|
|
James,
An obvious problem with your license to publish is that you have no
credible evidence that the poem is the work of the person who is submitting.
Rather than this passive license get a written, signed document conveying
you the license t
|
|
|
In article <3d5d1tF6msu2dU1@individual.net>,
"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote:
<snip>
> >> > Maximum tire deceleration: -0.8g, -25.6 feet/sec/sec
> >>
> >> More bull#@($ numbers WITH A CAR THATS STATIONARY
> >> TO START WITH WITH LOCKED
|
|
|
G W Shrub wrote:
> "forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1114423408.902452.276620@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>
>>1. According to whom? You have the autopsy report and crime scene
>>photos? Also, considering that the alleg
|
|
|
I moved a few weeks ago. Someone may have taken out a restraining
order against me after I moved.
How would I know? No one has my new address, except the cable and
electric company.
|
|
|
Hello,
Does anyone know the rules and laws that a Collection Agency, based in
Canada, must obide by when dealing with persons who owe money ? I wish to
know what they can and can't do. Your reply is much appreciated. Thank you.
~Daniel
|
|
|
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:038q6115tuen6g9schj93q9ir6e2c3uocd@4ax.com...
> Again, buoyancy.
> And note that Lacy and baby came up and washed up on shore.
> Completely normal.
4 months later. Less than 24 hours apart
|
|
|
"comradreja" <comradreja@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:comradreja-C20430.12031525042005@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> Why did Laci last so much longer? Why did she have so few
> > barnacles?
>
> She was probably covered by a tarp and chicken
|
|
|
"forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1114423408.902452.276620@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> 1. According to whom? You have the autopsy report and crime scene
> photos? Also, considering that the alleged dumping had a lot of
|
|
|
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 01:49:39 +0000, Alan Baker wrote:
> In article <mjr4ay1o1w19.dlg@officer.com>,
> ?hadoaeraith <shadowraith@see.message-id> wrote:
>
>> Alan Baker wrote:
>>
>> > In article <alangbaker-D5F9F9.13062125042005@news.telus.net>,
|
|
|
Rod Speed wrote:
>
>
>
> More bull#@($ numbers WITH A CAR THATS STATIONARY
> TO START WITH WITH LOCKED BRAKES.
>
> Reams of your desperate wanking with useless numbers
> plucked out of your arse flushed where they belong.
>
>
Last we
|
|
|
In article <3d57ltF6q6a8gU1@individual.net>,
"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote in message
> news:alangbaker-1145C4.13290425042005@news.telus.net...
> > Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote
>
>
|
|
|
In article <1114355071.536171.222650@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
"CJ" <charlesjones456@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I was recently rear-ended -- the accident was not my fault -- and I had
> a rather rude surprise when I called my doctor. The doctor's off
|
|
|
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 03:42:58 GMT, "G W Shrub" <whois@my.house> wrote:
>
>"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3q5o61te55hnr6hiq3mr4faj4k3nh6beol@4ax.com...
>
>> >Then who tied the twine so tightly around Conner's neck and body?
|
|
|
"Lance Mannion" <a@a.net> wrote in message
news:jqidnXO9UIqtMPDfRVn-iA@comcast.com...
> I moved a few weeks ago. Someone may have taken out a restraining
> order against me after I moved.
>
> How would I know?
You'd be Holding In Your Hand s
|
|
|
blazing laser <none> wrote in
news:1jlr51tibn1oobeodtvp6hashk8e02cm1v@4ax.com:
> It also amazes me how easy it was for the administration to explain
> 9/11 as based on jealousy and hatred of our 'freedom'. Fifty years of
> US intervention in thi
|
|
|
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:59:16 -0700, The Real Bev wrote:
> keith wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 12:37:41 -0700, The Real Bev wrote:
>>
>> > "C.H." wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 23:16:24 -0400, Magnulus wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Why th
|
|
|
"John Graeme" <jdgraeme@my-deja.com> writes:
>Don Taylor From: wrote:
>> Considering the number of net-swindles and spammers hosted in Florida,
>> I'd be very skeptical of anything coming from there.
>Saying there are a lot of scammers in Florida (b
|
|
|
In article <EuKdnei7HPgT4PHfRVn-2A@comcast.com>,
"Lance Mannion" <a@a.net> wrote:
> Background:
> I had a violent roommate (co-signer on a lease with me), and
> moved out on April 1st. I stopped paying rent. There are several
> months left on the
|
|
|
Araik Margarian wrote:
> What is passivity in a case when a powerful, all-included
> force manipulates you?
You're in denial. It's not a "force" you're dealing with,
and you're not powerless. These are just human beings,
trying to make you feel
|
|
|
I don't know what state you're in so of course the California form-will
might not be exactly what is required where you live. There are also
books by Nolo Press that have will-and-trust forms. You can find them in
a bookstore or a library.
A
|
|
|
In article <alangbaker-D5F9F9.13062125042005@news.telus.net>,
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote:
<snip>
> > >> Pity what was actually being discussed was the effect of the
> > >> stationary car HAVING THE BRAKES ON AT THE TIME OF
> > >> TH
|
|
|
In article <3d4u3mF6ptmbfU1@individual.net>,
"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote in message
> news:alangbaker-02CADD.00014825042005@news.telus.net...
> > Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote
> >> Ala
|
|
|
"§hadoØraith" <shadowraith@see.message-id> wrote in message
news:1eo31iluin5ko$.dlg@officer.com...
: Yibbels wrote:
:
: > §hadoØraith wrote:
: >
: >> The guy's a nut. Ignore him.
: >
: > What you don't realize is that there is actually
: > qu
|
|
|
<mournenwould@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1114396831.522614.51710@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
: As a good healthy para-normal psycholigist
: Might say ~
: Strange things happen!
:
: Center yourself in Truth and Light,
: Draw upon the Univers
|
|
|
"Yibbels" <yibbels@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1114396861.018570.311870@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
: He's probably just a very naive boy from a backward
: part of the world whose naivete must have led him
: to some have some negative exp
|
|
|
"L Sternn" <lincolnfs@hm.net> wrote in message
news:18jn61lg07k30jkgc9iukm45grl7p8phfq@4ax.com...
: On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:01:22 -0400, "Araik Margarian"
: <aramargar1@aol.com> wrote:
:
: >
: >"Yibbels" <yibbels@yahoo.com> wrote in message
: >news
|
|
|
"Yibbels" <yibbels@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1114438173.336884.216000@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
:> government involvement is unfortunately a possibility
: > which needs to be considered in such cases.
:
: Oh, absolutely. I suspect wh
|
|
|
"Yibbels" <yibbels@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1114349520.697326.315120@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
:> I do question someone who
: >thinks a cell phone failure, spam, email problems, and popups are
: evidence
: >of a well-organized unsee
|
|
|
Dan Ganek wrote:
> Unless the dumpster is on private property.
Well, Dan from what I read, in a number of cases the dumpster or other
trash receptacle CAN be on private property, and it is still legal to
go in it if there is 'no reasonable expectati
|
|
|
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 04:41:41 GMT, "Bernard farquart"
<Bernardfarquart@deletehotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"DTJ" <none@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>news:ljpo619842e9ja2pr54i087s3ra2gh931s@4ax.com...
>
>> The interesting thing was her saying it was my f
|
|
|
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 13:53:49 +1000, "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>>> Cant see why they would, natural reaction would be to apply the brakes
>>> harder.
>
>> Depends.
>
>I doubt it with the brakes already applied.
>
>> I was hit onc
|
|
|
"The Etobian" <pdcorcoran@msn.com> wrote in message
news:cebq61t62fjun5l56egll2hcgl80ngc8r1@4ax.com...
> Anti-junk fax laws are ineffective, and junk faxers know it.
>
> Their risk of getting a complaint against them is small, and their
> risk of
|
|
|
---MIKE--- wrote:
> I am 75 years old and am in good health but I am planning for the
> "future". All my financial accounts list my brother as beneficiary. I
> own my house (a small log home) and my car is not paid for yet. My only
> other relative
|
|
|
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:59:07 -0500, russotto@grace.speakeasy.net
(Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>In article <1u5o61hg5rvnfj2sqbm9hdnlrc5q7mbi7n@4ax.com>,
>Bob Ward <bobward@email.com> wrote:
>>On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:57:34 -0500, Alan Moorman@visi.com wr
|
|
|
Illinois has a strategy to make suing the state difficult, which is
that it has a special court system for state entities, called the Court
of Claims, which gives the state 6 months notice on any filing, and is
completely separate from other state cour
|
|
|
"Lance Mannion" <a@a.net> wrote in message
news:l5KdnS5ifrSrsvDfRVn-rw@comcast.com...
>> Your question doesn't make a lot of sense to me. How about you just get
> him
>> to state clearly in writing that he's releasing you from all obligations
>>
|
|
|
Alan Baker wrote:
> In article <alangbaker-D5F9F9.13062125042005@news.telus.net>,
> Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>> >> Pity what was actually being discussed was the effect of the
>>> >> stationary car HAVING THE BRAK
|
|
|
Yibbels wrote:
>> government involvement is unfortunately a possibility
>> which needs to be considered in such cases.
>
> Oh, absolutely. I suspect what we have in this country is
> a situation where in some cases, the line between
> government
|
|
|
"Dave" <dland@mytrashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1114450268.032628.114560@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> You should set up a revokable living trust. That way, your beneficiary
> won't have to pay a dime in estate taxes when you pass. You could
|
|
|
"Lance Mannion" <a@a.net> wrote in news:l5KdnS5ifrSrsvDfRVn-rw@comcast.com:
>> Your question doesn't make a lot of sense to me. How about you just get
> him
>> to state clearly in writing that he's releasing you from all obligations
>> under the le
|
|
|
"John P Reber" <JohnReber@ChesapeakenospamIsle.org> wrote in message
news:1114451298.b8b06610d3746af4465364c572050d92@teranews...
> Zen Cohen wrote:
>> "John P Reber" <JohnReber@ChesapeakenospamIsle.org> wrote in message
>> news:1114447124.c5405cc
|
|
|
"Lance Mannion" <a@a.net> wrote in message
news:EuKdnei7HPgT4PHfRVn-2A@comcast.com...
> Background:
> I had a violent roommate (co-signer on a lease with me), and
> moved out on April 1st. I stopped paying rent. There are several
> months left on
|
|
|
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 08:44:27 -0700, lawdog <nunyabusiness@nospam.com>
wrote:
Thanks for the information lawdog, as I had stated in my posting, not
all of the work was performed that they were charging us for which is
why we wanted an itemized i
|
|
|
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, ---MIKE--- wrote:
> I am 75 years old and am in good health but I am planning for the
> "future". All my financial accounts list my brother as beneficiary. I
> own my house (a small log home) and my car is not paid for yet.
|
|
|
"The Real Bev" <bashley@myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:426C5C82.F1D765F6@myrealbox.com...
> JustMe wrote:
>>
>> "The Real Bev" <bashley@myrealbox.com> wrote:
>> > keith wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 12:37:41 -0700, The Real Bev wr
|
|
|
"John P Reber" <JohnReber@ChesapeakenospamIsle.org> wrote in message
news:1114447124.c5405cccfccb0049e7770fd90dadc17b@teranews...
> Would this be considered a deceptive business practice. Would this be
> pursuable as a class action suit?
>
> We w
|
|
|
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:54:58 -0400, "Araik Margarian"
<aramargar1@aol.com> wrote:
>: I'd really like to know why you are here. If there's some legal
>: basis for it, please tell us because it sounds like you're not a
>: contributing member of soci
|
|
|
On 24 Apr 2005 14:47:53 -0700, "Yibbels" <yibbels@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I'd really like to know why you are here. If there's some legal
>> basis for it, please tell us because it sounds like you're not a
>> contributing member of society.
>
>Darn.
|
|
|
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 11:03:18 -0700, "Cable Speed Test" <no@thanks.com>
wrote:
>
>"Falky foo" <falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>news:ujZae.166$zu.146@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
>> well, vote Democrat next time.
>>
>>
>Like that's
|
|
|
Is a petitioner allowed to ask questions of individual employees
in a respondent organization? Petitioner needs definitions
of terms such as "regular faculty" and whether a given person
is considered by the university to be belonging to the "regular f
|
