|
|
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:22:12 -0600 (MDT),
hollaar@antitrust.cs.utah.edu (Lee Hollaar) wrote:
>In article <u0zbe.1680$zu.1222@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com> "Falky foo" <falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> writes:
>>I would definitely like to see this because I
|
|
|
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:58:10 -0700, Rod Gazinia
<Rod_Gazinia@bend_on_over.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:42:34 GMT, "Falky foo"
><falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> But the question is what could they do?
>
>They could INVOKE THE Li
|
|
|
In article <426C78F5.330BF80D@myrealbox.com>, The Real Bev wrote:
>Don Klipstein wrote:
>>
>> In article <426C4EF4.542F71F9@myrealbox.com>, The Real Bev wrote:
>> >keith wrote:
>>
>> >> Come on, Bev! You don't pay for door service, so you're *not
|
|
|
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:14:39 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>comradreja wrote:
>> In article <zvebe.16$vN2.10@clgrps13>, "NSM" <nowrite@to.me> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> One cannot have a "discussion"(whether it is acriminious or not, even
|
|
|
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:21:26 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis"
<kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> [again, added afb-l and true-crime f/b/o Kent and ienj]
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>
>>> RIGHT bollocks! As usual.
>
>>> Ken
|
|
|
n Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:10:58 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>[again, added afb-l and true-crime f/b/o Kent and ienj]
Thank you. I haven't visited misc.legal since Ted stopped
posting a bit ago.
[...]
>>
>>>Our courts routinely gra
|
|
|
In article <MeudnTjuhfQOi_DfRVn-vA@speakeasy.net>, Matthew Russotto wrote:
>In article <slrnd6os15.e6i.don@manx.misty.com>,
>Don Klipstein <don@manx.misty.com> wrote:
>>
>> Too many drivers in Philadelphia start their turn signals when they
>>start
|
|
|
"ragnar" <ragnar@free.speech> wrote in message
news:39O8PX9Z38469.3249421296@reece.net.au...
>
> Identifying the Real Free Speech Problem
> by John 'Birdman' Bryant
>
> [...]
>
> In noting that Western law has increasingly embraced censorship as
|
|
|
"Commentary" <newyear15@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1114528937.824276.85480@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Given the State of Illinois had defeated the legal rights of the public
> with the actual practices of IDES, and the retaliation vict
|
|
|
Well that's a lovely post but I really don't care about your opinion on
whether or not they should filibuster. I'm personally a democrat and so I
support it. But that's beside the point.
I'm curious as to what the Dems could specifically do and wha
|
|
|
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:38:19 -0700, Rod Gazinia
<Rod_Gazinia@bend_on_over.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:11:38 GMT, "Falky foo"
><falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>Hey, I keep hearing in the news that if the conservatives vote to get rid
|
|
|
yeah, non-lawyers have to keep in mind that the validity of a contract is
given to it by the law, not by the contract itself. And the law is decided
by the court. I remember sitting in small claims court waiting to sue my
landlord awhile back and the
|
|
|
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote in message
news:PhD_failure-3C6B5B.14274526042005@news.isp.giganews.com...
> In article <cOvbe.834$Gd7.271@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>,
> "Dr. Rastis Fafoofnik" <DRFafoofnik@rumpledanus.com> wrote
|
|
|
"BiG Orange" <@charter.net> wrote in message
news:kvybe.7559$f6.2070@fe04.lga...
> Listen guys, the car dealers makes you sign all kinds of paperwork to
> cover their butt. Unless he had Dateline with him with hidden cameras, he
> can't prove any of
|
|
|
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:11:38 GMT, "Falky foo"
<falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote:
>Hey, I keep hearing in the news that if the conservatives vote to get rid of
>the filibuster the Dems are going to stall the senate with certain
>procedures and preve
|
|
|
Hey, I keep hearing in the news that if the conservatives vote to get rid of
the filibuster the Dems are going to stall the senate with certain
procedures and prevent any work from getting done.
I would definitely like to see this because I think the
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:38:19 -0700, Rod Gazinia
<Rod_Gazinia@bend_on_over.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:11:38 GMT, "Falky foo"
><falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>Hey, I keep hearing in the news that if the conservatives vote to get rid
|
|
|
"Dr. Rastis Fafoofnik" <DRFafoofnik@rumpledanus.com> wrote in message
news:cOvbe.834$Gd7.271@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
>I simply take their FAX...copy it about 3 times and tape it into a loop.
> Wait until 2 or 3 AM and send it back to them OVER A
|
|
|
"Falky foo" <falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:Kpzbe.1694$zu.933@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
> yeah, non-lawyers have to keep in mind that the validity of a contract is
No, we are also fully aware of the fact that there are flaky j
|
|
|
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:31:36 GMT, "Dr. Rastis Fafoofnik"
<DRFafoofnik@rumpledanus.com> wrote:
>I simply take their FAX...copy it about 3 times and tape it into a loop.
>Wait until 2 or 3 AM and send it back to them OVER AND OVER until their
>machine
|
|
|
know know...
|
|
|
Grey Hangman wrote:
> The key phrase is "Closing the border with Mexico would be quite
simple
> indeed, with the right manpower.". I did the math one time. To put
enough
> people on the broder to guarantee no-one crossed we'd need a little
in
> e
|
|
|
A lawsuit has been filed against Peter Letterese founder of Galileo and
SAVE International by a Former Partner.
http://geocities.com/peterletterese/
|
|
|
My preference is just plain old fashioned filibuster the rule change to
eliminate the filibuster if it comes up for a vote. It has my sense of
humor.
The quorum call has been mentioned. There's nothing more dead boring
than watching a quorum call
|
|
|
> The Service Mgr. sits in the truck, turns the engine on and watches the
> oil pressure guage drop to zero in about 25 seconds. Then he says -
> "that's a perfectly normal reading".
BTW, are they asserting that it's normal for oil pressure to drop
|
|
|
"Ron Tellus" <RTellus@maxtel.net> wrote in message
news:FOOdnY9aIqDzFvPfRVn-vw@giganews.com...
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:16:58 +0000, McGyver wrote:
....
>> Finally, you need to get a mechanic to tell you in writing what exactly
>> is wrong. You'l
|
|
|
Rod Gazinia wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:42:34 GMT, "Falky foo"
> <falkyfoo@bonksbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> > But the question is what could they do?
>
> They could INVOKE THE Liberal Cabala
>
>
> CRY
> ABUSE
> BLAME
> ACCUSE
> LIE
|
|
|
Will it hurt my wife's chances to be classified as a "women-owned
business" if I'm named on the lease?
Josh
|
|
|
comradreja wrote:
> In article <zvebe.16$vN2.10@clgrps13>, "NSM" <nowrite@to.me> wrote:
[snip]
> One cannot have a "discussion"(whether it is acriminious or not, even
> it is on the Usenet, home of acriminious discussion) if you are being
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>>[again, added afb-l and true-crime f/b/o Kent and ienj]
>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>RIGHT bollocks! As usual.
>>>Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>>>>while Dr. Hayes' testimony is corroborative;
>>>
>>>So is
|
|
|
I received a civil summons (chapter 61 - in KS) for a balance due to a
lawyer.
I was making monthly payments for a while (they charged interest) but then
wasn't able to keep up the payments due to lack of income. I can't afford a
lawyer to respo
|
|
|
"Dr. Rastis Fafoofnik" <DRFafoof...@rumpledanus.com> wrote:
> I simply take their FAX...copy it about 3 times and tape it into a
loop.
> Wait until 2 or 3 AM and send it back to them OVER AND OVER until
their
> machine wont answer anymore.
> Repeat
|
|
|
> Excuse me, but that isn't based on anecdotes, that is based on toilet
> flushings of fraud from Florida based internet providers that I get
> all the time. Some of the biggest long term internet spam houses for
> fraud have been hosted in Florida.
|
|
|
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:11:11 -0700, Robert Morien
<PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote:
>In article <Oazbe.7200$J12.5948@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
> "Dr. Rastis Fafoofnik" <DRFafoofnik@rumpledanus.com> wrote:
>
>> "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@n
|
|
|
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 13:52:26 -0400, The Etobian <pdcorcoran@msn.com>
wrote:
>On 25 Apr 2005 05:58:43 -0700, "John Graeme" <jdgraeme@my-deja.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Read an interesting article (Margie Wylie, Newhouse News Service) about
>>dealing with jun
|
|
|
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:54:02 GMT, "Zen Cohen" <aturny@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
>"Ron Tellus" <RTellus@maxtel.net> wrote in message
>news:FOOdnY9aIqDzFvPfRVn-vw@giganews.com...
>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:16:58 +0000, McGyver wrote:
>...
>>> Finally,
|
|
|
"The Trucker" <mikcob@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:d4mi040psl@news4.newsguy.com...
>
> "L Sternn" <lincolnfs@hm.net> wrote in message
> news:3h1r61lpoe1gfojn1j2unrv0rr5p3snfag@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 11:03:18 -0700, "Cable Speed T
|
|
|
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-FA70DD.23534225042005@news.telus.net...
> Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote
>>> So present some that are relevant.
>> Not even feasible with crumpling, @$#*wit.
> You keep
|
|
|
I simply take their FAX...copy it about 3 times and tape it into a loop.
Wait until 2 or 3 AM and send it back to them OVER AND OVER until their
machine wont answer anymore.
Repeat this as needed to get their attention...it works well..
|
|
|
Araik Margarian at <aramargar1@aol.com> wrote in
<d46hi3$4hv$1@domitilla.aioe.org>:
>
> I am looking to find a lawyer or journalist who can assist in the
> following:
>
> I had a traffic accident on 04/01/2005,
>
Do you mean 4 January 20
|
|
|
Your instinct that the mistake becomes the company's responsibility if they
confirmed that the check was proper, would probably be true in the case of
formation of a contract. If a contract is formed, and there is a mistake in
the price, and the ot
|
|
|
I also doubt whether the three day right to rescind will apply. But you
can't take our word for it because time's awastin. You need to get to a
local attorney today. Otherwise you might find out that there was a three
day right to rescind and you
|
|
|
"L Sternn" <lincolnfs@hm.net> wrote in message
news:8q1r611mmnfe9k43lh59lr29s992bq45up@4ax.com...
: On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:54:58 -0400, "Araik Margarian"
: <aramargar1@aol.com> wrote:
:
: >: I'd really like to know why you are here. If there's so
|
|
|
"§hadoØraith" <shadowraith@see.message-id> wrote in message
news:7ihchkpar2gf.dlg@officer.com...
: Yibbels wrote:
:
: >> government involvement is unfortunately a possibility
: >> which needs to be considered in such cases.
: >
: > Oh, absolute
|
|
|
"Yibbels" <yibbels@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1114487537.681180.116440@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
:
: Araik Margarian wrote:
:
: > What is passivity in a case when a powerful, all-included
: > force manipulates you?
:
: You're in deni
|
|
|
"Giddy" <giddy@dalesdenizen.net> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BE943902000946D4F04075B0@fe07.highwinds-media.phx...
: Araik Margarian at <aramargar1@aol.com> wrote in
: <d46hi3$4hv$1@domitilla.aioe.org>:
:
: >
: > I am looking to find a lawyer or
|
|
|
"§hadoØraith" <shadowraith@see.message-id> wrote in message
news:1ume5x7xmwlrx$.dlg@officer.com...
: Yibbels wrote:
:
: > So I figure what has happened is, he somehow got on some nutjob's
: > or group's radar and they're toying with him, making him p
|
|
|
In article <Oazbe.7200$J12.5948@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>,
"Dr. Rastis Fafoofnik" <DRFafoofnik@rumpledanus.com> wrote:
> "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@nousefulinfo.com> wrote in message
> news:PhD_failure-3C6B5B.14274526042005@news.isp.giganews.com
|
|
|
Listen guys, the car dealers makes you sign all kinds of paperwork to cover
their butt. Unless he had Dateline with him with hidden cameras, he can't
prove any of the stuff the saleman said, and it even covers this in the
paperwork. It says any warr
|
|
