Satin, a criminal etc..
And you have the evidence for your claim.. from where?
And
|
|
|
Arrrrrgh!! This thread will still be going at Christmas. :-(
"Slope" <slope7#@($@excite.com> wrote in message
news:cse061lrrbsuhhjcak5ndb7d4jq8850a49@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 18:52:15 -0700, "Quick"
> <quick7135-news@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
|
|
|
<Jabriol@excite.com> wrote in message
news:1113579962.768705.16970@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> http://www.sfexaminer.com/articles/2005/04/11//news//20050411_pe11_witness.txt
>
>
> By Bay City News
> Published: Sunday, April 10, 2005 10:46 P
|
|
|
"Paul Elliot"
SNIP
>> Can you imagine if 1000 chaps like Rudolph were
>> suddenly on the steets?
>> Not so much on the abortion issue but attacking
>> the general festering
>> spots of national degeneracy, Hollywood, big
>> media, Washington
|
|
|
I am trying to remember but I believe that during the Carter
Administration they wanted to build a dam and there was a certain kind
of crayfish which had only been found in one small stream of
Tennessee. Under the Endangered Species Act, the dam could
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> Many words have been used to describe Ted Kaldis over the years. Gentleman
> has not been one of them :)
This is true.
--
Theodore A. Kaldis
kaldis@worldnet.att.net
|
|
|
forevernitefan wrote:
> I never claimed to be an "upper crust' type of woman, but I AM female and I
> DO wear dresses and for the most part ACT like a "lady'.
Prove it.
--
Theodore A. Kaldis
kaldis@worldnet.att.net
|
|
|
>Why is it that by making an application for a home loan, I give away
>the right to my privacy so that anyone who can access my credit reports
>and see information I don't necessarily want them to know. Where in
>the forms and laws did I give away my
|
|
|
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 15:31:18 GMT, "Mortimer Schnerd, RN"
<mortschnerd@carolina.rr.com.remove> wrote:
>irvin wrote:
>> The good, simple question is:
>>
>> Why would a 45-year-old guy want to sleep with 10-year-old boys?
>
>
>Because he likes to p
|
