misc.legal

Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>forevernitefan wrote: >> >>>>[her standard bile] >>> >>>You need to get your heart right with the Lord. >> >>Et tu, Brute? > > You're in no position to talk. Su

"Falky foo" <falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote: >Why would you want to 'call' them? I never understand why people do >business with customer service folks over the phone. They're worthless. >Write a strongly worded letter... this gets into the righ

At present there is a wide misuse of dowry (gifts that a girl receive from her parents at the time of marriage in India, also called as Stridhan) related laws like sec. 498 A and 406 of Indian Penal Code, by wives in India against their innocent husban

Reposted/simplified question for a good family lawyer: If a non-custodial parent is made legally responsible for his adult child's medical bills until graduation from college (in accordance with a divorce decree or court order) but the adult child is

"z" <z@y.x.invalid> wrote in message news:zkh9e.934$Xb4.798@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com... > What is the definition of an "adversary hearing"? > > I have Black's and the nearest explanation seems > to be "adversary system," although it's not an exac

"Dane Metcalfe" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4265b4d6$1_1@127.0.0.1... >> WHAT A FUCKING LOSER. The Judge must feel sorry for you, as he did not > have >> you kicked out of Court on your pathetic loser ass. >> > And your a fu

"Samuel H. Smith" <samsmith1601@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:2gcb61d1gfs91qknidkvrp190ll0a4qig8@4ax.com... > Reposted/simplified question for a good family lawyer: > > If a non-custodial parent is made legally responsible for his adult > child'

"StanB" <stanbooz@comXXXcast.net> wrote in message news:f7adnVK1mskfKvjfRVn-jA@comcast.com... > > "Dane Metcalfe" <quack_deala@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:4265b4d6$1_1@127.0.0.1... > > >> WHAT A FUCKING LOSER. The Judge must feel sorry fo

"Messalina" <messalinana@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1113945948.404711.118450@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > I'd like to know if I going to have trouble re-entering the US after a > trip to Europe. I have a traffic warrant for not registerin

In article <d43ilq$jsj$4@flonk.databasix.com>, Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> wrote: > Diet Soda Can Wino <gt89ny7o@iushgiudf.net> wrote in > news:Xns963DC4D1B98F1NIGS8AC3DFE@195.131.52.135: > > > Roofshadow <Roofshadow2004@nospam.yahoo

"Sam Sloan" <sloan@ishipress.com> wrote in message news:42656655.71369921@ca.news.verio.net... > SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK > APPELLATE DIVISION - SECOND DEPARTMENT [...] > 8. An order disqualifying Michael J. Matsler or the law fir

"Smitty" <tonto@krakatoa.com> wrote in message news:Bba9e.103662$vK6.61537@bignews3.bellsouth.net... > X-No-archive: yes > > "Sam Sloan" > 16 THE COURT: What are you looking for? MR. > SLOAN: I have to ask my wife, but I guess we c

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:27:24 -0400, "ElJay" <LJ@LJLJ.LJl> wrote: >"Tarkus" <Tarkus@homeland.security.net> wrote in message >news:01ia61dotd3j2ciendhl26q01h871km2fc@4ax.com... >> He shouldn't have to. He is absolutely entitled to an itemized >> stat

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION - SECOND DEPARTMENT ____________________________________________________________________ Sam Sloan Petitioner INDEX No. 2004-7739 -against- Beatriz Marinello, Tim Hanke, Step

On 19 Apr 2005 10:51:26 -0700, j r sherman <jrst@earthlink.net> wrote: >In article <1113931938.948223.66750@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, >c_lysaght@bikerider.com says... >> >>TSB Bearings in Allendale, New Jersey host a website called >>Insurge

"Yibbels" <yibbels@yahoo.com> wrote: > >I need to erase erroneous data from my credit report, >but I bought my copy a few years ago. The credit bureau >main phone number records all say I have to buy >a new copy of my credit reports directly from t

Besides being insulting you're also wrong. But apparently not understanding things is also your speciality. "NoNoBadDog!" <mypants_bjsledgeATpixi.com> wrote in message news:425deaa7$1_2@127.0.0.1... > Let's see if I can make it simple for you...You

<c_lysaght@bikerider.com> wrote in message news:1113931938.948223.66750@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > TSB Bearings in Allendale, New Jersey host a website called > Insurgent.org. They use this as a vehicle to slander people, and they > have

Diet Soda Can Wino <gt89ny7o@iushgiudf.net> wrote in news:Xns963DC4D1B98F1NIGS8AC3DFE@195.131.52.135: > Roofshadow <Roofshadow2004@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in > news:Roofshadow2004- C46860.12103019042005@comcast.dca.giganews.com: > >> In article <

THE NEXT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR <Bill was prepared to move to Tennessee. He had already ordered a moving van and was preparing to pack his stuff and move when he found out that he was being fired by Beatriz. Also,Beatriz did not give up a job to become

On 18 Apr 2005 06:52:41 -0700, mtwingcpa@yahoo.com wrote: >Replying to ElJay, YES I would be more than happy to pay up front >(preferably at a discount) and then pursue my own insurance claim. I >have tried to do this, but failed because (a) my provi

On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 17:18:38 -0400, "ElJay" <LJ@LJLJ.LJl> wrote: ><mtwingcpa@yahoo.com> wrote in message >news:1113832361.333042.300610@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... >> ...... >> So, the question remains: Why won't my provider furnish ME with a co

Thanks for the advice ; that's exactly what I am doing.

Roofshadow <Roofshadow2004@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in news:Roofshadow2004- C46860.12103019042005@comcast.dca.giganews.com: > In article <Hvr8e.3730$Jg7.3199@fe03.lga>, > Frank Lodge <nobody@home.com> wrote: > >> So I guess that,among other things

<tariq.1.rahim@spamgourmet.com> wrote in message news:1113877609.977357.209490@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... > x-no-archive: yes > > my life is sad, bleak, and despairing. do others have the desire to end > it all? Nope. Just you. Everyone el

Whereas the Constitution of the United States of America defines the act of treason as: **************************************************************************** "Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying

Classix wrote: > Laila wrote: > >>Classix wrote: >> >>>Laila wrote: >>> >>>>there weren't any cliches >>> >>>Au contraire. You are adrift on a sea of cliches, Laila, you silly >> >>but >> >>>nice little girl. >> >>please list the cliches

"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote: From: "- Mr Ross" <vac...@mail.co> Subject: Re: Must see places in Boulder? Date: 1999/10/15 Message-ID: <01bf16cf$32df4e80$8201a8c0@anon.gol>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 536954035 References: <3804158A.B1106B92@wronganswer.com> <01bf1

K. Start over, why do you want to sue your landlord? Because he vandalized your car? Because he kept 1/2 your deposit? Because the apartment was not fit for habitation? Because you parked your car under leaking drainpipes? Each of these migh

evv7@webtv.net wrote: > 1.Viet Nam War > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 2. JFK > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 3. Iraq War > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 4.High gasoline prices > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > "Nothing is Impossible in Iraq but reform" > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Ken Smith wrote: > it is Jews doing the terrorizing.... > Sez the redolent BIGOT!

\"- Prof. Jonez©\" wrote: > chainsaw wrote: >> "- Prof. Jonez©" wrote: >><the @$#*ing TRAITOR scum!> >> >>>And exploited and abused all those who died on 9.11 >> >>>the USA *deserved* the 9.11 >>>kick in the nuts -- >> > 1948 - PRESENT > AMERIC

"- Prof. Jonez©" wrote: <the @$#*ing TRAITOR scum!> > And exploited and abused all those who died on 9.11 > the USA *deserved* the 9.11 > kick in the nuts -- > The US troops in Iraq DESERVE to DIE, they are > terrorist war criminal scum,

Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> forevernitefan wrote: >>> [her standard bile] >> You need to get your heart right with the Lord. > Et tu, Brute? You're in no position to talk. Because you need to get your heart right with

and we keep ignoring it...

"Tarkus" <Tarkus@homeland.security.net> wrote in message news:01ia61dotd3j2ciendhl26q01h871km2fc@4ax.com... > He shouldn't have to. He is absolutely entitled to an itemized > statement of services rendered, with billing codes. HIPAA doesn't > even e

Tarkus wrote: > He shouldn't have to. He is absolutely entitled to an itemized > statement of services rendered, with billing codes. HIPAA doesn't > even enter into it. HE is requesting HIS OWN INFORMATION - HE DOESN'T > NEED TO SIGN A RELEASE O