|
|
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/04/10/BUG1GC5M481.DTL
bought what she thought was new carbon paper for her fax machine and ended up with a recycled roll containing reams of
private correspondence belonging to an Albany business co
|
|
|
On 16 Apr 2005 18:52:15 -0700, jabriol1@excite.com wrote:
>
>DE wrote:
>
>>
>> So what? You're even farther from their moral standards than she
>could
>> possibly be, what with your _intent_ to harm others, your obsessive
>> stalking and parano
|
|
|
Richard Miller <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:HzgupDBNfkYCFwQu@seasalter0.demon.co.uk...
> In message <K-KdneulQfn6uf_fRVnytg@pipex.net>, Fat Freddy's Cat
> <port_26@hotmail.com> writes
> >My biggest concern is that there are
|
|
|
In message <auc56118lkmub1ctm0h23km6ho8lnqo7cs@4ax.com>, Sanni Abacha
<delegiwa@hotmail.co.uk> writes
>On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 12:27:04 +0100, Richard Miller
><richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>In message <3cetvlF6nt8dhU1@individual.net>, Paul
|
|
|
"Sanni Abacha" <delegiwa@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
>>So its all fair.
>
> Of course it isn't. The prosecution pays you to say what it wants you
> to say. You would not be employed if you didn't give a biased opinion.
> You are no more than a
|
|
|
Sam Sloan wrote:
>
> The problem with this contention is that child molestation, rape and
> other sexual offenses are often impossible to prove conclusively. The
> end result is that juries are required to go with their gut feeling
as
> to whether t
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Cynic" <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1re461dn10dri5jdtbqpokt2c2g1luhhgm@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 09:55:53 +0100, "Fat Freddy's Cat"
> <port_26@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>As an expert, I am allowed to give opinion in a court o
|
|
|
"Bishop" <The Bishop@OnTheBoard.Com> wrote in news:E9E8e.6709$0d6.6646
@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com:
>
> On 17-Apr-2005, jake <f@troop.fort> wrote:
>
>> We got engaged.
>> She was severely in debt.
>> I sent her two emails that I would LOAN her mone
|
|
|
<mtwingcpa@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113776720.817871.185320@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Replying to ElJay, the provider has never claimed that they can't
> furnish the information because of proprietary software issues. They
> claim th
|
|
|
jake wrote:
> We got engaged.
> She was severely in debt.
> I sent her two emails that I would LOAN her money not give.
> In court She admitted receiving them .
> She authorized her creditors to talk to me and confirm the amounts.
> She provided the
|
|
|
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 12:27:04 +0100, Richard Miller
<richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>In message <3cetvlF6nt8dhU1@individual.net>, Paul Nutteing
><nutteing@quickfindit.com> writes
>>
>>There was all that outcry over
>>"Cash for Questions" i
|
|
|
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 09:55:53 +0100, "Fat Freddy's Cat"
<port_26@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote in message
>news:3cejqpF6eckffU1@individual.net...
>>A rant worthy of usenet
>
>As an expert, I am allowed to
|
|
|
We got engaged.
She was severely in debt.
I sent her two emails that I would LOAN her money not give.
In court She admitted receiving them .
She authorized her creditors to talk to me and confirm the amounts.
She provided the account numbers and her
|
|
|
"Frank Lodge" <nobody@home.com> wrote in message
news:PLr8e.1510$Gq6.1301@fe02.lga...
> Given your immigration status here and your citizenship in at least
> one country other than the US,you can reasonably considered a high
> risk applicant by any
|
|
|
"Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message
news:4263099d.54924875@ca.news.verio.net...
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 01:44:59 +0200, "Rhilll" <rhilll@home.nl> wrote:
>
> >If the odd criminal goes free and you know it, it's because people like
you
|
|
|
Dane Metcalfe wrote
>"In all fairness, do you intend to post the reply brief by the state,
if one is filed, (and you know it will be)?"
Awwwwwwwwww, heck... our Kaldisingenuous buddy cant even produce the
Lauren Key *autopsy* let alone a reply bri
|
|
|
Don wrote:
> "JustMe" <JustMe@NoSpam.Nyet> wrote in message
> news:2dKdnf_zP7AHHPzfRVn-sg@comcast.com...
>
>> Of course it is. Do you think a creditor should be compelled to make
>> loans to someone who is a bad credit risk?. Has nothing to do with
|
|
|
haimcohen2002@hotmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am non-permanent resident who legally working in the US with work
> Visa.
> I have recently refused a loan by a creditor.
> In the letter I got, they said it is because I am a non-permanent
> resident of
|
|
|
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:58:33 GMT, slim <pickin's@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
>> I'm just asking you to name the exhibit that you refer to, here:
>>
>> >> >>> >> Idiot, the Brooklyn Museum debate was all about claims of
>> >> >>> >>of homoerotic imagery and
|
|
|
Phil wrote:
>
> Why shouldn't I have one?
When it comes to the "Hom*Brew", Phil, we all know that
you can't have just one!
--
"This notion that the United States is getting ready
to attack Iran is simply ridiculous. Having said that,
|
|
|
Is it possible to pass legislation to prevent doctors from hiding behind
their secret society mentality. When a patient is not given proper surgery
and is very ill after this as well as getting conditions he never had before
no doctor will comment n
|
|
|
"Welcome To My Nightmare!" <XenophobeneverLikedSpam___8@hotmail.com> wrote
in news:Uyv8e.1044939$Xk.1024055@pd7tw3no:
>
> "irvin" <noone@none.com> wrote in message
> news:DyP7e.7079$n93.1428@twister.nyc.rr.com...
>> The good, simple question is:
|
|
|
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 11:31:34 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
<rdsandman@(spamlock)comcast.net> wrote:
>John A. Stovall <johnastovall@earthlink.net> wrote in
>news:bdm461dc09mjhna7hhk0i92rvvmf46e2fa@4ax.com:
>
>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 21:17:55 -0500, "RD
|
|
|
On 17-Apr-2005, Scott en Aztlán <slothkills@NOyahooSPAM.com> wrote:
> >Sweeping New Bankruptcy Law To Make Life Harder for Deadbeats
>
> P.S. I have corrected the subject line.
>
> --
> When are you people going to wake up to the fact that reba
|
|
|
"Deodiaus" <deodiaus@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:1113708719.352764.302030@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> One of my Indian friend told me a story of how "Bank of America"
> tracked a friend of his down in India. Let me tell you, the laws
>
|
|
|
Oh, so very well said! Affirmed.
http://www.backwoodshome.com/articles/silveira66.html
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ News
|
|
|
"Rhilll" <rhilll@home.nl> wrote in message
news:d3oqhm$6kd$1@news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
> This Sam seems to think he is a good judge of character, first with
> Fischer and now with Michael J..
It has nothing to do with character valuations. Lear
|
|
|
"irvin" <noone@none.com> wrote in message
news:DyP7e.7079$n93.1428@twister.nyc.rr.com...
> The good, simple question is:
>
> Why would a 45-year-old guy want to sleep with 10-year-old boys?
And why do people cut off their balls and drink pheno
|
|
|
"caryrjr" <caryrjr@amm-j.orgNOSPAM> wrote in message
news:3Z-dnS0BF_CcXcLfRVn-3g@comcast.com...
> "Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message
> news:425fb168.6646109@ca.news.verio.net...
>>I have heard enough ! Michael Jackson is Not Guilty
|
|
|
"czerski" <czerski@iolfree.ie> wrote in message
news:d3u2ot$rb3$1@reader01.news.esat.net...
> Is it possible to pass legislation to prevent doctors from hiding behind
> their secret society mentality. When a patient is not given proper surgery
> and
|
|
|
"Dave Baker" <Pumaracing(NoEmails)@aol.com> wrote in message
news:42624d10_2@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>
>> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 09:55:53 +0100, "Fat Freddy's Cat"
>> <port_26@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >As an expert, I am allowed to give opinion in
|
|
|
"Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:4262883B.15CDA404@worldnet.att.net...
> ienjball@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > Once the Hamberian trial is over, in the event that Cam Brown stands
trial,
> > as I believe that he will,
|
|
|
Replying to ElJay, the provider has never claimed that they can't
furnish the information because of proprietary software issues. They
claim the problem rests with HIPAA.
As I understand it, HIPAA was intended to protect the confidentiality
of medic
|
|
|
ill -- any thoughts or comments on the response I provided to your original
post?
"ElJay" <LJ@LJLJ.LJl> wrote in message
news:2sadnf8merVIy8DfRVn-hg@comcast.com...
> In New Jersey, when a student is 18 years old or older, and is involved in
a
> sp
|
|
|
I assume that the procedure codes and screenshots are part of a billing
software package that your provider purchased to do their own billing of
insurance carriers. The software is proprietary information that they paid
for or pay to use. It also inv
|
|
|
Callous vomiting up scripture to claim one must be " born again" to HIS
faith is akin to a rapist telling his victim to say she loves his big
manly dick and to scream like a whore she is.
As for the ten commandments monument, I approve if its remova
|
|
|
My apoligies. I misread the last sentence and did not see the "not".
I apologize Kent. I should have realized you would not have made such
a statement.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
|
|
|
Wait, Kent cam "prove" his god of the Bible is the one, the "
intelligent design", the Creator? Meanwhile Kent claims that athests
CANNOT prove their beliefs right?
Worse yet. Kent just contradicted his earlier post......
Start quote
*********
|
|
|
A belief that gurantees damnation no matter what? Hoo boy, where have
I heard THAT before?
First off, beliefs are all human made, constructed by human
perceptions of what we think things are. For a belief to " guarantee
damnation", one must belie
|
|
|
How can I "prove" I am a lady on the internet, Callous?
Oh I get it, You want a nude picture of me, which OC by definition
invaidates the term "lady".
Sorry, you fat, horny piece of #@($, I don't give out nude pics of
myself.
Your own posts
|
|
|
bEGIN QUOTE
*******
Theodore A. Kaldis Apr 15, 2:57 pm show options
Newsgroups: alt.fan.bob-larson, alt.religion.christian.calvary-chapel,
alt.true-crime, misc.legal, ca.general
forevernitefan wrote:
> The Fort Hood case showed that Chri
|
|
|
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 09:55:53 +0100, "Fat Freddy's Cat"
> <port_26@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >As an expert, I am allowed to give opinion in a court of law (gladly not
on
> >life or death situations), and its up to the defence to employ experts to
>
|
|
|
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 21:17:55 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
<rdsandman@(spamlock)comcast.net> wrote:
>John A. Stovall <johnastovall@earthlink.net> wrote in
>news:8ke261hdj3qli54sr276p0oq9ua7f46ppe@4ax.com:
>
>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 10:52:56 -0500, "RD
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote
>" Scheduled trial date at this point is Aug. 29th."
Hey, just in time to kick off the Court TV fall season. Grrrrrreat
timing !!!!!!! <g>
>"No one can predict with any certainty what any judge will do."
Perhaps not,
|
|
|
In message <3cetvlF6nt8dhU1@individual.net>, Paul Nutteing
<nutteing@quickfindit.com> writes
>
>There was all that outcry over
>"Cash for Questions" in parliament but
>fees for opinions, delivered in court, is considered sacrosanct.
I take your p
|
|
|
In message <K-KdneulQfn6uf_fRVnytg@pipex.net>, Fat Freddy's Cat
<port_26@hotmail.com> writes
>My biggest concern is that there are a few women who will be released
>based on these appeals against meadows' credibility, who may well have
>killed thei
|
|
|
Jon Beaver wrote
>"Nobody agreeing with you is practically indistinguishable from being
wrong."
Ziiiiiiiiiiiiing !!!!!
Sayyyyy, could someone 'cc' Ted Kaldis with *that* one ???? <g>
----------
have a GREAT day !!!!!
Solar
|
|
|
John A. Stovall <johnastovall@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:o44561pasb6ojfpl3du0npng9ksoo9k5l1@4ax.com:
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 11:31:34 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
> <rdsandman@(spamlock)comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>John A. Stovall <johnastovall@earthlin
|
|
|
"Cynic" <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1re461dn10dri5jdtbqpokt2c2g1luhhgm@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 09:55:53 +0100, "Fat Freddy's Cat"
> <port_26@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >As an expert, I am allowed to give opinion in a court of
|
|
